Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Two general approaches are used in manufacturing companies for costing products for the purposes of
valuing inventories and cost of goods sold. One approach, called absorption costing is generally used for
external financial reports. The other approach, called variable costing, is preferred by some managers
for internal decision making and must be used when an income statement is prepared in the
contribution margin format. Ordinarily absorption costing and variable costing produce different figures
for net operating income and the difference can be quite large. In addition to showing hose these two
methods differ, we will consider the arguments for and against each costing and will be show how
management decisions can be affected by the costing method chosen. 1
Absorption Costing2
Also known as full, traditional, conventional and normal costing) is a method of product costing in which
all manufacturing costs, fixed and variable are treated as product inventoriable costs.
This method is the required method for external reporting and the reporting in most countries including
the Philippines.
Variable Costing 3
Or direct costing is a method of inventory costing in which all variable manufacturing costs are included
as inventoriable costs. All fixed manufacturing costs are excluded from inventoriable costs. Fixed
manufacturing costs are instead treated as costs in which they are incurred.
1
Managerial Accounting, Asia Global Edition, 2/e
2
Strategic Cost Management 2019-2020 Edition (Cabrera)
3
Strategic Cost Management 2019-2020 Edition (Cabrera)
4
Management advisory services (Roque 2016 Edition)
asset, being part of the cost of inventory.
In variable costing, only variable manufacturing costs are included in a unit’s product costs, and thus in
the value of inventory and cost of goods sold. Fixed manufacturing overhead is excluded. It is reported
as a separate expense and deducted from the contribution margin along with fixed selling and
administrative expense in determining operating income.
Managers generally prefer variable costing because its separates fixed from variable costs as in cost-
volume-profit analysis. As a result, it is easier to compare actual operating income to planned operating
income. With absorption costing, actual operating income corresponds well with planned operating
income only when inventory levels remain unchanged. With variable costing, income is more closely
associated with sales while absorption costing is influenced by units produced and unit sold.
Variable Costing and Performance Evaluation of Managers 7
5
Management advisory services (Roque 2016 Edition)
6
Strategic Cost Management 2019-2020 Edition (Cabrera)
7
Strategic Cost Management 2019-2020 Edition (Cabrera)
The evaluation of managers is often to the profitability of the units they control. How income changes
from one period to the next and how actual income compares to planned income are frequently used as
signals of managerial ability. To be meaningful signals, however, income should reflect managerial
effort. In general terms, if income performance is expected to reflect managerial performance, then
managers have the high to expect the following:
1. As sales revenue increases from one period to the next, all other things being equal, income should
increase.
2. As sales revenue decreases from one period to the next, all other things being equal, income should
decrease.
3. As sales revenue remains unchanged from one period to the next, all other things being equal,
income should remain unchanged.
The usefulness of variable costing for performance evaluation extends beyond evaluating managers.
Managers need to be able to evaluate the activities over which they have responsibility.
The separation of fixed and variable costs basic to variable cost is critical for making accurate
evaluations. Implicit in an evaluation is an associated decision whether to continue to operate a plant or
not, or whether to keep or to drop a product line.
Without the distinction between fixed and variable costs, the evaluation of profit-making activities and
the resulting decision may be both be erroneous. Reporting the profit contributions of activities or other
units within an organization is called segmented reporting.
Segmented reports prepared on a variable costing basis produce better evaluations and decisions than
those prepared on an absorption-costing basis. Let’s take a closer look at segmented reporting and see
why this is true.
8
Strategic Cost Management 2019-2020 Edition (Cabrera)
9
Strategic Cost Management 2019-2020 Edition (Cabrera)
FELCOM, INC.
Segmented Income Statement, 2000
Variable-Costing Basis
Product M Product N Total
Sales 400,000 290,000 690,000
Less: Variable expenses
Variable cost of goods sold (300,000) (200,000) (500,000)
Variable selling and adminstrative (5,000) (10,000) (15,000)
Contribution margin 95,000 80,000 175,000
Less: Direct fixed expenses
Direct fixed overhead (30,000) (20,000) (50,000)
Direct selling and administrative (10,000) (5,000) (15,000)
Segment margin 55,000 55,000 110,000
Less: Common fixed expenses
Common fixed overhead (100,000)
Common selling and administrative (20,000)
Net income (loss) (10,000)
Sample Quiz
2. Which one of the following statements is true for a firm that used variable costing?
a. The unit product cost changes because of changes in the number of units manufactured.
b. Profit fluctuates with sales.
c. Any underapplied overhead is calculated into the product cost.
d. Product costs include variable administrative costs.
3. A principal difference between variable costing and absorption costing centers on:
a. Whether variable manufacturing costs should be included as product costs.
b. Whether fixed manufacturing costs should be included as product costs.
c. Whether fixed manufacturing costs and fixed selling and administrative costs should be included
as product costs.
d. None of these.
10
Strategic Cost Management 2019-2020 Edition (Cabrera)
a. Net income will tend to move upward and downward in response to changes in level of
production.
b. Inventory costs will always be lower than under absorption costing
c. Net income will tend to vary inversely with production changes.
d. Net income will always be higher than under absorption costing.
5. When sales are constant, but the production level fluctuates, net income determined by the variable
costing method will:
a. Fluctuate in direct proportion to changes in production.
b. Remain constant.
c. Fluctuate inversely with changes in production.
d. Be greater than net income under absorption costing.
Magic Company manufactures a single product. The following data pertain to the company’s operation
last year.
At the beginning of the year there was no units in inventory. A total of 12,000 units were produced
during the year, and 10,000 were sold.
10. A company had a net income of P85,500 using variable costing and a net income of P90,000 using
absorption costing. Total fixed manufacturing overhead was P150,000, and production was 100,000
units, between the beginning and the end of the year, the inventory level:
a. Increased by 4,000 units
b. Decreased by 4,500 units
c. Increased by 3,000 units
d. Decreased by 3,000 units
Answer Key
1. D 6. A
2. B 7. C
3. B 8. C
4. B 9. B
5. B 10. C