Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Introduction
1.1 Aim of Work
2. Theoritical Learnings
2.1 Types of Polymer Blends
2.1.1 Elastomer/Elastomer Compounds
2.1.2 Thermoplastic /Elastomer Compounds
2.1.3 Thermoplastic / Thermoplastic compounds
3. Experimental
3.1 Materials
3.2 Techniques
3.3 Measurements
3.3.1.1. Tensile Strength (TS)
3.3.1.2. Tensile Modulus at 100 %( M 100)
3.3.1.3. Elongation at break %(Eb%)
3.3.1.4. Hardness
3.3.2. Physical Measurement
3.3.2.1. Detremination of Gel fraction %( GF %)
3.3.2.2. Detremination of swelling number (SN)
AIM OF THESIS
Theoretical Pre-requisites
the process of blending two or more polymeric components together is often
regarded as an inefficient and unpopular way to modify the final product's
qualities. Because of their distinct chemical make-ups and structural
arrangements, the various types of rubber each have their own set of drawbacks
and applications that cannot be used with them. Because of this, rather than
generating a new elastomer by chemical means, it is more cost-effective to
combine the shortcomings of two or more different forms of rubber by blending
together numerous types of rubber, each of which has the undesirable property in
question.
EXPERIMENT
The following procedures were taken into account before, during, and after
the mixing process:
• After going through the rollers without being banded the first two times
at a roll opening of about 0.2 mm, the rubber was then banded using a
mill opening of approximately 1.5 mm. There was a cut made every thirty
seconds, alternating between the two sides.
• The temperature of the roller was maintained at 70 degrees Celsius at all
times.
• The amount of time spent grinding (mastication) was regulated and
hovered around ten minutes on average. During the process of
masticating rubber blends on the rubber mill, all of the elements that
were measured out were completely integrated.
• After mixing, the weight of the blends was measured again to confirm
that there was not a significant loss of weight (more than 0.5%).
• Using a hot press set to 110 degrees Celsius for twenty minutes and with
16 megapascals of pressure, the compound was crushed into a sheet one
millimetre thick.
Morphology
For the SEM research, cryogenically fractured samples were used, and the process was
conducted in liquid nitrogen. By soaking the broken edge of the samples in petroleum ether for
72 hours at room temperature, it was possible to preferentially extract the NR phase from the
cryogenically fractured samples. The samples from which the NR had been removed were then
dried in an air oven. After this, the samples were coated with gold using sputter coating, and the
scanning electron microscope used to take pictures was a Phillip's model.
M M t
L H ts1 ts2 90 CRI
Blend Ratio (den m) (den m) (m : s) (m : s) (m : s) (min21)
Morphology of Blends
The microstructure of a mix of SBR and NR polymers may be affected by the relative
quantities of each component, the viscosity of the individual components, as well as the
processing history of the blend. Other factors that can have an effect on the
microstructure include temperature and time. In many types of mixtures, the component
that has a lower viscosity has a greater tendency to form the continuous phase throughout
a broad range of different concentrations. In the instance of the SBR/NR blends that were
investigated in this article, the morphology may take on a variety of forms, ranging from
the NR existing as tiny domains spread across an SBR matrix to the NR forming a
continuous phase with SBR present as dispersed domains. The permeation qualities of
the mix may be significantly influenced, both directly and indirectly, by the size and
location of the scattered domains. These mixes seem to have a heterogeneous
composition, as seen by the SEM photos.
Two processes, mastication and compounding, were used to make the rubber samples. In
the mastication phase, the rubber was combined for 5 minutes on a laboratory two-roll
mill before a measured quantity of filler (Posi or Fasi) was added and the mixture was
processed for a further 20 minutes. At the compounding stage, vulcanization chemicals
were added to the rubber and filler while being blended for an extra 20 minutes on a two-
roll mill. The resultant compounds were kept in storage at 25 degrees Celsius and 50
percent humidity until further evaluation. There were 100 parts rubber to 5 parts zinc
oxide to 2 parts stearic acid to 0.5 parts mercaptobenzthiazole to 0.2 parts diphenyl
guanidine to 3.0 parts sulphur in the rubber utilised in the investigation.
Measurements
1. Specimens
length: 50 millimetres
2. Tensile Strength
The formula takes into consideration factors such as load, breadth, and thickness.
Tensile Modulus at 100% force required per unit area to stretch specimen to a
certain elongation (in megapascals)
Where:
3. Elongation at Break
4.Hardness
5.Swelling Number
Shows the amount by which the specimens expanded after being immersed in the
solvent Gel Fraction Percentage the proportion of the total sample weight that is
insoluble upon extraction