Breakdown of the Matrix

(I DOUBT YOU CAN HANDLE IT)

STATE NATIONAL THEORY

by: brandon-joe: williams

This will be updated sometimes and the date here changed (Originally posted on 3/14/22, last
updated on 2/12/23)

IMPORTANT NOTE: Read this in its entirety and carefully take your time to understand all the
words and ideas. It would be helpful to have copies of various editions of Black’s Law
dictionary. I’m going to list links here to download Editions 1 through 6 (If you want to keep it
simple, just download the 4th Edition as that is pretty much the best choice a majority of the
time):

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE 1ST EDITION

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE 2ND EDITION

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE 3RD EDITION

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE 4TH EDITION

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE 5TH EDITION

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE 6TH EDITION

The online versions of Black’s Law are trash and are probably owned by the same people behind
all this mess. Don’t use them. After you finish reading all this, head over to my resources page
for a step-by-step breakdown on what you can do to get started.

MY FREE CONTRACT KILLER COURSE BREAKS DOWN EACH POINT FROM

THIS PAGE IN ADDITIONAL DETAIL. YOU CAN CLICK HERE TO GO TO THE
SIGNUP PAGE

This post is not a "conspiracy theory." It is 100% real. If you cannot handle what is in this post
and you defend your ideas by attacking mine, I will publicly humiliate you. So think twice before
commenting or mentioning anything. I will challenge you and invite you onto my podcast to
debate me and if you do not accept then I will let everyone know. If you don’t like this because
you are emotionally feeble then simply go away.

1 of 56
IF YOU DO NOT PUT IN THE WORK TO BECOME EDUCATED AND BE PATIENT
BEFORE TAKING ACTION ON ANY OF THIS INFORMATION, YOU ARE PUTTING
YOURSELF AT RISK. I HAVE READ BOOKS AND WATCHED VIDEOS 2-6 HOURS PER
DAY, 7 DAYS PER WEEK FOR NOW ABOUT 6 MONTHS AND I AM JUST NOW
STARTING TO TAKE ACTION. I AM ALSO WORKING WITH 3 MENTORS
PERSONALLY. THIS IS NOT A JOKE AND NOT SOMETHING TO DO HAPHAZARDLY.
IF YOU DON'T WANT TO PUT IN 500+ HOURS INTO THIS THEN JUST ENJOY IT AS
PASSING CURIOSA AND MOVE ON WITH YOUR LIFE... DON'T BOTHER. ANYTHING
ON THIS POST SHOULD BE WELL-RESEARCHED AND DONE LAWFULLY. THERE
ARE LAWFUL WAYS TO APPLY EVERY ASPECT OF THIS POST BUT IT IS A
PROCESS AND MAY REQUIRE SOME WORK AND TIME.

THIS POST REPRESENTS MY INDIVIDUAL POSITION AND MY INDIVIDUAL

DISCOVERIES, IDEAS, ETC. THIS POST, IN NO WAY, REPRESENTS ANY GROUP,
MOVEMENT, FRIEND, RELATIVE, FAMILY OR ANY OTHER OPINION OR STANCE OF
ANYONE OR ANYTHING THAT EVER HAS OR EVER WILL BE A PART OF MY LIFE.
TO MAKE THAT ASSUMPTION IS "SUPERIOR IGNORANCE" AND WILL NOT BE
ACCEPTED OR TOLERATED.

Not everything in this post is probably perfect - if I need to make adjustments or corrections,
please let me know and I will do so.

This post is to the RARE MINORITY looking for true freedom and willing to put in the work to
achieve it.

Much of this information was found and is being culled as part of the research aspect of my 3rd
book, which is on the subjects of Martyrdom and Escapism. At this point it looks like the book
will be broken down into 2 sections... one will be theory and the other practical. Originally the
book was only going to be theory but I was not expecting to stumble into such a massive and
encompassing situation. THE PURPOSE OF MY THIRD BOOK IS "TO TURN PAUPERS
INTO KINGS." I’m not working on that book more until this legal research is fully completed.
Honestly, the martyrdom book is about 30% done, but I might not be touching it for another year
or two because this legal stuff is FASCINATING and I want to complete this research line first.

Most of this information comes from the YouTube videos by Christopher Hauser (you should
watch them all in date sequence, the man is sheer brilliance - link on my resources page),
YouTube videos by James C Lovett, as well as books by Anna Von Reitz, David E. Robinson,
Howard Freeman, James Clinton Blecher, etc. MANY, MANY PEOPLE CONTRIBUTED TO
THIS AND I WANT TO PROUDLY THANK ALL THEIR WORK AND RESEARCH. Listen,
I am the newcomer. So many people have been working on this stuff for over 30 years. I’m just a
guy writing a page on the things I have learned.

Please see my resources page to continue your adventure after this. I have a step-by-step guide
for you there ONCE YOU UNDERSTAND ALL THE THEORY.

Ok so here we go...

2 of 56
1. When born, your parents sign your Certificate of Live Birth (Long Form Birth Certificate) and
Social Security papers which opens a cestui que vie trust of your full name in ALL CAPITAL
LETTERS. This name is found on all your credit cards, bills, loans, etc. Take a look if you don't
believe me. This all caps version of your name is a TRUST and is not you at all.

"cestui que vie" is French for "he who lives" and was used in Medieval times as a way for
farmers to handle their farms when traveling. Someone could produce on their farm while they
were gone... essentially it was a glorified contract.

There were two catastrophes in England in 1665 and then there were law changes in how these
trusts work in 1666. These changes opened the door for the kind of fraud I will explain in this
write-up. Your name as a trust, for example BRANDON JOE WILLIAMS, is located in Puerto
Rico. It is not owned by you at all but is supposed to “represent” you.

On your Certificate of Live Birth (Long Form Birth Certificate), you will see a Date of Birth and
a Date of Registration; that “Date of Registration” is the day your all caps trust in your name was
opened. On mine it says “Date Received by Local Health Officer.” It’s usually around 2-3 weeks
after you are born. So you technically have 2 “birthdays” - one for you and one for your trust.

A trust is defined as "A legal relationship in which one party holds a title to property while
another party has the entitlement to the beneficial use of that property." Essentially sort of a
glorified contract. Trusts ARE AMAZING and have a lot of interesting things you can learn
about, but for the sake of this post we will only cover the two major elements only: trustee and
beneficiary.

The trustee is the one who is basically working to keep the trust working and going, whereas the
beneficiary simply benefits from the exchange and does not have a direct hand in the operations
of the trust.

ALL ACTIONS IN LIFE ARE TECHNICALLY TRUST ACTIONS... EVERY SECOND OF

EVERY DAY. BY YOU READING THIS POST, I AM THE TRUSTEE AND YOU ARE THE
BENEFICIARY: MY JOB IS TO ENSURE YOU ARE GOING TO BENEFIT GREATLY BY
READING IT AND I NEED TO FIX IT IF YOU AREN'T.

So, for example, when you have an encounter with a police officer, because they are the "public
servant," then they are the trustee and you are the beneficiary... which I'll get into more later in
this post.

All court cases, all interactions with other humans, all letters or communication are ALL trust
actions. All of life is a series of trust actions. Someone is always the trustee and another is
always the beneficiary... and if that LAW OF GOD is violated at any point then that particular
interaction will fall apart in flames (may explain certain areas of your life). We'll be talking a lot
about trusts in this post.

3 of 56
A "reverse trust scam" is when someone like a judge or police officer act as though YOU are the
trustee and they are the beneficiary (such as in writing you an improper ticket). I will cover how
to handle that WITH EASE later in this post.

For now let's get back to the subject of your ALL CAPS name trust...

In the United States Manual of Styles it says: "a name that is in all capital letters is either an
acronym, corporation or trust."

"Legal conventions since Roman times mandate that living people must be described or denoted
in all small letter names. Under Roman Civil Law they only lose that status when they become
debtors, at which point a free man partially loses his status and is named using upper and lower
case style conventions. Slaves are named using all capital letters." -Anna Von Reitz in the book
Disclosure 101

Here is the exact quote where they also define a trust as a corporation (I know this is a bit
confusing, but it's like this on purpose):

"Corporation shall be deemed to include any company, trust, so called Massachusetts trust, or
association, incorporated or unincorporated, which is organized to carry on business for its own
profit or that of its members." 15 USCA (United States Codes Annotated) Section 44.

The reason why this is important is because the trusts themselves are Roman trusts and they
operate using Roman Civil Law. So this is a 2000 year old trust technology being used.

As per Common Law (non-corporate original law), in order for there to be a crime, there MUST
be a victim. But in statutory law (corporate law) you don't have to have a victim to have a crime
(speeding tickets, drug possession, etc). Plus, in Common Law the state CANNOT be the victim,
whereas in corporate law, the state CAN be the "victim."

COMMON LAW IS REAL LAW AND IS THE RULES OF GOD. “STATUTES” ONLY
APPLY TO SPECIFIC GROUPS OF PEOPLE AND ONCE YOU HANDLE YOUR LIFE AND
ADDRESS THE VARIOUS POINTS OF THIS WRITEUP, YOU ARE PULLING YOURSELF
OUT OF BEING SUBJECT TO THOSE STATUTES.

The Social Security trust (all caps name) is what is used to transfer a person's rights away from
the Constitution and Common Law (in our current court systems the Constitution does not apply
AT ALL. Some of you may have experienced this.)

Common Law is the law of the LAND. Statutory/corporate/commerce law is the law of the SEA.
And there is actually one more jurisdiction of the AIR, which is governed by God and the Bible.
The Air jurisdiction is expressed in law by Trust Law (which has its own rules) and Canon Law.

The letters in the word LAW break down into: LAND, AIR and WATER. That is what the word
“law” means; the 3 jurisdictions. (L)and, (A)ir, (W)ater.

4 of 56
The body of information containing commerce/corporate/statutory law is called the Uniform
Commercial Code... otherwise known as the UCC. I'll get into this more later.

IMPORTANT NOTE: THE UCC IS OWNED AND COPYRIGHTED. THE BAR BASICALLY
OWNS ALL OF COMMERCIAL LAW. You can legally and lawfully practice non-corporate
original universal law (Common Law), trust law or any other type of law… so who cares about
the stupid UCC. The idea that you need a degree or BAR membership to practice law is
ENTIRELY FALSE (prove me wrong!). The BAR is a PRIVATE CLUB. Nothing more, nothing
less.

2. The way you spell a name to differentiate it from your trust all caps name is like this: brandon-
joe:williams. The name is in all lower case. It's [firstname]-[middlename]:[lastname].

The ALL CAPS name is essentially what is used to pull you into the corporate jurisdiction of our
current "court" system. By them saying your name or putting it on paper in ALL CAPS and by
you responding to it, YOU TACITLY CONSENT TO BE THE CORPORATION/TRUST,
THUS PLACING YOU IN THE JURISDICTION OF CORPORATE LAW. They use your
name as a trust/corporation then your tacit consent of not knowing their game to yank you into
their jurisdiction (which is their STATUTES).

The word "jurisdiction" is an important word in law... probably the MOST important word. It
means "the right of a court to hear a particular case, based on the scope of its authority over the
type of case and the parties to the case." It comes from DICTION which is "to speak" and JURIS
which means "law." It is essentially the boundaries of authority of a court, police officer, judge,
etc.

I have been studying trust law in detail and I have a great book to start learning is Be the One: to
Execute Your Trust by David E. Robinson.

3. In the world of corporate law (known as “statutes” or “policy”), your human rights no longer
exist or are applicable... for example the Constitution. You are a fictional
organization/company/trust and your "rights" fall under the Uniform Commercial Code and the
United States Code, not the Constitution. The UCC and USC can be manipulated, at will, to suit
their needs. You become a slave. THEY WRITE AND ADJUST THEIR OWN STATUTES.

THEY MAKE MONEY ON FINES SO THEY KEEP ADDING NEW TYPES OF FINES IN
ORDER TO CONTINUALLY MAKE MORE MONEY. THIS IS LITERALLY RUN AS A
COMPANY MAKING PROFITS (because it is just a company making profits.) Courts are
corporations. Congress is a corporation too. You quickly realize, EVERYTHING is a
corporation.

The "war on drugs," for example, is nothing more than a very lucrative private corporate
campaign (masked as "government") to make money on fines. Which explains why the "war"
just got bigger and bigger. They make more money the larger the “war” gets… it’s all just a
smoke screen. Then eventually when they can no longer keep up the illusion, they tax it and
“legalize” it. That’s their retirement plan for once the war is no longer sustainable.

5 of 56
4. In the corporate law world, your all caps name is actually property (it's called a "franchise").
So you are, when you tacitly consent, property.

How this whole scam even became possible stems from a re-defining of the word "person" that
occurred around the same time that the 14th Amendment was "ratified." As far as I can tell,
there's not solid evidence that enough states actually even voted to ratify the 14th Amendment.

Definition from 26 USC 7701: “The term “person” shall be construed to mean and include an
individual, a trust, estate, partnership, association, company or corporation.”

So as you can see… the word "person" means more than human being... it can also mean
corporation or trust. So if you sign a document with the word "person" used to describe you or
anyone else and your name is in all caps in the document, you are tacitly consenting to possibly
being a non-living corporation or trust that does not have rights such as the Constitution. THIS
IS HOW THEY PULL YOU FROM COMMON LAW OVER TO THEIR STATUTES.

The word “individual” is in the same boat. I’ll show you…

*Black's Law 5th Edition definition of “individual”: “as a noun, this term denotes a single person
as distinguished from a group or class, and also, very commonly, a private or natural person as
distinguished from a partnership, corporation or association; but it is said that this restrictive
signification is not necessarily inherent in the word, and that it may, in proper cases, include
artificial persons.”

AN “artificial person” IS A TRUST, CORPORATION, ETC. ALL THESE WORDS THEY

USE ARE VAGUE ON PURPOSE SO THEY CAN MAKE YOU SIGN AS SOMETHING
THAT HAS NO HUMAN RIGHTS. THEY ARE TRYING TO GAIN THE UPPER HAND
AGAINST YOU ON ALL YOUR CONTRACTS AND THIS IS HOW THEY DO IT. WHEN
YOU SEE THESE WORDS YOU CAN JUST REDEFINE THEM OR CROSS THEM OUT.
I’LL EXPLAIN MORE AS WE GO, BUT THESE WORDS ARE THE BIG HUGE
EXPLOSIVE MINES THAT YOU NEED TO LEARN TO START SPOTTING.

So every time to see the word “person” on ANYTHING, realize that they are trying to make you
into a trust and trick you into signing for the trust. All you have to do is redefine the word on the
contract before you sign it by writing the new definition at the top of the contract. If they accept
it then you are all set!

5. As property, the state can then do whatever they want and violate your rights without any
repercussions. You are not human any longer through tacit consent and "agreement."

An entirely different set of rules comes into play (THEIR statutes) and you are now stuck inside
of a game where you don't know the rules (THEIR rules).

You have literally as many rights as a box does that is being shipped by Amazon.

6 of 56
6. There are ways to avoid and change all this and pull yourself out of the jurisdiction of
corporate/statutory law (this includes most policing, vaccine "laws," as well as taxes). At this
point the only laws that apply to you are Common Law laws, which are essentially: don't hurt
people or their property and don't steal from or swindle people. All the "statutes" and complexity
that you are used to seeing no longer applies to you. You are a "foreign entity" to corporate law
and tax codes and now need to give consent and jurisdiction to be pulled back into it.

This is commonly known as a "Sovereign citizen" but that is actually just a hit piece term as the
term itself is an oxymoron.

"Sovereign" means "king," while "citizen" means "A person owing loyalty to and entitled by
birth or naturalization to the protection of a state or nation." So, as you can see, the term
"Sovereign citizen," in itself, implies jurisdiction. The correct term would be "state National" or
simply... "sovereign."

Here is the actual dictionary definition from Black's Law 5th Edition: “‘Citizens’ are members of
a political community who, in their associated capacity, have established or submitted
themselves to the dominion of a government for the promotion of their general welfare and the
protection of their individual as well as collective rights.”

“The people of the state do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies which serve them. The
people, in delegating authority, do not give their public servants the right to decide what is good
for the people to know and what is not good for them to know. The people insist on remaining
informed so that they may retain control over the instruments they have created.” (Added Stats.
1953, c. 1588, p.3270, sec. 1.)

A sovereign is a foreigner to the “federal government” and to tax authorities (because they are
foreign private for-profit CORPORATIONS). True sovereigns are officially classified by tax
authorities as a "non-resident alien."

18 USC 112 actually explains the various terms and exact extent to how a state National has
diplomatic immunity. There are actually 6 terms that the United States Code uses to describe us,
which I will list here:

a. foreign government
b. foreign official
c. internationally protected person
d. international organization
e. national of the United States
f. official guest

When it comes to the ownership of land, the term sovereign comes from the idea that God gave
us the land and no man has the full right of ownership. Land is essentially common ownership
for the benefit of the people (God is the trustee, we are the beneficiaries). No different than how
the Constitution does not GIVE us rights but is nothing more than a communication of GOD-

7 of 56
GIVEN rights (again, God is the trustee, we are the beneficiaries AND NO HUMAN MAN CAN
CHANGE OR ALTER THAT AGREEMENT).

The Constitution is a communication of our natural state: an organizing and listing of that of
which we are entitled just for being alive. It is putting in writing the gifts bestowed on us by
God.

“A constitution is designed as a supreme enactment, a fundamental act of legislation by the

people of the State. A constitution is legislation direct from the people acting in their sovereign
capacity, while a statute is legislation from their representatives, subject to limitations prescribed
by the superior authority.” Ellingham v. Dye, 178 Ind. 336; NE 1; 231 U.S. 250; 58 L. Ed. 206;
34 S. Ct. 92; Sage vs. New York, 154 NY 61; 47 NE 1096.

1829 US Supreme Court case Lansing v. Smith: "People of a state are entitled to all rights which
formerly belong to the King, by his prerogative."

Supreme Court: Jones v. Temmer, 89 F. Supp 1226: "The privileges and immunities clause of
the 14th Amendment protects very few rights because it neither incorporates the Bill of Rights,
nor protects all rights of individual citizens. Instead this provision protects only those rights
peculiar to being a citizen of the federal government; it does not protect those rights which relate
to state citizenship."

1818: U.S. v. Bevans, 16 U.S.336. Establishes two separate jurisdictions within the United States
of America: 1. The "federal zone" and 2. "the 50 States."

7. If you are born inside one of the 50 states... THE MOMENT YOU COME OUT OF THE
WOMB... you are considered a state National of the state you were born in. There are particular
Statutes-At-Large (which means laws passed by Congress) that state that NO PRIVATE
CONTRACT CAN VIOLATE, NEGATE OR MITIGATE YOUR STATE NATIONAL
STATUS.

So if you were born in one of the 50 states, you are already a state National. Congrats!

8. THEN you become a "US citizen" when your parents sign your Social Security and Birth
Certificate documents at birth. But also whenever you fill out a government form and check or
imply "US citizen," then you are now TACITLY CONSENTING to be placed in their
jurisdiction. This could be a tax form, DMV form, passport form, etc.

"US citizen," is literally defined as “someone who is a volunteer government employee (paid or
unpaid) living in the area of Washington DC” Prior to signing this, you were a Non-Resident
Alien, then you ELECTED to be a Resident Alien when you signed any form attesting to you as
a “US citizen.” I understand that sounds strange but when you heavily research this topic, that is
the secret trap that pulls you into the jurisdiction of tax authorities, police, the UCC, etc. It is the
main landmine that you need to learn to quit stepping on. A RESIDENT ALIEN IS NOW
INSIDE THEIR SYSTEM - THEIR STATUTES. BECAUSE YOU ARE “RESIDENT” TO
THEIR SEPARATE COUNTRY CALLED “UNITED STATES.”

8 of 56
I’ll show you the law that proves that all “US citizens” are volunteer government employees:
19 USC Section 81o: “(a) Persons allowed to reside in zone: no person shall be allowed to reside
within the zone except federal, State, or municipal officers or agents whose resident presence is
deemed necessary by the Board.”

I’m going to break this all down for you in detail because it’s really important:

26 CFR § 1.871-1 states (now this is really complicated and I will break it all down afterwards so
don’t freak out): “Nonresident alien individuals are taxable only on certain income from sources
within the United States and on the income described in section 864(c)(4) from sources without
the United States which is effectively connected for the taxable year with the conduct of a trade
or business in the United States. However, nonresident alien individuals may elect, under section
6013 (g) or (h), to be treated as U.S. residents for purposes of determining their income tax
liability under Chapters 1 and 24 of the code. Accordingly, any reference in §§ 1.1-1 through
1.1388-1 to non-resident alien individuals does not include those with respect to whom an
election under section 6013 (g) or (h) is in effect, unless otherwise specifically provided.”

Now… we’re going to break this down.

UCC 9-307(h) SAYS IN BLACK AND WHITE: “[Location of United States] The United States
is located in the District of Columbia.”

“United States” as it is defined in 28 USC 3002 (15) (A): “A Federal corporation” [which means
District of Columbia]

So let’s rewrite 26 CFR Section 1.871-1 in FUCKING ENGLISH:

“Nonresident alien individuals are taxable only on certain income from money they make from
the District of Columbia. However, nonresident alien individuals may WILLINGLY ELECT, IF
THEY FEEL LIKE THEY WOKE UP TODAY AND DECIDED ON RETARDATION, to be
treated as resident aliens for purposes of us stealing their money. If they would like to file any of
our forms (like a W9) and say they are US citizens and send us money, we’ll do them a favor and
change their status to resident alien for them as a public service so that we can deposit their
money.”

I hope that helps to clarify this silly game.

Moving on…

“Executive orders” really just apply to government employees (US citizens!). THEY ARE NOT
LAW AND THEY HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH STATE NATIONALS. SAME THING
GOES FOR STATE MANDATES. So the entire country is governed in an entirely illegal,
fraudulent way. NOTHING YOU SEE OR HEAR ABOUT IS TRUE LAW. WE HAVE NOT
HAD A SINGLE PIECE OF TRUE LAW PASSED IN AGES. I know this might be shocking...
I expect you to do your own homework. (Even the way the IRS gets into your bank accounts is
through a form 6014, which is used for IRS employees).

9 of 56
This is really confusing but they do this on purpose. “United States” means the District of
Columbia, as we have already covered. “United States of America” or “states of the union” or
“the Republic” (there are many ways to say it) means the 50 United States of America. THESE
ARE TECHNICALLY 2 DIFFERENT COUNTRIES. I know, it’s confusing.

You actually have to go through an entire process to become a "US citizen" and you have never
done the program (and you shouldn't). So the hilarious aspect of all of this is that you ARE NOT
a “US citizen” at all and every time you say you are on forms you are TECHNICALLY lying:

"An alien may be admitted to become a citizen of the United States in the following manner, and
not otherwise." (2 Stat. 153, c. 28, ss.1, Revised Statute 2165)

Now that we have cleaned that up, these quotes will blow you mind:

“‘The People’ does not include U.S Citizens.” Barron v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore. 32
U.S 243

“A ‘citizen of the United States’ is a civilly dead entity” - Congressional Record June 13th 1967
pages 15641-15646

"Therefore, the U.S. citizens residing in one of the states of the union, are classified as property
and franchises of the federal government as an "individual entity"", Wheeling Steel Corp. v. Fox,
298 U.S. 193, 80 L.Ed. 1143, 56 S.Ct. 773

"Unless the defendant can prove he is not a citizen of the United States, the IRS has the right to
inquire and determine a tax liability." U.S. v. Slater, 545 Fed. Supp. 179,182 (1982).

"The United States government is a foreign corporation with respect to a state." 19 Corpus Juris
Secundum section 883

Cynthia J. Millis, U.S. Treasury, Disclosure Officer: "The IRC (Internal Revenue Code) is not
positive law, it is special law applicable to specific persons in the United States who choose to
make themselves subject to the requirement of the special laws in the IRC by entering into an
employment agreement with the U.S. Government."

"The laws of Congress in respect to those matters do not extend into the territorial limits of the
states, but only have force in the District of Columbia, and other places that are within the
exclusive jurisdiction of the National Government." Caha v. U.S., 152 U.S. 211, (1894).

“The term resident and citizen of the United States is distinguished from a Citizen of one of the
several states, in that the former is a special class of citizen created by Congress.” U.S. v
Anthony 24 Fed. 829 (1873)

“We have in our political system a government of the United States and a government of each of
the several States. Each one of these governments is distinct from the others, and each has citizen
of it’s own…” United States v. Cruikshank, 92 U.S. 542 (1875)

10 of 56
“…he was not a citizen of the United States, he was a citizen and voter of the State…” “One may
be a citizen of a State and yet not a citizen of the United States.” McDonel v. The State, 90 Ind.
320 (1883)

“That there is a citizenship of the United States and citizenship of a state…” Tashiro v. Jordan,
201 Cal. 236 (1927)

“A citizen of the United States is a citizen of the federal government.” Kitchens v. Steele, 112
F.Supp 383

“the term ‘citizen’ in the United States, is analogous to the term ‘subject’ in common law; the
change of phrase has resulted from the change in government.” State v. Manuel, 20 NC 122

“There are, then, under our republican form of government, two classes of citizens, one of the
United States and one of the state.” Gardina v. Board of Registrars of Jefferson County, 160 Ala.
155; 38 So. 788 (1909)

“The governments of the United States and of each state of the several states are distinct from
one another. The rights of a citizen under one may be quite different from those which he has
under the other.” Colgate v. Harvey, 296 U.S. 404; 56 S.Ct 252 (1935)

“…rights of national citizenship as distinct from the fundamental or natural rights inherent in
state citizenship.” Madden v. Kentucky, 309 U.S. 83: 84 L.Ed. 590 (1940)

“There is a difference between privileges and immunities belonging to the citizens of the United
States as such, and those belonging to the citizens of each state as such.” Ruhstrat v People, 57
N.E. 41 (1900)

“A ‘US Citizen’ upon leaving the District of Columbia becomes involved in ‘interstate
commerce,’ as a ‘resident’ does not have the common-law right to travel, of a Citizen of one of
the several states.” Hendrick v. Maryland S.C. Reporter’s Rd. 610-625. (1914)

“Taxpayers are not State Citizens” - Belmont v. Town of Gulfport, 122 So. 10

“State citizens are the only ones living under free government, whose rights are incapable of
impairment by legislation or judicial decision.” Twining v. New Jersey, 211 U.S. 97, 1908.

“The state citizen is immune from any and all government attacks and procedure, absent
contract.” see, Dred Scott vs. Sanford, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 393 or as the Supreme Court has stated
clearly: “… every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not
bound by any institutions formed by his fellowmen without his consent.” CRUDEN vs. NEALE,
2 N.C. 338 2 S.E. 70.

“The first section of the fourteenth article to which our attention is more specially invited opens
with a definition of citizenship – not only citizenship of the United States, but citizenship of the
States. No such definition was previously found in the Constitution, nor had any attempt been

11 of 56
made to define it by act of Congress. . . . It is quite clear . . . that there is a citizenship of the
United States, and a citizenship of a State, which are distinct from each other, and which depend
upon different characteristics or circumstances in the individual.” Slaughter House Cases
(Supreme Court), 83 U.S. 36

“The individual, unlike the corporation, cannot be taxed for the mere privilege of existing. The
corporation is an artificial entity which owes its existence and charter powers to the state; but the
individuals’ rights to live and own property are natural rights for the enjoyment of which an
excise cannot be imposed.” Redfield v. Fisher, 292 P. 813, 135 Or. 180, 294 P.461, 73 A.L.R.
721 (1931)

“The labor of a human being is not a commodity or article of commerce.” 15 USC 17

"The only absolute and unqualified right of a United States citizen is to residence within the
territorial boundaries of the United States." Supreme Court: US vs. Valentine 288 F. Supp. 957

Interesting note: Technically... if you have not done the steps to become a US citizen, yet you
continue to place that you or your parents are one on documents, this is the penalty and court
case to cover that point:

"Whoever falsely and willfully represents himself to be a citizen of the United States shall be
fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both." (June 25, 1948, ch. 645,
62 Stat. 742; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

So to make a long story short... the beauty of this whole process is that it's already done... no
papers to fill out, nothing to do. You're already done. Wasn't that easy?

"An individual state citizen has unalienable Constitutional rights. While a US citizen, a creature
of the state, has privileges and civil rights and is held subject to all policies, rules, codes and
statutes, the same as any other public servant." -Hale vs Henkel 1906

*26 USC 7701 (this shows that when you SAY or SIGN as a US citizen, you are allowing them
to treat you as though you are in their little world… their degraded sandbox. THIS IS WHAT
GIVES THEM JURISDICTION OVER YOU.):

“(39)Persons residing outside United States

If any citizen or resident of the United States does not reside in (and is not found in) any United
States judicial district, such citizen or resident shall be treated as residing in the District of
Columbia for purposes of any provision of this title relating to—

(A)jurisdiction of courts, or

(B)enforcement of summons.”

So now that we’ve covered what a “US citizen” is, let’s now cover what a “national” is:

12 of 56
8 USC 1101 subsection #21 states: “The term “national” means a person owing permanent
allegiance to a state.”

So now you can see that a US citizen pertains to being a resident of the District of Columbia,
while being a national makes you a resident of a state.

The part about all this that is complex is that you can be one, the other, OR BOTH. Right now
you are probably both. What we want to do is eliminate the “citizen” side and just leave you with
the “national” side. The main issue is that the idea of “state” is not that simple. Let me explain…

Now that you know that “United States” is just the District of Columbia and you’re starting to
see the difference between a citizen and a national, we’re going to get into how “STATE OF
CALIFORNIA” or “STATE OF MONTANA,” “State of New York,” “State of New Jersey” or
any other variation is a PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT CORPORATION UNDER THE “Federal
Corporation”

IF THERE IS ALL CAPITAL LETTERS OR THE “State” IS CAPITALIZED THEN THAT

MEANS IT’S THE PRIVATE FOR-PROFIT PRIVATE CORPORATION.

4 USC 72 proves that “STATE OF CALIFORNIA,” “CITY OF LOS ANGELES,” and every
other state, city or county are all physically legally located in the District of Columbia! Here, I’ll
show you:

“All offices attached to the seat of government shall be exercised in the District of Columbia,
and not elsewhere, except as otherwise expressly provided by law.”

So you can see that all “State” “governments” are actually just fake sub-corporations of “United
States (which is a “Doing Business As” for the District of Columbia!).

Even in the Code of Federal Regulations they define “State” as being the District of Columbia: 5
CFR 841.1002 defines “State” as: “State means a State, the District of Columbia, or any territory
or possession of the United States.”

So when you sign any document that says you are a resident of “State of California” or “STATE
OF CALIFORNIA,” YOU ARE SIGNING A DOCUMENT THAT STATES, OFTEN UNDER
PENALTY OF PERJURY, THAT YOU ARE RESIDENT TO THE DISTRICT OF
COLUMBIA (which is also known as “United States”).

So their wording is very tricky: “state” means the original state of the Republic (like California
or Texas), whereas “State” or “STATE” refers to a private for-profit corporation that is
physically located in the District of Columbia.

All through the United States Code, you will see various uses of the lower and upper case
version of the word. That is because it is two entirely different words!

13 of 56
The main problem with all this is that the “state” governments are basically vanished. So when
you say you are a national and you operate as a national, you are essentially operating in a void:
no government, no police, no laws, nothing. There are many groups working to rebuild the
original governments that are composed of amazing volunteers (these groups are usually called
“Assemblies,” such as the “California Assembly.” If you look online then you can probably find
these groups in your state).

It’s important to know about all this stuff because you could fuck up royally and renounce your
citizenship AND your nationality, which is a HUGE FUCK UP. This leaves you as a “stateless”
person and you will have to re-naturalize as a state national. Don’t freak out because I’ve only
heard of like one person ever fucking this up THAT badly. But you will hear the term “stateless”
and this is how it’s done.

You never want to renounce your NATIONAL status! You are a proud national and you are
simply shedding your citizenship. It’s very easy to do and you do it by sending an affidavit to the
Dept of State or attaching an explanatory statement to the back of a DS-11 passport application. I
talk more about that on my Resources page as well as in my Contract Killer Course.

After reading this page a couple of times and digging into all this for yourself, you will be ready
to either take a template (OF WHICH YOU READ THOROUGHLY AND UNDERSTAND
FULLY, NEVER SIGN OR SUBMIT THINGS YOU DON’T UNDERSTAND) or even type up
an affidavit from scratch to send in to clarify your status.

You VOLUNTARILY sign these documents and thus VOLUNTARILY enter yourself into
their world! It’s a VOLUNTARY system! YOU TELL THEM WHAT YOU ARE. Once you
understand the words and variations of the words, you will realize what it is you are really
signing voluntarily!

9. The tax forms: W4, W9 and other tax forms have literally ZERO repercussions for entirely
avoiding filling them out and signing them (look it up if you don't believe me).

26 CFR section 601.602 (a) states: "The tax system is based on voluntary compliance" (IT
REALLY IS BASED ON VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE!)

“The rights of the individuals are restricted only to the extent that they have been voluntarily
surrendered by the citizenship to the agencies of government.” City of Dallas v. Mitchell, 245
S.W. 944

Once these forms are filled out and signed, you are now obligated unless you file a Revocation of
Election. When you sign these forms, you are attesting to being a volunteer employee of the
federal government (thus a US citizen). THERE ARE ZERO PENALTIES FOR NEVER
SUBMITTING THESE FORMS. Do a little research.

This gets even crazier, because TECHNICALLY, Title 26 (which is the ENTIRE INTERNAL
REVENUE CODE) is not positive law (which means law that has been enacted by an official
legislature). Here is the proof on that:

14 of 56
26 U.S. Code § 7806 - Construction of title:

“(b)Arrangement and classification

No inference, implication, or presumption of legislative construction shall be drawn or made by
reason of the location or grouping of any particular section or provision or portion of this title,
nor shall any table of contents, table of cross references, or similar outline, analysis, or
descriptive matter relating to the contents of this title be given any legal effect. The preceding
sentence also applies to the sidenotes and ancillary tables contained in the various prints of this
Act before its enactment into law.”

Pretty wild, huh? I know. Your mind is probably blown just from that one point.

Moving on…

On the 2022 W9 form, here is the definition of a U.S. person: “For federal tax purposes, you are
considered a U.S. person if you are: An individual who is a U.S. citizen or U.S. resident alien.”
So you can see you are CONTRACTING TO PLAY THEIR GAME.

It's also not required to give an employer your Social Security number. 42 USC 408 (which
covers penalties for actions) states: “(8) discloses, uses, or compels the disclosure of the social
security number of any person.” TECHNICALLY IT IS A FELONY.

IT IS NOT ILLEGAL TO SIMPLY NEVER FILL OUT THESE FORMS IN THE FIRST
PLACE BUT IT IS ILLEGAL TO STOP PAYING ONCE YOU HAVE ALREADY SIGNED
THEM (WITHOUT DOING A REVOCATION OF ELECTION). BECAUSE ONCE YOU
SIGN THEM, YOU ARE WILLINGLY CONTRACTED. BECAUSE NOW YOU ARE IN
THEIR GAME - NOW YOU ARE A “RESIDENT ALIEN” - RESIDENT TO THEIR
WORLD… THEIR WORLD IN WHICH THEY MAKE THE RULES.

I used to run my own payroll (back when I had to actually DO payroll! No longer!) and I used a
large payroll company. When verifying documents for a new hire, just a passport alone is good
enough to approve them. A Social Security number is not required.

A “US citizen” is, by definition, a “taxpayer.” An internationally protected person (just one of
the terms to describe a state National), is NOT, by definition, a taxpayer. And that’s per 26 USC
7701:

”(14)Taxpayer
The term “taxpayer” means any person subject to any internal revenue tax.”

Now take that definition from 26 USC 7701 and link it up to what it says in 26 CFR 1.1-1:

“(1) Section 1 of the Code imposes an income tax on the income of every individual who is a
citizen or resident of the United States and, to the extent provided by section 871(b) or 877(b),
on the income of a nonresident alien individual.” [that section 871(b) and 877(b) are essentially

15 of 56
just talking about money made from the DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA! - TAKE A LOOK FOR
YOURSELF IF YOU DON’T BELIEVE ME!]

SO, AS YOU CAN SEE, ONLY “citizens” OR “residents” OF THE “UNITED STATES” ARE,
BY DEFINITION, “taxpayers.” NATIONALS ARE NOT RESIDENTS AND THEY ARE NOT
CITIZENS SO THEY ARE NOT TAXPAYERS! SO WHEN SOMEONE CALLS YOU A
“taxpayer,” YOU SIMPLY JUMP DOWN THEIR THROAT FOR CALLING YOU
SOMETHING THAT IS PHYSICALLY IMPOSSIBLE FOR YOU TO BE!

You can simply tell your employers that they have no obligation to withhold for the government
and that your status in terms of taxes is simply between you and your government (withholding
for the government is a full-blown voluntary employment position for the “government,” by the
way).

You can even whip up an affidavit (notarized document stating the truth under oath) stating such
and give it to them if they are trepidations. But again, your TACIT CONSENT that you are a
"US citizen" and thus under tax law is confirmed when you fill out and sign these forms.

AN AFFIDAVIT, BY DEFINITION, IS LITERALLY JUST A PIECE OF PAPER THAT HAS

BEEN NOTARIZED. “NOTARIZED” BASICALLY MEANS THAT A NOTARY, WHICH
REPRESENTS THE SECRETARY OF STATE, CHECKS YOUR IDENTIFICATION AND
WITNESSES YOU SIGN THE PAPER UNDER OATH TO ITS TRUTHFULNESS. YOU
CAN NOTARIZE A NAPKIN OR A PIECE OF PRINTER PAPER… ANYTHING… AND
TURN IT INTO THE MOST POWERFUL TOOL IN ALL OF LAW. YOU WOULD BE
SHOCKED BY HOW MUCH POWER THERE IS IN AN AFFIDAVIT. For example: if you
send an affidavit and they receiving party never responds, the judgment DEFAULTS to your
affidavit. Another thing: if you write an affidavit, they have to have an INDIVIDUAL write an
affidavit back countering EACH INDIVIDUAL POINT. The thing is that no one will stick their
neck out for their company and do that so if they don’t then your affidavit becomes the judgment
in law. It’s AMAZING how much power there is in simply doing an affidavit and it is the
primary weapon that gives YOU an advantage in all communications!

10. Taxes, by definition, are: "a contribution imposed".

I have a 30-page document with actual court cases where they explain how state Nationals, due
to them being technically a "Non-Resident Alien" to the federal government, have NO tax
burdens. CLICK HERE TO GET A PDF VERSION OF THAT DOCUMENT (IT WILL OPEN
A NEW WINDOW).

42 USC Section 401 shows how all your payroll “taxes” are actually just GIFTS - I’ll put that
text here:

“(i)Gifts and bequests

(1)The Managing Trustee may accept on behalf of the United States money gifts and bequests
made unconditionally to the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund, the Federal

16 of 56
Disability Insurance Trust Fund, the Federal Hospital Insurance Trust Fund, or the Federal
Supplementary Medical Insurance Trust Fund (and for the Medicare Prescription Drug Account
and the Transitional Assistance Account in such Trust Fund) or to the Social Security
Administration, the Department of Health and Human Services, or any part or officer thereof, for
the benefit of any of such Funds or any activity financed through such Funds.

(2)Any such gift accepted pursuant to the authority granted in paragraph (1) of this subsection
shall be deposited in—

(A)the specific trust fund designated by the donor or

(B)if the donor has not so designated, the Federal Old-Age and Survivors Insurance Trust Fund.”

Pretty wild, huh? You can pretty much swap the word “gift” every time you see the word “tax”
and, in the legal world, you would be correct.

There is a totally legal/lawful process that you can go through called a Revocation of Election
whereby you LEGALLY MOVE FROM THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BACK TO YOUR
HOME STATE (in law). This removes your "volunteer employee" status with the "government."
You will then have "no tax liability." You are REVOKING your ELECTION to be treated as a
Resident Alien and thus returning to your original American status as a Non-Resident Alien.
This allows you to regain your rights, pull out of all their statues, eliminate taxes and be a TRUE
American! This process changes your master tax file from “taxpayer” to “non-taxpayer.”

What you do with this information is entirely up to you. I'm not telling you what to do, I'm
simply sharing what I have learned. This post is for educational purposes only... I could fuckin
care less what you do.

Interesting statistics: the odds of accidental death in one year is 1 in 1,743. The odds of being
struck by lightning in one year is 1 in 400,000. The odds of being prosecuted by the IRS in one
year is 1 in 250,000.

"The cooperative taxpayer fares much worse than the individual who relies upon his
constitutional rights. Only the rare taxpayer would be likely to know that he could refuse to
produce his records to Internal Revenue Service Agents." - U.S. v. Dickerson, 413 F 2d 1116.

"In numerous cases where the IRS has sought enforcement of its summons pursuant to statute
(26 U.S.C. 7402), courts have held that a taxpayer may refuse production of personal books, and
records by assertion of his privilege against self-incrimination." - Hill v. Philpott, 445 F 2d 144;
and Stuart v. U.S. 416 F 2d 459; and U.S. v. Kleckner, 273 F Supp 251.

"Since the right to receive income or earnings is a right belonging to every person, this right
cannot be taxed as a privilege." Jack Cole Co. v. MacFarland, 337 S.W. 2Nd 453, 455-456
(Tenn. 1960). See similar court case ruling in Redfield v. Fisher, 292 P. 813 819 (Oregon 1930).

17 of 56
The Congressional record on March 27, 1943, page 2580 says: "the income tax is, therefore, not
a tax on income as such. It is an excise tax with respect to certain activities and privileges, which
is measured by reference to the income which they produce. The income is not the subject of the
tax; it is the basis for determining the amount of tax."

Title 31 - 321(d)(2) of the U.S. Code says “For purposes of the Federal income, estate, and gift
taxes, property accepted under paragraph (1) shall be considered as a gift or bequest to or for the
use of the United States.”

IMPORTANT NOTE: All federal income tax money goes to the Federal Reserve and is a
payment on the INTEREST on the loan we have for using Federal Reserve Notes (having the
"benefit" (hahahaha) of discharging our debts with debt - all Federal Reserve Notes are printed
and given to the Treasury WITH INTEREST so the loan gets bigger and can never be paid off).

NONE of federal income tax money goes to unemployment, roads, bridges, food stamps, or
anything else that contributes to the people or country. NOT ONE SINGLE PENNY. EVERY
SINGLE PENNY GOES ONLY TO THE INTEREST ON THE FRAUDULENT LOAN OF
ALL OUR MONEY. THERE’S NO MONEY LEFT BEYOND JUST THE INTEREST SO IT
ALL JUST GOES STRAIGHT TO THE BANKERS AND NOT ONE SINGLE SOLITARY
FUCKING PENNY GOES INTO YOUR ROADS, UNEMPLOYMENT, HOMELESS OR
ANYTHING ELSE.

The Federal Reserve is a private bank owned by the International Monetary Fund. The
International Monetary Fund (IMF) is owned by the United Nations. The United Nations
building was placed and donated by the Rockefellers.

The IRS is a private, for-profit collections company:

“The IRS is not part of the United States government.” - Diversified Metal Products v. T-Bow
Co. Trust, IRS 93-405 E-EJL.

Again, this post is for educational purposes ONLY... and I'm not just saying that. I wish someone
would have shared this information with me 15 years ago and now I'm simply passing it on
because I FINALLY understand it. Do what you want... do nothing... go jam a cucumber up your
ass.... I don't care.

A STATE NATIONAL DOES NOT HAVE “INCOME,” THEY HAVE “EARNINGS” OR

“PRIVATE PROPERTY.”

11. Through the Passport system, you can achieve different levels. The level system goes from 1-
5 "stars" (if you call the Passport office, they call them "asterisks"). These levels signify if you
are a "US citizen" or a state National.

A state National (sovereign) has a 4 or 5 star passport indicating they are human and they have
the full rights available to a human. This also places them in the police database as "diplomats"
which gives them LIMITED diplomatic immunity.

18 of 56
22 CFR 51.3 covers all the various types of passports if you care to look that up. The 5-star
passport is called a “Regular Passport” as per 22 CFR 51.3. As far as I can tell, a 4-star passport
is an Official Passport subsection (c)(4) of 22 CFR 51.3.

A "diplomat," by definition, is a FOREIGN ambassador. So when you correct your status as a

foreigner to the federal government (which all states in the union ARE legally foreign to the
federal government - remember, the Republic is a separate country in relation to the District of
Columbia, otherwise known as “United States”), you achieve a foreigner status that pulls you out
of the jurisdiction of federal police, tax authorities, the UCC, etc.

Here is the definition of “foreign” from Black’s Law 4th Edition: “Belonging to another nation
or country; belonging or attached to another jurisdiction; made, done, or rendered in another state
or jurisdiction; subject to another jurisdiction; operating or solvable in another territory;
extrinsic; outside; extraordinary. Nonresident.”

YEP. “NONRESIDENT” AND “FOREIGN” MEAN THE SAME THING!

Like I mentioned earlier, if you want to know the exact extent of the diplomatic immunity
available to a state National, please review 18 USC 112.

Also, 22 USC 611 covers how once you change your status, you are a “government of a foreign
country” by definition - here is the exact text on that:

“(e)The term “government of a foreign country” includes any person or group of persons
exercising sovereign de facto or de jure political jurisdiction over any country, other than the
United States, or over any part of such country, and includes any subdivision of any such group
and any group or agency to which such sovereign de facto or de jure authority or functions are
directly or indirectly delegated. Such term shall include any faction or body of insurgents within
a country assuming to exercise governmental authority whether such faction or body of
insurgents has or has not been recognized by the United States”

Interesting side note: If you have children and never sign for a birth certificate or Social Security
card, then they are humans for life and need to do nothing to retain their God-given rights. All
they need is some basic training on their rights and they are all set for life. ALTHOUGH THERE
ARE ALSO BENEFITS TO HAVING SOCIAL SECURITY. Benefits you have never been told
about. (I'll get to that later).

So don't feel bad if it's already too late. Plus, once a child turns 18 you can actually go down and
close the account and pull all the money out (once you turn 18 and then start using the number
on forms or get a job, you can no longer do this until you are 65).

Your children will need passports to be employed if they have no birth cert or SS #. You can still
do banking without a Social.

THESE BIRTH CERTIFICATES AND SOCIAL SECURITY SIGNATURES ARE HOW CPS
TAKES YOUR CHILDREN - IF YOU HAVE CPS ISSUES THEN SIMPLY GET YOUR

19 of 56
ORIGINAL SIGNATURES ON EVERYTHING AT THE HOSPITAL/SCHOOL THAT YOU
SIGNED RESCINDED AND YOUR CPS PROBLEMS INSTANTLY VANISH. YOU
SIGNED UNDER FRAUD SO THOSE CONTRACTS ARE VOID (I'll get more into this soon).

12. All "registration" or "licenses" or "permits" are all unconstitutional and they actually deepen
your relationship with their statutes via tacit consent. Once you correct your
citizenship/nationality status, you can now start to eliminate your driver's license, concealed
carry permit, marriage license, etc.

One of the definitions of "license" as per Black's Law 4th edition is: "Permission to do
something which without the license would not be allowable." City of Shreveport v. Brister, 194
La. 615, 194 So. 566, 567. Great Atlantic Pacific Tea Co. v. City of Lexington, 256 Ky. 595, 76
S.W.2d 894, 896

Your God-given rights are only "not allowable" when you tacitly agree to be a trust in your ALL
CAPS name. TRUSTS DON'T HAVE RIGHTS.

"To register" by definition means "to beg for approval" or "to beg for a benefit" and puts you
"under" the entity you are begging, WHICH PLACES YOU IN THEIR JURISDICTION. It also
creates a contract because you are getting a "benefit" and when that occurs that other party now
has the ability to request something in return.

The truth is that what you are getting is a false benefit in exchange for a contractual obligation
that forces you to now give back something of actual value. PLUS THIS ACTS AS TACIT
CONSENT TO NOT BEING HUMAN IN THE EYES OF THE LAW (because it's not YOU
that has the license, it's your trust!). Humans don't need licenses, only trusts do.

How can anyone but God give you rights? How can the people you pay to run your country
SELL to you and GIVE you rights? You APPLY for rights from agencies YOU pay to have
there. That seem correct to you? Are you GRANTING the power of God to your government?
Only God has the power to grant rights or take them away. These people believe they are God
because we allow this to happen.

Once you reclaim your rights then none of this is necessary. Also passports give you domestic
travel abilities (look up more on that yourself). Passports really are pretty much the key to
everything.

Much of this information is located when studying contract law, which I also have reading
material on that as well if you're interested.

The problem is that you are a trust/corporation in the eyes of the law so that has to be corrected
then you can acquire your human rights.

Registration definition: "to prepare a security for sale to the public." - all these licenses and
permits are actually turned into securities and bought/sold on private markets. It's all a scam for
private corporations, pretending to be government, to make money.

20 of 56
The government you think has existed your whole life doesn't exist at all. They want your money
and jurisdiction and issuing "registration," "licenses" and "permits" is how they do it.
BEGGING OR APPLYING FOR A LICENSE IS TACIT CONSENT THAT YOU ARE
NOT ALIVE OR THAT YOU DO NOT WANT YOUR RIGHTS. IN LAW, IT’S NO
DIFFERENT THAN SAYING “I DON’T WANT THESE PESKY HUMAN RIGHTS AND
WOULD RATHER HAVE PRIVLEDGES FROM A PRIVATE CORPORATION.”

"The acceptance of a license, in whatever form, will not impose upon the licensee an obligation
to respect or to comply with any provision of the statute or with the regulations prescribed that
are repugnant to the Constitution of the United States." W. W. CARGILL CO. v. STATE OF
MINNESOTA, 180 U.S. 452 (1901) 180 U.S. 452

13. When someone is arrested there are special bonds made and sold/traded called "penal bonds."
The bonds are the only things keeping a person in jail and if you pay off the bonds then the jail
can no longer hold the person. This is a well-buried secret and you can clear out the prisons with
this information.

The bonds that are made to put people in jail are General Services Administration (GSA) bonds.
The exact forms that are used to create these bonds (you can look up PDFs of these online if you
wish) are GSA SF 24, GSA SF 25 and the GSA SF 25a forms (“SF” means “Standard Form”). If
you study those forms in-detail, you will understand exactly how people are placed in and held in
jail.

These bonds are full-blown securities and are sold and traded on private markets.

The main system where bonds are created and traded are on the CRIS system (website for the
CRIS system is https://www.ncmd.uscourts.gov/court-registry-investment-system-cris).

The body of the “criminal” is held as a surety on the bond. A “surety” is someone who accepts
legal responsibility of the debt on a bond or the actions required (performance) to discharge the
bond.

THE JAIL IS ACTUALLY PHYSICALLY AN ESCROW AND THE “TIME SERVED” IS

THE PERFORMANCE PART OF THE BOND.

To discharge these bonds you can use a GSA SF 90, which is a form to release the lien. You can
also use a GSA OF 91, which is a “Release of Personal Property from Escrow” (“Escrow” means
jail). You simply sign over power of attorney to the judge to fill out and get these forms
completed for you and that’s how you can get people out of prison!

The creation of these bonds prove that courts are actually corporations. THEY ARE NOT
GOVERNMENT. They are private corporations making a fortune on bonds and fines.

ALL A JUDGE IS TRYING TO DO DURING A COURT CASE IS CREATE BONDS. IF

HE/SHE CREATES BONDS THEN THE COURT MAKES MONEY. BOND CREATION IS
SECURITY CREATION. DO YOU KNOW WHO CREATES SECURITIES? BANKERS!

21 of 56
JUDGES IN CORPORATE LAW ARE LITERALLY JUST BANKERS. ONCE YOU KNOW
THIS THEN YOU CAN CONTROL THE COURT BECAUSE ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS
JUST HELP THE JUDGE CREATE THE LARGEST BONDS AND THEY WILL LOVE
YOU!

The purpose of a corporation is "maximum profits for shareholders."

So common sense and logic dictates that the next question would be... who are the shareholders?!
Does the judge own the corporation of the court? If not then who does? How is the court
corporation connected in with the privatized jailing system? Are they all owned by some larger
person or corporation?

Corporate courts that send people to corporate jail for corporate crimes with no victim are
actually creating indentured servitude. THIS IS SLAVERY. PLAIN AND SIMPLE.

They create and sell bonds on a private market, but they also get to create free slave labor by
having prisoners work for pennies per hour.

The entire "justice" system is a private corporation and their 2 major money-makers are bonds
and indentured servitude. If you think companies like Nike and Apple might use cheap labor
from other countries, you would be shocked by how we have horrific slavery right here in the
USA. We are slaves through taxation and also through the "justice" system.

Indentured servitude and slavery is more alive now than it has ever been all through history.
When the 14th amendment was "ratified," it didn't free the blacks, it actually enslaved all of
America (in fact, blacks to this day, technically only have “civil rights"… not human rights). I'm
sure that probably wasn't the intention, but sadly that's what happened.

The ONLY people who are currently in jail should be those who violated Common Law... NOT
statutory law. Statutory law applies only to corporations and trusts, NOT NATURAL HUMANS.

All people who HAVE violated Common Law should be judged by a jury of their peers and they
should be educated in law and given a chance to REPAIR DAMAGE THEY HAVE DONE. This
is how a Common Law court operates... law can be truly beautiful and sane! What you see in
today's world is so horrific, degraded and criminal.

Law allows the defendant to face their accuser and allows the group to demand a change in
behavior and reparations... not tickets and "infringements" and all this other bullshit you see in
society.

REAL LAW IS WHERE PEOPLE ARE NOT BOTHERED UNLESS THERE IS EVIDENCE
THAT THEIR BEHAVIOR IS HURTING OTHERS. THAT IS TRUE FREEDOM; THAT IS
TRUE LAW.

During an arraignment you can ask for the “penal sum,” then pay it and WALK RIGHT OUT.
You’ve always heard that the rich don’t go to jail. Well that’s how they do it.

22 of 56
14. Lawyers are "officers of the court" and by using one you put yourself into the jurisdiction of
the court. You also waive your rights when you accept "representation." The legal definition of
"represent" is "to present again." AN ATTORNEY, BY DEFINITION, REPRESENTS PEOPLE
WHO CAN’T “PRESENT” THEMSELVES… SUCH AS THE INSANE, CHILDREN AND
RETARDS. BY TAKING ON AN ATTORNEY YOU AUTOMATICALLY CLASSIFY
YOURSELF IN THESE SAME CATEGORIES AND THUS YOU HAVE NO RIGHTS. ONCE
YOU DO THIS IT BECOMES IMPOSSIBLE TO WIN IN COURT. YOU BECOME A
“WARD OF THE COURT” - WHICH MEANS YOU BECOME THEIR PLAYTHING.

An attorney is a “professional legal thief” by definition. It comes from feudal times, which is
perfect because we are still currently in a feudal system through mortgages and property taxes:

Definition of “attorn” from The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, 5th
Edition:

1. To recognize or bring about a transfer, especially of property.

2. To transfer (something) to another.
3. To turn, or transfer homage and service, from one lord to another. This is the act of
feudatories, vassals, or tenants, upon the alienation of the estate.

Here is a couple pieces of case law that show you what you’re doing when you take on a lawyer:

“The attorney is obligated to the courts and the public. Wherever his duties to his client conflict
with those he owes as an officer of the court in the administration of justice, the former duties
must yield to the latter.” Corpus Juris Secundum, 1980, section 4.

“A lawyer cannot claim that you have rights.” U.S. vs Johnson, 76 F. Supp. 538

The only safe way to handle legal proceedings is to never make it into a tribunal courtroom
(corporate law). THEY MAKE THE RULES SO IT’S NOT EASY TO WIN. Common Law
courts are real courts but they hardly exist in some states (there are groups building them in
certain places - I'm about to sign up as a grand juror myself. You should too if you want to help).

If you do wind up forced into a tribunal "court," question and attack jurisdiction while
"presenting" (not RE-presenting) yourself. "Free" state representation is given away with a
massive price tag: jurisdiction. Plus, there are MANY instances of judges saying that people do
not need licenses to practice law. The Bar exam and the Bar Association is nothing more than a
corrupt glorified club.

You waive your rights when you choose to take on representation, so when you say you have
rights... you really don't.

The only possible way to win in a corporate court is to present yourself and challenge
jurisdiction. Otherwise you are playing a game where THE COURT MAKES MONEY ON
BONDS AND FINES IF YOU ARE FOUND GUILTY SO THEY HAVE A FINANCIAL

23 of 56
INCENTIVE TO CRUSH YOU. They use lawyers to do it. The equation is "lawyer plus
court/judge = money in their pocket."

"The law provides that once State and Federal Jurisdiction has been challenged, it must be
proven." - Main v. Thiboutot, 100 S. Ct. 2502 (1980)

ARGUING THE "FACTS" OF A CASE OR GIVING A PLEA OF "NOT GUILTY" IS TACIT

CONSENT TO THEIR JURISDICTION. YOU ARE A FOREIGN ENTITY MAKING A
SPECIAL APPEARANCE TO CHALLENGE JURISDICTION. THEY HAVE NO RIGHT OF
DOMINION OVER YOU AT ALL AND YOU ARE ONLY THERE THROUGH THREAT
AND DURESS. THERE IS NO CASE AND THERE IS NO REASON TO DEFEND
YOURSELF IN A COURT THAT IS RUN BY CRIMINALS FOR THE PURPOSE OF SELF-
ENRICHMENT. THEY ARE NOT YOUR FRIENDS AND THEY ARE NOT YOUR
COUNTRY.

Doing this is quite a complex and deep personal dive that you will have to do - again, this post is
just to give you a taste. If you want to move forward to learn exactly how to do this... remember
it's 500+ hours of investment time. It might even be 1000+ hours investment time... I guarantee
nothing as everyone is different. After 14 months of studying I feel fairly confident that I could
do it for myself. No I'm not for hire so please do not ask, you need to learn to stand on your own
2 feet. I explain a lot of what you need to know to do this in my free Contract Killer Course.

Think about this... to defend automatically assumes and grants the other person to be the
attacker. By defending, YOU are granting power to not only the subject matter but to the
"attacker." To defend is to enter yourself into battle.

When you receive an offer, presentment (which is just an offer of a contract), idea or anything
else... you have to CHOOSE to defend. When you defend you are consenting to the fact that
there is something to fight about and you are also contracting into a battle WILLINGLY.

The definition of defend is: "To engage in or be prepared to engage in battle to prevent (a
population or area, for example) from being captured or occupied by an enemy."

The only power the attacker has is when YOU decide to defend. This situation gives the attacker
tacit consent that they are in control (because in an attack-defend dichotomy, the attacker is
considered the point of cause, while the defender is the point of effect.)

TAKING THE DEFENSE POSITION IS ALWAYS A WILLFUL ACTIVITY AND YOU

HAVE A CHOICE TO DO IT OR NOT.

15. The most powerful tool in all of law is called a "conditional acceptance." It is an affidavit
that states you will accept the terms presented under certain CONDITIONS. Then you make the
"conditions" nearly impossible to handle because you list the laws and request proof of various
things.

24 of 56
Courts only see DISPUTES (The legal name for a dispute is a “justiciable controversy.”) and, by
definition, a conditional acceptance is not a dispute so courts will not accept for it to be heard
until the conditional acceptance is completed. This is how you stay out of court.

This can be used for traffic violations, tax problems, CPS issues, etc. You can literally use a
conditional acceptance for almost anything... divorce, business deals, commerce, joint ventures,
etc. In my Contract Killer Course, I explain how to structure one and break down some of the
ones I have done. A conditional acceptance makes you nearly invincible in law.

In my free Contract Killer Course, I cover conditional acceptances in more detail and walk you
through some of the ones I have done. It’s hard to really talk too much about without SHOWING
you because it’s just a lot.

If you wind up forced into a courtroom, one of the most powerful tactics is to bring your own
hired certified public recorder to the courtroom. This means you are legally recording everything
happening and said in the courtroom (thus making them anxious and feeling very careful about
what they do or say - this is how you take control of their courtroom).

It will piss off the judge but will also put them in their place as a PUBLIC SERVANT. You need
to force these people to do their job in a fiduciary trust where they are the trustee as a public
servant and you are the beneficiary. It is only YOU that will force these people to do their job.
FOR THEM TO DO ANYTHING THAT DOESN'T BENEFIT YOU IS ACTUALLY TRUST
FRAUD.

IN LAW, THAT OF WHICH CREATES SOMETHING HAS THE POWER TO DESTROY

IT... THE PEOPLE CREATE AND FUND THESE OFFICES OF PUBLIC SERVANTS AND
THUS HAVE FULL RIGHT OF DOMINION TO MAKE SURE THEY ARE NOT CORRUPT
OR DESTROY THEM IF THEY ARE. (Note: Since all of these “governmental” organizations
are all private, for-profit corporations, your tax dollars and your money does not go towards their
operation. So in a super fucked up world, like what we have now, this particular point isn’t really
true. It’s only sort of true because they are the trustees once they put your Social Security
number on your case information. That automatically makes the action a trust action and you are
the beneficiary. Kind of complicated, but I did want to clarify this point a little more.)

A conditional acceptance is an affidavit. Truth is expressed in the form of an affidavit. An

unrebutted affidavit stands as truth in Commerce. An unrebutted affidavit becomes judgment in
Commerce.

Here are 5 generic points that could be used in a conditional acceptance to UTTERLY CRUSH
any legal presentment for court:

"1. Where is the alleged maritime contract? Your jurisdiction goes no more than 1 mile inland.
(This is as regards to statutory law being from the jurisdiction of the sea.)

2. Who or what is being addressed as the DEFENDANT? Is the trust the defendant? I am not a
trustee of that trust and am only the beneficiary.

25 of 56
3. Is this court a constitutional entity? If so, is it an Article 3 or an Article 5 court?

4. Where is the Injured Party, named as PLAINTIFF? If it is not a living man or woman, please
explain: who owns it? What is it? Who is responsible for it?

5. What jurisdiction or authority does this court or its officers have to address fraudulent claims
to my attention? (If the documents were mailed, that's mail fraud. If they were hand-delivered,
that's trespassing)."

You won’t learn how to do conditional acceptances overnight, but the long road it takes to
learning them will give you peace of mind for yourself and your friends/family in life.

16. The "legal" definition of "argue" is "to make clear." Very fascinating. I’m going to leave this
here as a point all by itself because I think it is a truly life changing definition. This one single
definition has the ability to quietly change the whole world, in my opinion.

17. In contract law, the only way that someone can "force" reciprocation of a contract is if you
have already accepted and consented to "benefits."

For example: if you have accepted the "benefit" of Social Security then you are now obligated to
reciprocate. You are contracted.

The main "benefit" that ties you into being a "US citizen" is actually the "right" to vote. Now it
gets a bit more complex than that because it's not tied to the right to vote... technically... it's tied
to the "right to register" to vote.

This is called "enfranchisement." The exact definition is: "To endow with the rights of
citizenship, especially the right to vote."

So basically they are giving you the "benefit" of voting for a "president" that is not really the
actual government president, but the president of a private company that is acting as though it is
the actual government.

The first time the use of enfranchisement (contracting people under fraud to take away their
rights) was in The Reform Act of 1867.

It's avoiding and eliminating enfranchisement that then allows you to disconnect as a tacit US
citizen, which means you revoke voter registration. But by law I have read that you can still just
show up on vote day and vote without registering.

I think the REGISTERING to vote is actually the trap that pulls you into the US citizen
designation.

Remember... "register" is a BAD word. Whenever you hear that word, a million alarms should be
going on in your head and you need to start asking A LOT of questions.

26 of 56
Once you stop consenting and actively negate and cut ties with all "benefits" offered by the
government, your obligation to contribute is also eliminated. This is how you lawfully/legally
disconnect from the government. If a living person has no contract or tacit agreement with
benefits, they have no obligation to live on the land of God.

Who has the right to say they own the land of God? Who has the right to say you cannot move or
travel due to their possession of some road or byway? Would a normal, sane, friendly, supporting
human act that way towards their fellow man? No, this is the behavior and acts of evil men with
no self-esteem and deserves you pay them no mind.

Yes there is such a thing as ownership, but OWNERSHIP IS A CONTRACT WITH GOD AND
IF YOU VIOLATE HIS TRUST THEN YOUR CONTRACT IS NULL AND VOID
INSTANTLY.

There is a legal word called "inducement" that means: "Misrepresentation that leads a person to
enter into a contract or transaction with a false understanding of the risks and obligations."

It is actually a maxim of law that "fraud vitiates everything." God knows of fraud instantly and
thus all fraud, no matter how well hidden, when it involves a piece of his land, means ALL
CONTRACTS ARE INSTANTLY VOIDED FROM THEIR INCEPTION ONCE FRAUD HAS
BEEN ENTERED INTO THE EQUATION. THE REASON WHY THAT IS, IS BECAUSE
THE TRUSTEE/BENEFICIARY RELATIONSHIP ENDS ONCE THE BENEFICIARY
STANDS UP AND SAYS “I’M NOT BEING BENEFITTED! THIS IS FRAUD!” IF YOU
BELIEVE YOU ARE BEING BENEFITED, THEN THE TRUST STAYS ACTIVE. IT’S ALL
BRAINWASHING AND MANIPULATION TO MAKE PEOPLE BELIEVE AS THOUGH
THEY ARE BEING BENEFITTED WHEN THEY ARE ACTUALLY BEING BENT OVER
AND RAILED.

18. You can reserve your rights at the beginning of any court case, police interaction or any other
commercial transaction. By doing this you can stay within the jurisdiction of Common Law. By
not doing this, you GRANT jurisdiction and move into strictly statutory law. To do this you
voice or write "without prejudice" above or below a signature. This comes from UCC 1-308.

This, combined with the non-corporate signature (first-middle:last), is how you can learn how to
sign things in a way (like traffic tickets) that make them instantly void.

"When a waivable right or claim is involved, the failure to make a reservation thereof, causes a
loss of the right, and bars its assertion at a later date." - UCC 1-207.4

UCC 1-103.6 - "The Code is complimentary to the Common Law, which remains in force,
except where displaced by the code. A statute should be construed in harmony with the Common
Law, unless there is a clear legislative intent to abrogate the Common Law."

THE WAY TO BE FREE IS TO CONSTANTLY AND CONTINUALLY OPERATE WITH

THIS QUESTION IN MIND: "HOW DO I STAY IN COMMON LAW EXCLUSIVELY AND
AVOID THE STATUTORY CORPORATE JURISDICTION AT ALL TIMES?" IF YOU

27 of 56
LEARN THIS AND LIVE YOUR LIFE BY IT, YOU WILL WALK THIS EARTH AS A
CHILD OF GOD... AN ARCHANGEL... BUT YOU NEED TO PUT THAT ENDLESS
FREEDOM TO USE TO SERVE AND HELP OTHERS. THIS POST IS TO CREATE
SOLDIERS OF GOD THAT ARE THE ENEMIES OF SLAVERY AND SHACKLES. THIS
POST IS TO EMPOWER YOU SO THAT YOU CAN STAND UP AND EMPOWER
OTHERS. THEY DON’T CONTROL COMMON LAW, THEY ONLY CONTROL THE
STATUES. STAY OUT OF THE STATUTES AND YOU TAKE AWAY THEIR CONTROL.

19. Trusts are a way to practice commerce but stay in Common Law. Pure Contract Trusts,
especially ones structured as a 508c1a Faith-Based Organization, allow you to operate entirely
out of the jurisdiction of statutory corporate law.

The government CANNOT tell you or define “faith” for you. If you sell tacos on the side of the
road and you love tacos because it reminds you of a vagina and you worship women, that is your
“faith,” and the government cannot tell you otherwise. Pure Contract Trusts are not created by
government and thus they cannot control or own it. Pure Contract Trusts come from Canon Law
and the Bible and are SENIOR to government. However you want to define them is up to you as
YOU ARE THE GOVERNMENT IN A PURE CONTRACT TRUST.

The simple and brief breakdown is that you write up a trust agreement, then have it notarized by
all the parties involved. Then BOOM, it exists. You don’t go to the corporate government to get
it approved or anything. Then the way you operate with it is just knowing the basics of the
trustee responsibilities and the beneficiary responsibilities.

Legally, neither the trustee nor the beneficiaries own the property in the trust. So that is why it is
such good asset protection. And when set up properly, NO ONE can get into them. I build trusts
that are so tight that only God himself could get into one.

Operating through trusts is a lifestyle, not some simple thing that someone can just do for you.
I’m not going to get into all the details on how to do this here because it’s simply too much. I
have a recommended book list on my state National Resources page if you would like additional
material on this subject.

"A Pure Contract Trust is not subject to legislative control. The U.S. Supreme Court holds that
Trust relationship comes under the realm of equity, based on the common law, and is not subject
to legislative restrictions as are corporations and other organizations created by legislative
authority." - Elliot v. Freeman 220 U.S. 178 (1911)

"The Trustees of a Trust have all the powers necessary to carry out the obligations which they
assume. Their books and records are not subject to review or subpoena. - Smith v. Morse 2 CA
524; Boyd v U.S., 116 U.S. 618; Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. U.S., 241 U.S. 385.

20. Semantic deceit is the number one weapon used against you at all times. Learning the
definitions of words and owning a Black's Law Dictionary (ideally the 4th or 5th editions) is how
you learn to play the game.

28 of 56
ONCE YOU LEARN TO PLAY THE GAME IT IS LITERALLY ALMOST IMPOSSIBLE TO
LOSE. I'M NOT KIDDING... YOU BECOME A KING OF THE LAND.

The definitions of words in the world of law should ALWAYS BE SUSPECT. Simple everyday
words should be checked, checked, checked. Every single comma, every single space, every
single semicolon should be suspect and carefully inspected. If you assume there are traps
everywhere then you will be successful in law and will become invincible.

Assuming that strange definitions that you aren’t aware of are being used will allow you to
become one of the greatest lawyers on Earth.

21. Police are simply unknowing foot soldiers of corporate statutes from the UCC and the USC
(mostly). They don't know the law and fighting or arguing with them is bad. ARGUING
ACTUALLY LEGALLY GIVES THEM JURISDICTION! IT PROVES THAT THERE IS
SOMETHING TO ARGUE ABOUT WHEN THERE ISN'T!

To handle the police is very simple... you simply be genuinely kind, knowing they are stuck in
the same trap you are.

Let's say for example you're in a traffic stop... they offer you to sign a ticket (definition of a
ticket is "a contractual agreement to show up at court"). Very simple, you say "and what happens
if I don't sign it?" (Say this with curiosity and kindness). They might tell you they will arrest you
if you don't. Then you just sign the ticket like this: "without prejudice. Signed under threat and
duress. brandon-joe:williams, beneficiary" - now you have reserved your rights, identified as a
human, identified that you are the beneficiary and they are the trustee in a trust action and also
defined that you were under duress to sign. HANDLE THEM WITH KINDNESS AND MAKE
THEM DO THEIR JOB. The ticket is dead at that point.

Even if you do get forced into court, who cares? Who cares if they suspend your license? Once
you sort out your passport you don't technically even need it unless you are doing straight
commerce like driving a taxi or big rig. SO WHO CARES. The secret is knowing that they are
fucked. They have no power.

Police have a gold-fringed admiralty martial law flag on their uniform and they don't even know
it's there. They are good people, lost in the same system you are. They know something is up
with this country and our police and military WILL defend us if things get too bad. They are
good people with good intentions and you should actually offer books to the ones that confront
you. You should go to their precinct and offer books for them and additional books for their
friends there that want to learn. These people are some of the great allies you can have as a
foreign ambassador.

True Constitutional police would be your county sheriff. So if you are ever in an altercation with
a police (policy) officer and you see it's getting bad, simply say you are going to call the county
sheriff and have him come to the scene to help. Sheriffs are awesome and, like U.S. Marshals,
are true American law enforcement. YOUR SHERIFF WILL PROTECT YOU FROM BAD
POLICING.

29 of 56
YOU NEED TO ALWAYS BE CREATING FRIENDS AND DELIVERING VALUE TO
OTHERS, OTHERWISE YOU JEOPARDIZE THE SURVIVAL OF YOUR WORLD. BY
READING THIS POST YOU ARE BECOMING THE TRUSTEE AND YOU ARE NOW IN A
FIDUCIARY TRUST WITH THE PEOPLE YOU ENCOUNTER AND THEY ARE THE
BENEFICIARIES. THE POLICE, WHEN THEY PULL YOU OVER, NEED TO BE
BENEFITTED BY YOU EDUCATING THEM AND BEING KIND AND POLITE. BY YOU
BENEFITING THEM BUT DEMANDING THEY BENEFIT YOU IS TO ENTER INTO THE
TRUST OF GOD AND IS THE PROPER AND LEGAL WAY GOD INTENDED HUMAN
INTERACTION TO BE.

We've all been lied to. The police joined the force because they wanted to help. THEY HAVE
ALSO BEEN LIED TO. Educate and help them. The tickets they give you are nothing more than
offered contracts to be in court. They don't give "fines," they only offer contracts. Those
contracts can be refused and destroyed with literally no effort.

You defang them entirely when you know this but nothing is stopping them from turning off
their camera and beating the shit out of you for being terrifically disrespectful. If I was a cop and
I was being treated like utter garbage, I would probably turn off my camera and beat the shit out
of you too.

If police truly knew what was going on and how they are literally just generating corporate
revenue (mostly), they would quit!

They do also apply and protect Common Law and for that they are appreciated! If you removed
statutory law and the private corporate aspect of their job, they would instantly be fantastically
supported.

Oh and if any cops are reading this... if you divided all the "revenue" taken in for traffic citations
nationally and divided it by each individual officer, it would be around $137,000 a year. You're
getting shafted! If you're going to play this game, at least do it right. Make your superiors' life a
living hell unless you get a decent cut! Hahahaha. You can even use the information in this write
up to leverage yourself some better pay.

22. The American Flag that you see everywhere is actually owned by the International Monetary
Fund and has been since 1944.

The TRUE American flag actually has vertical stripes. Type "civil peace flag" into Google or a
search engine to see a picture. If you research what this flag is, you will see they say it's a flag
used by "tax protestors." But that information is planted all over the internet on purpose to divert
attention off someone locating this massive treasure trove of information.

The truth is that this flag is the true American flag used on the land for Constitutional, live
human Americans that SHOULD be identified as state Nationals.

The American flag you are used to seeing is actually a maritime flag but that asset of the
government was stolen in 1944 by the IMF.

30 of 56
When you see the maritime flag with a gold fringe... that means "wartime martial law" and that is
the flag you see in courtrooms and on police officer uniforms. This is exactly why this country is
constantly at war: it allows the president to rule the country by executive orders. They want to
keep that going which is why we get into so many wars... hence the gold fringe.

We are TECHNICALLY under martial law and have been for ages.

23. Keep in mind that America had no federal income tax up until 1911. How was the country
built and funded?

The answer is that the people who were in charge were given access to the trust of the State or
government via Trust Management Organizations. These TMOs are supposed to be contracted to
service us (run our cities and towns) in exchange for money. The ability to be the trustee of the
State or government allowed the people in charge to do as they pleased and the TMOs are
FULLY SELF-FUNDING. Meaning they fund literally everything needed for a government or
State (INCLUDING THE PAY FOR ALL THE PUBLIC SERVANTS).

Direct taxation (which is unconstitutional to do in America to live humans), was added on

literally as an ADDITIONAL form of revenue. It is just corruption, plain and simple.
Constitution Article 1 Section 9 shows that direct taxation is illegal - I’ll put the text here:

Clause 4 Direct Taxes

“No Capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or
enumeration herein before directed to be taken.”

States or governments that report that they are broke (as many do), do so only as a way to hide
and siphon funds and also request new funds or justify needing more funds. They are private
corporations.

"It is well stated that the United States, et al, is a corporation originally incorporated on February
21, 1871 under the name of District of Columbia." 16 Stat. 419 Chpt. 62

“UNITED STATES, US, U.S., USA, and AMERICA means ‘federal corporation.’” - USC Title
28, Section 3002(5), Chapter 176

“The UNITED STATES is a corporation.” - 534 Federal Supplement 724

They use a very sketchy form of "accounting" that allows them to hide vast sums of money off-
ledger, making themselves appear broke. It’s all just messing with the books to move around
money to justify needing more… same old shit.

The perception of what you see around you is manufactured and hand-fed to you. The reason
being is pure corruption and greed.

24. Tax debt is already prepaid (your trust owes taxes, you don't!). Get the book called Dissolve
Your Debt to learn how to get all your tax bills to simply evaporate. LEGALLY.

31 of 56
Another great book (not easy to read though... take your time and slowly research each part and
clear up all the legal words) is Give Yourself Credit by David E. Robinson.

When the USA declared bankruptcy in 1933, it made all the US citizens the holders of the debt.
US citizens are not the true debtors of America, they are only the sureties (meaning they are the
sort of like "co-signers" on the loan). This is based off of House Joint Resolution (HJR) 192,
which later became Public Law 73-10.

IMPORTANT NOTE: BOTH HJR 192 AND PUBLIC LAW 73-10 HAVE BEEN CUT UP
AND PLACED INTO THE UNITED STATES CODE. IF YOU TRY AND USE THEM, THEY
ARE TECHNICALLY REPEALED. BUT I HAVE FOUND A SPOT IN THE USC THAT HAS
THE DATA FROM HJR 192/PUBLIC LAW 73-10: 18 USC 891 SECTIONS 1 AND 4.

Our trusts are the ones that "owe taxes," but even beyond that, our trusts don't DIRECTLY owe
the national debt. That debt is legally held by the private corporation called UNITED STATES.

"Every taxpayer is a cestui que trust" In re Bolens 135 N.W. Rep. 164 (1912) supreme Court of
Wisconsin.

25. Your Social Security Card is LITERALLY, by definition, a credit card. Let me explain...

So all Federal Reserve Notes are backed by the value of our Social Security accounts, which are
backed by our ability to sell and exchange and deliver goods and services (TRUE production).

Banks are NOT ALLOWED, by law, to loan out other people's money that is deposited in the
bank. Here is the proof for that sentence:

12 USC 83 - “Loans by bank on its own stock:

(a)General prohibition
No national bank shall make any loan or discount on the security of the shares of its own capital
stock.”

So how do they loan you money?

They do so by having you do an application for something like a credit card. So they take your
application, TURN THE APPLICATION INTO A SECURITY (DEFINITION: DOCUMENT
THAT EVIDENCES A DEBT) AND THAT'S THE WAY THEY CREATE MONEY OUT OF
THIN AIR. THEN THEY TAKE THAT SECURITY TO THE FEDERAL RESERVE AND
THEY TRADE YOUR SECURITY TO THE BANK FOR FEDERAL RESERVE NOTES,
THEN THE BANK TURNS AROUND AND GIVES YOPUR OWN MONEY BACK TO YOU
AT INTEREST. YOUR AUTOGRAPH REPRESENTS YOUR POTENTIAL PRODUCTION
AND THAT IS WHAT CREATES THE ACTUAL CREDIT.

So let me break this down...

32 of 56
What they do is take YOUR signature (autograph)... meaning your promise to pay based off your
ability to produce... they turn it into a bond or some kind of financial instrument... then get
money from the Federal Reserve based off that instrument... then give you YOUR OWN DAMN
MONEY AT INTEREST.

It's the same game the Federal Reserve does with our currency that is loaned to the country.

So what does that mean for you?

It means all your credit card debt or ANY OTHER DEBTS THAT ARE BASED OFF YOUR
SOCIAL SECURITY ACCOUNT ARE ALL NULL AND VOID. Well wait... how could that
be?

Remember: fraud vitiates everything. Plus a contract is void if it doesn't contain "equal
consideration for both parties." That means you put up the money for the fees... what did they put
up?

The answer is NOTHING. Plus they opened the account under fraud. So that means that all the
money that is owed on these loans is all non-existent.

Now, that doesn't mean you can simply ignore your loans. Because 4 of the maxims of
commercial law are:

*Truth is expressed in the form of an affidavit.

*An unrebuffed affidavit stands as truth in commerce.

*An unrebuffed affidavit becomes a judgment in commerce.

*He who leaves the field of battle first [meaning does not respond to an affidavit] loses by
default.

MEANING YOU HAVE TO LEGALLY REBUT THE BILLS OR STATEMENTS YOU ARE
GETTING. YOU CAN DO SO BY USING A CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE AND
REQUEST FOR THEM TO SHOW PROOF OF HOW THE MONEY WAS OBTAINED TO
LOAN TO YOU TO MAKE SURE THEY WERE NOT BREAKING THE LAW BY
LOANING OUT OTHER PEOPLE'S MONEY. THEY WILL
NEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEVVVVVVVER RELEASE THAT INFORMATION SO THE
ENTIRE LOAN DIES INSTANTLY AND IMMEDIATELY WITHOUT EVER HAVING TO
STEP ONE SINGLE FOOT IN A COURT ROOM.

Please don't abuse this information... remember that your actions have consequences and people
still need to feed their families, etc. What I mean by that is don’t fuck around with people just
trying to feed their families and stuff. Banks and big organizations, have fun, but don’t discharge
debts with little mom and pop shops… please.

33 of 56
I'm writing this, again, TO TURN PAUPERS INTO KINGS/QUEENS.

You are the one with the credit... not the banks. They pretend to give you a credit score but that
"score" is basically their adjudication of how valuable your potential production is, NOT about
how likely you are to get a loan. It's all a lie. Credit scores mean basically nothing.

CREDIT REPORTING COMPANIES ARE PRIVATE FOR-PROFIT CORPORATIONS

TOO. THEY ARE IN BED WITH THE CREDIT CARD COMPANIES AND
“LENDERS” AND THEY FUCK EACH OTHER PUTTING TOGETHER THIS GIANT
FALSE REALITY WHERE THEY MAKE YOU LOOK LIKE THE BAD GUY. THIS IS
HOW THEY GENERATE REGRET, SHAME AND BAD FEELINGS IN YOU. THOSE
BAD FEELINGS IS HOW THEY CONTROL YOU. THIS IS ACTUALLY SLAVERY
OR INDENTURED SURVITUDE AND YOU CAN FILE LAWSUITS AND LIENS TO
FIGHT THIS.

If you look at 31 USC 5312, you can look at the definition of “financial institution” and it’s
pretty incredible what you find in the definition of that:

“(K)an issuer, redeemer, or cashier of travelers’ checks, checks, money orders, or similar
instruments;
(L)an operator of a credit card system;”

You look at those two points and you start thinking to yourself “well, that means everyone is a
financial institution.” Yeah, that’s true, BECAUSE YOU MAKE THE CURRENCY, NOT THE
BANK.

Now... how can you get credit by bypassing the banks? How can you lien or turn your own credit
into a security and take out the middle man entirely? How much credit are you entitled to?
Millions? At no interest?

Ah ha! Now you're starting to ask the right questions! I don't know the answers but I'm sure you
will soon! (Let me know).

TOP SECRET: The black/red letters and numbers on the back of your Social Security card is
actually your bond number. The letter at the beginning signifies which Federal Reserve bank
your account is at. Then your Social Security number represents your account number. Then you
just find out which bank your letter represents and you can find the routing number that way.
Boom now you have the routing/account numbers. I haven’t been able to make this work but I
know people who have!

26. Your Social Security account actually has on-ledger and off-ledger money.

The on-ledger money is the money that you put into the account via your payroll.

The off-ledger money is what the government puts in that is not listed.

34 of 56
Keep in mind… the US Treasury and the Federal Reserve are the trustees of your Social Security
account. You are the beneficiary.

So your job is not to figure out the money or know how much is there or do anything with the
account. YOUR ONLY JOB IS TO BENEFIT FROM THE ACCOUNT.

There is a way you can take a 1099a IRS form and write it in the form of a check and use it to
purchase things that you want (purchases have to benefit you and be a somewhat justifiable in
terms of your life).

You can pay off your house with it, buy a house, buy a new car, pay off debts, etc using this
account.

This account is completely separate from the bond account I spoke about previously.

The reason the "government" puts money in your trust is because they are the successor of the
trust and they get it all back during probate (after your death). This includes all the money you
put into it as well.

So they print money out of thin air (fiat), then put it in all the trusts, then now they can get loans
based off being the successor of the trust.

This is so complex because they can't just print money and hand it to themselves. So this is how
they do it.

Now YOU are the beneficiary of the trust. So keep in mind that you really shouldn't be asking
about the accounts or trying to administer the trusts.

YOUR ONLY JOB IS TO BENEFIT… MEANING TO WRITE CHECKS OFF THE

ACCOUNTS OF THE TRUST OR BENEFIT OFF THE THINGS THE TRUST HOLDS.

All you have to do is learn how to write the 1099a forms as checks… then you simply write them
as checks.

There is most likely over $100 million in your trust. So the funny thing is that we are all rich
trust fund babies and don't even know it.

27. Foreclosure is a very funny thing.

When you foreclose on a property, the mortgage company actually files a 1099a, has the entire
property paid out of YOUR Social Security account, then they have you kicked out of your
home.

Now… the way this actually works is based off of abandonment laws.

35 of 56
What I mean is you actually pay your entire house OFF during a foreclosure. Then you willingly
leave and the mortgage company repossesses the home under abandonment.

So what can you do?

Well once you have the foreclosure and they file the 1099a, the house is fully paid off. At that
point you can just stay in your home.

Now, will the Sheriff come? Possibly. But you just stay in the house. If the Sheriff throws you
out and locks the door, simply go right back in.

Now, YOU CAN BE ARRESTED. But it's ok because they can only hold you for contempt.

So the way it works is each state is different… each state has different rules but they are limited
and you can only be held for contempt 2 or 3 times for maybe 10 days each (depending on the
state… this is just an example).

So you can get thrown in jail for 10 days then just go back to your house. Then you can be
thrown in jail again. THEN YOU ARE HOME FREE AND YOU GO BACK HOME FOR THE
FINAL TIME TO YOUR FULLY PAID-OFF HOUSE. THE NIGHTMARE IS OVER AND
YOU NOW OWN THE HOUSE FREE AND CLEAR.

But you can also file your own 1099a as well to pay off a home or buy one.

Mortgage companies are wildly fucked up. They do really awful things.

Another thing that happens is if you notice when you get a mortgage, they offload the loan to
someone else within maybe 30 days of having your loan.

They sell the full loan at 60% or some huge discount.

Now why the hell would they do that?

Well because they file a 1099a form right away, then the house is fully paid out of your cestui
que vie trust (your money), THEN they sell the loan for 60% and THEN the new company takes
your payments and interest.

So your house is technically fully paid off the moment you sign the mortgage documents and you
don't even know it.

THEN the debt portion is a double-charge on the home and you paying it is tacit consent that you
agree to the terms.

Fraud vitiates everything so this is a massive fraudulent situation. ALL MORTGAGES ARE
ILLEGAL AND DON'T EXIST AT ALL.

36 of 56
The easiest way to get a mortgage to vanish is by writing a Conditional Acceptance to verify
where the money came from, how the money is equal consideration and to clarify the terms of
the contract. You can also cook up a negotiable instrument and send it in, but frankly that’s not
even necessary. Just the Conditional Acceptance should be enough to discharge a mortgage. If
you want to be extra safe then you can put a Common Law lien on your property prior to
discharging it, which makes it impossible for them to take back from you and sell out from under
you. I’m not sure if you can, but you could also try to do an allodial title on the property as well
prior to discharging it. Discharging a property is a joke… super easy.

28. Vaccines are essentially patenting projects. What I mean by that is that the whole point of
any DNA-altering activities is to patent the newly-created DNA.

Once they patent the new strains, legally they own you. The same way they own GMO corn or
salmon.

GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOOD SETS THE PRECEDENT IN LAW TO PATENT

HUMAN DNA.

They are trying to own you in every single way possible. The more angles they “own” you, the
more it becomes truth in law.

29. In the 14th Amendment, Blacks were freed from slavery and only given “civil rights.”

To this day, this has never changed and this basic point is truly “systemic racism.”

The people screaming about systemic racism know this point, but they divert your attention
elsewhere rather than explain it to you.

The reason being is because the Trust Management Organization makes money delivering
“services” to us. They can only bill the American people for services rendered.

Blacks have been subverted to be the greatest asset to the 14th Amendment/Trust Management
Organization machine.

The people screaming the loudest for BLM are the same ones behind this entire scam. They want
all Blacks to be fully reliant on the government… as then they are all needing the “services” of
the “federal government.”

The exact steps for Blacks to regain their HUMAN rights is for them all to become state
Nationals. They have more to gain from this process than any other race. It’s the most glorious
way to give the slave masters, who are very much still alive and busy, a big fat, juicy middle
finger.

True racism is the secret degradation of an entire race and not assisting them in achieving their
full rights because you are making money “servicing” them with all “services” that further
degrade them.

37 of 56
Again… it's not a matter of revenge. Revenge will destroy your soul. The solution is to regain
your rights as a living Son or Daughter of the Most High.

“Civil” rights are unacceptable as they place you below the level of even a US citizen. I hope this
is as disgusting to you as it is to me.

30. When you go to the state and get a title for your home or your vehicle, you are GIFTING that
item to the state in exchange for the title.

This is how they get jurisdiction on you.

Possession is 9/10th ownership, but, technically speaking, when you title your property with the
state, you are giving it away.

There is a type of deed for property called an allodial deed (otherwise known as a fee simple
title). If you look up "how to gain an allodial deed" online you will see the process.

An allodial title is a “title held in allodium,” which means disconnected from a lord and fully
owned without any lord or king above it. It was given to surfs in the feudal days as a reward for
stellar feats.

If you get an allodial deed, then sell your property into a trust for 25 pieces of silver, then you
NEVER go and get a new title and actually write the state telling them you have sold your
property, you can actually completely extract your property entirely. Your property becomes
another country, legally, and police basically can't come on your property and you no longer
need permits or anything to build on your property. All you have to do is place a very clear
PUBLIC NOTICE at the entrance of your property.

Same thing operates for a car: you can sell the car into a trust or to a friend for 25 pieces of silver
and just write a notarized bill of sale and never go switch over the title. You can also get an MSO
for your car (but you can’t have an MSO and a title at the same time, so you can’t get plates with
an MSO). You can drive legally without plates but you might get harassed. If you want to know
how to get an MSO/MCO for your vehicle, head over to my state National Resources page.

A notarized bill of sale is actually BETTER in a court than a title is. So it's not a problem.

You may want to title the property then immediately get rid of the title that way at least it was
transferred.

This is how you can TRULY own something.

You also give away ownership when you pay for registration. If you really want to get out of the
jurisdiction of your state's police, there are 3 contracts that have to be
corrected/handled/eliminated:

1. Title and ownership

38 of 56
2. Registration

3. Driver's license/passport

So if you correct all three points by doing the above system and then also get your passport and
start using that rather than a driver's license, you are truly free as a driver of the road and police
have zero jurisdiction UNLESS YOU HARM OTHERS.

Also, when you do a full allodial property title and sort out the deed and eliminate the state out of
the deal, you are no longer liable for real estate taxes. You pay taxes because you are contracted.
They deliver "services" to you and in exchange you follow their rules and pay the taxes to be a
part of the system.

THE SYSTEM IS VOLUNTARY, YOU WERE JUST NEVER TOLD THAT.

If you want to create a fee simple title it can take a while and be some work but if you want to do
it, now you can. It will also dramatically increase the value of your home as you can use it as a
MAJOR selling point when you sell the house (fee simple titles are almost unheard of).

31. Marriage. Phew boy.

So when you get a marriage license, the state basically contracts with you in order to make your
marriage a "for profit" corporation under the state.

Keep in mind that the definition of "license" is "something that permits you to break the law." So
if you reverse engineer that idea, it is AGAINST THE LAW to get married and the state is
ALLOWING YOU TO BREAK THAT LAW under certain conditions.

When a wife goes to the store to pick up food, the state looks at that activity as one of their
businesses is restocking inventory at the place of business.

Children DELIVERED out from a marriage are literally products and they become wards of the
state via the marriage license as well as the birth certificate and Social Security system.

The marriage license, according to statute, is an entirely secular, for-profit business venture
where the husband and wife are now teamed up together in a "privileged" business venture.

And the most shocking part is what the state believes they are giving you in exchange for this:
they believe that by placing you under their state statutes, they are giving you something of value
and that is the consideration that binds the contract.

Laughable.

So they enslave you via the marriage license and they call that enslavement a PRIVILEGE.

Now, what can you do about this?

39 of 56
Well if you are already married you can nullify the state from your marriage or just get a divorce
then do a different type of marriage.

There is only one state in all of the USA that does not have marriage licenses anymore and that
ONLY does Common Law marriages. That state is Alabama. They call them “marriage
certificates.”

So if you're looking to get married and you want the simplest route and you don't want to deal
with all the headache, just get married there and you will be fine.

To get married at home would be you just make an affidavit, get it notarized and briefly describe
the event and the agreements between the spouses, then get some witnesses to also attest to the
event. Then copy those documents and take them and file them with the County Register. Then
you file those documents in a Bible at home (also file a picture of the Bible in the County
Register).

Boom, now you have a real marriage... not a perpetual threesome with the state.

There are other ways to do it as well. You can type "Common Law Marriage" into the internet
and probably find other info on it.

If you are looking to change your status and you want to become a state National, you will need
to get rid of your marriage license contract, otherwise you are tied to the state via this contract. It
MUST be severed if it exists. Once severed you can do another style of marriage and continue
with your spouse under the new contract.

32. So in California, the sales tax page specifically states: "Tax is measured in United States
dollars based on the conversion rate of the foreign currency as of the date of the contract for
sale."

The problem is "United States Dollars" is ONLY definable as "gold and silver."

Thus because there is no gold/silver, then the amount to collect for sales tax would be zero.

This is based on Article 1 Section 10: "No State shall ... make any Thing but gold and silver Coin
a Tender in Payment of Debts"

So you can request a form for sales tax exemption and put "A1SEC10USC" in the number box
and boom, no more sales tax.

You can do this same thing for any state because I'm absolutely positive that they all work the
same way. Each state may have slightly different wording but it's all the same shit.

You're welcome!

40 of 56
33. MONEY MONEY MONEY

Everyone wants some and no one has a CLUE what it is.

Maxim from Brandon: YOUR ABILITY TO GAIN AND CONTROL MONEY IS IN DIRECT
RELATION TO YOUR UNDERSTANDING OF THE WORDS AND FUNCTIONS OF
MONEY, COMBINED WITH YOUR SKILL IN BEING A TRUSTEE.

That said, let's do a deep dive!

Constitution Article 1 Section 10: "No State shall ... make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a
Tender in Payment of Debts"

Ok so is only gold and silver considered money?

Let's dig through Black's Law 4th Edition.

Definitions of "tender":

1. An offer of money; the act by which one produces and offers to a person holding a claim or
demand against him the amount of money which he considers and admits to be due, in
satisfaction of such claim or demand, without any stipulation or condition.

2. The offer of performance, not performance itself, and, when unjustifiably refused, places other
party in default and permits party making tender to exercise remedies for breach of contract.

(This def means that when you offer to pay with something like a 1099a and it is refused, there is
breach of contract and the amount owed is voided out)

3. The actual proffer of money, as distinguished from mere proposal or proposition to proffer it.

4. Legal tender is that kind of coin, money, or circulating medium which the law compels a
creditor to accept in payment of his debt, when tendered by the debtor in the right amount.

So you now understand "tender."

Now let's ask our good friend Black's Law 4th Edition about the definition of money:

1. In usual and ordinary acceptation it means gold, silver, or paper money used as circulating
medium of exchange, And does not embrace notes, bonds, evidences of debt, or other personal or
real estate.

Hmmmmmm so wait a second... "does not embrace notes." WAIT JUST A SECOND.

What's in my wallet is a Federal Reserve Note. Ok so what is that?

41 of 56
Federal Reserve is referring to a network of PRIVATE, FOR-PROFIT, NON-GOVERNMENT
banks that supply our currency at interest.

Ok back to our good friend Black's Law 4th Edition to search for the definition of "note."

1. A unilateral instrument containing an express and absolute promise of signer to pay to a

specified person or order, or bearer, a definite sum of money at a specified time.

Phew, that's a mouthful... ok let's start with "unilateral"... what does that mean?

It means "Obligating only one of two or more parties, nations, or persons, as a contract or an
agreement."

Ok so it's sort of like an unfair, one-sided contract. Ok.

Now let's go back to the definition of "note" and let's clear up the word "instrument."

Instrument:

1. A written document; a formal or legal document in writing, such as a contract, deed, will,
bond, or lease.

Well wait a second... what is a bond? Hmmmmmm. Let's call our friend Black's Law 4th
Edition:

Bond:

1. A certificate or evidence of a debt.

WAIT... WHAT!????!

Ok so a Federal Reserve Note is not money... it is some kind of contract or maybe a bond... and it
is entirely one-sided. So it is evidence of a debt? Ok now we're getting somewhere. Let's dive
deeper.

Are there different kinds of instruments? Well yes. A negotiable and non-negotiable instrument.
Let's clear those up on Google.

As per Investopedia:

1. The term negotiable refers to the fact that the note in question can be transferred or assigned to
another party; non-negotiable describes one that is firmly established and cannot be adjusted or
amended.

42 of 56
Hmmm ok so it's a debt contract that can be exchanged, as Notes are negotiable instruments. But
it's one-sided so who owes who? Well our path has ended here so let's ask more questions and
dive deeper...

Ok so what is a dollar?

1. The unit employed in the United States in calculating money values. It is of the value of one
hundred cents.

Ok so it's a measurement. Like an inch. Well what is currency?

1. Coined money and such banknotes or other paper money as are authorized by law and do in
fact circulate from hand to hand as the medium of exchange.

2. The term "money" is synonymous with "currency," and imports any currency, token, bank
notes, or other circulating medium in general use as the representative of value.

Ok and what is a bank note?

1. A promissory note issued by a bank or banker authorized to do so, payable to bearer on

demand, and intended to circulate as money.

Hmmm so TECHNICALLY a bank note matches with definition number 2 of currency. So I

guess it would be a currency but not money.

Alright...

So who is the Federal Reserve Note an evidence of debt for? Me or them?

Well, figuring that they give us this currency at interest, it must be me!

So wait... that means that a Federal Reserve Note is evidence of me owing the Fed something...
hmmmm. So what is a debt?

1. A fixed and certain obligation to pay money or some other valuable thing or things, either in
the present or in the future.

Ok. So do I owe the Fed money now or later? I suppose that since it's an amount of MONEY that
is owed, that means I can only pay this debt in gold or silver. Hmmm but didn't the government
take all the gold in 1933?

So let's break this down...

Federal Reserve Notes are exchangable contracts that are evidences of a debt. They are not
money. The more you have, the more you owe. In the future, at some point, the debt can be

43 of 56
called in to be paid and must be paid with gold and silver. There is not a whole lot of gold
because someone took it all so it can't really be paid back by design.

SO WHY IN THE FUCK DO I WANT IT SO BADLY... UGH... THESE THINGS ARE

DISGUSTING.

So wait a second... what is real money then?

I heard money orders are real money.

Let's look at the definition of "money order."

1. Under the postal regulations of the United States, a money order is a species of draft drawn by
one post-office upon another for an amount of money deposited at the first office by the person
purchasing the money order, and payable at the second office to a payee named in the order.

Ok so that looks like real money. Interesting.

So money orders, gold and silver are all real money.

Well if my loan is called in by the Fed then what would I do? Could i exchange my FRNs for a
money order to pay the debt? Sounds workable.

But wait… if FRNs are just contracts (negotiable instruments) that are a promise to pay, can’t I
just whip up my own promise to pay and it will be considered “currency?”

Let's take a look at UCC 3-104 which states: “Except as provided in subsections (c) and (d),
"negotiable instrument" means an unconditional promise or order to pay a fixed amount of
money, with or without interest or other charges described in the promise or order.”

So yeah, I could literally whip up my own negotiable instruments and use them. So fascinating.
I'm not “coining money” or “printing money” or anything… I'm literally just writing contracts
with agreements and they are accepted. That’s not illegal!

Well wait, how will I get people to accept my negotiable instruments? Let's dive back in…

UCC 3-603 states: “If tender of payment of an obligation to pay an instrument is made to a
person entitled to enforce [who you owe money to] the instrument and the tender is refused,
there is discharge, to the extent of the amount of the tender, of the obligation of an indorser or
accommodation party having a right of recourse with respect to the obligation to which the
tender relates.”

That's a bit complex. That means they literally cannot refuse it? So wait… I can manufacture
negotiable instruments and they MUST be accepted by statute? This can't be. How would they be
able to pay their employees and survive?

44 of 56
Wow, it's literally not legal for them to demand I pay my debts with Federal Reserve Notes. How
wild.

I guess for debts that are already prepaid as per HJR 192, this makes sense. Such as mortgages,
credit card bills, etc. Because they have already been prepaid via my cestui que vie account via
my Social Security number. They have my money and are “double-dipping” by charging me 2
times for my monthly statements, so fuck that, I can discharge those debts without worrying
about harming others. Phew, that's a lot of financial pressure off my back, actually.

Ok so how could I get them to accept it? I guess I would just write a conditional acceptance with
the above info and send it to them with a negotiable instrument.

Wow, this is so empowering. I now hold the power to discharge any debt by my hand and a pen!
I no longer need Federal Reserve Notes. Unreal.

Well wait… will it hurt the company I send this to if I send it to anything besides a bank or
something involving prepaid debt? No it looks like they can then send in the negotiable
instrument and get “U.S. Dollars” in exchange for the negotiable instrument. Hot damn, that's
even better for them than Federal Reserve Notes because that's actually considered real money!
Amazing!

My fingers are magic wands. Time to make this debt that is destroying my life and my family's
life VANISH like magic!

34. The main purpose for lawyers is the manufacturing of "controversy."

Controversy definition from Black's Law 4th Edition: A litigated question; adversary proceeding
in a court of law; a civil action or suit, either at law or in equity; a justiciable dispute.

Justiciable Controversy from Black's Law 4th Edition:

1. A controversy in which a claim of right is asserted against one who has an interest in
contesting it.

2. A question as may properly come before a tribunal for decision.

If a lawyer does not create controversy then there is no way to create court cases. Court cases
mean they are making money.

This is exactly why bills, such as IRS bills, come off as so hostile and upsetting. They are
HOPING that their bill is VIOLENTLY rejected, which puts the bill into dishonor.

Dishonor definition from Black's Law 4th Edition: “In mercantile law and usage. To refuse or
decline to accept a bill of exchange, or to refuse or neglect to pay a bill or note at maturity.”

45 of 56
Once there is dishonor then there is now a grounds from a court case because now there is a
controversy.

So how do you handle this?

Realize that EVERYTHING SAID AND DONE BY ALL LEGAL PEOPLE IS DONE ON
PURPOSE TO UPSET YOU AND GET A LOUD AND MASSIVE REJECTION OF
WHATEVER IT IS THEY SEND YOU.

This is how they usher you into a courtroom.

So what is the solution?

A Conditional Acceptance!

The Conditional Acceptance prevents the manufacturing of dishonor and controversy and
prevents legal "professionals" (ha!) from gaining any traction.

The Conditional Acceptance is basically a very kind way of saying "I accept your offer fully.
There is no dishonor here. All I need is a handful of things such as proof of consideration that
this is a valid contract, proof of it being a valid contract, validation of debt, etc."

You want to make it nearly impossible for them to actually do whatever it is your conditions are
for accepting. If you can do that then you stop all legal "professionals" (ha!) DEAD IN THEIR
TRACKS.

Without controversy, they can never move the ball farther down the field. Once they know that
you know how to stop their motion, they will rapidly give up.

This is a huge secret to the defensive end of being a state National. Your defense is disarming
your opponent. Their main weapon is controversy. Never give them any leverage. Smile happily
and conditionally accept all offers.

THE ENTIRE PURPOSE OF THE EXISTANCE OF COURTROOMS IS THE HANDLING

OF DISPUTES. WITHOUT A DISPUTE, THERE IS NO COURTROOM. YOU REALLY
MUST UNDERSTAND THAT THE PURPOSE OF A COURT IS TO HELP SETTLE
DISPUTES. IT’S NOT THERE TO DESTROY YOUR LIFE, IT’S ONLY THERE TO SETTLE
DISPUTES. IF YOU REMOVE ALL DISPUTES FROM YOUR LIFE, YOU REMOVE ALL
COURTROOMS FROM YOUR LIFE.

The more I do this, actually, the more I realize that you can actually Conditionally Accept
everything in life and live a much better life. People hate rejecting others and they hate the
reactions that people have so why not Conditionally accept?

Asked on a date but don't really want to? Conditionally accept and make it nearly impossible for
them to do it. Women do this all the time without totally realizing it.

46 of 56
Offered jobs you don't want to do? Conditionally accept them where the client has to do a bunch
of stuff and pay outrageous fees only a crazy person would accept.

The problem with this approach is obviously that people might accept! So just be sure 100% that
you are ready for that.

For example, would I sell my car for something insane like $200k? Sure I probably would even
though I always tell people my car isn't for sale.

Almost anything can be Conditionally accepted and it puts other people at ease because you
allow them to be in control or think they are in control. Women sort of naturally do this as a tool
of their gender and it's quite beautiful to see how women often apply this with such finesse and
precision.

Learn it well and it will dramatically improve your life.

"Agree with thine adversary quickly, whole thou art in the way with him; lest at any time the
adversary deliver thee unto the judge, and the judge deliver thee unto officer, and thou be cast
into prison." - Jesus at Matthew 5:25

"I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves, be ye therefore wise as serpents, and harmless
as doves." - Matthew 10:16

35. Let's talk about the mail!

Like Steve from Blue's Clues used to say:

"Here's the mail, it never fails.

It makes me want to wag my tail.

When it comes I want to wail - Mail!"

But I'll wager you know very little about the mail.

Let's do a DEEP DIVE.

There are actually 2 different postal offices: there is the USPS and the USPO.

The USPS is a corporation and the USPO is the original de jure mail facility.

Registered mail is actually sent by the USPO, whereas Certified mail is sent by the USPS. What
this means is Registered mail is sent by the true American government of the Republic, whereas
other types of mail are sent by a corporate arm of "United States" (which means the District of
Columbia).

47 of 56
Now let's move on to contracts...

When something is sent Registered mail with Adult Signature required, once it is sent, the
receiver is actually contracting to whatever is in the envelope when they sign for it. I know that
is shocking if you have never heard about this.

People BELIEVE that Certified mail is the same rule, but it's actually not. This is why lawyers
and debt collectors send Certified mail. They THINK the same rule for Registered mail works
for Certified, but it TECHNICALLY doesn't.

Now, you can reject Certified or Registered mail... as you should. Otherwise you are contracting
with them and agreeing to what is INSIDE the envelope.

This is the secret to sending Conditional Acceptances. So it breaks down like this: you are sent a
presentment... let's say a bill. You Conditionally Accept their presentment and create new
conditions, which now alters the contract (this is called a novation). Then you send that back to
them and make them sign for it via Registered mail (or Certified because they BELIEVE it's the
same rule). Now they have agreed, by signing to accept it, to the new contract you have written
despite having not read it. YOU BASICALY REWRITE THE CONTRACT AND THEY HAVE
NO CHOICE BUT TO ACCEPT THE ADJUSTED CONTRACT YOU WROTE. This is how
you control people using the mail.

You can always send things back as well if you want to after you open it. You have 72 hours to
send back ANYTHING and refuse to contract. Just write "no contract. Rejected." Or "refusal to
contract. Cease and desist." Or any other variation of rejection.

Another thing is that when someone mails something to you and it has your ALL CAPS NAME
on it, you can simply send it back as "person doesn't live here. Mail Fraud. Unknown addressee.
Return to sender." Your trust is in Puerto Rico so have them direct that mail there. You can say
"that person doesn't live here." Or any other variation of rejecting the mail on the grounds of the
fact that your TRUST does not reside there. BECAUSE IT DOESN'T! Just act like they mailed
you something from some completely random person you have never known or met.

The abbreviated state and zip codes are actually trademarked and this is how the "federal
government" gets jurisdiction.

What you can do is put a "c/o" (which means "in care of") before your address to indicate that
you do not actually live at that address but you do receive mail there. This is smart because the
entire mail system has basically been subverted.

By putting the state abbreviated and the zip code, you now place yourself into a "federal zone."
This is not good as this is how the federal government gets jurisdiction over you.

There is a way around that though by using the "four corners rule." That means you can put
brackets around the things that you don't want to contract with. So for example: 123 Main Street
Los Angeles California [91202]

48 of 56
So the brackets basically allows you to put information without it being contractable.

So you can do brackets or you can also do "c/o" and you can also get a PO Box or some kind of
paid mailbox to prevent you having to say you live in a certain place. You can also use brackets
and MAKE SURE YOU ALWAYS SPELL OUT YOUR STATE IN FULL. DO NOT USE THE
2 LETTER ABBREVIATION. Also avoid the ZIP code as much as you can or put brackets
around it.

Now if you use "c/o" then you can avoid all that because you are not admitting to living there.
PROOF OF WHERE YOU RESIDE HAVING AN ABBREVIATED STATE AND ZIP CODE
IS WHAT YOU WANT TO AVOID. THIS BECOMES PROOF THAT YOU ARE A "US
CITIZEN."

Now there is another interesting aspect: Registered mail is used for human-to-human interaction.
So when you write and notarize a piece of paper and send it Registered mail, you wanna send it
to the CEO as an individual. Then, in the Conditional Acceptance, you want to demand that an
INDIVIDUAL handle and address each individual part of your CA and notarize it and return it.
This is the exact and technical way this process works. But they simply won't or can't do it so
YOU REWRITE ANY CONTRACT YOU RECEIVE AND MAIL IT BACK AND THEY ARE
FUCKED. You could write it in literally any way you want. YOU HOLD ALL THE POWER
BY BEING ABLE TO PUT YOUR AUTOGRAPH ON PAPER IN THE FORM OF AN
AFFIDAVIT.

THE ONLY WAY ANY BILL OR LAWSUIT CAN HOLD IS BY YOU FAILING TO
REWRITE THE CONTRACT BY CONDITIONALLY ACCEPTING IT THEN SENDING IT
BACK SIGNATURE REQUIRED (ideally Registered but Certified is also accepted even though
technically that's not true.)

I could LITERALLY buy a mailing list and send ENTIRELY FRAUDULENT BILLS to all the
people in the area Registered mail. Then collect up all the signatures and, if the people never
reject or Conditionally Accept, the bills become truth in law and I can now pursue more
aggressive forms of collections.

Again... as I have been talking about through this entire Theory writeup, DON'T SIGN A
GODDAMN THING ANYWHERE FOR ABSOLUTELY ANY REASON WITHOUT
CHECKING OUT WHAT YOU ARE SIGNING. If for some reason you can't figure out what
you're signing, SIMPLY REJECT IT.

You are being CONSTANTLY tricked into contracting into things you don't understand. This is
the parasitic way in which CRIMINALS TAP INTO YOUR POWER AND STEAL IT. THEY
STEAL YOUR CREDIT, YOUR VOTES AND EVERYTHING ELSE USING THESE
SYSTEMS.

Another trick is witnesses... this is going to blow your mind.

49 of 56
When you send a Conditional Acceptance you can also send Certified or Registered copies to the
attorney generals of the state and also the federal attorney general for the United States. By doing
this, they sign for the parcel and thus agree by doing so that they are witnessing the new contract.
This is so powerful because it corners the original presenter into agreeing with your novation
because all these powerful people have witnessed that this was served on them. In fact, if there
was ever a lawsuit, YOU CAN CALL THE ATTORNEY GENERALS IN AS WITNESSES TO
TESTIFY AND THEY HAVE TO BECAUSE THEY ARE PUBLIC SERVANTS
(TRUSTEES) AND FOR THEM TO FAIL TO DO THIS FOR YOU IS TRUST FRAUD AS
YOU ARE THE BENEFICIARY. The mail is truly incredible.

HUMANS ARE ALWAYS SENIOR TO CORPORATIONS. ONLY HUMANS CAN

AUTOGRAPH AFFIDAVITS. HUMANS INSIDE OF CORPORATIONS HAVE TO STICK
THEIR NECK OUT TO SIGN AFFIDAVITS FOR THEIR COMPANY. MAKE IT SO
FUCKING DANGEROUS FOR THEM TO STICK THEIR NECK OUT THAT NO ONE IN
THE COMPANY WOULD EVER DARE AFFIX THEIR SIGNATURE TO AN AFFIDAVIT
AND YOU BECOME A KING OR QUEEN AND LITERALLY ANYTHING YOU SAY
BECOMES TRUTH IN LAW. BILLS DISAPPEAR, LAWSUITS FALL APART, EVEN
CRIMINAL CASES FOLD WITH NO EFFORT. YOU ARE IN CONTROL.

36. In a world where "commerce law" (maritime law) has insidiously taken over the whole
planet, the MOST IMPORTANT thing to know about is actually contracts.

Let's start with the definition of “contract” from Black's Law 4th Edition: "An agreement, upon
sufficient consideration, to do or not to do a particular thing."

A contract is basically anything from a romantic exchange, to a friendship to a business situation.

"Contract" is a very wide-ranging term used for almost anything and the UCC has deliberately
expanded the "commercial" aspect of the word to include almost everything.

Contract law is the ultimate tippy-top of commerce law and if you know contract law then you
should be able to navigate most, if not all, of everything you may encounter.

All bodies of law that are statutes basically stem from the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC).
The UCC is the ultimate weapon of the bankers and the ultimate defense to that weapon is an
understanding of contract law. Contract law is senior to the UCC and all of the UCC conforms to
it.

So let's do a deep dive on the 10 points of a contract (most places you look say there are only 4
or 5 points to a contract. There are 10):

1. More than one party

Shockingly, a contract is with 2 or more people. This doesn't need much explanation.

2. Agreement

50 of 56
This means OFFER and ACCEPTANCE.

An offer can also be called a "presentment."

Without an acceptance, how can there be a contract?

Also "acceptance" can be defined as "not saying no to a presentment." So clear and open
communication is critical.

"Acceptance" of a contract can get complex because you might assume you are rejecting
something when you are really accepting it, such as in various types of "dishonor."

Dishonor is basically when you are given a presentment and you don't keep the game going and
you "drop the ball."

You want to always hand the ball back to the person who presented to you.

Maxim: "whoever drops the ball and fails to hand it back, loses." THAT is dishonor!

This is where the conditional acceptance comes into place. By conditionally accepting, you stay
in honor and the game continues. But now if they fail to meet your conditions, they lose as they
fall into dishonor.

This is the basis of legal agreements. You're just learning how to play the game.

By violently fighting and rejecting presentments, you are "dropping the ball" and ending the
game as the loser.

NEVER BE THE ONE TO FALL INTO DISHONOR AND YOU WIN.

3. Intention to create a legal relationship

This means that the two parties essentially agree to subscribe to the idea of: "if you don't do what
you promised, you face the consequences."

This is basically an agreement on a penalty system if each side doesn't hold up their end of the
bargain.

The breaking of contracts is so intrinsic into our lives that even Common Law has a provision for
contracts and their importance.

Contract law is also found in statute, but for this particular point I'm referring mainly to Common
Law, not statute. Statute only applies to specific groups of people.

4. Lawful consideration

51 of 56
This is where things get interesting...

So "lawful consideration" means that both parties need to give something of value to the
transaction in order for it to be a contract.

Because of the way loans are made or because of the way Federal Reserve Notes are, you can see
that this point is particularly interesting.

Bank loans and other professional loans don't have consideration, as I've described previously in
this thesis. They simply take your promissory note and monetize it and trade that value for
Federal Reserve Notes.

So shockingly, most of the time, this is an area where contracts fall down.

This ONE point of contract law can make all your credit card debt, mortgage debt, tax debt and
most other debts all VANISH instantly.

EACH PARTY MUST DO SOMETHING WHICH IS A DETRIMENT TO THEMSELVES

AND OF BENEFIT TO THE OTHER PARTY.

IN ORDER FOR SOMETHING TO BE CONSIDERED AS CONSIDERATION, BOTH

PARTIES HAVE TO AGREE IT IS CONSIDERATION. YOU CANNOT FORCE
SOMETHING ON SOMEONE AND CALL IT CONSIDERATION.

This is exactly why, when you buy something large, you should buy it partially or fully with gold
or silver. Or you should barter (partially or fully). Because TECHNICALLY, all Federal Reserve
Note transactions are void. Why? Because Federal Reserve Notes represent a DEBT. Sure, it
might be considered to be valuable by the recieving party, but technically it is only consideration
in theory, not in the hard fact of law.

Plus keep in mind that the Constitution allows you a Grand Jury deliberation for any amount
contested above $20. So if you can toss even $21 in silver coins into a transaction (like a nice car
or house), it actually makes for a more lawful contract and protects you.

5. Capacity of parties to contract

Minors, lunatics, idiots, drunken people, people on drugs, etc, cannot contract.

Evidence that proves they are not in the correct state to agree to a contract, voids the contract.

This also includes "like kinds." Meaning that corporations can only speak to corporations and
individual humans can only speak to other humans. You cannot mix the two together. Meaning if
you send in an affidavit to a company, than an individual person in that company would have to
send an affidavit back to you.

52 of 56
Corporations are MUCH lower on the totem pole than living humans. People don't realize this
but corporations can only exist through the energy of humans animating them to life. This is why
they are called corp(corpse)orations. They are dead entities in themselves and need YOUR
energy to animate. Which is exactly how things like banks work: they suck you dry of your
energy to animate them into existence. They lie and pretend they are giving you THEIR energy
but that is false. This is the vampire mentality of those who cannot create energy but require the
parasitic use of other people's energy to survive.

6. Free consent

This means the person is not being forced in any way or tricked. This could include: coercion,
undue influence, fraud, misrepresentation and mistakes.

A mistake on one single fact can void the whole contract.

I believe the reason why contract law is so hardcore is because the MOMENT someone is getting
fucked over, there are supposed to be these protections in place to protect both parties. Contract
law is set up to where THE MOMENT THE CONTRACT CEASES TO BE OF VALUE TO
BOTH PARTIES, IT INSTANTLY EVAPORATES. THIS ENTIRE BASIS MATCHES WITH
TRUST LAW: THAT EVERY MOMENT THERE IS SUPPOSED TO BE ONE PERSON
WHO IS THE TRUSTEE, WHILE ANOTHER BENEFITS AS THE BENEFICIARY.

Contract law, just like trust law, is designed to benefit all parties at all times... just like God
intended. And God intends those contracts to have no power or baring the INSTANT his requests
are broken. His intention is to disarm the wicked. Your job is to simply use his intent in your
actions.

TRUST LAW IS SENIOR TO EVERYTHING, EVEN CONTRACT LAW.

7. Lawful object

This one is simple: it means any illegal or harmful things being made or part of the contract
voids the contract. Contracts made to harm the innocent, for example, do not have the backing of
law as they violate the rule of God: trustee and beneficiary.

8. Certainty of meaning and full disclosure

Ok... here is another major point that you need to memorize to save your ass.

A VAST MAJORITY OF ALL CONTRACTS YOU HAVE EVER SIGNED IN YOUR

ENTIRE LIFE DID NOT HAVE CERTAINTY OF MEANING.

In my opinion, even the usage of the word "person" or "U.S. person" on a contract without
explicitly taking the time to define these specialized legal terms is FRAUD.

53 of 56
You can literally go to court over a contract and just attack the definitions of all the words and
probably have the entire contract thrown out on this one point.

EVERYTHING IN A CONTRACT NEEDS TO BE OPENLY AND CLEARLY

COMMUICATED, OTHERWISE THE CONTRACT IS VOID FROM ITS INCEPTION!
SPECIAL OR STRANGE DEFINITIONS OF WORDS OR TERMS SHOULD BE LISTED
RIGHT ON THE CONTRACT.

9. Signatures and autographs.

There must be an autograph for a living man or a signature for corporate contracts in order for
there to be a contract. A signature is made by a person on behalf of a company, corporation or
trust.

IF YOU AS THE LIVING MAN DON'T HAVE ANOTHER HUMAN ON THE OTHER SIDE
OF THE EQUATION, THEN THERE IS NOT MATCHING AUTOGRAPHS AND THUS
THERE IS NO CONTRACT.

10. Certainty of terms and privacy of contract

The terms and ideas of the contract are not changeable without express permission or approval
from both parties. You cannot simply change up the terms and the contract as you see fit because
things are changing. The contract itself needs to be changed as the contract no long envelops that
of which has occurred and needs to be expanded or clarified. The contract is actually VOIDED
when broken, not simply "now up to be adjusted as seen fit" as many people often think. That's
not how it works.

So at this point you're probably asking yourself: "well fuck... after reading all this, how the fuck
do you write or hold anyone to contract at all? It seems impossible."

The answer is never give a person a reason to be upset about your contract and never contract
with someone that you think won't be a good person to contract with.

Personally, I believe that the moral of the story is "never contract with someone who you
wouldn't be willing to do a handshake deal with."

God created man in his image; that means that we benefit each other or are cast aside as
worthless or broken. And that's the truth! Only those of low self-esteem or self value try and
benefit only themselves at the expense of another. That is opposite of what God intended and, by
definition, could technically be defined as "evil."

“Evil" could be roughly defined as the flipping of trust law and forcing or tricking others to be
the trustee while you are the beneficiary. This action will ALWAYS recoil on the person who
does it.

54 of 56
37. You, as an individual, have the ultimate right to decide and determine what contracts you
involve yourself in, what citizenship status you have, etc. If anyone labels you a particular
citizenship status and you do not tacitly agree, THEY now have the burden of having to prove it
in court.

THIS IS WHY WE ARE SOVEREIGNS. OUR CHOICES ARE LEGALLY/LAWFULLY

UNASSAILABLE AND WHAT YOU SAY GOES AND THERE IS LITTLE TO NOTHING
ANYONE CAN DO ABOUT IT. IF ANYONE WANTS TO CHALLENGE YOU THEY WILL
HAVE TO DO IT IN FRONT OF A JURY AND YOU SIMPLY THREATEN TO HAVE THE
COURT CASE TAPED AND BROADCASTED OR PROMOTED AND THEY DON'T WANT
THIS INFORMATION TO GET OUT AT ALL.

You could say you domicile in Heaven, you could say you are a German Shepard, you could say
that you live in the clouds... YOU CAN LITERALLY SAY OR LABEL YOURSELF
HOWEVER YOU WANT AND THEY WOULD NEED TO PROVE IN A COURT THAT
WHAT YOU SAY ISN'T TRUE. It's never going to happen. EVER. So you are now empowered
to live your life the way you want to.

Certain things do have specific steps... I'm not saying that you just decide and it's all done in all
cases... you should still be writing affidavits and communicating and actively updating your
records with what you decide.

You are a FOREIGN AMBASSADOR of your own personal world and you need to start acting
like it. Be very honest and transparent with your contracts, put all information on the table (good
and bad).

CONTRACT AS A FOREIGN AMBASSADOR ENTIRELY RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR

"COUNTRY" OR WORLD AND BE 100% TRANSPARENT IN ALL YOUR CONTRACTS
AND YOU WILL WIN AND YOUR LIFE WILL CHANGE AND ALL YOUR DREAMS
WILL COME TRUE. As per contract law, any hidden or dishonest/non-transparent aspect makes
the contract null instantly - don't do it! (This includes business transactions, romantic
rendezvous, etc. ALL HUMAN INTERACTION IS BASICALLY A CONTRACT.)

You are alone and you need to realize that your ability to help and make friends with FOREIGN
entities is the only way you will survive. Contract as a FOREIGNER in any way you see fit...
help the people around you. Your peers, by definition, are people who live in your state and
identify as state Nationals.

I am a National of California and I am writing this post as a WAY TO HELP EMPOWER AND
IMPROVE THE LIVES OF THOSE FELLOWS IN CALIFORNIA AS WELL AS FOREIGN
FRIENDS FROM OTHER STATES THAT I WOULD LOVE TO SEE FREE AND
SUCCESSFUL AND LIVING LIFE ON THEIR OWN TERMS... NOT ON TERMS OF
PRIVATE ORGANIZATIONS THAT ARE PRETENDING TO BE GOVERNMENT
AGENCIES.

55 of 56
MY ULTIMATE GOAL IS TO HELP BENEFIT OTHERS SO THEY CAN, IN TURN,
BECOME TRUSTEES AND HELP OTHERS.

I wish freedom for you and that freedom can ONLY be defined on YOUR terms. If you are an
English Bulldog that lives in Zirbackenstan, then I solute you.

For me, it's just like Christopher Hauser says: I'm a sojourn of the land and I only domicile in
Heaven. IF SOMEONE DOESN'T LIKE THAT THEN PROVE OTHERWISE. I'LL SEE YOU
IN A COMMON LAW COURT (good luck, you'll need it).

In Common Law there MUST be a victim for there to be a crime and the state CANNOT be a
victim because they are the trustee in a fiduciary trust with the people being the beneficiaries
(which means you).

So the ONLY crime of which you would be involved in that would be the jurisdiction of the state
to handle would be that of which you: 1. Harmed another or their property 2. Stole from
someone 3. Swindled someone or were non-transparent in your contracts.

By living your life in Common Law only, you become immune to 98% of all taxation, law,
police activity, etc.

Knowing your rights is truly the most powerful thing you can do. Knowledge is truly power. Not
all the money in the world is even 1% of the power contained in this information.

Legal maxim: "He who fails to assert his rights has none."

56 of 56