Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SPECIAL ARTICLE
Burden and Cost of Gastrointestinal, Liver, and Pancreatic
Diseases in the United States: Update 2021
Anne F. Peery,1 Seth D. Crockett,1 Caitlin C. Murphy,2 Elizabeth T. Jensen,3 Hannah P. Kim,1
Matthew D. Egberg,1 Jennifer L. Lund,4 Andrew M. Moon,1 Virginia Pate,4 Edward L. Barnes,1
Courtney L. Schlusser,4 Todd H. Baron,1 Nicholas J. Shaheen,1 and Robert S. Sandler1
1
Center for Gastrointestinal Biology and Disease, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina;
2
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas; 3Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem,
North Carolina; and 4Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel
Hill, North Carolina.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Gastrointestinal diseases account for the United States. To that end, we used multiple data
considerable health care use and expenditures. We estimated sources to produce GI-specific summary statistics on office-
the annual burden, costs, and research funding associated with based and emergency department (ED) visits, adult and
gastrointestinal, liver, and pancreatic diseases in the United pediatric hospitalizations, readmissions, and mortality. We
States. METHODS: We generated estimates using data from the report statistics and temporal trends in GI endoscopy, can-
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey; National Hospital cers, and organ transplants. We estimated GI-specific health
Ambulatory Medical Care Survey; Nationwide Emergency care expenditures and summarized National Institutes of
Department Sample; National Inpatient Sample; Kids’ Inpatient Health (NIH) funding for GI research.
Database; Nationwide Readmissions Database; Surveillance,
Epidemiology, and End Results program; National Vital Statis-
tics System; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide- Methods
Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research; MarketScan
Commercial Claims and Encounters data; MarketScan Medicare Symptoms and Diagnoses Across Ambulatory
Supplemental data; United Network for Organ Sharing registry; Settings
Medical Expenditure Panel Survey; and National Institutes of We used the 2016 National Ambulatory Medical Care Sur-
Health (NIH). RESULTS: Gastrointestinal health care expendi- vey (NAMCS) and the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical
tures totaled $119.6 billion in 2018. Annually, there were more Care Survey (NHAMCS) to tabulate the leading GI symptoms
than 36.8 million ambulatory visits for gastrointestinal symp- and diagnoses in the United States for outpatient office-based
toms and 43.4 million ambulatory visits with a primary and ED visits. The NAMCS and NHAMCS are national surveys
gastrointestinal diagnosis. Hospitalizations for a principal conducted annually by the US Centers for Disease Control and
gastrointestinal diagnosis accounted for more than 3.8 million Prevention (CDC).4 The NAMCS surveys nonfederal employed
admissions, with 403,699 readmissions. A total of 22.2 million office-based physicians or nonphysician clinicians primarily
gastrointestinal endoscopies were performed, and 284,844 new engaged in direct patient care. The NHAMCS collects data on ED
gastrointestinal cancers were diagnosed. Gastrointestinal dis- visits exclusive of federal, military, and Veterans Administra-
eases and cancers caused 255,407 deaths. The NIH supported tion hospitals. We downloaded public use data files from the
$3.1 billion (7.5% of the NIH budget) for gastrointestinal CDC website to perform our analyses. Patient-reported symp-
research in 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Gastrointestinal diseases are toms are available in both the NAMCS and NHAMCS. We used
responsible for millions of health care encounters and hun-
dreds of thousands of deaths that annually costs billions of
dollars in the United States. To reduce the high burden of Abbreviations used in this paper: AHRQ, Agency for Healthcare Research
gastrointestinal diseases, focused clinical and public health ef- and Quality; CCSR, Clinical Classifications Software Refined; CDC, US
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; CDC WONDER, Centers for
forts, supported by additional research funding, are warranted. Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemi-
ologic Research; ED, emergency department; GI, gastrointestinal; ERCP,
SPECIAL ARTICLE
the most important complaint (variable RFV1) for our analyses. combining related codes (see Supplementary Table 3), and
We combined related symptoms and totaled data from office present the top 20 GI diagnoses and symptoms. Diagnosis
visits and ED visits to present the top 10 most common categories and associated codes were determined using previ-
symptoms. We categorized physician and nonphysician di- ously published GI coding categories mapped to ICD-10
agnoses into relevant disease categories based on clinical codes.2,5–8 Weighted national estimates for ED visits in 2018
expertise using the International Classification of Diseases, 10th were generated, including estimates of the total number of
Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) (see visits and rate of visits per 100,000 persons for each individual
Supplementary Tables 1 and 2). We used the primary diagnosis ICD-10 code (or group of codes). We included the number of
code only. After combining the related diagnoses, we created a secondary diagnoses for each GI category. Secondary diagnoses
rank order list. The NAMCS and NHAMCS are based on prob- are additional diagnoses that appear on the discharge record
ability samples. Therefore, sampling weights were applied to all with the first-listed or principal diagnosis.
analyses to generate national estimates. When there were Additional information on the most common GI diagnoses
fewer than 30 observations for a specific condition, the esti- among patients seen in the ED according to Clinical Classifica-
mates are unreliable and should be interpreted with caution. tions Software Refined (CCSR) categories is provided in
Both analyses include children and adults. Supplementary Table 4, including mean age, numbers admitted
to the hospital, and deaths. CCSR is a tool developed by the
AHRQ for clustering diagnoses into a manageable number of
Emergency Department Visits clinically meaningful, policy-relevant categories. A complete list
The most common GI diagnoses in the ED were compiled of GI-related CCSR diagnoses is also included in Supplementary
using discharge data from the Nationwide Emergency Depart- Table 4 and was used to estimate the total number of ED visits
ment Sample (NEDS), part of the Agency for Healthcare in the United States with a principal diagnosis code for a GI
Research and Quality (AHRQ) Healthcare Cost and Utilization disease or symptom.
Project (HCUP). The NEDS is the largest, publicly available, all-
payer ED database in the United States. The 2018 NEDS con-
SPECIAL ARTICLE
Table 2.Leading Physician Diagnoses for GI Disorders in the United States, 2016
NOTE. Source: The 2016 NAMCS and the 2016 NHAMCS, ED only.4
GERD, gastroesophageal reflux disease.
a
Gray shading denotes categories that decreased in visits by 50% or more compared to 2014 data.
b
Categories reported from the NAMCS with <30 observations, which should be interpreted with caution.
c
Categories reported from the NHAMCS (ED only) with <30 observations, which should be interpreted with caution.
We queried the database for the rank order of the principal associated with each CCSR category. Information on the most
discharge diagnosis (ie, ICD-10) for all patients in all hospitals. common GI procedure categories related to GI hospital admis-
For inpatient stays, the principal diagnosis is that condition sions are also provided in Supplementary Table 6.
thought to be chiefly responsible for the patient’s admission to
the hospital. We identified the top 15 GI diagnoses and symp-
toms, which were subsequently rank ordered after combining Pediatric Hospitalizations
related diagnosis codes. Diagnosis categories and associated
codes were determined using previously published GI coding We performed a cross-sectional analysis of the 2016 data
categories mapped to ICD-10 codes.2,5–8 Specific groupings of contained within the Kids’ Inpatient Database (KID), a nation-
SPECIAL ARTICLE
ICD-10 codes for each category are detailed in Supplementary ally representative sample of pediatric (aged <21 years at
Table 3. Weighted national estimates for visits in 2018 were admission) hospitalizations from the HCUP.9 KID is the largest
generated. We also included the number of secondary di- publicly available, all-payer pediatric inpatient database and is
agnoses for each GI category. Secondary diagnoses are addi- designed to be representative of pediatric hospital care across
tional diagnoses that appear on the discharge record with the the United States. In 2016, the KID data set included pediatric
first-listed or principal diagnosis. hospitalization data from 44 states including the District of
A complete list of GI-related CCSR diagnoses is included in Columbia and represented nearly 4,200 participating commu-
Supplementary Table 5 and was used to estimate the total nity hospitals (defined as short-term, nonfederal, general, and
number of admissions with a principal diagnosis code for GI specialty), excluding rehabilitation hospitals.
diseases or symptoms. The list includes median length of stay, We queried the 2016 KID database and analyzed the principal
median charges and costs, and number of inpatient deaths discharge diagnosis (ie, ICD-10) for all hospitalizations from
624 Peery et al Gastroenterology Vol. 162, No. 2
Table 3.Most Common GI, Liver, and Pancreatic Principal Diagnoses From US ED Visits, 2018
NOTE. Total ED visits in 2018 with a principal diagnosis code for a GI diagnosis or symptom (see Supplementary Table 4 for
complete list) ¼ 17,943,067. Source: HCUP NEDS.9
SBP, spontaneous bacterial peritonitis.
SPECIAL ARTICLE
a
Includes C difficile infection.
b
Does not include diarrhea coded as gastroenteritis, C difficile infection, or GI infection.
c
Excludes hemorrhoids of pregnancy (included with GI disorders during pregnancy).
d
Excludes liver abscess and SBP.
participating hospitals. We identified GI diagnoses, which were Median length of stay in days and interquartile range (25%–75%)
subsequently rank ordered in frequency after combining related were analyzed in addition to median hospital charges (dollars)
diagnosis codes (see Supplementary Table 7). Weighted national per hospitalization and interquartile range. Hospital charges
estimates for diagnosis frequency estimates were generated using represent hospital billing for covered hospital services but do not
2016 KID weighting coefficients provided by the HCUP/AHRQ. include professional fees or noncovered charges.
February 2022 Burden of Gastrointestinal Diseases 625
Table 4.Most Common GI, Liver, and Pancreatic Principal Diagnoses From US Hospitals, 2018
NOTE. Total admissions in 2018 with a principal diagnosis code for a GI diagnosis or symptom (see Supplementary Table 5 for
complete list) ¼ 3,873,354. Source: HCUP NIS.9
NOS, NOS, not otherwise specified.
a
Includes esophageal (eg, achalasia), gastric (eg, dyspepsia), and intestinal (eg, irritable bowel syndrome) functional/motility
syndromes, as well as constipation and diarrhea.
b
Includes Salmonella; Shigella; Escherichia coli; and other viral, bacterial, and parasitic GI infections. Does not include C
difficile infection (reported separately).
Table 5.Most Common Pediatric GI, Liver, and Pancreatic Principal Diagnoses in US Hospitals, 2016
Cancer Incidence and Mortality death certificates filed in all 50 US states and the District of
We estimated the incidence and mortality rates of GI can- Columbia.
cers in adults (aged 20 years) during 1992–2018 using data We estimated age-adjusted (to the 2000 US standard pop-
SPECIAL ARTICLE
from the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, ulation) incidence and mortality rates of esophageal, colorectal,
and End Results (SEER) program of cancer registries and the gastric, liver, pancreas, gallbladder, and small intestine cancer
National Center for Health Statistics. SEER routinely collects as rates per 100,000 persons using SEER*Stat, version 8.3.9,
data on patient demographics, primary tumor site, tumor overall and by year and race/ethnicity.10 Race/ethnicity
morphology, and stage for all cancers diagnosed in defined included non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic
geographic regions. The SEER 13 registries cover approxi- (any race), non-Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander, and non-
mately 14% of the US population and include Alaska, Atlanta, Hispanic Alaska Native/American Indian.
Connecticut, Detroit, rural Georgia, Hawaii, Iowa, Los Angeles,
New Mexico, San Francisco–Oakland, San Jose–Monterey, Noncancer Mortality
Seattle–Puget Sound, and Utah. Mortality data are collected We determined the most common causes of non–cancer-
and compiled by the National Center for Health Statistics from related GI deaths in the United States from the CDC’s Wide-
February 2022 Burden of Gastrointestinal Diseases 627
Table 6.All-Cause 30-Day Readmissions Ranked by Most Frequently Readmitted GI, Liver, or Pancreatic Conditions in US
Hospitals, 2018
Number of 30-day
Principal diagnosis for index Number of all-cause Readmitted, Median charge per Median charge per
Rank hospital stay index stays readmissions % index stay, US$ readmission, US$
Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC of death. Diagnoses were combined to create clinically mean-
WONDER),11 a publicly available online database developed by ingful categories. The crude rate per 100,000 deaths was
SPECIAL ARTICLE
the CDC. Causes of death are derived from physician-completed calculated by dividing the number of deaths listed as an un-
death certificates and are classified in accordance with ICD-10. derlying cause by the total US population of children and adults
The underlying cause of death is defined as the disease that in the United States in 2019 (328,239,523 from the US Census
initiated the train of events leading to death. A disease listed as Bureau) and multiplying by 100,000. We also calculated
a contributing cause of death is classified on the death certifi- numbers of deaths and mortality rates stratified by ethnicity
cate as the underlying cause or any of 20 additional diseases and race (Supplementary Tables 23 and 24).
leading to death. For this analysis, we used the 2019 public use
data files from CDC WONDER for underlying cause of death and
multiple cause of death. The 15 most common nonmalignant GI Endoscopy Use and Trends
causes of death were identified using ICD-10 codes (see Using the IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and En-
Supplementary Table 22) and were ranked by underlying cause counters database and IBM MarketScan Medicare
628 Peery et al Gastroenterology Vol. 162, No. 2
Table 7.New Diagnoses and Deaths From GI, Pancreatic, Supplemental database, we examined patterns of endoscopy
and Liver Cancers in the United States, 2018 use in adults (aged 18 years) during 2002–2019. We
examined temporal trends in upper endoscopy, colonoscopy,
Number of new Number of flexible sigmoidoscopy, endoscopic retrograde chol-
Cancer site diagnoses deaths angiopancreatography (ERCP), and upper and lower
endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). MarketScan is an
Colon and rectum 141,074 52,163
employer-based claims database that includes 77 contributing
Pancreas 52,546 44,914 employers and 12 contributing health plans, with 126 unique
Liver and intrahepatic bile ducts 34,638 27,685 carriers and 8 Medicaid states representing approximately
165 million covered lives. The Medicare Supplemental data-
Stomach 24,101 11,043 base includes beneficiaries aged 65 years with an employer-
Esophagus 18,364 15,419 sponsored Medicare Supplemental plan. We summed the total
number of months persons aged 18–64 years (MarketScan)
Small intestine 9810 1686 and 65 years (Medicare Supplemental) were enrolled in
Gallbladder 4311 2180 their insurance plan in each calendar year as standardized
denominators of enrollee-time. We then depicted time trends
Total 284,844 155,090
by calculating a rate of the procedure per 1000 enrollee-years
in each calendar year, assuming constant rates within each
NOTE. Sources: National Program of Cancer Registries and calendar year. We examined rates by age group (18–29, 30–
National Center for Health Statistics, 2018. 39, 40–49, 50–64, 65–74 and 75 years). We estimated the
SPECIAL ARTICLE
number of procedures performed in 2019 by standardizing recipient’s primary disease, and donor characteristics. We
the number of procedures in each database to 2018 US report frequencies and proportions for these data.
Census Bureau data (within age categories).
Expenditures
Organ Transplant Using data from the 2018 Medical Expenditure Panel Sur-
We used information available through the United vey (MEPS),12 we estimated total expenditures (not charges)
Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry to tabulate data for GI diseases and symptoms. The MEPS is a set of large-scale
related to liver, intestine, and pancreas organ transplants. surveys of families and individuals, their medical providers
UNOS is a nonprofit scientific and educational organization (including doctors, hospitals, and pharmacies), and employers
that administers the Organ Procurement and Trans- across the United States. MEPS collects data on the use of
plantation Network in the United States. An online database specific health services, how frequently they are used, and the
SPECIAL ARTICLE
system, UNetSM, was developed to collect, store, analyze, cost of these services. These surveys are designed to collect
and publish all Organ Procurement and Transplantation data from a nationally representative sample of households in
Network data. Data are collected through an online appli- the United States. In the 2018 MEPS Household Component,
cation from transplant professionals in hospitals, histocom- 29,415 persons were surveyed. This survey represents the
patibility laboratories, and organ procurement organizations civilian noninstitutionalized population. Expenditures are
across the country. The data we included are publicly available only for CCSR categories. All GI-related categories
available as deidentified data at optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/ available in MEPS were pulled for this analysis. The full-year
data/. We included patients with a history of liver, intestine, consolidated data file for 2018 was used to estimate expendi-
or pancreas transplant during 1988–2020. Data extracted tures. All estimates were weighted by the MEPS person-level
included number of patients on the wait list, type of weight (PERWT18F) to produce national estimates of
transplant, patient demographics at the time of transplant, expenditures.
630 Peery et al Gastroenterology Vol. 162, No. 2
National Institutes of Health Categorical million visits, followed by vomiting (5.4 million visits),
Spending nausea (3.9 million visits), diarrhea (2.6 million visits), and
We gathered estimates of annual GI-specific and all-cancer GI bleeding (1.5 million visits). Constipation, anorectal
funding from the NIH between 2011 and 2022.13 Estimates symptoms, heartburn, decreased appetite, and dysphagia
were selected from NIH-determined research areas. Actual ex- accounted for an additional 4.0 million visits. Abdominal
penditures are reported when available; otherwise, the values pain is also the most frequent diagnosis (vs symptom), with
were estimated. Individual research projects could be included 15.7 million annual visits (Table 2). There were more than
in multiple categories. We also report the total NIH budget 4.7 million visits with GERD and reflux esophagitis di-
between 2011 and 2022 from the NIH Office of Budget.14 We agnoses, and hemorrhoid diagnoses accounted for nearly 1.9
SPECIAL ARTICLE
calculated the percentage of the NIH budget spent on digestive million visits.
and liver diseases and the percentage of NIH cancer funding
spent on GI cancer research.
Emergency Department Visits
Results In 2018, there were 17.9 million ED visits with a prin-
cipal diagnosis code for a GI diagnosis or symptom (for a
Symptoms and Diagnoses Across Ambulatory comprehensive list, see Supplementary Table 4). The most
Settings common GI diagnoses are detailed in Table 3. Abdominal
The leading GI symptoms prompting a visit are shown in pain was the most common principal diagnosis, with 5.8
Table 1. Abdominal pain was responsible for more than 19.0 million visits. Nausea/vomiting (2.2 million visits),
February 2022 Burden of Gastrointestinal Diseases 631
constipation (1.1 million visits), and GI bleeding (941,658 are detailed in Table 4. GI bleeding (530,855 visits), chole-
visits) were also high-frequency primary diagnoses. A lithiasis and cholecystitis (316,020 visits), pancreatitis
foreign body in the GI tract accounted for 201,613 visits. (299,150 visits), and liver disease (280,645 visits) were the
Abdominal pain (12.0 million visits), gastroesophageal most common principal GI discharge diagnoses. Gastro-
reflux disease (9.3 million visits), and nausea/vomiting (8.5 esophageal reflux disease (6.0 million visits), liver disease
million visits) were common secondary diagnoses that (3.7 million visits), functional/motility disorders (4.0
appear on the discharge record with the principal diagnosis. million visits), and GI bleeding (1.3 million visits) were
Additional details on the most common GI diagnoses and common secondary diagnoses that appear on the discharge
symptoms among patients seen in the ED are available in record with the principal diagnosis. Length of stay, median
SPECIAL ARTICLE
Supplementary Table 4. charges and costs, and deaths by category are detailed in
Supplementary Table 5. The most common GI procedures
Hospitalizations related to a hospital admission were esophagogas-
In 2018, there were 3.9 million adult hospital admissions troduodenoscopy, cholecystectomy, colectomy, para-
with a principal diagnosis code for a GI diagnosis or centesis, and appendectomy (Supplementary Table 6).
symptom (for a comprehensive list, see Supplementary
Table 5). The estimated aggregate charges (“the national
bill”) and costs for GI hospitalizations in 2018 were more Pediatric Hospitalizations
than $200 billion and $47 billion, respectively. The most In 2016, there were an estimated 202,647 pediatric
common GI diagnoses associated with hospital admissions hospital admissions with a principal diagnosis code for a GI
632 Peery et al Gastroenterology Vol. 162, No. 2
disease or symptom. The most common GI diagnoses are all-cause readmissions. Median charges for readmissions
detailed in Table 5. Appendicitis was the most frequent were higher than median charges for an index admission for
discharge diagnosis (58,017 visits) and was associated with most disease categories.
a median charge of nearly $35,000. Intestinal infection
(25,550 visits) was the second leading discharge diagnosis
among pediatric hospitalizations. Of those infectious hospi- Cancer Incidence and Mortality
talizations, viral gastroenteritis was the most frequent, with In 2018, there were 284,844 new diagnoses and 155,090
nearly 14,000 hospitalizations. Congenital malformations deaths from GI cancers (Table 7). Between 1992 and 2018,
were the sixth leading discharge diagnosis but the second the incidence and mortality of esophageal cancer (Figure 1A
highest median total cost per hospitalization, driven pre- and B) decreased among non-Hispanic Blacks, Asians, and
dominately by small bowel malformations. Hispanics. Over the same time, esophageal cancer incidence
SPECIAL ARTICLE
Deaths Deaths Crude mortality Deaths Deaths Crude mortality Deaths Deaths Crude mortality
underlyinga contributingb rate per 100,000c underlyinga contributingb rate per 100,000c underlyinga contributingb rate per 100,000c
1 Alcohol-associated liver 7460 9294 4.5 16,650 22,339 10.3 24,110 31,633 7.3
disease
2 Hepatic fibrosis/cirrhosis 8763 18,473 5.3 11,421 26,381 7.1 20,184 44,854 6.1
(all-cause)d
3 GI bleeding, unspecified 4642 16,184 2.8 4906 19,662 3.0 9548 35,846 2.9
4 Vascular disorders of the 4781 9082 2.9 2976 6395 1.8 7757 15,477 2.4
intestine
5 Paralytic ileus and 3934 10,225 2.4 3009 8314 1.9 6943 18,539 2.1
intestinal obstruction
6 Hepatic failure (acute and 2095 12,173 1.3 2516 15,746 1.6 4611 27,919 1.4
chronic)d
7 C difficile 2644 4569 1.6 1889 3557 1.2 4533 8126 1.4
8 Ulcers (gastric/duodenal/ 1746 3328 1.0 1798 3708 1.1 3544 7036 1.1
peptic)
9 Chronic hepatitis C 1252 4008 0.8 2245 10,223 1.4 3497 14,231 1.1
10 Fatty change of liver—not 2158 3667 1.3 1315 2987 0.8 3473 6654 1.1
elsewhere specified
11 Diverticular disease 1931 3042 1.2 983 1738 0.6 2914 4780 0.9
12 Acute pancreatitis 1118 2311 0.7 1693 3367 1.0 2811 5678 0.9
13 Perforation of intestine 1676 4369 1.0 1021 3131 0.6 2697 7500 0.8
(nontraumatic)
NOTE. Source: CDC WONDER.11 See Supplementary Table 22 for specific groupings of ICD-10-CM codes for each category.
a
The underlying cause of death is defined as the disease that initiated the train of events leading to death.
b
A contributing cause of death is classified on the death certificate as the underlying cause or any of 20 additional diseases leading to death.
c
Crude rate per 100,000 deaths was calculated by dividing the number of deaths listed as an underlying cause by the total population in the United States in 2019 then
multiplying by 100,000.
d
Does not include deaths from liver disease, unspecified (K76.9), which accounted for 3711 deaths in 2019.
633
SPECIAL ARTICLE
634 Peery et al Gastroenterology Vol. 162, No. 2
Table 9.Estimated Annual Number of Endoscopic rates of upper endoscopies increased slightly in adults aged
Procedures in the United States, 2019 18–74 years and decreased in the oldest age group
(Figure 6B). Rates of flexible sigmoidoscopies decreased
Procedures Number
across all age groups between 2002 and 2010 and then
Colonoscopy 13,837,748 plateaued (Figure 6C). The rates of ERCPs have remained
stable across all age groups between 2002 and 2019
Upper endoscopy 7,459,419
(Figure 6D), while upper EUS use increased each year
Flexible sigmoidoscopy 379,883 (Figure 6E). The rates of lower EUSs have declined since
Upper EUS 290,655
2012 (Figure 6F).
ERCP 177,508
Organ Transplant
Lower EUS 17,428 In 2020, there were 12,610 persons added to the liver
Total 22,162,641 transplant wait list, as well as 138 intestine, 446 pancreas,
and 1275 kidney/pancreas candidates added to their
respective wait lists. The number of liver transplants per-
NOTE. Source: MarketScan Commercial Claims and En- formed has steadily increased over the past 3 decades, with
counters and Medicare Supplemental database.
a total of 8906 liver transplants performed in 2020
(Figure 7A). Alcohol-associated cirrhosis is the leading
ethnicities except non-Hispanic Asians. The incidence of indication for liver transplantation, accounting for 25.9% of
pancreatic cancer (Figure 5A) increased among non- liver transplants in 2020, followed by cirrhosis from
Hispanic Whites, Asians, and Hispanics between 1992 and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (14.7%) and hepatocellular
2018 and remained highest among non-Hispanic Blacks. carcinoma (14.1%). In contrast to liver transplants, there
Pancreatic cancer mortality has changed little over this time has been a decrease in the number of intestine and pancreas
(Figure 5B). Given the small population size, cancer rates for single-organ transplants throughout the past decade,
Alaska Native/American Indian were not stable and are whereas the number of combined kidney/pancreas trans-
included in Supplementary Tables 8 to 21. We observed plants has remained stable (Figure 7B–D). A total of 91 in-
increasing incidence and mortality for almost all GI cancers testine and 962 pancreas (135 pancreas only, 827
in this population between 1992 and 2018. Because gall- simultaneous kidney/pancreas) transplants were per-
bladder and small intestine cancers are rare, temporal formed in 2020. Short gut syndrome accounted for 45.1% of
trends of these cancers are included in Supplementary all intestine transplants, and 13.2% were related to intestine
Tables 16, 17, 20 and 21 only. graft failure and need for retransplant. A primary diagnosis
of diabetes accounted for 82.7% of pancreas transplants.
The characteristics of the transplant recipients and donors
Noncancer Mortality are described in Table 10.
Among the top 15 causes of death from nonmalignant GI
diseases in 2019, there were a total of 100,317 total deaths Expenditures
(Table 8). The most common causes of nonmalignant GI- Health care expenditures for GI conditions totaled
related mortality were alcohol-associated liver disease, un- $119.6 billion annually (Table 11). Among the 23 condition
derlying 24,110 deaths and serving as a contributing factor categories available, the 5 most expensive categories were
for more than twice that number; hepatic fibrosis/cirrhosis biliary tract disease ($16.9 billion), esophageal disorders
of any etiology (20,184 deaths); GI bleeding (9548 deaths); ($12.1 billion), abdominal pain ($9.5 billion), abdominal
vascular disorders of the intestine (7757 deaths); and hernias ($9.0 billion), and diverticular disease ($9.0 billion).
paralytic ileus and intestinal obstruction (6943 thousand Prescription medications accounted for 53% of expendi-
deaths). More than half (56%) of deaths from all nonma- tures for esophageal disorders and 71% of expenditures for
lignant GI diseases were attributable to liver disease. When inflammatory bowel diseases.
stratified by race/ethnicity, a similar distribution of causes
of death was observed (see Supplementary Tables 23
and 24).
National Institutes of Health Categorical
SPECIAL ARTICLE
Spending
The NIH supported $2.3 billion in digestive diseases
Endoscopy Use and Trends research and $845 million in liver disease research in 2020
In 2019, an estimated 13,837,748 colonoscopies; (Table 12). The total NIH budget increased from $30.6
7,459,419 upper endoscopies; 379,883 flexible sigmoidos- billion in 2011 to $41.5 billion in 2020. Funding for GI
copies; 290,655 upper EUSs; 177,508 ERCPs; and 17,428 research has kept pace with increases in the NIH budget. In
lower EUSs were performed in adults (Table 9). Colonos- 2020, $319 million financed colorectal cancer research, and
copy use in adults aged 50–74 years increased every year $130 million was allocated for liver cancer research, $230
between 2011 and 2019, whereas rates in adults aged 75 million for pancreatic cancer research, $24 million
years decreased and then plateaued (Figure 6A). Since 2002, for stomach cancer research, and $37 for esophageal cancer
February 2022 Burden of Gastrointestinal Diseases 635
research (Table 13). Of the $7.0 billion in funded cancer some GI conditions. For example, the MEPS estimate asso-
research at the NIH in 2020, 10.5% supported GI cancer ciated with GI bleeding was $300 million. In comparison, the
SPECIAL ARTICLE
develop after admission to the hospital (eg, GI bleeding) or We used data from the KID database to specifically es-
may be an underlying condition for hospitalized patients timate the most common primary GI diagnoses among
(eg, liver disease). We found substantial numbers of GI children. Compared with a similar report using data from
conditions and symptoms listed in secondary positions on 1997, the total number of admissions for pediatric intestinal
the discharge record. For example, liver disease accounted infections has decreased by more than 50% over the last 20
for 280,645 discharges with a primary diagnosis; however, years.18 This decline may be attributable to the introduction
there were 13-fold as many discharges (3.6 million in 2018) of the rotavirus vaccine in 2006, which is now a routine
with liver disease as a secondary diagnosis.17 Including all immunization for all US infants.19 Admissions for abdominal
diagnoses captures a burden of GI disease not previously pain have also declined, whereas those for acute pancrea-
reported. titis increased. This change is potentially due to an
February 2022 Burden of Gastrointestinal Diseases 637
increased awareness of pediatric pancreatitis and recate- demonstrated the highest total number of 30-day all-cause
SPECIAL ARTICLE
gorization from abdominal pain to pancreatitis.20,21 Admis- readmissions. The burden of readmissions among patients
sions for inflammatory bowel disease have increased, which with liver disease is noteworthy and markedly higher
is likely due to increased disease incidence.22,23 Similar to compared to our last report.3 We suspect that the high
1997, appendicitis remains the most common primary GI burden of readmissions in the liver disease population is
diagnosis among children in the United States.24 accurate given that a similarly high proportion of 30-day
Readmissions represent a significant burden for pa- readmissions has been noted in other recent evaluations
tients admitted with a primary diagnosis of a GI condition. of patients with a primary diagnosis of a liver disease
In our evaluation of readmissions using the NRD, patients (particularly those with complications of cirrhosis).25–29 In
with a primary admission for GI bleeding or liver disease comparison to readmission data from the 2015 NRD,
638 Peery et al Gastroenterology Vol. 162, No. 2
Figure 7. (A) Numbers of persons added to the waiting list and liver transplants performed, UNOS registry, 1988–2020. (B)
Numbers of persons added to the waiting list and intestine transplants performed, UNOS registry, 1988–2020.
readmissions for a primary diagnosis of obesity and We determined the most common causes of non–cancer-
appendicitis have decreased. However, it should be noted related GI deaths in the United States using data from the
that there were significant changes in coding from the ICD- CDC. A substantial proportion of deaths from all nonmalig-
Ninth Revision (ICD-9) to ICD-10 within the 2015 data. nant GI diseases were attributable to liver disease. Mortality
Additionally, there is a high likelihood that patients from alcohol-associated liver disease and nonalcoholic fatty
admitted with a primary diagnosis of obesity or appendi- liver disease continue to increase over time.30 Hepatitis C–
citis may have undergone a surgical procedure during the related mortality is declining (rate per 100,000: 2.3 in
primary admission, potentially leading to anomalies in 2012, 1.8 in 2016, and 1.1 in 2019), likely as a result of the
readmission counts in prior evaluations using a different availability of effective hepatitis C therapy.31–33 Mortality
ICD coding system. from C difficile infection has declined since 2011, likely as a
GI cancers account for a large number of diagnoses and result of a true decline in C difficile infection and potentially
deaths annually, with persistent disparities in incidence and from more effective therapy.34
SPECIAL ARTICLE
mortality rates by race/ethnicity. Despite an uptake in Using data from commercial claims, we estimated the
colorectal cancer screening and surveillance, colorectal annual number of GI endoscopies in the United States and
cancer remains the leading cause of mortality among GI described patterns of use between 2002 and 2019. Colo-
cancers. Pancreas cancer mortality rates in 2018 are noscopy use in adults aged 50–74 years has increased every
approaching rates for colorectal cancer mortality. If that year since 2011. This trend is likely driven by an uptake in
trend continues, we may soon see pancreas cancer become colorectal cancer screening and surveillance.35 Rates of
the leading cause of GI cancer–related death. Liver cancer ERCP have remained stable, which is expected given that
mortality continues to increase over time. We found that of indications for this procedure have not changed in the last
the $7.0 billion in cancer research funded at the NIH in 20 years.36 Compared to ERCP, upper EUS is relatively new,
2020, 10.5% supported GI cancer research. with growing and evolving utility beyond the staging of
February 2022 Burden of Gastrointestinal Diseases 639
Figure 7. Continued. (C) Numbers of persons added to the waiting list and pancreas transplants performed, UNOS registry,
1988–2020. (D) Numbers of persons added to the waiting list and of kidney-pancreas transplants performed, UNOS registry,
1988–2020.
malignancy. Rates of upper EUS have increased over time as transplants from living donors began in 1989 and have
EUS becomes a standard approach to tissue acquisition in grown from 0.1% to 5.5% in 2020. Additionally, livers from
pancreatic cancer, and a tissue diagnose is required in these donations after circulatory death accounted for 1.1% of all
patients for the delivery of neoadjuvant therapy.37,38 liver transplants in 1993 and have increased to 9.3% of
Additionally, therapeutic endoscopy is increasingly being transplants in 2020, and liver donations from hepatitis C
performed for drainage of pancreatic pseudocysts and virus–positive donors began in 1994 and have increased
walled-off necrosis, biliary drainage, and the creation of from 1.2% to 9.0%. Remarkably, the number of liver
enteric anastomoses, among other procedures. Racial, transplants in 2020 (8906 transplants) did not decline
ethnic, and regional disparities in access to most GI endos- during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to 2019 (8896
copy procedures exist, which suggests an unmet need for GI transplants).42
procedures across the United States.39–41 This work has limitations. We relied on data collected
SPECIAL ARTICLE
We gathered information available through the UNOS by the CDC on leading GI symptoms prompting an ambu-
registry to examine national characteristics and temporal latory visit and leading physician diagnoses in the ambu-
trends related to liver, intestine, and pancreas organ latory setting. The number of sampled visits in the 2016
transplants. Liver transplants account for a vast majority of data set was substantially reduced, and as a consequence,
all GI-related solid organ transplants. Over the past 3 de- some diagnoses from the prior report (eg, ulcerative coli-
cades, we have seen a steady increase in the number of liver tis) had too few visits in 2016 to generate estimates.
transplants performed each year. This growth is, in part, due Compared with our last report, the numbers of ambulatory
to an increase in living donor transplants and the use of visits reported in Tables 1 and 2 have decreased. The
organs from donations after circulatory death and from decreased number of visits may be related to changes in
donors with positive hepatitis C virus status. Liver sampling or may be due to a downward trend in outpatient
640 Peery et al Gastroenterology Vol. 162, No. 2
Table 10.Recipient and Donor Characteristics of Liver, Pancreas, and Intestine Transplants in the United States, 2020
visits in the primary care setting.3,43 Since our last report, Classifications Software codes to CCSR codes. Given these
diagnosis coding has transitioned from ICD-9 to ICD-10. We changes, the AHRQ recommend extreme caution when
mapped the codes from the last report. In addition to comparing data expenditures before and after this transi-
mapping, we consulted available lists of ICD-10 codes for tion. The limitations of each data source are described in
specific GI conditions to ensure that important diseases Supplementary Table 25.
were not overlooked. Because of differences between the It is essential that we understand the basic epidemiology
ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes, caution should be used when of digestive and liver diseases in the United States and
comparing our results in this report to prior estimates. We identify changes in this epidemiology over time. Carefully
may have overestimated the number of GI procedures examining the data in this report can help generate areas for
performed annually because we do not have data from future investigation, prioritize research funding, identify
uninsured individuals and those covered by Medicaid. Our areas of unmet need or disparities, and provide an impor-
SPECIAL ARTICLE
estimates appear to be conservative compared with tant overview of the impact of digestive and liver conditions.
others.44,45 Using data from the MEPS, total expenditures By periodically updating the data, we can map trends and
for GI diseases fell from $135.9 billion in 2015 to $119.6 identify gaps. During the COVID-19 pandemic, elective
billion in 2018. A decrease in hepatitis expenditures ($23.2 endoscopy stopped, and patients delayed or lost access to
billion to $3.1 billion) accounted for most of this difference. health care. In the future, we expect to find a greater burden
There is evidence that drug expenditures for hepatitis C of mortality from GI diseases and cancers because of the
medications peaked in 2015 in the United States and have impact of COVID-19 on health care. Finally, we hope that
decreased over time.46 It is also important to note that others will use this report as motivation to take a deeper
between 2015 and 2018, diagnosis coding transitioned dive into individual diseases. There is much to learn from
from ICD-9 to ICD-10, and the MEPS switched from Clinical carefully studying existing data sources.
Table 11.Total Expenses for GI, Pancreatic, and Liver Diseases in the United States, 2018
February 2022
Distribution of total expenditures by type of service
641
b
No survey participants reported services from which expenditures can be extrapolated.
SPECIAL ARTICLE
642 Peery et al Gastroenterology Vol. 162, No. 2
Table 12.NIH Estimates of Funding for Select GI Disease Categories and Total Budget, 2011–2022
2021 2022
GI disease category 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 estimated estimated
Digestive diseases $1698 $1719 $1575 $1607 $1684 $1745 $1881 $2242 $2173 $2273 $2316 $2390
Inflammatory bowel $113 $121 $114 $125 $128 $126 $134 $144 $163 $177 $180 $186
disease
Liver diseases $623 $632 $594 $605 $616 $635 $691 $802 $851 $845 $860 $892
Chronic liver disease $303 $288 $282 $293 $295 $293 $285 $324 $351 $368 $373 $388
and cirrhosis
Hepatitis $208 $210 $195 $251 $262 $267 $306 $349 $378 $362 $371 $385
Hepatitis A $4 $2 $2 $3 $4 $3 $4 $5 $3 $5 $5 $5
Hepatitis B $58 $51 $48 $48 $42 $47 $42 $55 $67 $70 $72 $74
Hepatitis C $114 $112 $101 $111 $96 $107 $114 $129 $150 $120 $123 $128
NIH total budget $30,630 $30,802 $29,129 $30,019 $30,293 $32,258 $34,147 $36,642 $39,420 $41,525 — —
NIH budget spent on 7.6 7.6 7.4 7.4 7.6 7.4 7.5 8.3 7.7 7.5 — —
digestive and
liver diseases, %
NOTE. Dollar values are in millions and rounded. Sources: NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Categorical
Spending and NIH Office of Budget.
Supplementary Material 3. Peery AF, Crockett SD, Murphy CC, et al. Burden and
Note: To access the supplementary material accompanying cost of gastrointestinal, liver, and pancreatic diseases in
the United States: update 2018. Gastroenterology 2019;
this article, visit the online version of Gastroenterology at
156:254–272.
www.gastrojournal.org, and at https://doi.org/10.1053/
4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Ambulatory
j.gastro.2021.10.017.
health care data. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/
nchs/ahcd.htm. Accessed April 6, 2021.
References 5. Myer PA, Mannalithara A, Singh G, et al. Clinical and
1. Peery AF, Dellon ES, Lund J, et al. Burden of gastroin- economic burden of emergency department visits due to
testinal disease in the United States: 2012 update. gastrointestinal diseases in the United States. Am J
Gastroenterology 2012;143:1179–1187. Gastroenterol 2013;108:1496–1507.
2. Peery AF, Crockett SD, Barritt AS, et al. Burden of 6. Everhart JE, Ruhl CE. Burden of digestive diseases in the
gastrointestinal, liver, and pancreatic diseases in the United States part III: liver, biliary tract, and pancreas.
United States. Gastroenterology 2015;149:1731–1741. Gastroenterology 2009;136:1134–1144.
Table 13.NIH Estimates of Funding for GI Cancers and All Cancer, 2011–2022
2021 2022
Category 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 estimated estimated
GI cancer
Colorectal cancer $313 $302 $281 $271 $309 $274 $270 $314 $294 $319 $325 $335
Liver cancer $74 $73 $71 $74 $85 $83 $90 $113 $127 $130 $133 $137
Pancreatic cancer $112 $127 $125 $123 $174 $168 $199 $215 $219 $230 $233 $239
SPECIAL ARTICLE
NOTE. Dollar values are in millions and rounded. Source: NIH Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools Categorical Spending.
Dashes indicate no data available for those years.
February 2022 Burden of Gastrointestinal Diseases 643
7. Everhart JE, Ruhl CE. Burden of digestive diseases in the 22. Sandberg KC, Davis MM, Gebremariam A, et al.
United States part II: lower gastrointestinal diseases. Increasing hospitalizations in inflammatory bowel dis-
Gastroenterology 2009;136:741–754. ease among children in the United States, 1988–2011.
8. Everhart JE, Ruhl CE. Burden of digestive diseases in the Inflamm Bowel Dis 2014;20:1754–1760.
United States part I: overall and upper gastrointestinal 23. Kappelman MD, Moore KR, Allen JK, et al. Recent trends
diseases. Gastroenterology 2009;136:376–386. in the prevalence of Crohn’s disease and ulcerative co-
9. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. HCUPnet. litis in a commercially insured US population. Dig Dis Sci
Available at: https://hcup.ahrq.gov/. Accessed June 10, 2013;58:519–525.
2021. 24. Minneci PC, Hade EM, Lawrence AE, et al. Association of
10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National nonoperative management using antibiotic therapy vs
Program of Cancer Registries and Surveillance, Epide- laparoscopic appendectomy with treatment success and
miology, and End Results Program SEER*Stat Database: disability days in children with uncomplicated appendi-
NPCR and SEER Incidence—U.S. Cancer Statistics citis. JAMA 2020;324:581–593.
Public Use Research Database, 2020 submission (2001– 25. Tapper EB, Halbert B, Mellinger J. Rates of and reasons
2018). Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/uscs/ for hospital readmissions in patients with cirrhosis: a
public-use/obtain-data.htm. Accessed June 21, 2021. multistate population-based cohort study. Clin Gastro-
11. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. CDC enterol Hepatol 2016;14:1181–1188.
WONDER. Available at: http://wonder.cdc.gov. 26. Chirapongsathorn S, Krittanawong C, Enders FT, et al.
Accessed March, 16, 2021. Incidence and cost analysis of hospital admission and
12. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Medical 30-day readmission among patients with cirrhosis.
expenditure panel survey. Available at: https://meps. Hepatol Commun 2018;2:188–198.
ahrq.gov/. Accessed June 8, 2021. 27. Mumtaz K, Issak A, Porter K, et al. Validation of risk score
13. National Institutes of Health. Estimates of funding for in predicting early readmissions in decompensated
various research, condition, and disease categories cirrhotic patients: a model based on the administrative
(RCDC). Available at: https://report.nih.gov/funding/ database. Hepatology 2019;70:630–639.
categorical-spending#/. Accessed June 28, 2021. 28. Singal AG, Rahimi RS, Clark C, et al. An automated
14. National Institutes of Health. Office of Budget. Spending model using electronic medical record data identifies
history by institute/center/mechanism, etc. (1983 to patients with cirrhosis at high risk for readmission. Clin
present). Available at: https://officeofbudget.od.nih.gov/ Gastroenterol Hepatol 2013;11:1335–1341.
spending_hist.html. Accessed June 28, 2021. 29. Tapper EB, Finkelstein D, Mittleman MA, et al. A quality
15. Laine L, Barkun AN, Saltzman JR, et al. ACG clinical improvement initiative reduces 30-day rate of read-
guideline: upper gastrointestinal and ulcer bleeding. Am mission for patients with cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol
J Gastroenterol 2021;116:899–917. Hepatol 2016;14:753–759.
16. Crockett SD, Wani S, Gardner TB, et al. American 30. Moon AM, Yang JY, Barritt AS 4th, et al. Rising mortality
Gastroenterological Association Institute guideline on from alcohol-associated liver disease in the United
initial management of acute pancreatitis. Gastroenter- States in the 21st century. Am J Gastroenterol 2020;
ology 2018;154:1096–1101. 115:79–87.
17. Moon AM, Singal AG, Tapper EB. Contemporary epide- 31. Kim D, Li AA, Gadiparthi C, et al. Changing trends in
miology of chronic liver disease and cirrhosis. Clin etiology-based annual mortality from chronic liver dis-
Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020;18:2650–2666. ease, from 2007 through 2016. Gastroenterology 2018;
18. Guthery SL, Hutchings C, Dean JM, et al. National esti- 155:1154–1163.
mates of hospital utilization by children with gastroin- 32. Tapper EB, Parikh ND. Mortality due to cirrhosis and liver
testinal disorders: analysis of the 1997 kids’ inpatient cancer in the United States, 1999–2016: observational
database. J Pediatr 2004;144:589–594. study. BMJ 2018;362:k2817.
19. Burnett E, Jonesteller CL, Tate JE, et al. Global impact of 33. Belli LS, Perricone G, Adam R, et al. Impact of DAAs on
rotavirus vaccination on childhood hospitalizations and liver transplantation: major effects on the evolution of
mortality from diarrhea. J Infect Dis 2017; indications and results. An ELITA study based on the
215:1666–1672. ELTR registry. J Hepatol 2018;69:810–817.
20. Sellers ZM, MacIsaac D, Yu H, et al. Nationwide trends 34. Guh AY, Mu Y, Winston LG, et al. Trends in U.S. burden
in acute and chronic pancreatitis among privately of Clostridioides difficile infection and outcomes. N Engl
SPECIAL ARTICLE