Professional Documents
Culture Documents
To cite this article: Shikha Aggarwal, Angela Makris & Annemarie Hennessy (2015) Linking
the old and new — do angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies provide the missing link
in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia?, Hypertension in Pregnancy, 34:3, 369-382, DOI:
10.3109/10641955.2015.1051227
Download by: [University of Toronto Libraries] Date: 24 November 2016, At: 21:31
Hypertens Pregnancy, 2015; 34(3): 369–382
! Informa Healthcare USA, Inc.
ISSN: 1064-1955 print / 1525-6065 online
DOI: 10.3109/10641955.2015.1051227
INTRODUCTION
Preeclampsia affects 3–5% of all pregnancies and remains a leading cause of
maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality (1). The clinical hallmarks of
the disease include the onset of hypertension after 20 weeks of gestation
associated with proteinuria, renal failure, elevated liver enzymes with low
platelets (HELLP syndrome) and cerebral oedema with seizures (2).
Due to the limited understanding of the disease process and unreliable
diagnostic techniques, current therapeutic options are limited (2). Treatment
options involve managing the hypertension and as the disease progresses,
delivering the baby and placenta to prevent further deterioration of the mother
and baby, even if premature. Preeclampsia is not a benign disorder and the
consequences do not end with pregnancy as previously thought (3). Studies of
long-term health outcomes in women who develop preeclampsia have shown
that both women (4) and their babies (5) are at increased risk of cardiovascular
disorders later in life. Furthermore it is associated with significant morbidity
to the neonates, accounting for up to 15% of pre-term births (1).
Preeclampsia is considered a maternal endothelial disorder made up of two
stages (6). The first stage occurs when there is abnormal placental implant-
ation secondary to insufficient invasion of the maternal uterine spiral arteries
by trophoblast cells (7). This results in impaired placental blood flow and
development. The second stage of the disease comprises of the ischaemic and or
reperfusion phenomena associated with a hypoxic placenta, which releases
circulating factors into the maternal circulation (8). These circulating factors
and other tissue-based pathways such as free radical generation contribute
to the clinical features of preeclampsia via alterations in endothelial cell
function (9). The circulating factors include inflammatory cytokines (10), e.g.
TNF-a (tumour necrosis factor- alpha), IL-6 (interleukin-6) and angiogenic
molecules such as soluble endogolin (sEng) (11) and soluble fms-like tyrosine
kinase 1 receptor (sFlt-1) (12). These factors have not only been shown to be
elevated in preeclamptic women but have also been shown to be a response to
placental ischaemia (10,12,13) thus making the link between clinical disease
and putative mechanism of placental ischaemia.
Alterations in the renin- angiotensin- aldosterone system (RAAS) have also
been shown to be substantially different in preeclampsia compared with
normal pregnancy (14). Whether these differences indicate a critical role in the
pathophysiology of preeclampsia remains uncertain and targeting the RAAS
has not afforded any therapeutic interventions for either placental function or
clinical disease to date. Given our recent and improved understanding about
the links between blood flow/hypoxia, placental protein synthesis and mater-
nal disease, it is timely to consider how differences in elements of the RAAS
and its regulation align with these disease mechanisms.
More recently an autoimmune factor has been identified: angiotensin II type
1-receptor autoantibodies (AT1-AA) that may have a role in the underlying
pathogenesis in women with preeclampsia (15). The generation of these
autoantibodies in women with preeclampsia, would potentially link the
various known aspects of disease pathology: immune system involvement
and antiangiogenic pathways with the RAAS.
This review discusses the role of AT1-AA in preeclampsia and it’s relation to
the other pathological mechanisms of the disease. It aims to explore the link
between AT1-AA and other immune markers, antiangiogenic pathways the
RAAS and tie all of these together to the concept of ischaemia and even
reperfusion injury and placental hypoxia.
AT1-AA
AT1-AA were first described in preeclampsia by Wallukat et al. (15). The group
detected the stimulatory effect of AT1-AA in the sera of preeclamptic women
using neonatal rat cardiomyocyte contraction assays. Wallukat et al. (16) have
also shown the agonistic antibody to be an immunoglobulin G (IgG) of the IgG3
subclass. These antibodies are directed to a specific epitope on the second
extracellular loop on the angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor and bind
to receptors found in/on human trophoblasts and vascular cells (17).
The role of AT1-AA in preeclampsia 371
AT1 receptors and angiotensin 2 (AT2) receptors are the two major receptors
for angiotensin and belong to a family of seven transmembrane G protein
coupled receptors (14). AT1 receptors are expressed on vascular smooth
muscles and adrenal glands and are coupled to the Gq protein and stimulate
intracellular calcium release (14). They are responsible for the majority of
angiotensin II mediated effects such as vasoconstriction, sympathetic activity
and release of Aldosterone (14). AT2 receptors are widely expressed in fetal
tissue and have limited expression in adult tissue (they will not be discussed
further in this review).
Following these initial studies, multiple in-vitro laboratory studies have
shown mechanistic pathways for the involvement of AT1-AA in women with
preeclampsia.
PERSPECTIVES
The current research in humans suggests that maybe these antibodies occur
prior to the development of the preeclampsia syndrome and may be the
initiating factor for the disease. However, the timing and or sequence
relationships between placental hypoxia, inflammatory cytokines, antiangio-
genic molecules such as sFlt-1 and AT1-AA in humans have not been
determined. Causality would be indicated here by looking at the gestational
specific sequence of changes in these molecules in women destined to develop
preeclampsia. Ultimately the ability to correct the AT1-AA at the ‘‘right’’ time
of a pregnancy and then preventing disease would answer the question.
Whether these antibodies affect placental implantation and result in
placental ischaemia remains uncertain. The critical issues here are about
timing, sequence and the actual events going on in the placenta, which we are
unable to measure. Does all reduced blood flow (at all times of pregnancy) lead
to the same level of ischaemic insult? There is clearly a vicious cycle of
placental damage that occurs as both AT1-AA and RUPP lead to markers
of ischaemia and inflammatory stimulation. It is likely that the technical
aspects of animal studies produce a range of placental insults from frank
infarction to ischaemic reperfusion injury and therefore a range of placental
synthetic responses (77).
Furthermore as these antibodies have the potential to explain the RAAS
changes in preeclampsia for the first time, future studies of the links between
RAAS deactivation, plasma vasculature changes and placental blood flow may
well be informed by a more detail assessment of AT1-AA in human and
relevant animals studies.
The key lies in determining the timing of onset of these antibodies and their
downstream effects. Are they detected in serum in time to reverse the
378 S. Aggarwal et al.
CONCLUSION
The current experimental data extends our knowledge of ATI-AA by displaying
that they play an important role in preeclampsia. AT1-AA may provide a link
between the various components of disease pathophysiology, in particular, the
immune, angiogenic and RAAS pathways.
However, there are many unanswered questions. Further studies are
required to isolate the molecular mechanisms responsible for this autoimmun-
ity and its relationship with preeclampsia and placental ischaemia.
DECLARATION OF INTEREST
The authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are responsible
for the content and writing of this article.
REFERENCES
1. Roberts JM, Cooper DW. Pathogenesis and genetics of pre-eclampsia. Lancet 2001;
357:53–6.
2. Tranquilli AL, Dekker G, Magee L, et al. The classification, diagnosis and
management of the hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: a revised statement
from the ISSHP. Pregnancy Hypertens 2014;4:97–104.
3. Chesley LC. Recognition of the long-term sequelae of eclampsia. Am J Obstet
Gynecol 2000;182:249–50.
4. McDonald SD, Malinowski A, Zhou Q, et al. Cardiovascular sequelae of
preeclampsia/eclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Am Heart J
2008;156:918–30.
5. Backes CH, Markham K, Moorehead P, et al. Maternal preeclampsia and neonatal
outcomes. J Pregnancy 2011;2011:214365.
6. Roberts JM, Taylor RN, Musci TJ, et al. Preeclampsia: an endothelial cell disorder.
Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;161:1200–4.
7. Roberts JM, Lain KY. Recent insights into the pathogenesis of pre-eclampsia.
Placenta 2002;23:359–72.
8. Hung TH, Burton GJ. Hypoxia and reoxygenation: a possible mechanism for
placental oxidative stress in preeclampsia. Taiwanese J Obstet Gynecol 2006;45:
189–200.
9. Roberts JM, Edep ME, Goldfien A, Taylor RN. Sera from preeclamptic women
specifically activate human umbilical vein endothelial cells in vitro: morphological
and biochemical evidence. Am J Reprod Immunol (New York, NY: 1989) 1992;27:
101–18.
10. Conrad KP, Benyo DF. Placental cytokines and the pathogenesis of preeclampsia.
Am J Reprod Immunol (New York, NY: 1989) 1997;37:240–9.
11. Venkatesha S, Toporsian M, Lam C, et al. Soluble endoglin contributes to the
pathogenesis of preeclampsia. Nat Med 2006;12:642–9.
The role of AT1-AA in preeclampsia 379
12. Maynard SE, Min JY, Merchan J, et al. Excess placental soluble fms-like
tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt1) may contribute to endothelial dysfunction,
hypertension, and proteinuria in preeclampsia. J Clin Investig 2003;111:
649–58.
13. Makris A, Thornton C, Thompson J, et al. Uteroplacental ischemia results in
proteinuric hypertension and elevated sFLT-1. Kidney Int 2007;71:977–84.
14. Irani RA, Xia Y. The functional role of the renin-angiotensin system in pregnancy
and preeclampsia. Placenta 2008;29:763–71.
15. Wallukat G, Homuth V, Fischer T, et al. Patients with preeclampsia develop
agonistic autoantibodies against the angiotensin AT1 receptor. J Clin Investig 1999;
103:945–52.
16. Wallukat G, Neichel D, Nissen E, et al. Agonistic autoantibodies directed against
the angiotensin II AT1 receptor in patients with preeclampsia. Can J Physiol
Pharmacol 2003;81:79–83.
17. Dechend R, Homuth V, Wallukat G, et al. Agonistic antibodies directed at the
angiotensin II, AT1 receptor in preeclampsia. J Soc Gynecol Investig 2006;13:
79–86.
18. Yang X, Wang F, Chang H, et al. Autoantibody against AT1 receptor from
preeclamptic patients induces vasoconstriction through angiotensin receptor
activation. J Hypertens 2008;26:1629–35.
19. LaMarca B, Parrish M, Ray LF, et al. Hypertension in response to autoantibodies to
the angiotensin II type I receptor (AT1-AA) in pregnant rats: role of endothelin-1.
Hypertension 2009;54:905–9.
20. Zhou CC, Irani RA, Dai Y, et al. Autoantibody-mediated IL-6-dependent endothelin-
1 elevation underlies pathogenesis in a mouse model of preeclampsia. J Immunol
2011;186:6024–34.
21. Yang X, Wang F, Lau WB, et al. Autoantibodies isolated from preeclamptic patients
induce endothelial dysfunction via interaction with the angiotensin II AT1 receptor.
Cardiovasc Toxicol 2014;14:21–9.
22. Dechend R, Homuth V, Wallukat G, et al. AT(1) receptor agonistic antibodies from
preeclamptic patients cause vascular cells to express tissue factor. Circulation 2000;
101:2382–7.
23. Bobst SM, Day MC, Gilstrap 3rd LC, et al. Maternal autoantibodies from
preeclamptic patients activate angiotensin receptors on human mesangial cells
and induce interleukin-6 and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 secretion. Am J
Hypertens 2005;18:330–6.
24. Xia Y, Wen H, Bobst S, et al. Maternal autoantibodies from preeclamptic patients
activate angiotensin receptors on human trophoblast cells. J Soc Gynecol Investig
2003;10:82–93.
25. Dechend R, Viedt C, Muller DN, et al. AT1 receptor agonistic antibodies
from preeclamptic patients stimulate NADPH oxidase. Circulation 2003;107:
1632–9.
26. Thway TM, Shlykov SG, Day MC, et al. Antibodies from preeclamptic patients
stimulate increased intracellular Ca2 + mobilization through angiotensin receptor
activation.[Erratum appears in Circulation. 2004 Nov 9:110(19):3156]. Circulation
2004;110:1612–19.
27. Haller H, Oeney T, Hauck U, et al. Increased intracellular free calcium and
sensitivity to angiotensin II in platelets of preeclamptic women. Am J Hypertens
1989;2:238–43.
28. Sowers JR, Zemel MB, Bronsteen RA, et al. Erythrocyte cation metabolism in
preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989;161:441–5.
29. Hojo M, Suthanthiran M, Helseth G, August P. Lymphocyte intracellular free
calcium concentration is increased in preeclampsia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1999;180:
1209–14.
30. Siddiqui AH, Irani RA, Blackwell SC, et al. Angiotensin receptor agonistic
autoantibody is highly prevalent in preeclampsia: correlation with disease severity.
Hypertension 2010;55:386–93.
380 S. Aggarwal et al.
31. Hubel CA, Wallukat G, Wolf M, et al. Agonistic angiotensin II type 1 receptor
autoantibodies in postpartum women with a history of preeclampsia. Hypertension
2007;49:612–17.
32. Irani RA, Zhang Y, Blackwell SC, et al. The detrimental role of angiotensin receptor
agonistic autoantibodies in intrauterine growth restriction seen in preeclampsia.
J Exp Med 2009;206:2809–22.
33. Zhang S, Zheng R, Yang L, et al. Angiotensin type 1 receptor autoantibody from
preeclamptic patients induces human fetoplacental vasoconstriction. J Cell Physiol
2013;228:142–8.
34. Walther T, Wallukat G, Jank A, et al. Angiotensin II type 1 receptor agonistic
antibodies reflect fundamental alterations in the uteroplacental vasculature.
Hypertension 2005;46:1275–9.
35. Herse F, Verlohren S, Wenzel K, et al. Prevalence of agonistic autoantibodies
against the angiotensin II type 1 receptor and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 in
a gestational age-matched case study. Hypertension 2009;53:393–8.
36. Dragun D, Muller DN, Brasen JH, et al. Angiotensin II type 1-receptor activating
antibodies in renal-allograft rejection. N Engl J Med 2005;352:558–69.
37. Fu ML, Herlitz H, Schulze W, et al. Autoantibodies against the angiotensin receptor
(AT1) in patients with hypertension. J Hypertens 2000;18:945–53.
38. Riemekasten G, Philippe A, Nather M, et al. Involvement of functional
autoantibodies against vascular receptors in systemic sclerosis. Ann Rheum Dis
2011;70:530–6.
39. Xiong J, Liang Y, Yang H, et al. The role of angiotensin II type 1 receptor-activating
antibodies in patients with lupus nephritis. Int J Clin Pract 2013;67:1066–7.
40. Zhou CC, Ahmad S, Mi T, et al. Autoantibody from women with preeclampsia
induces soluble Fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 production via angiotensin type 1
receptor and calcineurin/nuclear factor of activated T-cells signaling. Hypertension
2008;51:1010–19.
41. Takeda-Matsubara Y, Iwai M, Cui TX, et al. Roles of angiotensin type 1 and 2
receptors in pregnancy-associated blood pressure change. Am J Hypertens 2004;17:
684–9.
42. Granger JP, LaMarca BB, Cockrell K, et al. Reduced uterine perfusion pressure
(RUPP) model for studying cardiovascular-renal dysfunction in response to
placental ischemia. Methods Mol Med 2006;122:383–92.
43. LaMarca BB, Bennett WA, Alexander BT, et al. Hypertension produced by
reductions in uterine perfusion in the pregnant rat: role of tumor necrosis factor-
alpha. Hypertension 2005;46:1022–5.
44. Lamarca B, Speed J, Ray LF, et al. Hypertension in response to IL-6 during
pregnancy: role of AT1-receptor activation. Int J Interferon Cytokine Mediator Res
2011;2011:65–70.
45. LaMarca BB, Cockrell K, Sullivan E, et al. Role of endothelin in mediating
tumor necrosis factor-induced hypertension in pregnant rats. Hypertension 2005;
46:82–6.
46. LaMarca B, Wallukat G, Llinas M, et al. Autoantibodies to the angiotensin type I
receptor in response to placental ischemia and tumor necrosis factor alpha in
pregnant rats. Hypertension 2008;52:1168–72.
47. Sargent IL, Borzychowski AM, Redman CW. Immunoregulation in normal preg-
nancy and pre-eclampsia: an overview. Reprod Biomed Online 2006;13:680–6.
48. Messerli M, May K, Hansson SR, et al. Feto-maternal interactions in pregnancies:
placental microparticles activate peripheral blood monocytes. Placenta 2010;31:
106–12.
49. Guller S, Tang Z, Ma YY, et al. Protein composition of microparticles shed from
human placenta during placental perfusion: potential role in angiogenesis and
fibrinolysis in preeclampsia. Placenta 2011;32:63–9.
50. Germain SJ, Sacks GP, Sooranna SR, et al. Systemic inflammatory priming in
normal pregnancy and preeclampsia: the role of circulating syncytiotrophoblast
microparticles. J Immunol (Baltimore, Md: 1950) 2007;178:5949–56.
The role of AT1-AA in preeclampsia 381
51. Gupta AK, Hasler P, Holzgreve W, et al. Induction of neutrophil extracellular DNA
lattices by placental microparticles and IL-8 and their presence in preeclampsia.
Hum Immunol 2005;66:1146–54.
52. Hedlund M, Stenqvist AC, Nagaeva O, et al. Human placenta expresses and
secretes NKG2D ligands via exosomes that down-modulate the cognate receptor
expression: evidence for immunosuppressive function. J Immunol (Baltimore, Md:
1950) 2009;183:340–51.
53. Laresgoiti-Servitje E. A leading role for the immune system in the pathophysiology
of preeclampsia. J Leukocyte Biol 2013;94:247–57.
54. Barden A, Ritchie J, Walters B, et al. Study of plasma factors associated with
neutrophil activation and lipid peroxidation in preeclampsia. Hypertension 2001;
38:803–8.
55. Banchereau J, Briere F, Caux C, et al. Immunobiology of dendritic cells. Ann Rev
Immunol 2000;18:767–811.
56. Parrish MR, Murphy SR, Rutland S, et al. The effect of immune factors, tumor
necrosis factor-alpha, and agonistic autoantibodies to the angiotensin II type I
receptor on soluble fms-like tyrosine-1 and soluble endoglin production in response
to hypertension during pregnancy. Am J Hypertens 2010;23:911–16.
57. Dhillion P, Wallace K, Herse F, et al. IL-17-mediated oxidative stress is an
important stimulator of AT1-AA and hypertension during pregnancy. Am J Physiol
Regulatory Integrative Comparative Physiol 2012;303:R353–8.
58. Irani RA, Zhang Y, Zhou CC, et al. Autoantibody-mediated angiotensin receptor
activation contributes to preeclampsia through tumor necrosis factor-alpha signal-
ing. Hypertension 2010;55:1246–53.
59. Zhou CC, Irani RA, Zhang Y, et al. Angiotensin receptor agonistic autoantibody-
mediated tumor necrosis factor-alpha induction contributes to increased soluble
endoglin production in preeclampsia. Circulation 2010;121:436–44.
60. Laresgoiti-Servitje E, Gomez-Lopez N. The pathophysiology of preeclampsia
involves altered levels of angiogenic factors promoted by hypoxia and autoanti-
body-mediated mechanisms. Biol Reprod 2012;87:36.
61. Verlohren S, Muller DN, Luft FC, Dechend R. Immunology in hypertension,
preeclampsia, and target-organ damage. Hypertension 2009;54:439–43.
62. Darmochwal-Kolarz D, Kludka-Sternik M, Tabarkiewicz J, et al. The predominance
of Th17 lymphocytes and decreased number and function of Treg cells in
preeclampsia. J Reprod Immunol 2012;93:75–81.
63. Jensen F, Wallukat G, Herse F, et al. CD19 + CD5 + cells as indicators of
preeclampsia. Hypertension 2012;59:861–8.
64. LaMarca B, Wallace K, Herse F, et al. Hypertension in response to placental
ischemia during pregnancy: role of B lymphocytes. Hypertension 2011;57:865–71.
65. Tal R. The role of hypoxia and hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha in preeclampsia
pathogenesis. Biol Reprod 2012;87:134. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.112.102723.
66. Siddiqui AH, Irani RA, Zhang Y, et al. Recombinant vascular endothelial growth
factor 121 attenuates autoantibody-induced features of pre-eclampsia in pregnant
mice. Am J Hypertens 2011;24:606–12.
67. Williams DJ, Vallance PJ, Neild GH, et al. Nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation in
human pregnancy. Am J Physiol 1997;272:H748–52.
68. Wilson M, Morganti AA, Zervoudakis I, et al. Blood pressure, the renin-aldosterone
system and sex steroids throughout normal pregnancy. Am J Med 1980;68:97–104.
69. Gant NF, Worley RJ, Everett RB, MacDonald PC. Control of vascular responsive-
ness during human pregnancy. Kidney Int 1980;18:253–8.
70. Brown MA, Zammit VC, Mitar DA, Whitworth JA. Renin-aldosterone relationships
in pregnancy-induced hypertension. Am J Hypertens 1992;5:366–71.
71. Brown MA, Zammit VC, Mitar DM. Extracellular fluid volumes in pregnancy-
induced hypertension. J Hypertens 1992;10:61–8.
72. Miyamoto S, Shimokawa H, Sumioki H, et al. Circadian rhythm of plasma atrial
natriuretic peptide, aldosterone, and blood pressure during the third trimester in
normal and preeclamptic pregnancies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1988;158:393–9.
382 S. Aggarwal et al.
73. Kappers MH, van Esch JH, Sluiter W, et al. Hypertension induced by the tyrosine
kinase inhibitor sunitinib is associated with increased circulating endothelin-1
levels. Hypertension 2010;56:675–81.
74. Gennari-Moser C, Khankin EV, Schuller S, et al. Regulation of placental growth by
aldosterone and cortisol. Endocrinology 2011;152:263–71.
75. Gennari-Moser C, Khankin EV, Escher G, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor-
A and aldosterone: relevance to normal pregnancy and preeclampsia. Hypertension
2013;61:1111–17.
76. Siddiqui AH, Irani RA, Zhang W, et al. Angiotensin receptor agonistic autoanti-
body-mediated soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 induction contributes to impaired
adrenal vasculature and decreased aldosterone production in preeclampsia.
[Erratum appears in Hypertension. 2013 Jun;61(6):e61]. Hypertension 2013;61:
472–9.
77. Burton GJ, Jauniaux E. Placental oxidative stress: from miscarriage to pre-
eclampsia. J Soc Gynecol Investig 2004;11:342–52.