3/23/23, 12:41 PM Condescension - Defendant’s Strategy Revealed

Condescension - Defendant’s Strategy

Revealed
The government resorts to labeling plaintiffs claims as absurd, fantastical, and
conspiratorial in the historic lawsuit filed by Targeted Justice and 18 plaintiffs
(Positively NOT a legal opinion)

Len Ber MD
11 9
7 hr ago

“In light of the unfounded, fantastical allegations.., this case should be resolved by dispositive
motion at the earliest stage of the case.”

“…Defendants expect this case - which involves baseless allegations and conspiracy theories - to
be resolved … at the earliest stage and have not moved to transfer venue.”

These statements addressed to Judge Tipton by the attorney representing three

government agencies named as Defendants in the Targeted Justice lawsuit felt like a slap
in the face. I will not review the particulars of the claims, I am not a lawyer, nor a legal
expert. I will speak on my behalf, as the first plaintiff in the said lawsuit.

I consider these statements condescending, dismissive, and ultimately, a form of name

calling.

When do you resort to name calling? When you run out of arguments to address the
issue at hand. In this sense, the government acts like an unruly teenager who can barely
control his/her emotions when parents ask them to take out the trash.

Why does The HAVANA Act recognize the brain damage and compensate federal
employees for injuries acquired due to “directed pulsed microwave energy”, but when a
civilian is diagnosed with the same condition, by the same experts, it is unfounded and
fantastical?

Why is using the government's own data to make inquiries about the “non-investigative
subjects' ' portion of the Terrorist Screening Database considered a conspiracy theory
and treated with condescension?

https://lenbermd.substack.com/p/condescension-defendants-strategy?fbclid=IwAR3a8pbAX5MhTUj9wq5TuMEMawVtlnY3Nqx-EMjv4Q1I7jXdUPO8y… 1/3
3/23/23, 12:41 PM Condescension - Defendant’s Strategy Revealed

Why do our Government Agencies portray us as lunatics, resort to name calling and pass
condescending judgment on the nature of our claims, instead of investigating our quite
reasonable inquiries based on established facts and statements given under oath?

Defendants clearly insist on dismissing the case and not giving us a day in court in front
of a jury of our peers. And understandably so. Someone will have to answer for taking
away our constitutional rights, and betraying trust of US Citizens.

I urge everyone reading this to understand what’s at stake, and stand up to the way our
claims are treated by our own government.

Absurd? Fantastical? Conspiratorial? Or are they gasping for air, as their house of cards
is collapsing in the most public way?

9 Comments

Write a comment…

Maureen Melcher 3 hr ago

There is no such thing as “Havana Syndrome

“. The name, “Havana Syndrome”, was made-up by, “the media” because the first published
accounts were by diplomats and their civilian families in, Havana, Cuban. “Havana Syndrome”
is equal to, being “targeted” with “Directed Energy ” regardless of a geographical location.
LIKE (3) REPLY

Griffen Herchko Writes Griffen’s Substack 2 hr ago

You hit the nail right in the head. You bring testimony under oath, evidence, and a detailed
explanation as to what’s going on. In response they call it crazy with articulated words. Who
does this? Children and people who have something to hide. Believe me, I understand the
frustration more than anyone. I actually know an engineer in the aerospace community
personally that demonstrated how this equipment works, but he gets to hide behind pointing
the finger and proclaiming crazy, while hundreds, maybe thousands of people around the
globe in various ways suffer. This should be an open and shut case. The world should be able

https://lenbermd.substack.com/p/condescension-defendants-strategy?fbclid=IwAR3a8pbAX5MhTUj9wq5TuMEMawVtlnY3Nqx-EMjv4Q1I7jXdUPO8y… 2/3
3/23/23, 12:41 PM Condescension - Defendant’s Strategy Revealed

to, with ease, see the effects of these types of technologies. Einstein was able to see the
effects of a black hole before it was proved it existed. Why is this not the same? The answer
sadly is simple. Their are those who have to keep this a secret while others are running
around creating a mess with the equipment.

I know the TJ lawsuit is pointing the finger at the government, but I also understand that
private citizens also have the equipment and are willing to privately conduct torture on US
civilians under the strategic assumption that if the government won’t acknowledge these
claims, we are free to act without worry.

It’s a serious issue. Evidence is piling up, it’s frustrating, but if the government won’t
acknowledge the facts...that does not mean the American people won’t.

I’m looking into building a sweepstakes, giving away prize money to eager young minds who
can devise a way or a system to catch a group of individuals using this type of equipment. It’s
based on some simple principles.

One: No matter what the delivery system is, it’s still required to fire a complex ribbon of
pulsed EMF that upon contact with a human, causes the neurological activity to respond in a
manner
Expand fullthat produces
comment an effect. Audio, Video, perception of pain. So the source antenna or
LIKE (2) REPLY

1 reply

7 more comments…

© 2023 Len Ber MD ∙ Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice

Substack is the home for great writing

https://lenbermd.substack.com/p/condescension-defendants-strategy?fbclid=IwAR3a8pbAX5MhTUj9wq5TuMEMawVtlnY3Nqx-EMjv4Q1I7jXdUPO8y… 3/3