Professional Documents
Culture Documents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents
1.1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................1
1.2 Background of the problem..................................................................................................2
1.3 Legality and rights................................................................................................................3
Anti-Homosexuality Act...................................................................................................3
1.4 Recognition of same-sex relationships.................................................................................4
1.5 Recognition of transgender identity.....................................................................................4
1.6 Problem statement................................................................................................................5
1.6.2 REDUCED LIFE EXPECTANCY...................................................................................7
1.6.3 SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED INFECTIONS/DISEASES (STIs or STDs)...................7
1.6.4CANCER............................................................................................................................8
1.6.7 YOUTH AT RISK............................................................................................................9
1.7 General Objective...............................................................................................................10
1.8 SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES..................................................................................................10
1.9 RESEARCH QUESTIONS................................................................................................10
1.10 SCOPE OF THE STUDY................................................................................................10
1.10.1 SUBJECT SCOPE........................................................................................................10
1.10.2 GEOGRAPHICAL SCOPE..........................................................................................10
1.10.3 TIME SCOPE................................................................................................................11
1.10.4 JUSTIFICATION OF THE STUDY............................................................................11
1.10.5 Significance of the study...............................................................................................11
1.11 CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK....................................................................................11
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW..........................................................................12
2.1 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................12
2.2The Concept of a Law Against LGBTQ Activities.............................................................12
2.3 People’s View....................................................................................................................12
CHAPTER THREE..................................................................................................................14
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY.............................................................................................14
3.0 Introduction........................................................................................................................14
3.1 Study Research Design......................................................................................................14
3.2 Study Population................................................................................................................14
3.3 Sample Size........................................................................................................................14
3.4 Data Collection...................................................................................................................14
3.7 Questionnaires....................................................................................................................15
3.7.2 Pre- administration of the questionnaire.........................................................................15
3.7.3 Administration of the questionnaire................................................................................15
3.8 Limitations of the Study.....................................................................................................15
Chapter One
1.1 INTRODUCTION.
Morality has always been the core determinant of laws in many jurisdictions in Africa and
particularly in Uganda. Ever since the revival of the scientific study of jurisprudence the
connection of law and morality has much been discussed, but the question is not yet, and
perhaps never will be settled. Every variety of opinion has been entertained, from the extreme
doctrine held by Austin that for the purpose of the jurist, law is absolutely independent of
morality, almost to the opposite positions, held by every Oriental cadi, that morality and law
are one. The question is an important one, and upon the answer which is given to it depends
upon the answer which is consequences. The problem is an intensely practical one. And on a
contemporary African setting, morality indeed influences the law.
The popular conception of the connection between law and morality is that in some way the
law exists to promote morality, to preserve those conditions which make the moral life
possible, and than to enable men to lead sober and industrious lives. The average man regards
law as justice systematized, and justice itself as a somewhat chaotic mass of moral principles.
On this view, the positive law is conceived of as a code of rules, corresponding to the code of
moral laws, deriving its authority from the obligatory character of those moral laws, and
being just or unjust according as it agrees with, or differs from them. This, like all other
popular conceptions, is inadequate for scientific purposes, and the jurist, so for at least as he
is also a scientist, is compelled to abandon it. For it is contradicted by the fact’s. positive laws
do not rest upon moral laws and common notions of justice furnish no court of appeal from
the decrees of the State. The average man confounds law and morality, and identifies the
rules of law with the principles of abstract justice.
Law is an enactment made by the state. It is backed by physical coercion. Its breach is
punishable by the courts. It represents the will of the state and realizes its purpose. Laws
reflect the political, social and economic relationships in the society. It determines rights and
duties of the citizens towards one another and towards the state. It is through law that the
government fulfils its promises to the people. It reflects the sociological need of society. Law
and morality are intimately related to each other. Laws are generally based on the moral
principles of society.
They influence each other to a great extent. Laws, to be effective, must represent the moral
ideas of the people. But good laws sometimes serve to rouse the moral conscience of the
people and create and maintain such conditions as may encourage the growth of morality.
Laws regarding prohibition and spread of primary education are examples of this nature.
Morality cannot, as a matter of fact, be divorced from politics. The ultimate end of a state is
the promotion of general welfare and moral perfection of man. It is the duty of the state to
formulate such laws as will elevate the moral standard of the people. The laws of a state thus
conform to the prevailing standard of morality.
Earlier writers on Political Science never made any distinction between law and morality.
Plato's Republic is as good a treatise on politics as on ethics. In ancient India, the term
Dharma connoted both law and morality. Law, it is pointed out, is not merely the command
of the sovereign, it represents the idea of right or wrong based on the prevalent morality of
the people. Moreover, obedience to law depends upon the active support of the moral
sentiments of the people. Laws which are not supported by the moral conscience of the
people are liable to become dead letters. For example laws regarding Prohibition in India
have not succeeded on account of the fact that full moral conscience of the people has not
been aroused in favor of such laws. As Green put it, "In attempting to enforce an unpopular
law, a government may be doing more harm than good by creating and spreading the habit of
disobedience to law. The total cost of such an attempt may well be greater than the social
gain." Although law and morality arc interdependent yet they differ from each other in their
content, definiteness and sanction
Overtime, activities of the LGBTQ+ community have gradually increased in Uganda that
greatly affects the moral beliefs of Ugandans as Uganda is a highly conservative society that
greatly believes in religion and aspects of culture.
Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) are subject to active discrimination and
stigmatization. As it is entirely against our morals and the laws have continued to prove blind
to this aspect. We have an Un-natural offenses 1but this act has also proven non workable as
it never specifies the actual activities.
1
Section 147 Penal Code Act, Cap 120.
Mwanga II took a more aggressive approach than other African leaders, choosing to expel all
missionaries and insist that Christian and Muslim converts abandon their faith or face death.
The Luganda term abasiyazi refers to homosexuals, though usage nowadays is commonly
pejorative. The Baganda were not the only ethnic group known to engage in homosexual acts.
Among the Lango people, mudoko dako individuals were believed to form a "third gender"
alongside male and female. The mudoko dako were effeminate men, mostly treated by Langi
society as women and could marry other men without social sanctions. [13] Homosexuality was
also acknowledged among the Teso, Bahima, Banyoro, and Karamojong peoples.[14] Societal
acceptance disappeared after the arrival of the British and the creation of the Protectorate of
Uganda.
Presently, there is widespread denial that homosexuality was practised before colonisation.
Furthermore, the false belief that homosexuality is "un-African" or "Western" is quite
prevalent in Ugandan society.
The term kuchu, of Swahili origin, is increasingly used by the Ugandan LGBT community. A
documentary film, Call Me Kuchu, was released in 2012, focusing in part on the 2011 murder
of LGBT activist David Kato.
4
January 16, 2023 Parliament of Uganda
since the late 1980s and deems that approximately two percent of the U.S. population
identifies as either gay, lesbian, or bisexual.2 The 2006-2008 National Survey of Family
Growth conducted by the CDC’s National Center for Health Statistics found that among
women ages 18 to 44, 3.5 percent identified as bisexual with 1.4 percent identifying as
homosexual, gay, or lesbian. Among men of the same age group, 1.7 percent claimed gay
identity with 1.1 percent identifying as bisexual.3
The question of the ultimate origin of sexual orientation is not yet definitively answered, but
there is very little evidence that anyone is inherently of alternative sexual orientation.
A 1993 scientific literature critique by Byne and Parsons in Archives of General Psychiatry
reviewed the major studies on the subject and found no evidence favoring sexual orientation
being either genetically or biologically determined.4
Researchers Friedman and Downey of Columbia University School of Medicine remarked,
“At clinical conferences one often hears . . . that homosexuality is fixed and unmodifiable.
Neither assertion is true. . . . The assertion that homosexuality is genetic is so reductionist that
it must be dismissed out of hand as a general principle of psychology.”5
Dr. Francis S. Collins, current Director of the U.S. National Institutes of Health and former
director of the National Human Genome Research Institute, asserted that homosexuality “is
genetically influenced but not hardwired by DNA” and that “whatever genes are involved
represent predispositions, not predeterminations . . .” 6 Predisposition is not destiny.
The 2008 American Psychological Association’s brochure Sexual Orientation &
Homosexuality:5, “There is no consensus among scientists about the exact reasons that an
individual develops a heterosexual, bisexual, gay, or lesbian orientation. Although much
research has examined the possible genetic, hormonal, developmental, social, and cultural
influences on sexual orientation, no findings have emerged that permit scientists to conclude
that sexual orientation is determined by any particular factor or factors. Many think that
nature and nurture both play complex roles; most people experience little or no sense of
choice about their sexual orientation.”7
GLBT-oriented men and women may not choose their attractions, but, short of force, they do
choose their sex partners. From a national health perspective, the issue is not the origins of
homosexual or GLBT orientation, but the consequences of engaging in such sexual activity.
The negative health consequences of alternative sexuality are made more understandable by
first recognizing the nature of the sexual practices at issue. A 1979 survey in the book The
Gay Report revealed the percentage of gay men who engaged in the following practices: 99%
oral sex, 91% anal sex, 82% rimming (analingus), 22% fisting, 23% golden showers
(urination on another), 4% scat (defecation on another). 8 The book’s two authors were of
same-sex sexual attraction. A May 2011 medical journal article found that felching (“sucking
or eating semen out of someone's anus”) was a sought-after practice in one-sixth of men’s
profiles in “one of the largest Internet websites specifically targeting MSM looking for
partners for unprotected sex.”9
The Gay Lesbian Medical Association (GLMA) web site describes the following detrimental
effects associated with same-sex sexual practice: higher rates of HIV/AIDS, substance abuse,
depression/anxiety, hepatitis, sexually transmitted illnesses (anal papilloma/HPV, gonorrhea,
syphilis, and chlamydia), certain cancers, alcohol abuse, tobacco use, eating disorders, and (in
subsets) obesity.10
5
Answers to Your Questions for a Better Understanding states
In February 2009 a Canadian GLBT group filed a human rights complaint against the
Canadian government and Health Canada asserting that the Canadian GLBT population had
poor statistics for life expectancy (twenty years short of standard), suicide, alcohol and illicit
drug/substance abuse, cancer, infectious disease, HIV/AIDS, and depression. This is
noteworthy in that it challenges the assertion of those claiming the negative health statistics
attributed to individuals of GLBT orientation are merely a function of the lack of acceptance
of such individuals, and that said statistics would improve with their increased acceptance.
Canada provides a highly supportive government, celebration from liberal churches, and a
public coerced into silence by hate speech codes, yet the poor health indicators for the GLBT
populace remains. This demonstrates that acceptance and affirmation of same-sex sexuality is
not the promised antidote for the problems inherent in GLBT sexuality.
To reiterate, The Gay Report, the Gay Lesbian Medical Association, and the Canadian GLBT
coalition’s human rights complaint are sources from within the GLBT population.
1.6.4CANCER
A 2011 study published in the journal Cancer found gay men demonstrating 1.9 times the
odds of reporting a cancer than heterosexual men, while “. . .lesbian and bisexual female
cancer survivors had 2.0 and 2.3× the odds of reporting fair or poor health compared with
heterosexual female cancer survivors.” 19 In a related interview, lead researcher Dr. Boehmer
specified that said cancers were both AIDS associated and non-AIDS defining. Examples of
the latter were given as, “anal, lung, testicular cancer, and Hodgkin’s lymphoma.”20
The American Cancer Society’s web page Cancer Facts for Gay and Bisexual Men specifies
that gay men are at increased risk for lung, testicular, colon, and anal cancers.21 Their web
page Cancer Facts for Lesbians and Bisexual Women indicates this population finds an
increased risk of breast, lung, colon, ovarian, and endometrial cancers.22 For both the groups
listed, the risk factors are described as stemming in part from higher rates of tobacco use,
alcohol use, and being overweight. For breast and gynaecologic malignancies, the Cancer
Facts for Lesbians and Bisexual Women page clarifies, “Women who have not had children
and have not breast-fed, have not used oral contraceptives, and are older when they first give
birth – all factors more likely to affect lesbians and bisexual women – are also at a slightly
higher risk.”
The Gay & Lesbian Medical Association (GLMA) web site features the page Ten Things
Lesbians Should discuss with Their Healthcare Provider, which states the following:
“Lesbians have the richest concentration of risk factors for breast cancer than any subset of
women in the world.” And “Lesbians have higher risks for many of the gynaecologic
cancers.”23
The GLMA’s web page Ten Things Gay Men Should Discuss with Their Healthcare Provider
warns, “Gay men may be at risk for death by prostate, testicular, or colon cancer.” It also
notes, “. . . the increased rates of anal cancers in gay men.”24
MENTAL HEALTH
The Netherlands Mental Health Survey and Incidence Study (NEMESIS) asserted, “people
with same-sex sexual behavior are at greater risk for psychiatric disorders.” Mood disorders,
anxiety, having more than one psychiatric diagnosis, and substance use disorders were
specified. 25
A 1999 New Zealand Study found that gay, lesbian, and bisexual young people were at
increased risk for suicidal behavior and ideation, major depression, generalized anxiety
disorder, conduct disorder, tobacco dependence, and multiple disorders compared to the
heterosexual subsample.26 The study also reported a prevalence rate of two percent for
homosexuality/bisexuality, 2.8 percent if counting any same-sex encounter after sixteen years
of age.
A 1999 co-twin control study in adult men, “Sexual Orientation and Suicidality,” showed
same-sex sexual orientation was significantly associated with four measures of suicidality
(thoughts about death, wanting to die, thoughts of suicide, and attempt). After adjustment for
substance abuse and depressive symptoms, three of four measures (except “wanting to die”)
remained higher in same-sex attracted people than heterosexuals.27
A 2001 study came to similar conclusions: “Homosexual orientation, defined as having same-
sex sexual partners, is associated with a general elevation of risk for anxiety, mood, and
substance use disorders and for suicidal thoughts and plans.”28
1.6.5 DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
Domestic violence is higher in same-sex relationships. In 2004, with a 50,000 U.S. dollar
grant from the Blue Shield of California Foundation, the Gay and Lesbian Medical
Association launched the "LGBT Relationship Violence Project" to educate medical
professionals about the high rate of domestic violence in those communities. "The Blue
Shield of California Foundation recognizes that little attention has been paid to domestic
violence in LGBT contexts..." said Marianne Balin, manager of the Blue Shield of California
Foundation's anti-violence program. 29
In 1993 a Boston program for gay-bashing victims noted that half the calls they received
regarded domestic violence. Same-sex-couple domestic violence is called “the second
closet,” and has been a taboo subject for conversation. “In a sexual minority, there’s always
resistance to airing dirty laundry,” reported Terry Person, director of San Francisco’s
Community United Against Violence. 30
One might assume said violence is mainly a male-on-male phenomenon, but the literature
refutes this. The Journal of Social Service Research in 1991 published a survey of more than
1,100 lesbians with over half reporting, “they had been abused by a female lover/partner. The
most frequently indicated forms of abuse were verbal/emotional/ psychological abuse and
combined physical-psychological abuse.”31
A 1994 study in the Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology reported that 37% of
lesbians had been physically abused as adults or children, and 32% were either raped or
sexually battered. 32
From the conceptual framework above, we realize that the morality protection and
degradation is largely dependent on the law against LGBTQ activities. We further realize that
the spread of LGBTQ activities and further their control is dependent on the legislation
available that is the law.
CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW
2.1 INTRODUCTION
This Chapter intends to deal on the impact of the Ugandan Law on the activities of the
LGBTQ+ community in Uganda
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.0 Introduction
This chapter will focus on the research methodology that was used in the study. It provides a
detailed description of the research approach adopted in this study. Research design, target
population, research instruments, data collection and analysis methods used were presented in
the subsequent sections.