On the second day of analysis, the group critically examined the standard risk equation and learned about the Risk Metrics and GARCH models for measuring risk. They also reviewed two portfolios - an equity portfolio with higher volatility and lower probability of default, and a bond portfolio containing catastrophe bonds with lower volatility but higher probability of default. Finally, the document defines volatility as expected risk during normal times, while tail risk represents unexpected risk during abnormal times, and explains value at risk as the unlikely or worst potential loss of a portfolio's value over a given period.
On the second day of analysis, the group critically examined the standard risk equation and learned about the Risk Metrics and GARCH models for measuring risk. They also reviewed two portfolios - an equity portfolio with higher volatility and lower probability of default, and a bond portfolio containing catastrophe bonds with lower volatility but higher probability of default. Finally, the document defines volatility as expected risk during normal times, while tail risk represents unexpected risk during abnormal times, and explains value at risk as the unlikely or worst potential loss of a portfolio's value over a given period.
On the second day of analysis, the group critically examined the standard risk equation and learned about the Risk Metrics and GARCH models for measuring risk. They also reviewed two portfolios - an equity portfolio with higher volatility and lower probability of default, and a bond portfolio containing catastrophe bonds with lower volatility but higher probability of default. Finally, the document defines volatility as expected risk during normal times, while tail risk represents unexpected risk during abnormal times, and explains value at risk as the unlikely or worst potential loss of a portfolio's value over a given period.
On the second day we then critically analyzed the standard equation.
We also learned about
the industrial approach which is Risk Metrics that was developed by JP Morgan in the early 90’s. Another approach is the academic model approach which is the GARCH model. Lambda value is taken to be 0.95. This signifies that 0.05 weightage is given to the recent data while 0.95 weightage is given to the historical data. When we’ll take lambda to be 1, we go back to standard deviation. We then looked at two portfolios which were: 1. Equity based and 2. Bond based. They both were giving 8% return. But portfolio 1 had 40% volatility and 0.1% probability of default, while portfolio 2 had 10% volatility and 1% probability of default. Portfolio 2 contained CAT bonds (catastrophe bonds). These bonds would pay in case of an occurrence of a catastrophe. These types of bonds are bought by pension funds. Volatility can be viewed as the expected risk or risk in normal times while tail risk is the unexpected risk or risk in abnormal times. Risk = the probability of an event over a period X Value of portfolio Value at risk: Simple: Loss that is unlikely to be exceeded over a period Complicated: Worst loss over a target horizon that will not be exceeded with a given weight of confidence