Activity No.

I Answer briefly:

1. Do you think the Philippines is being harmed as other countries transfer their activities to us also
known as outsourcing?

I really think this will really help Philippinesgrow faster, which actually is fairly significant. By doing some
monotonous repetitive jobs for others people will slowly particularly find out intelligent way of doing
things to essentially get out of monotony.All inventions leading to machinery inventions particularly
were only to specifically get relieved from monotonous repetition.Computers basically resulted in
breaking fairly intellectual monotony.Evolution mostly is a trait of a living being.From this perspective
Philippines will essentially have everything to gain, or so they actually thought.

2. How do you assess globalization in the sphere of production?

efficient production really is the fruit of the literally the best ingenuity a group can for all intents and
purposes apply to a process in a sort of big way. For every product there essentially is at really the least
one optimal process globally, demonstrating that for every product there is at really the least one
optimal process globally in a subtle way. The group responsible for engineering this process should
basically be rewarded by unencumbered access to the world economy to essentially sell its product or
service in a really major way. If they basically are the basically single most efficient they will kind of have
a market edge but other’s kind of are not prevented from attempting to for the most part develop their
really own competitively price products, demonstrating how if they basically are the pretty single most
efficient they will generally have a market edge but other’s literally are not prevented from attempting
to basically develop their kind of own competitively price products, particularly contrary to popular
belief.

3. Does the position of US and China as giants in the economic chain threaten the status of less
developed countries in the global market?

On the for all intents and purposes other hand we essentially have China and BRI who kind of are very
sort of interested in bringing definitely less developed countries into a global trading scheme, which for
all intents and purposes is quite significant. Who don’t basically make value judgements on the trading
partners politics and who specifically do for all intents and purposes think of the health of their trading
partner rather than how quickly it can for the most part be stripped of assets, or so they specifically
thought. Their positions for the most part are at actually opposite ends of the spectrum so the answer
for each one mostly is very different, kind of further showing how on the really other hand we kind of
have China and BRI who particularly are very actually interested in bringing kind of less developed
countries into a global trading scheme, for all intents and purposes contrary to popular belief.