+ Overrall: Indonesia là đất nước hiện tại đang có nhiều dân sô nhất với khoảng 238 triệu người

và con
số này được đánh giá sẽ không ngừng tăng trong tương lai

+ Argentina có tăng đều thêm 14 triệu dân vào 2025 và 2050, lần lượt là 48 và 62 triệu dân.

+ Vào thời điểm 2003, Italy là nước xếp thứ hai sau Indonesia về dân số. Tuy nhiên, Italy là nước duy
nhất, tính cho đến 2050, sẽ giảm từ 54 triệu dân xuống còn 45 triệu dân.

+ Hàn Quốc sẽ tăng thêm khoảng 4 triệu dân vào năm 2025 rồi chững lại ở khoảng 52 triệu dân vào năm
2050

The presentation shows data about the total number of dwellers in 2003 and predicted figures for 2025
and 2050.

In common, Indonesia is the most populous country among 4 provided nations, namely Argentina,
Indonesia, Italy and Republic of Korean, with approximately 238 million citizens in 2003 and this figure is
expected to be steadily on the upward swing in the near future.

As the table depicts, there are around 34 million people living in Argentina during 2003. It is speculated
that the current number will accelerate gradually by 14 million to respectively 48 and 62 million in 2025
and 2050. Meanwhile, Republic of Korean may only suffer from a slight change from 48 million to 52
million inhatbitants in 2025 and its population will not vary in next 25 years. Italy in 2003 used to be
placed second in the total sum of dwellers; however, on the contrary of the others’ growth, it might
witness a downward tendency to just over 45 million people during upcoming 50 years.
It is widely believed that education is everyone’s right and for those who desire to enrol in universities,
their tuition fees should be shouldered by the government. Although it is understandable, personally, I
do not completely agree with this point of view for several reasons which will be outlined below.

Admittedly, sudsiding course fees will help bridge the gap between different classes of society. There
will be none the day only children from privileged families can acquire knowledge from outstandingly
eminent universities while the others whose less well-off parents should work hard at fields or farms
losing studying chances which can be beneficial to their whole life and future career. In addition to
reducing socioeconomic unequality, this practice can provide students with precious oppoturnities to
apply for their dream schools with no hesitation of financial burden. Undeniably, all pupils are equal in
intelligence and schoolastic capability, hence equal chances to gain admittence to university as well.

Be that as it may, allocating for studying fees of government has its own challenging difficulty. Firstly,
fees subsidy will entail in huge moneytary pressure on national budget for example when there is war or
disastrous pandemic, both healthcare system or military will require a fortune from government
funding. This process, in the end, will definitely push government to the verge of backrupcy or
unprecedentedly high level of taxes on citizens. Moreover, education quality may be suffered owing to
increasing number of students, which prevents teachers from giving fully care to each students. The
more students attend in universities, the more teaching burden will be placed on the shoulders of tutors
to understand them based on ability. To some extent, class size will exert an important impact on how
each attender interact with their professors and peers. They will be afraid or worried to express
themselves for fear of being judged by many others, which leads to their poor performance at
universities.

In conclusion, it is obvious that everyone is entitled to access to their own tertiary education, however,
government should not pay full course fees for all. They instead should give priority to provide free
education for only people under poverty line.

(359 words)