Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PAKISTAN AFFAIRS
LECTURE 15
PMS 2015
AD MOD 2019
CSS 2020
AC IRS
Lecture 15
The prevailing Social problems of Pakistan and Strategies to deal with them ,poverty ,
education , Health and Sanitation
Pakistan’s Relations with Neighbors excluding India
Pakistan’s Role in the Region
Changing Security Dynamics for Pakistan: Challenges to National Security of
Pakistan
I. Educational backwardness
A Single National Curriculum (SNC) has been designed with the vision of one system of
education for all, in terms of curriculum, medium of instruction and a common platform of
assessment, so that all children have a fair and equal opportunity to receive high quality
education.
The total number of enrolment during 2018-19 was recorded at 52.5 million as compared
to 51.0 million during 2017-18, which shows an increase of 2.9 percent. The
The number of institutes (both public and private) reached to 273.4 thousand during
2018-19 as compared to 262.0 thousand during 2017-18. However, the number of institutes is
2018-19 were 1.76 million as compared to 1.77 million during the last year.
The number of teachers is estimated to increase to 1.80 million during 2019-20.
According to the PSLM, District Level Survey 2019-20, the literacy rate of population
Province wise analysis suggests that Punjab has the highest literacy rate, with 64 percent
followed by Sindh with 58 percent, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (Excluding Merged Areas) with
1.5 percent of GDP in 2019-20, as compared to 2.3 percent in 2018-19. The education related
expenditures decreased by 29.6 percent i.e., from Rs 868.0 billion to Rs 611.0 billion due to
closure of educational institutes, amid country-wide lockdown and
The COVID-19 pandemic has not only created a health crisis in the country but also
adversely affected other sectors including education sector. In order to mitigate the
learning losses of students during the closure of educational institutes, the government
has launched initiatives like Tele School and Radio School to provide distance learning and
addressed provision of education to the children of far flung and remote areas during the
pandemic.
a) Improve infrastructure
b) Educational emergency
c) Invest at least 7% budget on education ( Paul Kennedy in PREPARING FOR THE 21ST CENTURY)
d) Improve examination system-analytical
Health
The COVID-19 pandemic has tested the country’s health infrastructure and identified
the need for more investment in the health sector especially for diagnostic facilities, disease
surveillance, disease prevention and spread, training of health personnel and their
protection from the pandemic, vaccine development, up-grading health care infrastructure,
emergency rooms, intensive care units, isolation wards and public awareness.
In order to make substantial progress on Goal 3 of SDGs (Good Health and Wellbeing),
the Government of Pakistan has given priority to strengthen the health sector to further
resolve and address the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic. The health-related expenditure
In Pakistan, the first case of COVID-19 was confirmed on 26 February 2020, when the first
patient in Karachi tested positive. The first wave of COVID-19 claimed 6,795 lives, infected
332,186 and left behind 632 on ventilators. The government announced the second wave of
COVID-19 on 28 October 2020, when there was a sudden increase in active cases from 6,000 to
11,000 and 93 hospitalized patients were put on ventilators. The third wave of COVID-19 in
Pakistan started on 17 March 2021, when daily cases reached 3,000 with a positivity rate of 10
percent.
China has donated 1.5 million doses of the Sinopharm vaccine, which has an efficacy of 79
percent. Till 2nd June, 2021, a total of 13.0 million doses of vaccine have been received by
the Government of Pakistan and 8.3 million doses have been administered as on 5th
June, 2021.
The government is fully committed to increase the health coverage and provision of good
nutrition to meet the emerging demand and to develop the effective human capital.
population of Pakistan is 215.25 million with a population growth rate of 1.80 percent in
20201 and
Pakistan has an extraordinary asset in the shape of youth bulge, which means
that the largest segment of our population consists of young people. The population falling in
the age group of 15-59 years is 59 percent, whereas 27 percent is between 15-29 years. This
youth bulge can translate into economic gains only if the youth have skills consistent with the
requirements of a modern economy.
The government has started different programmes for improving employment
opportunities
for youth such as "Prime Minister's Youth Entrepreneurship Scheme" and "Prime Minister's
Hunarmand Programme-Skills for All” etc.
working were 55.74 million, prior to COVID-19. This number declined to 35.04 million which
indicates people either lost their jobs or were not able to work. The government announced
package for construction sector and provided industrial relief, etc. Thus opening of these
sectors, in which daily wagers were working along with fiscal stimulus and monetary
Poverty
Social protection has a central role to play in addressing the social, economic and
health dimensions of the COVID-19 crisis. The Ehsaas Emergency Cash programme
19 pandemic.
assistance to 14.8 million families at risk of extreme poverty. Since the launch of
Ehsaas, many transformative initiatives and policy reforms have effectively been
implemented nationwide. Some of the Ehsaas’ early wins across various sectors include
Ehsaas
Nashonuma, Ehsaas Langars, Ehsaas Interest-Free Loans, Ehsaas Amdan and several
others.
Under Ehsaas Kafaalat Programme, the government is providing cash stipends of
Rs 2,000 monthly. Number of Kafaalat beneficiaries has been increased from 4.6 million
to 7 million. All payments are being made through the new biometric Ehsaas Digital
Under Ehsaas strategy, interest free loans are a major component of the National
Poverty Graduation Initiative. Since July 2019 to March 2021, a total of 1.2 million loans
(46 percent loans to women) have been disbursed amounting Rs 44.42 billion. Overall,
1,100 loan centers/branches have been established in about 110 districts by 24 partner
organizations across the country. During July-March FY2021, a total of 490,368 interest free
loans (47 percent loans to women) amounting to Rs 17.50 billion have been
Pakistan Poverty Alleviation Fund (PPAF) also helps in micro-credit, water, health, education
and livelihood. Since its inception in April 2000 till March 2021, PPAF has disbursed an amount
of approximately Rs 228 billion to its Partner Organizations (POs) in 144 districts across the
country. A total of 8.4 million microcredit loans have been disbursed with 60 percent loans to
women and 80 percent financing extended to rural areas. The overall disbursements for core
Pakistan Baitul Mal (PBM) is providing financial assistance to the destitute, widows, orphans
and other needy persons at the district level. During July-March FY2021, PBM
Workers Welfare Fund during July-March, FY2021 disbursed Rs 2.47 billion on 33,679
scholarship cases, while Rs 573.44 million have been utilized as marriage grants @Rs 100,000
per worker benefitting 5,736 workers' families. The WWF has also disbursed Rs 496.55 million as
a death grant @Rs 500,000 per worker, covering 994 cases of mishaps all over the country.
EOBI provides monetary benefits to old age workers through various programmes such as Old Age
Pakistan has interest over the Persian Gulf and has wide-ranging bilateral relations with the United
States and other Western countries.
Pakistan distrusted the Soviet Union during much of the Cold War. Because of this Pakistan had
strong relations with both the United States of America and the People's Republic of China.
Pakistan was a member of the American-sponsored CENTO and SEATO military alliances.
Pakistans' alliance with the United States was especially close after the Soviets invaded the
neighboring country of Afghanistan.
In 1964, Pakistan signed the Regional Cooperation for Development (RCD) Pact with Turkey and
Iran, when all three countries were closely allied with the U.S., and as neighbors of the Soviet
Union, wary of perceived Soviet expansionism.
To this day, Pakistan has had a close relationship with Turkey. RCD became defunct after the
Iranian Revolution, and a Pakistani-Turkish initiative led to the founding of the Economic
Cooperation Organization (ECO) in 1985.
Afghanistan–Pakistan relations
Afghanistan–Pakistan relations involve bilateral relations between Afghanistan and Pakistan.
The two neighbouring countries are bordered with one another; each has declared itself an Islamic
republic and both have become members of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation.
Relations between the two countries have been strained since 1947, when Pakistan gained
independence and Afghanistan was the sole country to vote against Pakistan's admission into the
UN.
Afghanistan immediately armed separatist movements in the nascent Pakistan and made
irredentist claims to large swathes of Pakistani territory—which prevented the emergence of
normalised ties between the two countries.
Further tensions have arisen with various issues related to the War in Afghanistan (1978– present),
and with the millions of Afghan refugees who have sought shelter in Pakistan since the start of that
war, water rights, the growing relations of India and Afghanistan.
Bilateral relations between the countries have been poor, beginning immediately after Pakistan
became independent in August 1947. Afghanistan's sole vote against Pakistan's admission to the
United Nations in 1947, due to Afghan discontent with the permanency of the Durand Line.
Iran–Pakistan relations
After Pakistan gained its independence in August 1947, Iran was one of the first countries to
recognize its sovereign status.
Relations between Shi'a-majority Iran and Sunni-majority Pakistan became greatly strained due to
sectarian tensions in the 1980s, as Pakistani Shi'a Muslims claimed that they were being
discriminated against under the Sunni-biased Islamization program being imposed throughout
Pakistan by the military dictatorship government of then-President, General Muhammad Zia-
ulHaq.
Following the 1979 Islamic Revolution, Iran and Saudi Arabia (considered the "leading state
authority" of Shi'a and Sunni Muslims, respectively) gradually began to use Pakistan as a
battleground for their proxy sectarian conflict, and Pakistan's support for the Deobandi Taliban
organization in Afghanistan during the civil wars in the 1990s became a problem for Shi'a Iran,
which opposed a Taliban-controlled Afghanistan.
Nevertheless, both countries continue to cooperate economically where possible and are forming
alliances in a number of areas of mutual interest, such as fighting the drug trade along their
border and combating the insurgency in the Balochistan region.
Iran has also expressed an interest in joining the China–Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) as part
of the larger Chinese Belt and Road Initiative.
Pakistan is one of the few countries where Iranian influence is positively received as per polls
conducted by the Pew Research Center. Polls have consistently shown that a very high proportion
of Pakistanis view their western neighbour positively. Supreme Leader of Iran Ayatollah
Khamenei has also called for the sympathy, assistance and inter-cooperation of all Muslim
nations, including Pakistan.
Diplomatic relations between the two states have recently improved under the policies of Prime
Minister of Pakistan Imran Khan, who seeks to expand Pakistan's relationship with Iran. He has
also offered to serve as a mediator between Saudi Arabia and Iran in their ongoing proxy conflict.
China–Pakistan relations
Formal relations were established in 1950 when the Dominion of Pakistan was among the
first countries to end official diplomatic relations with the Republic of China (Taiwan) and
recognize the People's Republic of China (PRC) government on Mainland China.
Since then, both countries have placed considerable importance on the maintenance of
an extremely close and supportive special relationship and the two countries have
regularly exchanged high-level visits resulting in a variety of agreements. The PRC has
provided economic, military, and technical assistance to Pakistan, and each country
considers the other a close strategic ally.
Bilateral relations have evolved from an initial Chinese policy of neutrality to a
partnership with a smaller but militarily powerful Pakistan. Diplomatic relations were
established in 1950, boundary issues resolved in 1963, military assistance began in 1966,
a strategic alliance was formed in 1972, and economic co-operation began in 1979. China
has become Pakistan's largest supplier of arms and its third-largest trading partner.
China has given Pakistan a loan of US$60 million which was later made a grant after East
Pakistan broke away. Recently, both nations have decided to cooperate in improving
Pakistan's civil nuclear power sector.
Maintaining close relations with China is a central part of Pakistan's foreign policy. In
1986, President Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq visited China to improve diplomatic relations, and
Pakistan was one of only two countries, alongside Cuba, to offer crucial support to the
PRC after the Tiananmen Square protests of 1989.
China and Pakistan also share close military relations, with China supplying a range of
modern armaments to the Pakistani defence forces.
China supports Pakistan's stance on Kashmir, while Pakistan supports China on the issues
of Xinjiang, Tibet, and Taiwan.
Military cooperation has deepened, with joint projects producing armaments ranging
from fighter jets to guided missile frigates.
Chinese cooperation with Pakistan has reached economic high points, with substantial
Chinese investment in Pakistani infrastructural expansion including the Pakistani
deepwater port at Gwadar.
Both countries have an ongoing free trade agreement.
Pakistan has served as China's main bridge to the Islamic world, and also played an
important role in bridging the communication gap between the PRC and the West by
facilitating U.S. President Richard Nixon's historic 1972 visit to China.
The relations between Pakistan and China have been described by Pakistan's ambassador
to China as "higher than the mountains, deeper than the oceans, stronger than steel,
dearer than eyesight, sweeter than honey, and so on."
According to Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, Pakistan is China's biggest
arms buyer, counting for nearly 47% of Chinese arms exports.
According to a 2014 BBC World Service Poll, 75% of Pakistanis view China's influence
positively with only 15% expressing a negative view. In the Indo-Pacific region, Chinese
people hold the third most positive opinions of Pakistan's influence in the world, behind
Indonesia and Pakistan itself.
IR scholars have observed that despite the PRC and Pakistan being "highly divergent
societies and polities with conflicting views on central global issues", the two states have
nevertheless forged a dynamic relationship over several decades – something which
supports the idea that realpolitik motivates foreign policies in the international system.
Relations between China and Pakistan represents a striking and paradigmatic example of
how state power considerations, rather than culture, ideology, economic interest or
composition of ruling elites, can determine foreign policy behaviour – as conceptualised
by the neo-realist school of International Relations (IR) theory.
S-Social role
E-Economic Role
P-Political Role
T-Technological role
E-Educational role
M-Moral
B-Biological
E-Environmental
R-Regional & international
Lack of parliamentary debate on the issue was also a major flaw in the previous
drafts of the national security policy. On the whole, in Pakistan, democracy or
democratic processes are hardly considered a factor in nurturing national
cohesion, building trust among communities and bringing economic prosperity to
the country.
There is no harm in getting input from academic institutions and think tanks,
despite their sorry state of affairs in the country. At least the standing and special
committees of the lower and upper houses can be taken on board. In the end,
these committees can ensure implementation and transparency in policy
discourse. But the establishment is not a big fan of these committees and often
ridicules the ‘quality’ of the people’s representatives.
The fate of the policy framework, which has yet to materialise, cannot be
predicted. The bureaucracy has also developed some security frameworks,
including the National Internal Security Policy, Counter Violent Extremism Policy,
and National Dialogue Policy. However, these policies have never been taken
seriously enough to be implemented.
The existing power structure is not capable of conceiving new ideas nor can it
implement even what it devises on its own.
The National Action Plan is another example of this failure, with a little exception
in that parliament was taken on board, at least for its endorsement. This is the
reason NAP is still alive in memory and we recall it whenever any critical
extremism challenge arises.
A shift in our security approach needs open discussion on public forums, media,
and in parliament.
Drafting may require skill and for this purpose, the bureaucracy is brought in. If
shorn of clichés and jargon, the national security discourse can be described in a
simple way.
To handle its internal and external challenges, Pakistan needs a strong economy
and good relations with the world, especially with its neighbours. Among the
neighbours, India is the most critical challenge, mainly because of the Kashmir
issue. To deal with India, there are several courses of action possible, including
direct talks, mediation or complete disengagement.
To defuse tensions, there are few better examples in both countries than the
efforts made by Vajpayee, Musharraf, and Mian Nawaz Sharif. If required, these
can be used as a template or they can be reinvented, but the most important
consideration is leadership.
The relationship between India and Pakistan has passed through many ups and
downs. During the good patches it has triggered enormous optimism on both
sides, but its fundamentally conventional framework has remained intact. It is
interesting that whenever a change in national security is conceived in
Islamabad, it starts from the eastern border.
This is natural as our political universe revolves around the threat from the
eastern side, and this is deeply rooted in our psyche.
what kind of shift does the power elite have in mind? These questions need an
open discussion on public forums, media, and most importantly, in parliament.
Pakistan has to focus more on transforming its economy, which may require
good relations with India, Afghanistan and Iran. Conceiving everything in the
security perspective and putting everything in the basket of human security will
further empower the elites, which are least interested in reforming the economy,
state, and society, and more concerned about maximising the advantages to
themselves.
The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor has become a victim of this mindset. CPEC
has great potential to transform the economy and challenge the existing means
of production, but the idea has been confined to a narrow strategic and political
context.