This assessment form outlines criteria for grading essays, including demonstrating understanding of strategic concepts, critically examining literature, and strategically analyzing case examples. The assessment evaluates if the essay coherently addresses the questions, uses proper writing style and references, and shows comprehension of strategy development and implementation frameworks. Examiners and students are to use this form to ensure quality of written examination assignments.
This assessment form outlines criteria for grading essays, including demonstrating understanding of strategic concepts, critically examining literature, and strategically analyzing case examples. The assessment evaluates if the essay coherently addresses the questions, uses proper writing style and references, and shows comprehension of strategy development and implementation frameworks. Examiners and students are to use this form to ensure quality of written examination assignments.
This assessment form outlines criteria for grading essays, including demonstrating understanding of strategic concepts, critically examining literature, and strategically analyzing case examples. The assessment evaluates if the essay coherently addresses the questions, uses proper writing style and references, and shows comprehension of strategy development and implementation frameworks. Examiners and students are to use this form to ensure quality of written examination assignments.
This assessment form is to be used by the examinators when grading the Essay and by the students to ensure the quality of the written examination assignment.
Criterion Assessment Description
The student has demonstrated that each question is Yes/No elaborated and understood in relation to the strategic concepts provided in the course literature. The student has demonstrated that the concept of the coherency in strategy development and implementation is Theoretical Yes/No understood by providing the critical discussion grounded in grounds the course literature. The student has demonstrated understanding of the similarities and differences in digital strategy and/or Yes/No change process between private and public sector through discussion grounded in the literature. The student has presented portions of the mandatory course Yes/No literature relevant to the questions. The student has critically examined and discussed different Literature Yes/No views of the authors and their results. The student has actively used relevant literature sources not Yes/No included in the mandatory course literature. The student has demonstrated the understanding of the Yes/No frameworks for analysis grounded in relevant literature and suitable for answering the question. The student has critically examined the case example and Strategic Yes/No identified potential strategic and/or managerial problems, analysis their causes and the impact on strategy failure/success. The student has demonstrated the understanding and explained in detail using literature how the different Yes/No components of the strategy re-enforce each other when analyzing and designing the strategy. The text is written in an adequate and professional Yes/No language. Writing style The argumentation is well grounded, logically coherent, Yes/No concise, clear, and easily understood. The references to previous research are made in a correct way according to a recognized reference system, a clear References Yes/No listing of used references is made in the same system, and all quotes from previous work are clearly specified.