According to Wallerstein’s world-systems analysis, to what group does the Philippine
belong? Is his analysis reflective of current Philippine conditions? Explain. It is said that Wallerstein’s world-systems analysis offers a succinct summary of world-systems analysis and a clear outline of the modern world-system, describing the structures of knowledge upon which it is based, its mechanisms, and its future. On this world system analysis, Philippines belong to the Periphery countries since we can’t deny the fact that Philippines has lack of strong central government, and we are still a developing country. We have underdeveloped industries such as in our agriculture that we have lack of technologies to use in production of goods and sometimes we depend on core countries for capital. Also in this case we have low skill labor resulting to intensive and tough production but in cheap labor and exporting it to core countries for cheaper price for their production and eventually sell it for higher profit selling. Why do you think that workers in biggest capitalist country in the world are now negatively affected by globalization’s policies? Globalization and the turn to the market have clear benefits for developing countries, both in terms of aggregate growth and poverty reduction and in terms of mobility and opportunity for low-income people. Yet new opportunities have come hand-in-hand with new vulnerabilities. Not surprisingly, public opinion about globalization and market reforms is mixed. While the street protests in the industrialized countries focus on the poor, in the developing countries people in the middle strata seem as vulnerable if not more so and also more negative in assessing their progress with the turn to the market. That those negative perceptions exist does not mean that a backlash against globalization is inevitable. At this juncture most publics seem to be aware that self-imposed isolation from the rest of the world has high costs. Yet policymakers must address the causes of these negative perceptions, precisely so that they do not become the source of a backlash. Reducing insecurity and distributing the benefits of reform more equitably could go a long way toward building broader and more sustainable support for continuing, market policies. And persuading poor people in poor countries that opportunities exist will make them much likely to invest in their children’s education, and therefore in their future in an integrated global economy