Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hope O’Malley
Mr. Smith
E Block
12 January 2023
The 1920’s are typically remembered as a turning point in the battle for women's rights,
but there were many obstacles during this time that are seldom remembered. The way in which
these women were treated was dependent on how much they adopted the modern ideals of the
decade. In The Great Gatsby the treatment of male characters versus their female counterparts is
a shocking difference, even though several of these characters have similar traits. In the novel, F.
Scott Fitzgerald portrays a pessimistic view of the 1920’s by writing women who are
progressive, but in actuality are still constrained to traditional ideals as seen through the
As the century advanced the Progressive Era was in full effect, allowing women several
new benefits, helping to improve their power socially and politically. The new opportunities
given to women completely changed their economic contributions, “The decade kicked off with
passage of the 19th Amendment, which gave white women the vote. Women also joined the
workforce in increasing numbers, participated actively in the nation’s new mass consumer
culture, and enjoyed more freedom in their personal lives.”(Pruitt). “Women's role” in society
and old traditions also changed overtime, “It wasn’t just their fashion that made flappers; It was
also their behavior and attitude. Flappers were young, fast-moving, fast-talking, reckless and
unfazed by previous social conventions or taboos. They smoked cigarettes, drank alcohol, rode in
O’Malley 2
and drove cars and kissed and “petted” with different men.” (Pruitt). The progression in several
different aspects of womens life is what made this period so crucial to women's advancement to
society. Earning the right to vote was another monumental step towards gender equality that gave
women not only the ability to gain political power, but also economic power. Rates of
employment for women increased as well as their individual income, giving them more respect
in society. Although the political and economic changes were vital to the women's role, social
advancements were arguably the most important to women in the Progressive era. Through
external changes in appearance or an internal change of ideals, women around the country
embraced the “flapper” lifestyle, paving the way for future generations of women to gain respect
in society. Although the wave of progressive thinking and actions provided women with a list of
freedoms that greatly improved their social standing, not all freedoms came into place
immediately. The 1920’s was a period filled with change in a short span of time but it lacked any
substantial progress, “Despite the heady freedoms embodied by the flapper, real liberation and
equality for women remained elusive in the 1920s, and it would be left to later generations of
women to fully benefit from the social changes the decade set in motion.”(Pruitt). On paper the
“Jazz Age” provided women with all sorts of new freedoms, and while this is partially true it is
nowhere near the entire story. The “behind the scenes” control of traditionalists who didn’t want
women to advance in society held them back from progressing for generations, despite the
constant battle for women's rights. This understanding of who the “modern women” were, how
they were seen and treated by society, is an important part of not only understanding Fitzgerald’s
The Great Gatsby, but also understanding his characters better and how they display the reality
of the “Roaring Twenties”. Fitzgerald uses the juxtaposition of progress and traditionalism in
The modern age of the 1920’s brought new progressive ideas that completely changed
past societal expectations, traditions and gender roles. New freedoms and opportunities created
to repair gender inequality created a more powerful and independent generation of women. This
new era of modern ideals, and the female characters who took advantage of them are portrayed
by Fitzgerald in a negative view through the seemingly impartial narrator, Nick Carraway. Nick,
a more traditional man, is critical of Bakers lifestyle yet he makes exceptions for more traditional
women which is supported by Strba’s analysis, “Nick makes a very strange statement at one
point regarding the ethical standards of women, which is certainly not the recognized truth he
pretends, though it is endorsed by the actions of all the women in the novel. He is referring to
Jordan Baker when he slips in this comment, deliberately making the reader an accessory to his
way of thinking by the use of the pronoun ‘you’: “Dishonesty in a woman is a thing you never
blame deeply” (Fitzgerald. 48). Nevertheless he does judge Jordan and throws her over in the
end. Daisy, however, is permitted to survive within this ideology – though at the price of her
freedom.” (Strba). Before realizing she was an intelligent woman hiding behind a persona in
order to climb to the top of her field, Nick was attracted to Jordan. Although in the beginning
Nick saw her as a sophisticated woman, he was lying to the reader about his true feelings. He
saw her as a truly special and successful woman, but a woman nonetheless meaning her
accomplishments must be diminished by his inflated ego. Similarly to Strba’s view of how Nick
treated Jordan, he points out the obvious favoritism Nick showed towards Daisy. On the surface
this closer relationship may be brushed over since the two are cousins but it's more likely that
Nick favors her because she is a less modern or “controversial” figure, opposite of Jordan who is
the stereotypical “flapper”. Daisy, having conformed to more traditional ideals that Jordan didn't,
she got married young, had children, and accepted poor treatment from men in her life, was seen
O’Malley 4
as less threatening, therefore Nick treated her better. This correlation between the female
characters' degree of modernity and the way they were treated by men around them shows how
even while progressing into more powerful citizens, women were constantly being held down.
The way Nick treated people he deemed immoral seemed to only apply to female characters and
not any of the male figures who were much more openly suspicious. Nick's blatant judgment of
women who didn't fit in with his morals would suggest that he would impose the same scrutiny
on the male characters, but that wasn’t the reality. Nick’s relationship with Gatsby was often
pressured by the mystery and deceit surrounding Gatsby and his past, but Nick still worshiped
him regardless, “They’re a rotten crowd,” I shouted across the lawn. “You’re worth the whole
damn bunch put together.” (Fitzgerald, p.116). This action shows an obvious double standard that
puts the women of the book in an unfavorable position. This critique of Jordan by what the
reader assumes is an unbiased source forms an unconscious pessimistic view of the modern
women and their lifestyle, similar to the reality these women would have faced. This
manipulation of looking down on women and worshiping the male characters sways readers into
trusting Nick's judgment of Gatsby and looking past his shady character.
In conclusion, F. Scott Fitzgerald used the reality of the 1920’s to portray a pessimistic
view of the reality of women's lives despite them gaining new freedoms. This historical
information and primary source show that the 1920’s brought along seemingly endless amounts
of change, but there was very little true progress that improved women's social standing in
society.
Works Cited
O’Malley 5
2008,
https://www.coursehero.com/tutors-problems/English-Literature/37422731-httpsw
wwwsfcsk12ncuscmslibNC01001395CentricityDomain79/.
https://www.history.com/news/flappers-roaring-20s-women-empowerment.
Strba, Ivan. “Emancipated Women of the Great Gatsby .” Emancipated Women of The
https://www.pulib.sk/web/kniznica/elpub/dokument/Kacmarova2/subor/strba.pdf.
Thesis establishes a
topic and a claim
Thesis Comments:
Evidence
Comments:
Comments:
O’Malley 7
Comments:
Shows evidence of
O’Malley 8
proofreading
Comments:
Hope,
This turned out really fantastic in the end, and structurally it resembles a much longer essay.
What I mean by that is the historical first body paragraph paves the way for the in-depth
analysis in the second. I think next steps to push yourself further would be to add more depth
(even if it means going beyond the assignment. You easily could have fit a body paragraph or 2
more to really dig into the various characters and dynamics.
Great job: A