Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Name
Institution
CAPITAL BUDGETING 2
Capital budgeting technique is also known as the investment appraisal and represent the
mechanism by which companies determine the viability of the capital project. Moreover, the
methods are also used to tell whether an existing asset is worth replacement (Tirole, 2010). The
capital budgeting techniques are grouped into discounting and non-discounting techniques.
Discounting techniques are mostly the traditional appraisal techniques and include the payback
period, accounting rate of return and profitability index. Again, the non-discounting methods do
not take into account the time value of money. The primary discounting techniques include the
net present value and internal rate of return. Net present value takes into account the cash inflows
and the cash-out flow from a given project (Bierman & Smidt, 2012). A project with a positive
NPV should be accepted as viable for investment. IRR, on the other hand, equates the present
value from a given project to zero and represent the percentage of return that is likely to be
McCormick & Company should go ahead and build the new plant and purchase the
equipment because the project has a positive expected cash flow of $ 146.30 million. The
investment has a positive net present value of $ 99 million, stipulating that it is viable for
investment. Lastly, the project has a higher internal rate of return of 93%. The IRR is higher than
the project weighted average rate of return of 9.24%, thus a 10 times level of return to the
company. By considering NPV and IRR, McCormick & Company should build the new plant
and purchase the equipment because the investment will generate a stream of profit to the
company.
CAPITAL BUDGETING 3
References
Bierman Jr, H., & Smidt, S. (2012). The capital budgeting decision: economic analysis of