Ten Damn Good Reasons to Oppose Ranked

Choice Voting
Topic: Elections

Capt. Seth Keshel

24
4 hr ago

I don’t openly resent people for supporting most political or ideological views if they are
able to defend those views.  I may find those views to be destructive and dangerous to
future prosperity and preservation of liberty, but my actual resentment is reserved
toward those who lash out emotionally over what they’ve been told to by the mainstream
media and celebrity influencers.

This is why I spend so much time rehashing lessons and explaining very rudimentary
things when it comes to elections, liberty, and history.  A popular hot-button topic on the
dissident right pertaining to elections is opposition to Ranked Choice Voting (RCV). 
RCV has kept Maine’s 2nd Congressional District with the blue team in the U.S. House,
despite Trump’s dominance there, and has also installed a Democrat U.S. Representative
and re-installed RINO-extraordinaire Lisa Murkowski in the U.S. Senate.

It is simply not enough to scream about the rapidly expanding system, now up for
discussion in Georgia, if we don’t know why it is dangerous.  You can read about how it
actually works here.

Once you understand how the votes are tallied and re-allotted, read on about the 10 slam
dunk reasons you should oppose RCV.  These are particularly useful for your base of
knowledge when you give testimony locally as to why RCV should be disqualified, as it
was in Tennessee and Florida in 2022.  Soak it up and spread it around.
TOP TEN REASONS TO OPPOSE RCV (in no order)

Center/Center Left Source: This article serves as a psychological teardown of RCV as an

issue.

1)    Despite claims RCV will minimize power of the two-party system, the winner will
always be from one of the two major parties because a packed slate of independent or
minor party candidates will always split votes with each another.

2)    RCV does not allow a voter to vote against any options, only to rank them lower than
others.

3)    Voters do not vote sincerely, but rather strategically to ensure their worst option does
not win.  This is no different than voting for a candidate in normal voting formats only so
his opponent doesn’t win.

Moderate Source: Written by professors; highlights Alaska’s House race and its idiocy.

4)    Extreme candidates are more likely to be elected when the electorate is polarized.
5)    Moderate candidates garner many second-place votes but are outflanked by first-
place votes; moderate candidates are unlikely to be elected in such a system, perpetuating
the polarized political system.

Conservative Source: the most in-depth and analytical of the three sources used here.

6)    “Ballot exhaustion,” the process of discarding ballots that aren’t fully voted if instant
run-offs are needed beyond the number of votes cast on a ballot, discards votes, thereby
negating an individual voter’s voice.

7)    Districts using RCV have lower turnout rates.

Minneapolis and St. Paul, as well as San Francisco, have lagged other major metros for
voter turnout since adopting RCV.  Turnout in off-year elections drops by an average of
eight percent.

8)    RCV discourages participation from new and infrequent voters because its
instructions are confusing.  Urban areas, which actively argue against Voter ID, are
effectively disenfranchising voters, as they tend to be areas in which more minorities and
low propensity voters are likely to live.

9)    RCV requires transportation of ballots to centralized facility in event of instant

runoff, which leads to increased cost and opportunities for mismanagement (electoral
fraud).

10) Changes to ballot counting process often require weeks to report results (as seen in
Alaska’s 2022 midterm).

a.     71% of all voters are likely to oppose RCV when they are informed that the process
increased election irregularities.

b.     66% are likely to oppose RCV when they learn results may take weeks to report.

CONCLUSION

If RCV didn’t provide another window for the political elite to control elections, they
wouldn’t be pushing it like wildfire, especially in emerging swing states like Georgia. 
Being able to use stalking horse candidates like Nick Begich or simply flooding enough
fraudulent ballots into the first round to keep a candidate under 50% are tricks the
political establishment would like to have at its disposal.  It is your responsibility to be
armed with facts and oppose RCV with your head, and not only with your keyboard.

Comments

Write a comment…

© 2023 Capt. Seth Keshel ∙ Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice

Substack is the home for great writing