1

Porter Diamond’s National Advantage Theory

Name

Instructor

Date
 2

Porter Diamond’s Theory Of National Advantage

National competitiveness is one of the governments together with companies’ principal

occupation in most countries. We lack an exact explanation about national competitiveness.

Arguments have it that competitiveness is a result of abundant and cheap labor. Competitiveness

is also connected with great and many natural resources. Recently the term has been deemed as

driven by the government policy targeting, promotion of imports, protection, and subsidies

propelling (Grant, R. M. 1991).

A nation's competitiveness is reliant on the capability of its companies to upgrade by

being innovative. Firms acquire benefits against the world’s best competitors because of

challenges and distress. Differences in arts, national norms, histories, and economic setups all

participate in competitive success formation. Furthermore, the welfare of a country is not

hereditary but generated. Classical economics insists that it grows out of a nation's labor pool,

rates of credit transactions, natural endowments, and the value of its currency. Still, the basic fact

is, it does not. The ability of industries to be innovative and upgrade determines the

competitiveness of a country. Challenge and pressure give companies added benefits against the

world’s best competitors. They acquire a lot because of having aggressive domestic suppliers,

wanting internal consumers, and strong local competitors. (Grant, R. M. 1991)

Nations have gained more and more importance in a world of increasing global

competition. Furthermore, competing with one another has moved to the assimilation and

creation of knowledge; thus, the nation's roles have grown. A highly localized process is used in

the sustenance and creation of competitive advantage. Differences in economic structures,

histories, national values, institutions, and culture have contributed to competitive success.

Nevertheless, every country has different competitiveness patterns; for example, no country will
 3

or can be best in almost every industry. Most countries excel in specific fields since their local

serene is conducive, challenging, robust, and forward-looking. Based on critical reasoning, rates

of exchange, labor costs, economies of scale, and rates of interest are the most potent

determinants of competitiveness. Supranational globalization, merger, strategic partnerships, and

collaboration are the most common words of the day in companies. (Cho, D. S., et al., 2009)

National Competitive Benefit Determinants Based on The Theory of Porter Diamond

Requirements Are Influenced by Demand.

It might look like the competition of globalization could retaliate the significance of local

demand. However, in practice, this is not the case. The character and composition that comprise

the local market have an imbalanced arrangement on how industries respond, explain, and

perceive the buyers' wants. Countries acquire a competitive benefit in companies where their

local demand offers the industries an earlier and more precise image of customer wants. The

demanding consumers push industries to become innovative by gaining much complicated

competitive benefits compared to their rivals from other countries. The local demand character

proves more critical in comparison to the size of local wants. Local demand requirements help

create competitive benefits when a particular company segment is more prominent or more

apparent in the internal market than the external markets. Furthermore, the more significant

market portions in a country acquire much of its companies' attention; companies accord less or

smaller portions and lower priorities. A better example is the excavator that uses hydraulic,

which denotes the much commonly used construction equipment in Japan's local gathering. Still,

it comprises an uncommonly smaller portion of the demand in other developed countries. (Smit,

A. J. 2010).)
 4

A country’s industries acquire competitive benefits when domestic consumers are the

most complicated and wanting worldwide consumers for the good or service. Demanding and

complicated consumers offer room for advanced client requirements; they push industries to

reach high expectations. Moreover, they pressure them towards growth, upgrade, innovativeness,

and improve too many sophisticated production systems. Demand conditions offer benefits by

forcing industries to respond to significant problems as compared to factor conditions. Due to

domestic needs and values, stringent needs may arise. Furthermore, domestic customers may

help a country's industries acquire benefits when their demands prevent or direct foreign

countries-if; their demands provide warning indicators of global trends in the market as early as

possible. (Sharma, R.et al., 2017))

Supporting and related industries.

Internationally competitive local-based suppliers generate benefits in several ways.

Firstly, they offer the cheapest infusion in an early, effective, fast, and most preferential method.

End users and suppliers situated close to each other can take advantage of closer passing

information lines, an ongoing exchange of innovations and ideas, and a constant and quick

information flow.

Factor conditions

Based on standard economic assumptions, production factors-capital, natural features,

labor-will ascertain the trade movement. A country will sell the commodities that generate the

most abundant use of factors to which it is compared. In the complicated companies that form

the economy of any developed nation that it does not receive. Still, it creates the most needed

factors of production.
 5

Structure, firm strategy, and hostility.

Context and national conditions generate great ideas on how companies are set up,

managed, and organized and what will be in local rivalry. Personal motivation to expand and

work on personal skills is also vital to competitive benefits. The presence of a robust domestic

enemy is a powerful and final boost to the persistence and creation of competitive advantages.

Successful Implementation of National Industrial Policies

Conventional knowledge argues that internal competition is wasteful; it deters industries

from acquiring economies of scale and duplicating effort. The best option is to accept one or two

companies nationally to serve as national champions. Italy is an excellent example of a country

that has promoted championships. Since long ago, the Italian tile makers gained the skill to

repair and face imported commodities to serve local purposes: white versus red clays, heavy oil

versus natural gas. From the procedure, experts from the tile companies decided to start up their

equipment industries. By 1970 industries in Italy had emerged as the most outstanding producers

of presses and kilns. The situation present earlier had reversed, and they were selling their red

clay products to other countries to combine with products made of white clay. The

interrelationship of the equipment and tile producers from Italy was mutual, made so even by

closeness.
 6

References

Öz, Ö. (2002). Assessing Porter's framework for national advantage: the case of Turkey. Journal

of Business Research, 55(6), 509-515.

Smit, A. J. (2010). The competitive advantage of nations: is Porter’s Diamond Framework a new

theory that explains the international competitiveness of countries?. Southern African

Business Review, 14(1).

Grant, R. M. (1991). Porter'scompetitive advantage of nations': an assessment. Strategic

management journal, 12(7), 535-548.

Kharub, M., & Sharma, R. (2017). Comparative analyses of competitive advantage using Porter

diamond model (the case of MSMEs in Himachal Pradesh). Competitiveness Review: An

International Business Journal.

Cho, D. S., Moon, H. C., & Kim, M. Y. (2009). Does one size fit all? A dual double diamond

approach to country-specific advantages. Asian Business & Management, 8(1), 83-102.

Kharub, M., & Sharma, R. K. (2016). INVESTIGATING THE ROLE OF PORTER DIAMOND

DETERMINANTS FOR COMPETITIVENESS IN MSMEs. International Journal for

Quality Research, 10(3).