Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Engineering,
Just To Share Knowledge.....,
Monday, 24 April 2017
Through this test can be obtained a continuous recording of the relative strength of the soil (CBR) up to a
depth of 90 cm below the sub-grade surface. Layers of existing pavement material must be disposed of
first before this experiment is carried out. Measurement and recording of field data consists of pairs of
number of collisions (n) and depth of penetration (cm).
3. Experimental Procedure
1. Dig the ground level at the test site to the depth at which the initial measurement of CBR
value will be evaluated. If the testing is carried out on the road body by pavement, remove all
existing pavement materials,
2. Place the DCP tool vertically, giving the initial collision enough(seating blows), toembed
the tip of the cone until the largest center line is located on the surface of the soil to be tested,
3. Perform the build-up with a free-dropped hammer, measure and note the penetration
depth for each collision. The work is carried out by a minimum of two people,
4. If the type of soil tested is very hard (penetration is less than approximately 0.2 cm /
collision), give a series of collisions as much as 5 or 10 times, then measure the depth of
penetration that occurs,
5. The experiment is stopped if the following circumstances have been reached:
* No significant decrease for the last 10 collisions in a row,
* The depth of penetration has reached the depth of the layer to be evaluated,
* The penetrometer rod has entered entirely into the ground.
6. Remove the tool from the ground by hitting the hammer with the direction up on the high
limiting bolt fall(uper stop),
7. As a result of repeated steps on point (6), it can cause a noticeable lengthening of the
launcher bar, so checks are required each time it will experiment, by setting the high limiting
bolt to fall in the right position.
4. Calculation
In this calculation, we can quickly get CBR value from the test result by looking at the table in ASTM
standard or by using the formula:
Example of DCP calculation ASTM D 6951 - 03
Correlation table between DCP index and CBR value based on ASTM D 6951 - 03
Dynamic Cone Penetration (DCP)
1. Introduction To dynamic cone experiment (DCP) is one of the tests conducted in the field, which is indirectly
carried out in...
Sand Cone Testing
1. Introduction To the trial of sand cones is one type of testing carried out in the field, to determine the weight of dry
content ...
Now a days DCPT is commonly used during construction for the following purposes.
PRINCIPLE OF DCPT
The basic principle involved in the operation of this apparatus is the measuring of the resistance offered by the
pavement layers to the penetration of a standard cone with a diameter of 20 mm (with 600 apex angle) driven
by an 8 kg hammer freely falling through a height of 575 mm. the amount of penetration (in mm) of the cone is
generally reported in terms of the average penetration per blow, DCPI60 (mm/blow).
PROCEDURE
1. Record the initial reading on the dynamic cone penetrometer scale.
2. Calculate the value of penetration (in mm) for each blow by subtracting the previous recorded reading
(i.e. reading on scale) from the current reading.
3. Calculate the cumulative depth of penetration (in mm) for each blow by adding all the previous
individual depth of penetrations.
4. Draw a chart using the data of cumulative depth of penetration and number of blows. (See Fig-1)
5. This step is about identifying the depth of each layer. Identify the slope change of the penetration curve.
Every change in slope represents a change in layer type.
6. After identifying each slope change, calculate the average penetration/blow for each slope change and
calculate the thickness of each layer.
7. Use the following equation and determine the corresponding CBR value of each layer.
8. To know the variation of the CBR value across the depth, draw another semi-log chart with CBR values
on logarithmic scale as abscissa (x axis) and depth of penetration on ordinary scale as ordinate (y axis).
(See Fig-2).
0 9.5 0 0 0 73 44.9
5 12.5 6 30 45.4 3
13 19 22 95 11.5 9.5
Note:
Email
Print
More
7 Comments | Oct 1, 2016