You are on page 1of 2

Consumption of ultra-processed food items

among rural poor and marginalized households


A SURVEY STUDY IN UTTAR PRADESH AND BIHAR
Background Objective
India is a Nutrition Paradox where undernutrition and obesity coexist as a classic There is a general perception that the high consumption of
case of the double burden of malnutrition. Over one-third of children under age 5 in ultra-processed food and drinks is mainly among the
India are stunted and underweight. On the other hand, obesity among children is on wealthy, urban, and affluent classes. It is somewhat valid,
an upward trend, with around 3.4 children either overweight or obsess. This is a but consumption of ultra-processed food and drinks
more than 50% increase in the last five years [1]. Almost, 15 % of Indian children are among an economically poor, rural, and under-privilege
section of society is multiplying. Therefore, the study
facing some form of obesity. Nearly half of all under-5 child mortality in India is
objective was to identify the level of consumption
attributable to undernutrition. Global estimates suggest that almost 2.3 billion prevalence of ultra-processed food items and its share in
children and adults are overweight. The growing availability of ultra-processed overall food expenditure of the socially most under-
foods containing high levels of sugar, sodium, saturated fats, and refined privilege and economically poor households and families
carbohydrates is a key contributor to the current obesity epidemic. The adverse in the rural part of the country. The study was conducted
health effect of unregulated ultra-processed food and drinks in an under-nourished primarily in the country's two most populous states with a
or stunted child, who received inadequate nutrition early in life, is more pronounced high share of the rural population to affirm that ultra-
than in children who received adequate nutrition, due to their weak immune processed food items have deep penetration among
systems. Ultra-processed package food accounts for nearly 10% of the average under-privilege and marginalized populations, causing a
total caloric intake in both rural and urban India. Urban households in high severe double burden of malnutrition.
economic affluence consume almost 30% of their daily calories from processed
This study is jointly carried by the People’s Vigilance
food [2] Committee on Human Rights (PVCHR) and People’s
Initiative for Participatory Action on food Labelling
(PIPAL).
Methodology PVCHR, since its inception, is working on Child right,
nutrition issues especially on malnutrition and hunger,
The study follows a Descriptive Research Design involving qualitative & children health and Neo-natal & maternal death as a core
quantitative research methods to explain the prevalence of Ultra-processed food thematic area along with Human rights of Dalits,
products among rural households. The study was carried out in two states – Uttar minorities and women. PVCHR are already linked with
Pradesh and Bihar. Varanasi was selected from Uttar Pradesh, and Gaya was progressive forums such as Global India and grassroots
selected from Bihar. The sample consisted of 330 families In Uttar Pradesh and level NGOs. PIPAL is a network of civil society
Bihar. Five blocks were selected from Varanasi and two from Bihar through cluster organizations working on health & nutrition, global &
sampling. From each village, households were identified using purposive random Indian think-tanks, health advocates, professionals
selection to obtain the responses. The required information was obtained based working for betterment of child & maternal health; and
women organizations. It is started as a public forum to
on the objectives by constructing a structured questionnaire. The questionnaire
engage and sensitize policy makers and decision makers
consisted of a general information schedule with questions about age, religion, through research, survey, community mobilization and
education, marital status, personal habits, frequency of processed foods, and public testimonies. The data were collected by network
significant driving force for purchasing processed food. members of PIPAL and research & analysis were carried
by researchers from Kashi Vidyapeeth, Varanasi.
All ethical guidelines were followed in the research study. After obtaining informed
consent, an adult respondent from each household was administered a pre-tested This study is part of national sensitization campaign for
questionnaire to gauge information on various aspects of food consumption. This strong and science-based Front of Pack Labeling (FOPL)
descriptive cross-sectional study was done over two months, from March to May regulation to help Indian consumers to identify unhealthy
2022. ultra-processed package food products which has high
health risk factors and reduce their consumption.
Survey Respondent
Around 90 % of survey respondents earn Rs.400 or less daily and live at least 20 km from the closest urban centers.

40 % of the families surveyed belong to the Dalit community (Mushaars), and over one-third belong to other backward castes.

The majority of respondents who were surveyed are illiterate, while another one-third studied up to class 10. Less than 4 % of respondents are
graduates or post-graduate.

In all families who are surveyed, no one has formal employment. The maximum number of families are employed as casual laborers in farm or non-
farm activities such as transport, restaurants, etc. Those receiving regular salaries are also daily wage earners without formal employment contracts.

74 % of respondents in the survey are female, while 26 % are male.

Key Findings Policy Takeaways


1. The survey once again reaffirms that the prevalence of ultra-processed Implementing front-of-package labeling (FOPL) that
food consumption is a country-wide phenomenon seen in all social gives clear warning regarding high content of sugar,
grouping and income levels.As we move down in income level and social sodium and saturated fat in utra-porcessed and
structure, expenditure on food increases while expenses on non-food packaged food and discourages purchase of unhealthy
items like housing, education, fuels, etc., reduces. Dalit families spend packaged food, is the an impactful policy solution to
safeguard public health.
94 % of their earning on food items while Upper caste and Other
backward caste communities spending on food items are around 65% of
There is a transition from home-cooked traditional
their earning. food to Ultra-processed food, even in the villages. It
2. Average Dalit families spend more than 90 % of their earnings on food comprises children's nutrition intake, as they are the
items of which 10-15 % is spent on ultra-processed food. biggest consumer of ultra-processed food items.
3. Their expenses on healthcare and education are 1.3 % and 0.5 %.
4. Among the general category and other backward caste groups, expenses Even in villages, marketing is the major driving factor
on food items are 65 % of total earning while spending on education in for increasing consumption of ultra-processed food
both social groups are 2.5 %. Health related expense among OBC items. Respondents agree that they buy them because
families are around 9 %. of TV / social media advertisements or Neighborhood
5. Still, in rural areas of Uttar Pradesh and Bihar, a majority of food influence.
expenditure are on food items like cereals, wheat, pulses, cooking oil,
There is a general awareness among respondents/
etc (75-80 % of total food expenditure depending on income of
consumers that ultra-processed food like chocolate,
household). They usually spend 15 % of their food expenditure on ultra- chips and carbonated drinks aren't good for health.
processed food items like chocolates, carbonated drinks, jellies, However, they are willing to consume it for
biscuits, and chips. taste/experience and expression for better living
6. A household which earns Rs 400 daily ( roughly Rs. 12,000 per month), standards.
spend Rs. 60 per day (15 %) on Ultra-processed food items. A family
with annual earning between Rs. 200,000 to 500,000 spend roughly Four factors contribute to the high prevalence of
around 18 % of their food expense on ultra-processed food items. An unregulated ultra-processed food & drink consumption
average urban middle class families spend 10 % of their food expenses in an economically poor, rural, and under-privilege
on Ultra-processed food items ( Lancet Commission). section of society where the maximum number of
stunted or underweight children belongs. These are:
7. The study reveals a correlation between level of education and
prevalence of ultra-processed food items consumption. Consumption of
1. Increasing urbanization or urban functions in a smaller
ultra-processed food items is higher in households which are either town and rural areas,
illiterate (10%) or have only primary level education (17 %) compared to 2. Rising income among all strata of society,
households with secondary (6.6 %) or higher education (5.9%). 3. Less time for food preparation due to high work-stress
8. Affordability of ultra-processed food items available in the market is an environment, and
important factor attributed to the higher consumption rates in low 4. Lucrative marketing strategies of the Food and
income groups and Dalit families. beverage industry.
9. Types of livelihood practiced by Dalit families do not allow enough time
for preparation of home cooked food, increasing their dependence on These four factors contribute significantly to the food
cheap packaged food. transition where affordable, convenient, and hyper-
palatable ultra-processed food or drinks which are
ready to eat take up a significant share of the daily diet
of a larger population in the country, including
economically weaker sections and migrant workforce.

[1] http://rchiips.org/nfhs/NFHS-5_FCTS/India.pdf
[2] Lancet Commission Study on comparison of Indian Diets

You might also like