Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dear Healers:
We would still use healers for the fraternity of doctors, as that is your prime occupation, to heal people,
bodily and mentally. You continue to be member of a most respected community. A famous member of
your fraternity, Dr Rudolf Virchow had said that doctors are attorneys of the poor. We know that those
less fortunate among us suffer a disproportionate burden of disease and disability. Ironically, they have
also the least means to access good quality healthcare. That has led to a situation where poor citizens of
the country have much higher burden of diseases, and deaths. Their children are much more
malnourished and sicker.
We believe that society and the state (government) has the responsibility to do all it can to reduce these
disparities, to stand with our own brethren, and to heal them. Doctors, Nurses, paramedics,
pharmacists, technicians, community health workers and other healthcare providers have a huge
responsibility here. Dr Bidhan Chandra Roy, who is founder of your Association, was once jailed in
Alipore Jail as a first class prisoner. However, he demanded a rigorous imprisonment so that he could
be with other less fortunate inmates. He started treating them in jail, and even bought medicines from
his own money, as some of these drugs were not available there! Such was his selfless commitment to
healthcare for those who could not seek it!
All civilized societies ensure that when a person meets with a medical emergency, he should not be
worried whether he has the money to access healthcare. This extends to a woman facing an emergency
that may be fatal for her or her unborn child. You know it better than we do, that many women continue
to lose their lives when faced with such an emergency, especially amongst those who have the least
means. Making health care a right is in line with the Constitution’s fundamental right to life, directive
principles on health and international human rights conventions to which India is a signatory. It is a
legal and policy mechanism to ensure that the state bears responsibility for ensuring health care access.
The Right to Health Act, by committing that everyone will have the right to access free and quality
healthcare, irrespective of their ability to pay is therefore a step in the direction of ensuring Universal
Healthcare Access (UHC), which also is part of India’s national and international commitments. It has
the potential to ensure that people are able to manage their healthcare needs, especially when faced
with an emergency, with dignity and without falling into a debt trap. You are aware that expenditure on
healthcare is one of the most common reasons for people falling in poverty in India and in Rajasthan
We know that having an act does not ensure that it would change things on the ground. However, they
are signals that we care for those who have less means. They also provide a constitutional framework
which allows citizens to question, to appeal, and to ensure that the government keeps it promises.
We know that you are opposing the bill because you fear that you may be forced to provide free health
care, putting you under financial stress. We have thoroughly reviewed the act. The Act is applicable to
only government health facilities for all provisions of the act, except for emergency clinical care. Hence
government facilities will need to be upgraded to provide the care that the government commits in this
act. The private sector is not bound to provide routine clinical, preventive, promotive or rehabilitative
care as per this Act. Only in case of defined medical emergencies is the private sector expected to pro-
vide care and not deny the same in case the patient is unable to pay. This is also in line with an earlier
Supreme Court order (in the Parmanad Katara versus Union of India AIR 1989, SC 2039), and subse-
quent Law Commission Report (201St report titled, Emergency Medical Care to Victims of Accidents
and during emergency medical condition and women under Labour, August 2006).
For providing such cashless emergency care, the Act provides for reimbursement to private facilities.
How would this be carried out is something that the Rules will clarify further. As of now, existing
provisions such as Chiranjeevi Yojana (which covers more than 80% of the state's population), and
Chief Minister's Accidental Insurance Scheme do cover most of the emergencies.
We are at a historic crossroads, where through the Act, we are saying that disparities in healthcare are
not acceptable. That it is unfair that many people in the state, our own brethren, continue to suffer from
avoidable deaths and disability. That through the Act, we are committing as a society to end this, and do
all we can do. Or we may oppose it for our own petty interests. The choice is ours.
We, the concerned doctors, and civil society representatives from Rajasthan and across the country are
writing to appeal you to rise above our interests and affiliations, and constructively engage with the Act
and formulation of its rules, so that we can proudly contribute to health and well-being of all. We
would end with this hymn " Sarve Bhavantu Sukhinah, Sarve Santu Niramaya" – May all be well, may
all be free of disease. Let us put our sincere effort towards achieving this goal.
Signatories: