Peer-review - EDAP01

Ella Hammer (el5416ha-s)

February 2023

1 Peer-review
First the robot simulation was checked. It should produced reasonable senors readings,
never further away than the second ring if ”nothing” and ”nothing” reasonably often, this
matched the expectations of the assignment. In regards to accuracy the two solutions
have results within the same span, a hit-rate between 30-40% and an average Manhattan
distance at approximately 1.6. The results of the solution is within the boundaries, both
Manhattan distance and hit-rate where below respectively over the boundary.
One specific improvement for the solution is a higher amount of moves in the main
function, from 100 to 1000 for example, in order to have less variation in the test trials.
Our solutions had some differences to the structure. One of the biggest dissimilarity’s
was how the given models where incorporated in the implementation. The robot class
RobotSim can use the given models, for example the transition model to simulate
the movements of the robot. The efficiency in this part of the implementation could
have been improved. The models are not used in the most efficient way to simulate
the movement and sensor readings rather computed according to the rules of movement
for the robot and the given scenario, the implementation therefor has an unnecessary
complex to it. This being said the solution is good and does the job.