Professional Documents
Culture Documents
case-report2020
IJSXXX10.1177/1066896920937770International Journal of Surgical PathologyPineda-Díaz et al
Case Report
International Journal of Surgical Pathology
Intraarticular Inflammatory
1–7
© The Author(s) 2020
Article reuse guidelines:
Myofibroblastic Tumor of the Left Knee sagepub.com/journals-permissions
DOI: 10.1177/1066896920937770
https://doi.org/10.1177/1066896920937770
Janet Pineda-Díaz, MD1, Irit Solar, PhD, MHA2, Dov Hershkovitz, MD, PhD2,3,
Ido Drukman, MD2, and Osnat Sher, MD2
Abstract
Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) is a lesion of intermediate biological potential with local recurrences and
rare metastases found in multiple anatomical locations. We present a case of a pure intraarticular IMT of the knee, a
location that has not been previously documented, with genetic confirmation of ALK-CARS fusion detected with next-
generation sequencing. A 20-year-old healthy male was admitted to the orthopedic oncology department due to several
months of pain and restriction in movement of his left knee. On magnetic resonance imaging, multiple intraarticular
nodular lesions were seen. The patient underwent 2 synovectomies within the course of 1 year. The initial biopsy was
interpreted as nodular fasciitis. The second biopsy revealed exuberant tissue displaying compact fascicles of spindle
cells intermixed with myxoid areas in a background of inflammatory cells, highly suggestive for IMT. Due to the unusual
intraarticular location, equivocal ALK immunostaining and the differential diagnosis with nodular fasciitis, we performed
targeted next-generation sequencing using Archer FusionPlex Sarcoma panel, which can identify multiple fusions in a
single assay. An ALK-CARS fusion was found, supporting the diagnosis of IMT. This report emphasizes the added value
of broad molecular analysis in cases with unusual clinical presentation, equivocal immunohistochemistry, and a wide
differential diagnosis.
Keywords
ALK-CARS, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, next-generation sequencing, Archer FusionPlex
Figure 1. (A) Initial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed a diffuse enhancing intra-articular mass in the anterior and
posterior aspects of the knee. (B) MRI 1.5 years later after surgery showing enlargement of residual/recurrent masses with diffuse
erosive changes in the tibia and femur that were not previously present.
with pigmented villonodular synovitis. The patient was significant atypia, atypical mitotic figures, or necrosis
referred to arthroscopy and underwent a synovectomy. were identified. The more collagenous fascicular areas that
were not present in the original biopsy raised the differen-
tial diagnosis of IMT (Figure 2A-F).
Pathological Findings Immunohistochemistry showed that tumor cells were
The histopathological examination of the first biopsy focally positive for CD68 and SMA, and negative for
showed fragments of fibrous tissue composed of bland panCK, CD23, CD21, EMA, SOX10, MUC4, ERG,
spindle cells set in a loose fibromyxoid stroma. Focal CD34, desmin, caldesmon, and S100. Ki67 was positive
chronic inflammatory infiltrate was present. Mononuclear in about 5% of the cells. Immunostain for ALK was weak
cell proliferation, giant cells, or hemosiderin pigment were and therefore equivocal (Figure 2F). Due to the unusual
not seen. Immunostains for caldesmon, β-catenin, desmin, location, equivocal ALK immunostain, and differential
actin, S100, and ERG were negative. The diagnosis of a diagnosis with nodular fasciitis, molecular confirmation
benign lesion was made, suggestive for intraarticular nod- of ALK rearrangement was necessary. Molecular studies
ular fasciitis (Figure 2A). were carried out using the FusionPlex Sarcoma NGS
The patient was therefore referred to physical therapy Panel (Archer Dx), a targeted NGS-based assay, that
and follow-up. Due to persistent pain, swollen knee, and simultaneously detects and identifies fusions of 26 genes
restriction in movement after several months, an MRI was associated with soft tissue tumors from formalin-fixed
repeated, showing recurrent diffuse intraarticular nodules, paraffin-embedded tissues. The assay is based on a modi-
especially in the suprapatellar recess, causing multifocal fied amplicon approach, referred to as anchored multi-
bone erosions (Figure 1B). He underwent a second sur- plex polymerase chain reaction (PCR). An ALK-CARS
gery, in which abundant tissue was excised. fusion (chr11:3033425, chr2:29446394) was identified
The second biopsy yielded more tissue for histological (Figure 3). This fusion was previously reported in the lit-
evaluation and contained features that were not present in erature8,9 supporting the diagnosis of IMT.
the original biopsy. It showed plump myofibroblasts
admixed with few plasma cells and lymphocytes set in a
Follow-up
collagenous stroma with fascicular arrangement.
Occasional ganglion-like cells and giant cells were also A positron emission tomography-computed tomogra-
seen. Areas of myxoid stroma were focally present. No phy performed 1 month after surgery showed an
Pineda-Díaz et al 3
Figure 2. (A) The first biopsy was composed almost entirely of bland spindle cells in a loose fibromyxoid stroma (hematoxylin
and eosin [H&E], 40×). (B) The second biopsy showed fascicles of spindle cells and a chronic inflammatory infiltrate (H&E, 40×).
(C) Area of plump myofibroblasts with mild atypia and ganglion-like cells in collagenous stroma (H&E, 40×). (D) Same area in
higher magnification (H&E, 100×). (E) Ganglion-like cells in myxoid stroma (H&E, 100×). (F) Immunostain for ALK was weak
and equivocal.
increased uptake in a diffuse heterogeneous synovial extensive debulking procedures in another institution.
lesion involving all compartments of the knee. No Due to some radiological and clinical improvement in
metastatic disease was seen. After a multidisciplinary the ensuing months, a drastic procedure such as an
discussion, the patient was offered treatment with extra-articular resection was postponed, and as of now,
crizotinib prior to surgical treatment. The patient the patient remains on follow-up and is scheduled for
declined this treatment and underwent 2 subsequent a repeat MRI in the future.
4 International Journal of Surgical Pathology 00(0)
Figure 3. (A) CARS-ALK fusion (chr11:3033425, chr2:29446394) was identified using the FusionPlex Sarcoma NGS Panel (Archer Dx).
pulmonary metastases.
leading to the initial confusion with nodular fasciitis in the
margins. Developed
original biopsy.
recurrence
belongs to the insulin receptor subfamily. The CARS gene,
located on chromosome 11, encodes the cysteinyl-tRNA
synthetase enzyme, and it is believed that when CARS
dimerizes it activates ALK, as reported for other ALK
fusions.8,12
equivocal
ALK stain
Negative
Weak
Paraspinal
Present case
7. Fu G, Xu C, Yao N, Gu J, Jiang H, Han X. Inflammatory and Treatment of Cancer 90101 CREATE): a multicentre,
myofibroblastic tumor: a demographic, clinical and thera- single-drug, prospective, non-randomised phase 2 trial.
peutic study of 92 cases. Math Biosci Eng. 2019;16:6794- Lancet Respir Med. 2018;6:431-441.
6804. 12. Debelenko LV, Arthur DC, Pack SD, Helman LJ, Schrump
8. Cools J, Wlodarska I, Somers R, et al. Identification of novel DS, Tsokos M. Identification of CARS-ALK fusion in pri-
fusion partners of ALK, the anaplastic lymphoma kinase, in mary and metastatic lesions of an inflammatory myofibro-
anaplastic large-cell lymphoma and inflammatory myofibro- blastic tumor. Lab Invest. 2003;83:1255-1265.
blastic tumor. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2002;34:354- 13. Yamamoto H, Yoshida A, Taguchi K, et al. ALK, ROS1 and
362. NTRK3 gene rearrangements in inflammatory myofibro-
9. Sirvent N, Hawkins AL, Moeglin D, et al. ALK probe rear- blastic tumors. Histopathology. 2016;69:72-83.
rangement in a t:2;11;2)(p23;p15;q31) translocation found 14. Antonescu CR, Suurmeijer A, Zhang L, et al. Molecular
in a prenatal myofibroblastic fibrous lesion: toward a molec- characterization of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors
ular definition of an inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor with frequent ALK and ROS1 fusions and rare novel RET
family? Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2001;31:85-90. gene rearrangements. Am J Surg Pathol. 2015;39:957-967.
10. Coffin CM, Hornick JL, Fletcher DM. Inflammatory myo- 15. Groisberg R, Roszik J, Conley A, Patel SR, Subbiah V. The
fibroblastic tumor: comparison of clinicopathologic, histo- role of next-generation sequencing in sarcomas: evolution
logic, and immunohistochemical features including ALK from light microscope to molecular microscope. Curr Oncol
expression in atypical and aggressive cases. Am J Surg Rep. 2017;19:78.
Pathol. 2007;31:509-520. 16. Racanelli D, Brenca M, Baldazzi D, et al. Next-generation
11. Schöffski P, Sufliarsky J, Gelderblom H, et al. Crizotinib sequencing approaches for the identification of pathog-
in patients with advanced, inoperable inflammatory myofi- nomonic fusion transcripts in sarcomas: the experience of
broblastic tumours with and without anaplastic lymphoma the Italian ACC Sarcoma Working Group. Front Oncol.
kinase gene alterations (European Organisation for Research 2020;10:489.