A NOVEL DECENTERIZLED PRODUCT VERIFICATION USING

BLOCKCHAIN TECHNOLOGY
SUBIRAMANIYAN S D1, MOHAMED FAYAS M P2, SELVA BHARATHI S M3, SASIKALA K4, R. RESHMA4, S. P.
SASIREKHA5
UG Scholar, Department of Computer Science and Engineering1, 2, 3,
Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering4
Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering 5,6
Karpagam Academy of Higher Education, Coimbatore.  1, 2, 3 ,4,5
Corresponding Mailid: emailtosasi@gmail.com

ABSTRACT:

A blockchain is a distributed database that serves as a public ledger of all digital events and transactions executed
and shared among participating parties. The consensus from a majority of system participants verifies each
transaction in the public ledger, and once recorded, the information cannot be erased. The blockchain contains a
verifiable record of every transaction ever made, making it similar to a cookie jar in a crowded marketplace
compared to a secluded location. The product verification system utilizes the Ethereum blockchain to deploy smart
contracts in blocks. There are two users: manufacturers and customers. Manufacturers can save the product
information, including product price, name, manufacturing date, location, and expiry date, in the blockchain as a
smart contract. This information can be saved in QR codes and NFC tags that act as digital invoices for the
product. Customers can confirm product details by scanning the QR code or NFC tag. Smart contracts are built
using Solidity, and the deployment is completed using the Truffle blockchain deployment tool. Firebase handles
authentication capabilities, allowing analytics on the number of authenticated customers.

Keywords-Supplychain; Blockchain; Hyperledger Fabric; Hyperledger Composer; Hyperledger Playground;

1
I. INTRODUCTION:
This is a key component in the next generation
of information technology. A product may be
anything from a mobile device, movie, or
restaurant to an internet service, and product
reviews include the product's attributes as well
as its star rating.Deep learning requires an
industrial mobile network for industrial
manufacturing. It ensures the regular operation
of machinery and the standardization of
industrial output. But spammers can use this
feature to harm others and influence industrial
production. Spammers are users who solely
spread spam, such as links to viruses and
adverts. Spammers have formed organizations in
order to maximize their benefits as mobile
network membership has grown. This has
created confusion and significant losses in
industrial productivity. It is different. To solve
this issue, this study presents a Spammer
Identification method for industrial mobile
networks based on NLP and MICHINE
LEARING. It identifies spammers intelligently
without depending on flexible and untrustworthy
connections. It mixes data presentation, where
each user node is classified into one class
throughout the model's creation phase. Social
spam is increasingly impacting personal
communication networks such as Facebook,
Pinterest, and Twitter. According to a study
conducted by the Web-based life security
organization, online networking stages
experienced a significant increase in social spam
during the first half of 2013. Internet social
platforms, such as Twitter, empower individuals
to independently produce tweets and consume
large amounts of material, regardless of their
characteristics. According to a report, while the
amount of data created is used by individuals
and companies to achieve a competitive edge, a
significant portion of the data is generated by
spam or fraudulent users. To educate the user on
the difference between phony and relevant
comments and to recognize them. To categories
that remark, If it's link spam or not. To make
purchasing decisions for products. Earlier
research relied on review text information to
determine if a review was false or not, but in
order to detect opinion spammers, it is required
2
to track spamming behavior indications of
reviewers.
II. EXISTING SYSTEM:
The current structure encourages certain
merchants to post review spam in order to
deceive customers. It has been stated that 80%
of buyers change their minds after reading bad
evaluations. Given the presence of spam
indicators, machine learning algorithms have
been used for spam detection via a stream of
messages in various formats. When spam terms
are not identified more properly, they are
classified as ham words, and certain ham words
contribute to spam. To eliminate unsolicited
comments, the present system employs the Spam
technique. Spam comment, also known as
unsolicited bulk communication, is the practice
of sending unwanted comments, typically with
commercial content, to an indiscriminate group
of receivers in high quantities. Therefore, there
is no way to prevent the undesirable in the Spam
approach.
III. PROPOSED SYSTEM:
NLP is used to identify spam and gammon in
comments and postings. To process the term,
tokenization and stemming are employed. Stop
words and punctuation are also employed in the
suggested approach to get more accurate results.
This will aid in the detection of spam comments
and posts. We utilise three separate machine
learning algorithms to detect spam users. Which
has the most accuracy: logistic regression,
random forest, and nave bayes. We employ a
classification (spammer detection) model based
on NLP and MICHINE LEARING.
BLOCK DIAGRAM:
Figure 1: Data Flow Diagram of the Proposed
System
This proposed system incorporates both system
design and system study with UML diagrams
including use case, class, data flow diagram, and
input and 15 output designs of the work
MODULES:
1. Dataset Loading
2. Preprocessing
3. Feature Selection
4. Feature extraction and Feature engineering
5. N Grams
6. Analyzer
7. Vocabulary
8. Binary
9. Machine Learning
METHODOLOGY
Requirement Analysis:
In this phase, we will identify the requirements
and functionalities of the product verification
system. This will include the features needed for
product registration, verification, authentication,
smart contract deployment, and analytics. We
will also gather feedback from potential users to
ensure that the system meets their needs.
System Design:
In this phase, we will design the system
architecture and user interface for the product
verification system. We will create mockups and
prototypes to visualize the system and gather
feedback from stakeholders.
Development:
In this phase, we will develop the product
verification system using Flutter, a cross-
platform mobile application development
framework. We will use Firebase for user
authentication and Truffle for smart contract
3
deployment. We will also implement the
modules required for product registration, QR
code and NFC tag generation, product
verification, analytics, user management, and
push notifications.
Testing:
In this phase, we will test the product
verification system to ensure that it meets the
functional and non-functional requirements. We
will perform unit testing, integration testing, and
system testing to identify and fix any bugs or
issues.
Deployment:
In this phase, we will deploy the product
verification system on the Google Play Store and
Apple App Store. We will also provide
documentation and user manuals to guide users
on how to use the system.
Maintenance:
In this phase, we will provide maintenance and
support for the product verification system. This
includes bug fixes, feature enhancements, and
system updates.
Input attributes
1. Product name:
This attribute will be used to identify the product
being registered and verified in the system.
2. Manufacturer: This attribute will contain the
name of the manufacturer who produced the
product.
3. Manufacturing date: This attribute will
contain the date on which the product was
manufactured.
4. Expiry date: This attribute will contain the
date on which the product will expire.
5. Price: This attribute will contain the price of
the product.
5. Manufacturing location: This attribute will The following requirements are needed to carry
contain the location where the product was out this development:
manufactured.
SOFTWARE HARDWARE REQUIREMENTS:
6. QR code/NFC tag: This attribute will be used
to store the unique code that will be generated Software:
for each product. The code will be used for
product verification and authentication. Language Used: Dart, Solidity

7. User ID: This attribute will be used to Libraries Used: Dart Material Library
identify the user who is registering or verifying
the product. Frameworks Used: Flutter

8. User authentication: This attribute will be Database Used: Firebase

used to authenticate the user who is registering
or verifying the product. User authentication will Blockchain deployment: Truffle, Ganache
be done using Firebase authentication.
Hardware Requirements: NFC Tag
9. Smart contract: This attribute will be used to
store the smart contract that will be deployed for
each product. The smart contract will be used for
product verification and authentication.

DESIGNING A DYNAMIC USER

INTERFACE
In our Decentralized product verification
application development, the modeling and the
standardized notations allow to express complex
ideas in a precise way, facilitating the
communication among the project participants
that generally have different technical and
cultural knowledge
.
MVC architecture has had wide acceptance for Figure 2: Authentication Module
corporation software development. It plans to Figure 2illustrates the use case diagram of our
divide the system in three different layers that are product verification application which shows the
in charge of interface control logic and data relationship between the manufacturer and the
access, this facilitates the maintenance and client .
evolution of systems according to the
independence of the present classes in each layer.
With the purpose of illustrating a Successful
application built under MVC, in this work we
introduce different phases of analysis, design and
implementation of a database and mobile
application.

III. RESULTS

4
 Figure 5: Ganache Blockchain Deployment
User Interface
The above figure describes the level 0 data flow
diagram also known as a context diagram, shows
how product data is stored.
Figure 3: Manufacturer Result Module
Figure 3 illustrates the use case diagram of our
product verification application which shows the
relationship between the manufacturer and the
client and their relationship with the product
data.

mentioned in this
paper. It is clear
that the results
from Table (3),
provided high
Figure 4: Firebase Authentication Screen
Backend side
Figure 4 comprises of the User interface and
results due to the
how a block initiate a transaction, in the
blockchain, how the blockchain verifies the classification
accuracy
transaction and creates a block and how the
block is appended to the blockchain through our
application.
classifiers with the
important features
selected by the

5
feature selection accurate and
algorithms effective detection
(Correlation to provide
coefficient) appropriate health
improved result care. The
compared to the traditional
model with methods which
related works and have been
converting proposed and
categorical data to performed
numerical data previously in
using label identifying the
encoding affected person
technology. spend a long time
7. Conclusion and costly, so data
ASD is a mining techniques
neurological were used as an
disorder and long- alternative to the
term. ASD needs traditional
early, rapid, methods which are
6
working on a short Vector Machine
time and lower SVM) were
cost applied to
patient diagnosis. perform early
Several studies in predicting ASD
this field has been among toddlers
performed and children using
successfully to AQ-10 datasets
predict ASD, but for toddlers and
these children. The
studies still did not results show high
reach a high performance in
performance in term of accuracy
less costly time. In compared with
this paper, data other related works
mining techniques
(Random Forest,
Naïve Bayes,
Decision tree J48, mentioned in this
and Support paper. It is clear
7
that the results using label
from Table (3), encoding
provided high technology.
results due to the 7. Conclusion
classification ASD is a
accuracy neurological
classifiers with the disorder and long-
important features term. ASD needs
selected by the early, rapid,
feature selection accurate and
algorithms effective detection
(Correlation to provide
coefficient) appropriate health
improved result care. The
compared to the traditional
model with methods which
related works and have been
converting proposed and
categorical data to performed
numerical data
8
previously in studies still did not
identifying the reach a high
affected person performance in
spend a long time less costly time. In
and costly, so data this paper, data
mining techniques mining techniques
were used as an (Random Forest,
alternative to the Naïve Bayes,
traditional Decision tree J48,
methods which are and Support
working on a short Vector Machine
time and lower SVM) were
cost applied to
patient diagnosis. perform early
Several studies in predicting ASD
this field has been among toddlers
performed and children using
successfully to AQ-10 datasets
predict ASD, but for toddlers and
these
9
children. The
results show high
performance in
term of accuracy
compared with
other related works
IV. CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the development of a mobile
application for product verification using QR
code and NFC tags in supply chain management
has the potential to significantly reduce fraud
and product tampering in the supply chain. The
proposed system is designed to allow
manufacturers to register and store product
information such as product name, price,
manufacturing date, expiry date, and
manufacturing location in a secure and tamper-
proof blockchain system. Customers will be able
to verify the authenticity of the product by
scanning the QR code or NFC tag on the product
and accessing the information stored in the
blockchain. The proposed system has several
advantages over existing systems, including
increased security, reduced risk of fraud and
tampering, and improved transparency in the
supply chain. The use of smart contracts in the
system ensures that transactions are transparent,
secure, and tamper-proof, which is crucial in a
supply chain where trust is often lacking. In
addition, the proposed system has several
potential use cases beyond product verification
in supply chain management. For example, it
could be used in the healthcare industry to verify
the authenticity of pharmaceuticals or medical
devices, or in the art industry to verify the
authenticity of artwork. Overall, the proposed
system has the potential to revolutionize supply
chain management and improve trust and
transparency in a wide range of industries.
10
REFERNCES
1. G. Baralla, A. Pinna, and G. Corrias, ‘‘Ensure
traceability in European food supply chain by
using a blockchain system,’’ in Proc. IEEE/ACM
2nd Int. Workshop Emerg. Trends Softw. Eng.
Blockchain (WETSEB), May 2019, pp. 40–47.
2. Marimuthu, Mohanapriya & Rajendran,
Santhosh & Radhakrishnan, Reshma &
Rengarajan, Kalpana & Khurram, Shahzada &
Sayed, Abdelaty & Shafiq, Muhammad. (2023).
Implementation of VLSI on Signal Processing-
Based Digital Architecture Using AES
Algorithm. Computers, Materials & Continua.
74. 4729-4745. 10.32604/cmc.2023.033020.
3. E. Oh and S.-Y. Son, ‘‘Peer-to-peer energy
transaction mechanisms considering fairness in
smart energy communities,’’ IEEE Access, vol.
8, pp. 216055–216068, 2020, Doi:
10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3041838.
4. C. Santiago, S. Ren, C. Lee, and M. Ryu,
‘‘Concordia: A streamlined consensus protocol
for blockchain networks,’’ IEEE Access, vol. 9,
pp. 13173–13185, 2021, Doi:
10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3051796.
5. Senthamil, M., Mohideen, K. S., Saran, S., &
Reshma, R. (2022, December). A State-of-the-
Art Approach for Securing Online Auction
System. In 2022 6th International Conference
on Electronics, Communication and Aerospace
Technology (pp. 658-663). IEEE.
6. S. Leonardos, D. Reijsbergen, and G.
Piliouras, ‘‘PREStO: A systematic framework
for blockchain consensus protocols,’’ IEEE
Trans. Eng. Manag., vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 1028–
1044, Nov. 2020, doi:
10.1109/TEM.2020.2981286
7. A. Ometov, Y. Bardinova, A. Afanasyeva, P.
Masek, K. Zhidanov, S. Vanurin, M. Sayfullin,
V. Shubina, M. Komarov, and S. Bezzateev,
‘‘An overview on blockchain for smartphones:
State-of-the-art, consensus, implementation,
challenges and future trends,’’ IEEE Access,
vol. 8, pp. 103994–104015, 2020
8. I. A. Omar, R. Jayaraman, M. S. Debe, K.
Salah, I. Yaqoob, and M. Omar, ‘‘Automating
procurement contracts in the healthcare supply
chain using blockchain smart contracts,’’ IEEE
Access, vol. 9, pp. 37397–37409, 2021, doi:
10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3062471.
defensive overview for double-spend and selfish
mining attacks: A systematic approach,’’ IEEE
Access, vol. 9, pp. 3838–3857, 2021, doi:
10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3047365.

9.W. Xiong and L. Xiong, ‘‘Smart contract-

based data trading mode using blockchain and
machine learning,’’ IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp.
102331–102344, 2019, doi:
10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2928325.

10. F. A. Aponte-Novoa, A. L. S. Orozco, R.

Villanueva-Polanco, and P. Wightman, ‘‘The
51% attack on blockchains: A mining behavior
study,’’ IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 140549–
140564, 2021, doi:
10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3119291.

11. T. Ahmad, D. Zhang, C. Huang, H. Zhang,

N. Dai, Y. Song, and H. Chen, ‘‘Artificial
intelligence in sustainable energy industry:
Status quo, challenges and opportunities,’’ J.
Cleaner Prod., vol. 289, Mar. 2021, Art. no.
125834, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.125834.

12. J. Yang, A. Paudel, H. B. Gooi, and H. D.

Nguyen, ‘‘A proof-ofstake public blockchain
based pricing scheme for peer-to-peer energy
trading,’’ Appl. Energy, vol. 298, Sep. 2021,
Art. no. 117154, doi:
10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117154.

13. Sasirekha, S. P., Reshma, R., Lallithamani,

P., Sundareswari, K., & Dhanapal, R. (2022).
Improving Object Detection Performance
Invanet Using Deep Learning. Mathematical
Statistician and Engineering
Applications, 71(3s2), 99-110.

14. J. Xie, H. Tang, T. Huang, F. R. Yu, R. Xie,

J. Liu, and Y. Liu, ‘‘A survey of blockchain
technology applied to smart cities: Research
issues and challenges,’’ IEEE Commun. Surveys
Tuts., vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 2794–2830, Jul. 2019,
doi: 10.1109/COMST.2019.2899617.

15. K. Nicolas, S. Member, Y. Wang, G. C.

Giakos, and B. Wei, ‘‘Blockchain system

11