Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Table 2

    Uploaded by

    Urbanus Madur
    5 views1 page
    This document summarizes a critical appraisal of a quasi-experimental study using the Johanna Briggs Institute checklist. The study received a total score of 7 out of 9, meeting most of the criteria. It clearly defined the cause and effect, included similar participant comparisons, used similar treatment/care across comparisons, had multiple outcome measurements pre- and post-intervention, and measured outcomes reliably and used appropriate statistics. It did not include a control group or fully complete follow up.

    Original Description:

    Tabel Dua

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a critical appraisal of a quasi-experimental study using the Johanna Briggs Institute checklist. The study received a total score of 7 out of 9, meeting most of the criteria. It clearly defined the cause and effect, included similar participant comparisons, used similar treatment/care across comparisons, had multiple outcome measurements pre- and post-intervention, and measured outcomes reliably and used appropriate statistics. It did not include a control group or fully complete follow up.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views1 page

    Table 2

    Uploaded by

    Urbanus Madur
    This document summarizes a critical appraisal of a quasi-experimental study using the Johanna Briggs Institute checklist. The study received a total score of 7 out of 9, meeting most of the criteria. It clearly defined the cause and effect, included similar participant comparisons, used similar treatment/care across comparisons, had multiple outcome measurements pre- and post-intervention, and measured outcomes reliably and used appropriate statistics. It did not include a control group or fully complete follow up.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    SUPPLEMENTARY TABLE 2

    Supplementary Table 2: Johanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklist for Quasi-Experimental
    Studies

    Article Number 1
    Criteria
    1. Is it clear in the study what is the ‘cause’ and what is the ‘effect’ (i.e. there is no confusion 1
    about which variable comes first)?

    2. Were the participants included in any comparisons similar? 1

    3. Were the participants included in any comparisons receiving similar treatment/care, other than 1
    the exposure or intervention of interest?

    4. Was there a control group? 0

    5. Were there multiple measurements of the outcome both pre and post the intervention/exposure? 0

    6. Was follow up complete and if not, were differences between groups in terms of their follow up 1
    adequately described and analyzed?

    7. Were the outcomes of participants included in any comparisons measured in the same way? 1

    8. Were outcomes measured in a reliable way? 1

    9. Was appropriate statistical analysis used? 1

    Total 7

    You might also like