Paint 1 Paint 2 Paint 3 Paint 4

128 144 133 150

137 133 143 142
135 142 137 135
124 146 136 140
141 130 131 153

overall mean 138

Group mean 133 139 136 144
Mean of group mean 138

Between group
squared deviation 125 5 20 180

sum of between
groups squared
deviation 330
Within group squared
deviation
25 25 9 36
16 36 49 4
4 9 1 81
81 49 0 16
64 81 25 81
Sum of within group
deviation 692

Overall squared
deviation 100 36 25 144
1 25 25 16
9 16 1 9
196 64 4 4
9 64 49 225

Sum of overall
squared deviation 1022

H0 The drying time of the paints are similar

H1 There is atleast one paint whose drying time is different from others
Anova: Single Factor

SUMMARY
Groups Count Sum Average Variance
Paint 1 5 665 133 47.5
Paint 2 5 695 139 50
Paint 3 5 680 136 21
Paint 4 5 720 144 54.5

ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value
Between Groups 330 3 110 2.5433526 0.0927643
Within Groups 692 16 43.25

Total 1022 19

Accept H0
since f value is less than f critical we are going to accept the null hypothesis
and p value is greater than alpha
 d.o.f Variance
sum of between groups squared deviation 330 3 110
Sum of within group deviation 692 16 43.25
Sum of overall squared deviation 1022 19 53.789474

f_stat 2.5433526

is different from others

 F crit
3.23887151745359

ll hypothesis
Metropolitan Area Shell BP Marathon
Akron, OH 3.77 3.83 3.78 First Factor
Cincinnati, OH 3.72 3.83 3.87 H0
Cleveland, OH 3.87 3.85 3.89 H1
Columbus, OH 3.76 3.77 3.79
Ft. Wayne, IN 3.83 3.84 3.87 Second Factor
Indianapolis, IN 3.85 3.84 3.87 H0
Lansing, MI 3.93 4.04 3.99 H1
Lexington, KY 3.79 3.78 3.79
Louisville, KY 3.78 3.84 3.79
Muncie, IN 3.81 3.84 3.83
Toledo, OH 3.69 3.83 3.86

Anova: Two-Factor Without Replication

SUMMARY Count Sum Average Variance

Akron, OH 3 11.38 3.7933333333 0.0010333
Cincinnati, OH 3 11.42 3.8066666667 0.0060333
Cleveland, OH 3 11.61 3.87 0.0004
Columbus, OH 3 11.32 3.7733333333 0.0002333
Ft. Wayne, IN 3 11.54 3.8466666667 0.0004333
Indianapolis, IN 3 11.56 3.8533333333 0.0002333
Lansing, MI 3 11.96 3.9866666667 0.0030333
Lexington, KY 3 11.36 3.7866666667 3.333E-05
Louisville, KY 3 11.41 3.8033333333 0.0010333
Muncie, IN 3 11.48 3.8266666667 0.0002333
Toledo, OH 3 11.38 3.7933333333 0.0082333

Shell 11 41.8 3.8 0.00468

BP 11 42.29 3.8445454545 0.0048673
Marathon 11 42.33 3.8481818182 0.0038564

ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value
Rows 0.1080060606 10 0.0108006061 8.2984866 3.52E-05
Columns 0.0158363636 2 0.0079181818 6.0838184 0.0086319
Error 0.026030303 20 0.0013015152

Total 0.1498727273 32
eject H0
 The price does not vary by brands
The price does vary by brands

Second Factor
The price does not vary by metropolitian area
The price does vary by metropolitian area

F crit
2.3478776
3.4928285
 Snow Shoveling

Arm-Crank
Treadmill Ergometer Snow Shovel Snow Thrower
177 205 180 98
151 177 164 120
184 166 167 111
161 152 173 122
192 142 179 151
193 172 205 158
164 191 156 117
207 170 160 123
177 181 175 127
174 154 191 109

Anova: Two-Factor Without Replication

SUMMARY Count Sum Average Variance

177 3 483 161 3133
151 3 461 153.6666666667 892.333333333
184 3 444 148 1027
161 3 447 149 657
192 3 472 157.3333333333 372.333333333
193 3 535 178.3333333333 582.333333333
164 3 464 154.6666666667 1370.33333333
207 3 453 151 613
177 3 483 161 876
174 3 454 151.3333333333 1686.33333333

Arm-Crank Ergom 10 1710 171 356.666666667

Snow Shovel 10 1750 175 219.111111111
Snow Thrower 10 1236 123.6 336.933333333

ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F
Rows 2144.1333333333 9 238.237037037 0.70643793793
Columns 16349.066666667 2 8174.533333333 24.239725877
Error 6070.2666666667 18 337.237037037

Total 24563.466666667 29

Page 8
 Snow Shoveling

P-value F crit
0.69609666925 2.45628114916
7.8210612E-06 3.55455714566

Page 9
Make/Model Class Type MPG
Honda Civic Small Car Hybrid 37
Honda Civic Small Car Conventional 28
Toyota Prius Small Car Hybrid 44
Toyota Corolla Small Car Conventional 32
Chevrolet Malibu Midsize Car Hybrid 27
Chevrolet Malibu Midsize Car Conventional 23
Nissan Altima Midsize Car Hybrid 32
Nissan Altima Midsize Car Conventional 25
Ford Escape Small SUV Hybrid 27
Ford Escape Small SUV Conventional 21
Saturn Vue Small SUV Hybrid 28
Saturn Vue Small SUV Conventional 22
Lexus RX Midsize SUV Hybrid 23
Lexus RX Midsize SUV Conventional 19
Toyota Highlander Midsize SUV Hybrid 24
Toyota Highlander Midsize SUV Conventional 18

Class Hybrid Conventional

Small Car 37 28
Small Car 44 32
Midsize SUV 27 23
Midsize SUV 32 25
Small Car 27 21
Small Car 28 22
Midsize SUV 23 19
Midsize SUV 24 18

Interaction H0 There is no interaction between vehicle class and vehicle type on fuel economy
H1 There is interaction between vehicle class and vehicle type on fuel economy

Column Factor H0 The fuel economy does not vary by vehicle type
H1 The fuel economy does vary by vehicle type

Row Factor H0 The fuel economy does not vary by vehicle class
H1 The fuel economy does vary by vehicle class

Anova: Two-Factor With Replication

SUMMARY Hybrid Conventional Total

Small Car
Count 2 2 4
Sum 81 60 141
Average 40.5 30 35.25
Variance 24.5 8 47.583333

Midsize SUV
Count 2 2 4
Sum 59 48 107
Average 29.5 24 26.75
Variance 12.5 2 14.916667

Small Car
Count 2 2 4
Sum 55 43 98
Average 27.5 21.5 24.5
Variance 0.5 0.5 12.333333

Midsize SUV
Count 2 2 4
Sum 47 37 84
Average 23.5 18.5 21
Variance 0.5 0.5 8.6666667

Total
Count 8 8
Sum 242 188
Average 30.25 23.5
Variance 50.78571429 22

ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Sample 441.25 3 147.08333 24.013605 0.0002356 4.0661806
Columns 182.25 1 182.25 29.755102 0.0006052 5.3176551
Interaction 19.25 3 6.4166667 1.047619 0.4228597 4.0661806
Within 49 8 6.125

Total 691.75 15

The column and row factor are behaving independently

For coloumn factor f value is 29.75510204

reject the null and accept the alternate

Row factor f value is 24.01360544 and f critical is 4v and p value is very less so we are going to reject the null hypoth
pe on fuel economy
on fuel economy
to reject the null hypothesis
System Spanish French German
System1 8 10 12
System1 12 14 16
System 2 6 14 16
System 2 10 16 22

Interaction H0 There is no interaction between the system. Tpe and language used on the translati
H1 There is interaction between the system. Tpe and language used on the translation

Coloumn Factor H0 The Translation time does not vary by language

H1 The Translation time does vary by language

H0 The translation time does not vary by system

H1 The translation time does vary by system

Anova: Two-Factor With Replication

SUMMARY Spanish French German Total

System1
Count 2 2 2 6
Sum 20 24 28 72
Average 10 12 14 12
Variance 8 8 8 8

System 2
Count 2 2 2 6
Sum 16 30 38 84
Average 8 15 19 14
Variance 8 2 18 30.4

Total
Count 4 4 4
Sum 36 54 66
Average 9 13.5 16.5
Variance 6.66666667 6.33333333 17

ANOVA
Source of Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit
Sample 12 1 12 1.38461538 0.28387987 5.98737761
Columns 114 2 57 6.57692308 0.03073872 5.14325285
Interaction 26 2 13 1.5 0.2962963 5.14325285
Within 52 6 8.66666667

Total 204 11
nguage used on the translation time
age used on the translation time