Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Symposium: A Quarterly
Journal in Modern Literatures
Publication details, including instructions for
authors and subscription information:
http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/vsym20
To cite this article: Joseph W. Slade (1971) The Functions of Eternal Recurrence in
Thomas Mann's Joseph and his Brothers, Symposium: A Quarterly Journal in Modern
Literatures, 25:2, 180-197, DOI: 10.1080/00397709.1971.10733134
Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the
information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform.
However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no
representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness,
or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views
expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and
are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the
Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with
primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any
losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages,
and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or
indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the
Content.
This article may be used for research, teaching, and private study purposes.
Any substantial or systematic reproduction, redistribution, reselling, loan,
sub-licensing, systematic supply, or distribution in any form to anyone is
expressly forbidden. Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at
http://www.tandfonline.com/page/terms-and-conditions
Downloaded by [University of Otago] at 10:05 02 January 2015
JOSEPH W. SLADE
For Mann the mythical is the timeless, the typical, the etemally-
recurring. Pattems of human experience, the very rhythm of existence,
constitute the dialectical aspects of the myth. For primitive man,
and for other men as well, myth is the ontological basis of life; it is
Downloaded by [University of Otago] at 10:05 02 January 2015
the timeless schema, the pious formula into which life flows when it
reproduces its traits out of the unconscious. 1
Joseph and his family live the myth, live it by imitation and repeti-
tion. To use Mann's famous phrase, they are "open at the back;" they
disguise and protect themselves with forms from the past. Much that is
external to them gathers to shape their individualities, their egos. But
is man's ego, Mann asks, "a thing imprisoned in itself and sternly
shut up in its boundaries of flesh and time ?"2 What precedes the
individual in time, and all that makes up his environment impinges
upon his psyche. The notion of each individual as isolated, that he is
himself and can be no other is "a convention, which arbitrarily leaves
out of account all the transitions which bind the individual conscious-
ness to the general" (p. 78). Those who have an ear for repetition, who
have received from God the "capacity of thinking in aeons and thus in
some sense a mastery of them" (p. 269), build their egos out of the
fragments of tradition. Every character in the quartet has a mythical
role, a role which, "Freud and the Future" tells us, he plays:
in the illusion that it is his own and unique, that he, as it were, has
invented it all himself, with a dignity and security of which his
supposed unique individuality in time and space is not the source,
but rather which he creates out of his deeper consciousness in
order that something which was once founded and legitimized
shall again be represented and once more for good or ill, whether
nobly or basely, in any case after its own kind, conduct itself accor-
ding to pattern. (pp. 317-318)
For good or ill, the pattems repeat themselves in man. And there is
much that is ill in the shadowy traditions of Joseph's family. Esau,
Jacob's brother, for example, relives the role played by Cain, a role
which has even darker connotations because of its correspondence to
182 Summer I~7I SYMPOSIUM
that of Set, brother and slayer of Osiris, and that of Edom the Red.
Ishmael, Esau's uncle, has played the role before him; both uncle and
nephew lapse into the pattern because of inherent tendencies and
inclinations in their personalities. Esau's "way of looking at things,
and at himself, was conditioned by inborn habits of thought" (p. 86).
Esau's early life, before the blessing is denied him, is far from exem-
plary, from which Mann concludes that blessing and curse alike are
only "a confirmation of established facts, and that Esau's character, his
role upon earth, had long been fixed [...]" (p. 86). Mann, however,
further supposes that Esau became a hunter and rover of the steppes
because of his strongly masculine disposition, but insists that it would
do small justice to the traditional mythology to think that Esau's calling
alone "had imbued him with the feeling and consciousness of himself
Downloaded by [University of Otago] at 10:05 02 January 2015
and his role as the sun-scorched son of the lower world" (p. 86). On
the contrary, Esau "had chosen the calling because of its suitability;
that is, out of obedience to the programme and knowledge of the
myth" (p. 86). Internalization of the myth takes place because of its
suitability, and its repetition determines the course of events in the
character's life.
Recurrence, the celebration of the myth in the playing of the role,
absorbs every facet of existence in the lives of its celebrants and brings
order to their world. Without the myth, in the absence of eternal repe-
tition, says Mann in "Freud and the Future," these men would not
know how to act, "would not know which foot to put foremost or
what sort of face to put on" (p. 318). The various roles of the figures
in the tetralogy are the chief dialectic aspects of the novel; their inter-
play creates the tension between form and life, spirit and nature.
Cycles of recurrence, by which the tetralogy progresses, continually
resolve these dialectical roles. Freighted as it is with the dusty tales of
immeasurable antiquity, the story of Joseph would be lost in the time-
coulisses where history and myth meet if time is considered as progres-
sion in a straight line. No order and certainly no meaning would
derive from this chaotic world if one insists on this conception, Mann
protests:
not counting those ancestors whose identity floats below the surface of
the past. As partisans of the phenomenon of imitation or succession,
Joseph and his predecessors envisage their task as "the filling out in
present time and again making flesh certain given forms, a mythical
frame that was established by the fathers" (p. 8 I). The cycles of
repetition of these forms labor to bring forth consciousness of the
self and its individual responsibilities. The greater the awareness of
identity and succession, the more detached from the collective is the
ego.
Nevertheless, this growth of the individual from the confines of
the tribe does not mean that the collective is deserted. When Joseph
realizes that his part resembles the roles of his ancestors, he under-
stands himself by reference to communal traditions, and is both him-
self and a part of the group. Repetition provides for a synthesis of
collective and individual; as Mann puts it in "The Theme of the Joseph
Novels," the ego of these prototypes "detaches itself from the collective
in much the same way as certain figures of Rodin wrest themselves out
of the stone and awaken from it" (p. 14). Jacob is one of these semi-
detached figures, a little more developed than Issac, and much more so
than Abraham, who first established the pattern by which their indi-
viduality grows. The cycles of growth culminate in the ego of Joseph;
his ego is conscious of its central importance but still participates in the
collective in a playful way. Abraham, Issac, and Jacob find eternal
recurrence crucial to the expansion of their minds, but as a tool over
which they have relatively little control; their spiritual journey toward
the Highest weighs profoundly on the solemnity of their role-playing.
Joseph, not content merely to be the hero of his story, must direct the
play and write the script as well. Like Gilgamesh, one of his prototypes,
Joseph is the "glad-sorry" man; he learns to use repetition in practical,
active endeavor, to conquer the world where spirit and nature inter-
sect.
184 Summer I97I SYMPOSIUM
between god and men, spirit and nature; he is the buffer between
Ahknaton, whose pure spirit had never known the refreshment of a
rebirth, and the people of the black soil. For his reconciliation of these
antipodes, the blessing conferred on him is not that of the spirit, but
of "heaven above" and "the deep that lieth under" (p. 1195); Joseph's
role lies in the present, while the spiritual blessing is a promise for the
future. "Play and playing it was," Jacob tells Joseph, "approaching
salvation yet not quite seriously a calling or a gift" (p. 1195). To act
one's role, even with consummate artistry, is not always to understand
the whole drama; the cosmic spotlight must pass to Judah, the bearer of
the spirit's blessing.
Yet Joseph plays out his role, repeats his pattern to its conclusion,
because he knows that the men of the present outnumber those of the
future and the spirit, and knows also that he too is creating a pattern.
For Another will come, a Pure Spirit who will also be a sacrifice to the
secular and the present, that the spirit and the future may endure.
and His Brothers represents the culmination of Mann's use of the leit-
motif as a literary tool.
In his eagerness to demonstrate his mastery of schematic unity,
Mann uses the leitmotif to a degree bordering on the absurd. Huge,
by the author's own admission (p. v), the tetralogy almost collapses
beneath its own ponderosity of design. Actually, however, the over-
burdened architectonics of the work provoke an intended humor.
In "The Theme of the Joseph Novels" address at the Library of Con-
gress, Mann singles out two works, Tristam Shane!Y and "Faust," as
having infI.uenced the writing of the tetralogy (p. 13). "Faust," con-
taining a wealth of mythological figures, appears a fairly obvious choice
of companion-piece, but Tristram Shane!Y seems hardly appropriate,
until one remembers Sterne's propensity for spurious documentation
Downloaded by [University of Otago] at 10:05 02 January 2015
the plot forward; old themes condition and qualify new situations.
Juxtaposition of one leitmotif with another provides new points of
departure for still others, as in a pendulum's swing. Momentum of one
swing begins a second; and the plot moves along its path of develop-
ment. Once this internal motion commences, if discontinued, the plot
will collapse, as it almost does in Joseph the Provider. For Joseph, once
resurrected from his pit and raised up as the Provider, has little need, it
would seem, for repeated patterns in the more practical concerns of
his life. Yet he merely pauses to change masks.
Mann's effort to utilize recurrence to its fullest capacity reaches its
zenith in the fourth volume, as Joseph stands before Pharoah. During
their first conversation, Joseph and Pharoah exchange stories. Akhna-
ton recites a tale of a mischievous god; Joseph counters with stories of
Jacob's hoaxing of Esau and Laban, and refers to his father as a rogue.
The reader, conditioned by Joseph's affinity with the moon, whose
mediation between heaven and earth "is of the jesting kind" (p. 960),
immediately makes an association between Joseph and this roguish
aspect of his father. Heretofore, Mann details Joseph's roles at length;
little imagination is required of the reader. But Joseph is again shifting
roles, this time to a more permanent one, that of the rogue god Hermes-
Thoth, the mediator between gods and men, who will stand between
Pharoah and his people. The reader intuitively knows the cycle of the
theme of moon and rogue is incomplete, and completes the recurrence
himself. Joseph's subsequent actions bear out this assumption of a
new role; his solution for the famine requires all the wit and artifice of
the playful god.
Mann's education of the reader in the tectonic principles of his
novel is indicative of the faultless structure of the work. Events must
recur if the plot is to retain its motion, and recur at the proper time.
Joseph's command of his life instinctively seizes upon a theme but
mutely sounded in the past, when he hears Pharoah's laughing approval
JOSEPH W. SLADE 191
of the stories of his father. Joseph knows the form which his life
must follow; at this late date, the reader knows it too.
Mann's penchant for irony must be indulged, even at his own
expense. By having Joseph act out the last scene of his drama, he not
only adds the finishing touches to his creation, but also mitigates the
blame for his thematic manipulation. Joseph, in his determination to
add significance to his life, has. done his part to "discover" recurrence
in the events of his career, but Mann certainly helps. Mann's statement
concerning the story-telling propensities of the shepherds applies to
himself as well: "they suppressed some of the facts and rearranged
others all for the sake of the story and with perfectly clear consciences"
(p. 106). Together Joseph and Mann, with perfectly clear consciences,
create a recognition-scene which, for sheer contrivance, would have
Downloaded by [University of Otago] at 10:05 02 January 2015
Yet on the whole time then had been more conservatively minded
than time now, the frame of Joseph's life, his ways and habits of
thought were far more like his ancestors' than ours are like the cru-
saders'. Memory, resting on oral tradition from generation to gene-
ration, was more direct and confiding, it flowed freer, time was a
more unified and thus a briefer vista; young Joseph cannot be
. blamed for vaguely foreshortening it, for sometimes, in a dreamy
mood, perhaps by night and moonlight, taking the man from Dr for
his father's grandfather-or even worse. For it must be stated here
JOSEPH W. SLADE 19~
that in all probability this man from Ur was not the original and
actual man from Vr. (p. 8)
7
194 Summer I97I SYMPOSIUM
sustains the role-player, for "the form of timelessness is the now and
the here" (p. 18).
Because of this willed repetition, present time projects itself into
mythical time. Thus the novelty of the present pales beside the reality
of the archetype. Those whose identities are "open at the back," whose
very beings are saturated with tradition, are products of all that has
gone before them. To understand themselves. time in the conventional
sense must be set aside.
Joseph's repetition of an event in the past establishes its presentness
in much the same way that modems conceive of the Eucharist as a
celebration of an event in the life of Christ. Since, in days to come,
the event will exhibit similar qualities of recurrence, the future becomes
present as well. To the mind, events are always simultaneous in their
impingement upon the consciousness; the effect of one may be more
forceful than that of another event, but the whole of one's remembered
experienced is present at the same time. Language, Joseph tells
Pharoah, "belongs to time and must deal with one thing after the
other, unlike the world of images, where two can stand side by side"
(p. 9 so). Time but facilitates the appearance of things; it has no final
influence. for the essence of things remains unruffled by temporal
passage. Time, Chronos-Mann tells his audience-"devours his
children that they may not set themselves over him, but must choke
them up again to live in the same old stories as the same children"
(p. 12.z).
Apprehension of the universal, the real in the world and in human
nature, depends upon the capacity to grasp the present moment in
its flight and to analyze its components in the light of past and future.
Joseph does just this in his celebration of his roles, and by so doing he
fathoms the past, understands the present, and prepares for the future.
The very pervasiveness of eternal recurrence in the novel attests to its
importance in the author's mind. Is Joseph and His Brothers merely an
JOSEPH W. SLADE 195
historical novel, or is Mann suggesting that the conception is still
viable today?
One obvious drawback to such a suggestion is the oppressive
nature of tradition. But Mann carefully forestalls this criticism. The
doctrine of eternal recurrence, as exemplified by Joseph, allows, even
demands, salubrious permutations. Tradition, if properly utilized as a
storehouse of archetypes, fosters not inertia, but progress. Tradition
and change are compatible because the role-player selects a pattem
from tradition and re-establishes it in a new setting. Elsewhere in one
of his essays, Mann remarks on the relationship of the two: "Reaction
as progress, progress as reaction, the interweaving of the two, is a
continually recurring historical phenomenon."? Although Joseph
suspends time in order to perceive the real, i.e., the universal and time-
Downloaded by [University of Otago] at 10:05 02 January 2015
less, by willing that recurrence take place, he still lives in and is condi-
tioned by his particular time. Temporal circumstances are powerful,
and Joseph acknowledges their force by choosing to repeat pattems
that retain their vitality in contemporary situations. In repetition there
always occurs variation, because no two human experiences are exactly
alike. Environmental time, as well as individual uniqueness, modulate
human repetition. Tradition or recorded experience is not necessarily
hostile to change; the beneficiaries of tradition must simply learn to
distinguish between the vital and the unessential, the pertinent and the
irrelevant, and to preserve the good pattems while condemning the
bad. Many patterns may function adequately in one generation, but
become useless or injurious in another context. Some pattems, how-
ever, remain prototypical throughout differentiation from age to age,
like the perpetually recurring archetypes of death and rebirth. Men
should commemorate these universal patterns by repeating them,
always allowing for modifications in their manifestations.
With the crucial deterrent of the denial of progress removed, the
concept of recurrence becomes a reasonable philosophical aid for men
today. Again, it is necessary to emphasize that for Mann, imitation of
the archetype does not necessarily destroy individuality. Joseph's
playing of his role invokes mimesis in the Aristotelian sense of imagina-
tive re-creation. The individual ego emerges from the collective into
the realm precisely because it repeats the old patterns in a new design.
The old and the new meet on a plane of freedom, to redefine the
personality. A good actor does not scruple to learn from a Booth or a
Barrymore; without prejudice to his own unique personality, the
individual learns by repetition and by perception of recurrence that
which is of continuing and vital importance to all men.
Why should men of today attempt to make use of recurrence? For
the same reasons that Joseph does: to rise above the pedestrian and
the prosaic, to add significance and symbolism to life, to bring order
196 Slimmer I97I SYMPOSIUM
At the same time, the modern age all too often feels competitiveness
with the past and its accomplishments. As Miguel de Unamuno, in Tb«
Tragic Sense oj Life, points out:
LongIs/anti Univer.ri!J
JOSEPH W. SLADE