Professional Documents
Culture Documents
www.elsevier.com/locate/carbon
a
Department of Chemistry and Material Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Shinshu University,
4-17-1 Wakasato, Nagano-shi, Nagano 380-8553, Japan
b
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Shinshu University,
4-17-1 Wakasato, Nagano-shi, Nagano 380-8553, Japan
Abstract
The multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs, mean diameter: 100–200 nm) with nickel–phosphorous (Ni–P) coatings were
obtained by an electroless deposition process. To prepare the MWCNTs covered with continual Ni–P layers, a pre-treatment pro-
cedure comprised of acid-cleaning, sensitization and activation has been developed. The resulting MWCNTs have a uniform distri-
bution of the Ni–P layers coated on the MWCNTs with the fibrous appearance maintained. X-ray diffraction (XRD) and
transmission electron microscopy (TEM) observations revealed that the as-coated MWCNTs were comprised of the amorphous
Ni–P layers and inner carbon nanotubes covered with the Ni–P layers. These amorphous Ni–P-coated MWCNTs were used as pre-
cursors for preparing MWCNTs with nanocrystalline Ni–P(crystalline Ni and Ni3P intermetallic compound) layers by the heat-
treatment above 400 C, which were determined by differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) and XRD studies. The results of this
work provide an effective electrochemical method for preparing powdery MWCNTs with Ni–P layer as new composite materials
from the aqueous solution.
2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
0008-6223/$ - see front matter 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.carbon.2005.02.015
F. Wang et al. / Carbon 43 (2005) 1716–1721 1717
on MWCNTs, it would be indispensable to increase the chemical method to prepare the powdery MWCNTs
catalyzation sites (which promote the electroless deposi- with metal layers.
tion) on the nanotube surface, and to improve the inter-
facial adhesion between MWCNTs and metal layers.
Therefore, an appropriate pre-treatment of MWCNTs 2. Experimental
is required prior to the electroless deposition process.
The pre-treated nanotubes are considered to undergo The MWCNTs used in the present study were synthe-
Ni–P layers more efficiently, when immersed to the plat- sized via catalyst-assisted chemical vapor deposition
ing bath containing metal source and reducing agent. (CVD) process (Showa Denko Co. Ltd.) [8]. They were
However, MWCNTs have a propensity to aggregate then heat-treated at 2800 C in an argon flow for 30 min.
into packed ropes or entangled networks due to strong Fig. 1 shows the pristine MWCNTs of 100–200 nm in
inter-tube van der Waals attraction, which hinders hom- diameter and of 20 lm in average length.
ogenously distribution of metal layers on individual The plating bath used contained 0.1 M NiSO4 Æ 6-
nanotubes. The present study has tried to develop an H2O, 0.2 M NaH2PO2 Æ H2O, 0.5 M C6H5Na3O7, and
optimum pre-treatment procedure for an ideal electro- 0.5 M (NH4)2SO4. All solutions were prepared using
less deposition, which makes Ni–P layers to be homo- deionized water and reagent grade chemicals.
geneously deposited on the surface of individual To impart the catalytic sites on the surface of
MWCNTs. Firstly, we conducted the cleaning and sur- MWCNTs for the electroless Ni–P deposition,
face modification of the pristine MWCNTs using con- MWCNTs need to be pre-treated through acid-cleaning
centrated nitric acid. Subsequently, sensitization and (purification and surface modification), sensitization
activation (so-called two-step process) of the acid-trea- and activation. Fig. 2 shows the process sequence of
ted MWCNTs were carried out to endow the nanotube electroless Ni–P deposition on MWCNTs including
surface with the catalyzation effect promoting the subse- the pre-treatment. Firstly, MWCNTs were cleaned in
quent electroless Ni–P deposition. To prevent the aggre- 12.8 M concentrated HNO3 for 12 h, and washed thor-
gation of the treated MWCNTs in the aqueous oughly with deionized water. The cleaning process by
solutions, a cationic polymer was employed as a dispers- nitric acid eliminates the residual metal catalyst parti-
ing agent. cles from the MWCNTs as-prepared by the CVD
The Ni–P layers formed by electroless deposition can process [9], which prevents the side-effect originating
be identified as a metastable phase from the viewpoint of from the catalyst particles in the subsequent electroless
thermodynamics, which is converted into a more stable
crystalline phase by heat-treatment. As a significant
application of such thermodynamically metastable prop-
erties of amorphous alloys, a previous study has reported
a novel fabrication method of nanocrystalline alloys by
an appropriate heat-treatment [7]. Based on this, we have
further prepared the MWCNTs with nanocrystalline Ni–
P layers by the heat-treatment of the amorphous Ni–P-
coated MWCNTs. The nano-crystallization process
was observed through differential scanning calorimeter
(DSC) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements.
In this study, we designed an advantageous pre-treat-
ment procedure allowing preparation of MWCNTs with
Ni–P coatings by an electroless deposition process. These
coated carbon nanotubes then were also characterized by
several techniques including scanning electron micro-
scope, X-ray diffracmeter and transmission electron Fig. 1. SEM image of pristine multi-walled carbon nanotubes
microscope. Our study provided an effective electro- (MWCNTs).
Fig. 2. Schematic illustration of the procedure of electroless Ni–P deposition on MWCNTs: (a) acid-cleaning, (b) sensitization, (c) activation, and
(d) electroless deposition.
1718 F. Wang et al. / Carbon 43 (2005) 1716–1721
deposition. Moreover, the acid-cleaning process slightly tural variation with temperature by XRD analysis, the
modifies the surface of MWCNTs to enhance the inter- sample was heat-treated under argon atmosphere at
facial adhesion between the MWCNTs and metal layers 200–480 C for 60 min, where the heating rate was
[10]. 10 C/min.
Next, the cleaned MWCNTs were sensitized in the
aqueous solution containing 8.9 · 10 3 M SnCl2 and
2.4 · 10 3 M HCl for 10 min. Subsequently, the sensi- 3. Results and discussion
tized MWCNTs were activated in an aqueous solution
containing 1.2 · 10 3 M PdCl2 and 1.2 · 10 2 M HCl 3.1. Morphological features of composites
for 30 min, followed by washing thoroughly with deion-
ized water. In the ‘‘two-step’’ method, the sensitization Although the pristine MWCNTs are black powders,
process leads to the adsorption of Sn2+ on the nanotube the obtained MWCNTs with Ni–P layers prepared by
surface, while the activation process forms fine Pd parti- the electroless deposition showed gray color, remaining
cles on the nanotube surfaces through the displacement powdery state. Fig. 3(a) shows the morphological fea-
reaction of Sn2+ with Pd2+. The resulting Pd particles tures of the coated MWCNTs observed by the FE-
serve as seeds for catalytic nucleation centers. SEM measurement. The appearance of the coated
Finally, the pre-treated MWCNTs were immersed in MWCNTs is fibrous (300–400 nm in diameter), and
the electroless Ni–P plating bath (a beaker of 200 cm3) the electrolessly deposited Ni–P layers are homoge-
with stirring magnetically. On each step of pre-treatment nously distributed on the individual nanotubes. This
and subsequent electroless deposition, the MWCNTs clearly indicates the validity of the above pre-treatment
were dispersed by adding 1.25 · 10 6 M poly(diallyl- procedure for the electroless deposition on MWCNTs.
dimethylammonium chrolide) solution (PDMA, mean The SEM image with higher magnification (Fig. 3(b))
molecular weight: 400 000, Aldrich) in the aqueous solu- shows the further morphological features that the sur-
tions. The electroless Ni–P deposition was conducted at face of the coated MWCNTs is relatively smooth, and
the temperature of 60 C for 30 min. Then, the resulting the thickness of the electroless deposition layer covering
MWCNTs with Ni–P layers were filtered, washed well the inner nanotube is about 90 nm.
with deionized water, and dried at room temperature
in a vacuum desiccator. 3.2. Phase structures of composites
The chemical composition of the Ni–P layers was
identified by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy The results of the EDS analysis indicate that the P
(EDS) analysis (Noran, Instrument, Inc.). The morpho- content in the electroless deposition layers is about
logical features of the MWCNTs with Ni–P layers were 19–21 at.%. The phase structures of the as-coated
investigated by field emission scanning electron micros- MWCNTs have been determined by the XRD analysis.
copy (FE-SEM, HITACHI S-4100). The phase struc- Fig. 4 illustrates the XRD patterns of (a) the pristine
tures of the MWCNTs with Ni–P layers were MWCNTs and (b) the as-coated MWCNTs with Ni–P
determined by X-ray diffractometry (XRD, RIGAKU layers. In the diffraction pattern (Fig. 4(a)) of the pris-
RINT2200V/PC) and high-resolution transmission elec- tine MWCNTs, a sharp and intense peak at
tron microscopy (HR-TEM, JEOL JEM-2000FE). A 2h = 26.42 and several small peaks are observed, which
differential scanning calorimeter (DSC, Seiko DSC- correspond to (0 0 2), (1 0 0), (1 0 1), (0 0 4) and (1 1 0)
200) was used to investigate the transformation of the planes of graphitized MWCNTs, respectively. In the
phase structures up to 450 C. The DSC measurements case of the as-coated MWCNTs, a new broad peak
were carried out under nitrogen atmosphere to prevent other than the (0 0 2) diffraction peak of graphitized
the oxidation of the samples. To characterize the struc- MWCNTs is clearly observed at around 45, which orig-
Fig. 3. SEM images of Ni–P-coated MWCNTs by the electroless deposition: (a) low magnification (b) higher magnification.
F. Wang et al. / Carbon 43 (2005) 1716–1721 1719
VGCF (004)
VGCF (100)
VGCF (101)
VGCF (110)
the nanotube surface, the phase structure of which is
an amorphous state without any trace of crystalline
Intensity (CPS)
359°C
10°C/min
Heat flow
[2] Iijima S, Ichihashi T. Single-shell carbon nanotubes of 1-nm. [9] Zhang Y, Shi Z, Gu Z, Iijima S. Structure modification of single-
Nature 1993;363:603–5. wall carbon nanotubes. Carbon 2000;38:2055–9.
[3] Chand S. Review carbon fibers for composites. J Mater Sci [10] Esumi K, Ishigami M, Nakajima A, Swada K, Honda H. Chemical
2000;35:1303–13. treatment of carbon nanotubes. Carbon 1996;34:279–81.
[4] Wang F, Arai S, Endo M. Metallization of multi-walled carbon [11] Revesz A, Lendvai J, Loranth J, Padar J, Bakonyi I. Nanocrys-
nanotubes with copper by an electroless deposition process. tallization studies of an electroless plated Ni–P amorphous alloy. J
Electrochem Commun 2004;6:1042–4. Electrochem Soc 2001;148:C715–20.
[5] Arai S, Endo M. Carbon nanofiber–copper composite powder [12] Keong KG, Sha W, Malinov S. Crystallization and phase
prepared by electrodeposition. Electrochem Commun 2003;5: transformation behavior of electroless nickel–phosphorus deposits
797–9. with low and medium phosphorus contents under continuous
[6] Arai S, Endo M, Kaneko N. Ni-deposited multi-walled carbon heating. J Mater Sci 2002;37:4445–50.
nanotubes by electrodeposition. Carbon 2004;42:641–4. [13] Revesz A, Lendvai J, Cziraki A, Liebermann HH, Bakonyi I.
[7] Lu K. Nanocrystalline metals crystallized from amorphous solids: Formation of nanocrystalline phases during decomposition of
nanocrystallization, structure, and properties. Mater Sci Eng R amorphous Ni–P alloys by continuous linear heating. Metallk-
1996;16:161–221. unde 2001;92:483–8.
[8] Endo M. Grow carbon fibers in the vapor phase. Chemtech [14] Endo M, Koyama T. Heat resistance properties of vapor growth
1988;18:568–76. carbon fibers in air. Tanso 1980;101:59–62.