Mark Vincent Espinosa

Bs Crim 1B

1. You certainly have already experienced making moral decisions for Yourself and
making moral judgments on others, deciding that this action is right, while the opposite
would be wrong can You recall a number of those instances? Now can you also recall the
reasoning behind your having said this is right or that is wrong? Reason.
Answer :I made the internal decision that when I was scolded, I had already experienced
many taboos and had been suffocated by love and protection. they were signaling to me that
they were depriving me of the pleasure I desired. I'm upset because I'm considering moving
out of our home, staying with a friend first, and looking for a job so that I can live alone and
no one will stop me from doing anything. Naturally, because I want to be correct, I will
believe I am. I want to learn what it's like to live alone and use my own money to get the
things I desire. But, if human knowledge is to be truly revelatory and practical, it must be
reduced to perceptual experience. Of ethical reasoning, this is unquestionably accurate. One
must be able to observe how virtues function in real-world situations. Honesty, for instance,
is the quality of accepting the world as it is without making claims that what is or is not true.
If we pretend they don't exist or ignore them, we won't be able to handle the problems of life
successfully. Hence, in order to properly cope with the numerous realities we are faced with
on a daily basis, we must put the qualities (in this case, honesty) into practice.

2. Distinguish among the following: moral issue, moral judgment, moral decision, moral
dilemma.
Answer : Moral issue are ones in which there is a difference in opinion rather than a question
of preference, Moral judgment are normally made by an observer evaluating an act
committed by a different, frequently fictitious, person, Moral decision is one that is chosen in
accordance with one's morals, manners, character, and ideas of what is appropriate conduct,
and Moral Dilemma are the decision-maker must weigh two or more moral obligations or
ideals but can only uphold one of them; as a result, regardless of the choice, the person will
break at least one significant moral obligation.

3. Distinguish between a descriptive versus normative study of ethics.

Answer : The primary distinction between normative and descriptive ethics is that the former
examines how individuals should behave while the latter examines what individuals believe
to be morally appropriate. Descriptive ethics is the study of people's perspectives on moral
ideas, whereas normative ethics is the study of ethical behavior. As the name suggests,
descriptive ethics explains how people behave and what moral principles they adhere to.
Descriptive ethics, on the other hand, focuses on moral good and evil. Metaethics and
practical ethics are the other two well-known subfields of ethics.

4. Explain: what is the importance of abstraction in ethical thinking?

Answer : If knowledge is to be truly revelatory and practical, it must be reduced to perceptual
experience. Of ethical reasoning, this is unquestionably accurate. One must be able to observe
how virtues function in real-world situations. Honesty, for instance, is the quality of
accepting the world as it is without making claims that what is or is not true. If we pretend
they don't exist or ignore them, we won't be able to handle the problems of life successfully.
Hence, in order to properly cope with the different realities we are faced with on a daily
basis, we must put the qualities (in this case, honesty) into practice.