You are on page 1of 4

International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication Control and Networking (ICACCCN2018)

Design and Comparison of Multislot


Microstrip Patch Antenna for WiMAX and
WLAN Application
Pooja Singh Gautam1 Dhananjay Singh 2 Surya Deo Choudhary 3 Baibaswata Mohapatra 4
Research Scholar, ECE Research Scholar, SEECE Assistant Professor, ECE Professor, SEECE
NIET Greater Noida, India GU Greater Noida, India NIET Greater Noida, India GU Greater Noida, India
ps398056@gmail.com ap.dhananjay@gmail.com suryadeo.bit@gmail.com bmohapatra9@gmail.com

Abstract-: In this work, we have proposed an In this paper we are designing microstrip patch
inverted F-slot microstrip patch antenna design antenna for WiMAX application. In order to propose
for Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave our antenna for WiMAX application falling in three
Access (WiMAX) and Wireless Local Area Network bands of operation 2.4GHz (2.5-2.8 GHz) called low
(WLAN) applications. The design is a modified band, 3.2GHz (3.2-3.8 GHz) called medium band and
version of [1] which provides better results. The 5.3 GHz called (5.2-5.8 GHz) called high band [1] [4]
radiation performance such as Voltage Standing [5] [6].
Wave Ratio (VSWR), return loss, radiation
pattern and gain of antenna are observed The operating frequencies of reference antenna are
using Ansoft HFSS. In this we have taken [1] as a falling under three bands [1]. We are taking the
reference and modified it and then finally reference antenna by taking the same design and
proposed our antenna. Microstrip feeding dimensions but some modifications are done like in
technique is used in our proposed antenna with substrate and feeding technique. By doing some
FR4 epoxy substrate with dielectric constant of modifications we got a better result and better band.
4.7 and height 1.6mm. A detailed comparison of And this modified antenna (proposed antenna 1) has
shapes and results are presented for readers. The applications in both Worldwide Interoperability for
operating frequency of proposed antenna falls in Microwave Access (WiMAX) and Wireless Local Area
band of operation of WiMAX technology which Network (WLAN) [7] [8].
is 2.7GHz-3.8GHz, 5.4GHz-6.0GHz.
But due to uneasily availability of substrate FR4
Keywords: Radiation pattern, VSWR, Dielectric epoxy with height 3.175 we had to take the height
constant, WiMAX, Microstrip feeding. which is easily available in market. So, finally we
proposed our antenna which has substrate FR4 epoxy
I. INTRODUCTION of height 1.6mm which is very easily available in
Wireless is a unique technology which is evolving market. And in our proposed antenna (i.e. proposed
on all fronts-in personal, local and wide area networks antenna 2) the feeding technique used is microstrip
and in some other surprising directions. Next feeding [3]. The frequency band of our proposed
generation technologies are developing day by day antenna has improvement in first band of existing
where communication is one of the most important antenna.
factors for long distance communication. For long
distance communication we need antenna which is With betterment in the first operating band, our
compact and has several applications [2]. proposed antenna has several other advantages like we
have used FR4 epoxy instead of RT duroid which is
In high performance aircraft, spacecraft and other cheap, easily available and everyone can process it as
applications like mobile where size, cost, performance well as have good mechanical strength. The operating
and ease of installation are constraints low-profile frequency of our proposed antenna is (GHz) which has
antennas are required. To meet these requirements WiMAX applications.
microstrip antennas are required [2].
II. ANTENNA DESIGN
Microstrip antennas are low profile, conformable In [1] RT/duroid 5880 (with dielectric constant, ℇ r
to planar and non planar surfaces, simple and = 2.2 and h=3.175mm) is used as a substrate. In the
inexpensive to manufacture using modern printed modified reference design substrate is FR4 epoxy with
circuit technology, mechanically robust when mounted h=3.175mm and finally in our proposed antenna
on rigid surfaces and when the particular patch shape substrate is FR4 epoxy with h=1.6mm which is easily
and mode are selected, they are very versatile in terms available.
of resonant frequency, polarization, pattern and
impedance [3].

ISBN: 978-1-5386-4119-4/18/$31.00 ©2018 IEEE 717


International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication Control and Networking (ICACCCN2018)

The dimensions of reference antenna are shown in


TABLE I. The shape of reference antenna is shown in
fig. 1.

TABLE I
Dimensions of the entire three inverted F- slot microstrip patch
antenna [1]

Parameter L W Ls Ws a b Yf
Dimension (in
mm) 34 27 28.25 12 2 2 5.5

Fig.2: Shape of proposed antenna 1

Fig.1: Shape of reference antenna [1]

In fig. 1 all the dimensions are same as in table I.


Substrate used is Rogers RT/duroid 5880 (dielectric
constant, ℇ r = 2.2 and h=3.175 mm) [1]. Fig. 3: Shape of proposed antenna 2

The dimensions of proposed antenna 1 and III. SIMULATION AND RESULT


proposed antenna 2 are shown in TABLE II. The shape In this section, the simulation and analysis is done
of proposed antenna 1 and proposed antenna 2 are for all the three reference, modified and proposed
shown in fig. 2 and fig. 3 respectively. antenna.
TABLE II
Dimensions of the Proposed Microstrip Patch Antennas

Parameter Wg Lg Wp Lp a b
Dimension
(in mm) 67 74 27 34 2 2.25

Parameter L1 L2 L3 L4 L5 L6
Dimension
(in mm) 28.25 20.05 6 28 13.95 34

In fig. 2 all dimensions are same as in table II.


Substrate used is FR4 epoxy with dielectric constant,
ℇ r = 4.7 and h = 3.175 mm.

In fig. 3 all dimensions are same as in table II


except the height of substrate (FR4-epoxy) is 1.6mm
which is easy available and cheap. Fig. 4: Simulated result S11 vs frequency for reference antenna

718
International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication Control and Networking (ICACCCN2018)

From these simulation results, the parametric


studies are carried out. In this paper, the return loss,
VSWR and gain are simulated and analyzed. The
operating frequencies of the reference design fall in
three bands of operation of WiMAX technology which
are 2.4GHz (2.5-2.8 GHz) called low band, 3.2GHz
(3.2-3.8 GHz) called medium band and 5.3 GHz called
(5.2-5.8 GHz) called high band shown in fig. 4. Return
losses are -13.5dB,-14.2dB and -33dB respectively.

The proposed antenna 1 design works both for


WiMAX and WLAN technologies having frequency
band (3.8-4.2GHz and 5.5-6.2GHz) shown in fig. 5
with return loss -13.8dB and -14.2dB respectively.

Fig. 7: Simulated result VSWR vs frequency for proposed antenna 2

Fig. 5: Simulated result S11 vs frequency for proposed antenna 1

The proposed antenna 2 design has frequency band


(2.7GHz-3.8GHz and 5.4-6.0GHz) which is improved
result of the reference antenna shown in fig. 6 with
return loss -23dB and -15.2dB respectively.
Fig. 8: Simulated 2D radiation pattern of proposed antenna 2

Fig. 6: Simulated result S11 vs frequency for proposed antenna 2 Fig. 9: Simulated 3D radiation pattern of proposed antenna 2
719
International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communication Control and Networking (ICACCCN2018)

TABLE III [7] K.Pengthaisong, P.kracchodnok, and R.wongsan, “Design of a


Comparison of proposed antenna with existing antenna Dual-band Antenna using a Patch and Frequency Selective
Surface for WLAN and WIMAX,” International Conference on
Feeding Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Tele-
Sub- Dimensions techniq Results Applicati communications and Information Technology (ECTI-CON),
Work pp.1-4, 15-17 May 2013.
strate ue (in GHz) ons
[8] R.Jothi Citra, K.Jayanthi, V.Nagaraja, “Design ofMicrostrip
As shown in slot Antenna for WiMAX Application,” IEEE International
Rogers table I with WiMAX Conference on Communication and signal processing (ICCSP)
Existing Coaxial 2.4 - 2.52;
RT dielectric and
Antenna feeding 3.8 - 3.95; , PP.645- 649, 22-23 March 2013.
Duroid constant, WLAN
[1] 5.58 - 5.95
ℇ r= 2.2 and
h=3.175mm

As shown in
table II with Micro- WiMAX
Proposed FR4 3.8 - 4.2;
dielectric strip and
Antenna Epoxy 5.5 - 6.2
constant, feeding WLAN
1
ℇ r=4.7 and
h=3.175mm

As shown in
table II with Micro- WiMAX
Proposed FR4 2.7-3.8;
dielectric strip and
Antenna Epoxy 5.4-6.0
constant, feeding WLAN
2
ℇ r =4.7 and
h=1.6mm

IV. CONCLUSION
A design and comparison of multislot Patch
antenna is proposed and its analysis is done through
different parameters by using Ansys HFSS v.15.0.0
simulation software. As compared to other antennas it
is very simple in structure, smaller in size and achieves
good return loss, impedance matching and radiation
patterns. The simulated -10 dB bandwidth is used for
IEEE 802.11a WLAN and WiMAX applications. The
proposed antenna has a good radiation characteristic
and VSWR.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors would like to thank Neha Suyal and


Monali Dey for their efforts in this work.

REFERENCES
[1] MithileshKumar, “Triple Band inverted F-Slot Microstrip Patch
Antenna for WiMAX Application”,2014 International
conferenceon medical imaging, m-health and Emgineering
Communication Systems(MedCom).
[2] Rappaport, Theodore S. Wireless Communications: Principles
and Practice. 2nd ed., Prentice Hall PTR, 2010.
[3] Balanis, Constantine A. Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design.
3rd ed., Wiley, 2017.
[4] Sana Arif, SyedaAreebaNasir, Muhammad Mustaqim and Bilal
A. Khawaja, “Dual U-Slot Triple Band Microstrip Patch
Antenna for Next GenerationWireless Networks,” PNEC,
National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST).
Karachi, Pakistan,” International Conference on Sensor
Network Security Technology and Privacy Communication
System (SNS & PCS), PP.1-6, 9-10 Dec 2013.
[5] Kai-Fong Lee , Shing Lung Steven Yang and Ahmed A. Kishk,
“Dual- and Multiband U-Slot Patch Antennas,” IEEE Antennas
and Wireless Propagation Letters, Vol. 7, pp.645-647,2008.
[6] K. Li, M. Ingram, and E.RAUSCH, “Multibeam antennas for
indoor wireless communications,” IEEE Trans.Comm., vol.50,
no.2, pp.192-194, Feb. 2002.
720

You might also like