You are on page 1of 2

French B HL – Paper 2 (written productive skills – 250-400 words

Based on the options – Leisure / Health) SECTION A


A: Language (10) C: Format (5)
How effectively and accurately does the student use language?  How correctly does the student produce the required type of text?
Marks Vocabulary Grammar  To what extent are the conventions of text type appropriate?
0 - The work does not reach a standard described in the descriptors below 0 - The work does not reach a standard described in the descriptors
1-2 : Command of the  Limited range of  Simple sentence below
language is limited and vocabulary structures sometimes 1  Conventions appropriate
generally ineffective  Many basic errors clear The text type is not recognizable to the text type are not
3-4: Command of the  Fairly limited range  Simple sentence used
language is generally of vocabulary structures usually clear 2  Conventions appropriate
adequate, despite many  Many errors The text type is hardly recognizable or to the text type are very
inaccuracies is not appropriate limited
5-6: Command of the  A range of  Simple sentence 3  Conventions appropriate
language is effective, despite vocabulary accurate structures clear The text type is sometimes recognizable to the text type are limited
some inaccuracies  Some errors and appropriate
7-8: Command of the  Wide range of  Some complex 4  Conventions appropriate
language is good and vocabulary accurate sentence structures are The text type is generally recognizable to the text type are evident
effective.  Few significant errors clear and effective and appropriate
9-10: Command of the  Wide range of  Complex sentence 5 The text type is clearly recognizable  Conventions appropriate
language is very effective. vocabulary accurate structures are clear and and appropriate to the text type are
and effective effective effective and evident
 Few errors Commentaires:
Commentaires:

B: Content (10) Total: Boundarie IB


 How clearly can the student develop and organise relevant ideas? s grad
Marks Ideas Development of ideas e
0 - The work does not reach a standard described in the descriptors below 23-25 7
1-2: The message has not  Ideas irrelevant and/or repetitive  Confusing 19-22 6
been communicated  Limited / inappropriate supporting 16-18 5
details 13-15 4
3-4: The message has been  Relevant to some extent  Evident at times 9-12 3
partially communicated  Sometimes appropriate supporting 5-8 2
details 1-4 1
5-6: The message has been  Mostly relevant  Coherent
communicated fairly well  Mostly appropriate supporting details
7-8: The message has been  Relevant  Coherent and effective Name of student:
communicated well  Appropriate supporting details Year 12
9-10: The message has been  Relevant and effective  Coherent and thorough
communicated very well  Highly appropriate supporting details
Commentaires:
French B HL – Paper 2 (written productive skills – 150-250 words
Based on the core – Communication and media, global issues, social relationships)
SECTION B
A: Language (10)
 How effectively and accurately does the student use language?
Marks Vocabulary Grammar
0
The work does not reach a standard described in the descriptors below
1-2  Limited range of vocabulary  Simple sentence structures sometimes clear
Command of the  Many basic errors
language is limited and
generally ineffective
3-4  Fairly limited range of  Simple sentence structures usually clear
Command of the vocabulary
language is generally  Many errors
adequate, despite many
inaccuracies
5-6  A range of vocabulary accurate  Simple sentence structures clear
Command of the  Some errors
language is effective,
despite some
inaccuracies
7-8  Wide range of vocabulary  Some complex sentence structures are clear
Command of the accurate and effective
language is effective.  Few significant errors
9-10  Wide range of vocabulary  Complex sentence structures are clear and
Command of the accurate and effective effective
language is very  Few errors
effective.
How to improve:

B: Argument (10)
 How skillfully does the student develop ideas?
 How clear and convincing is the argument?
 To what extent does the student react to the stimulus?
Marks Structure Ideas
0
The work does not reach a standard described in the descriptors below
1-2  Vague and  Irrelevant
The development of ideas is very poor, and confusing
the argument is unclear and unconvincing.

3-4  Sometimes  Sometimes relevant


The The development of ideas is poor, and apparent
the argument is rarely clear and
convincing.
5-6  Mostly relevant  Coherent
The development of ideas is sometimes  Mostly appropriate supporting details
good, and the argument has some clarity
and is sometimes convincing.
7-8  Relevant  Coherent and effective
The message has been communicated well  Appropriate supporting details
9-10  Relevant and  Coherent and thorough
The message has been communicated very effective  Highly appropriate supporting details
well
How to improve:
Total Boundarie IB
: s grad
e
20-18 7
15-17 6
12-14 5
11-13 4
8-10 3
5-7 2
2-4 1

You might also like