Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Accreditation of Eye
Hospitals – A Review
Delhi J Ophthalmol 2014; 25 (2): 118 -124
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7869/djo.91
Nirmal Fredrick T*, Every day more than a million people are treated safely and successfully in our Hospitals. However
Sunitha Nirmal the advances in technology and understanding of many diseases have created an immensely complex
healthcare system. This complexity brings risks, and evidence shows that things will and do go wrong
Nirmals’ Eye Hospital Pvt. Ltd in our hospitals. Medical Errors can cause devastating emotional and physical consequences for
Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
patients and their families. For the staff involved too, incidents can be distressing, while members
of their clinical teams can become demoralised and disaffected. Safety incidents also incur costs
*Address for correspondence through litigation and extra treatment. Quality of health care and the initiatives taken to address
various risk and safety issues in the hospitals have become a subject of debate. External assessment
is increasingly used to regulate, improve and market health care providers, especially hospitals.
The commonest models are peer review, accreditation, statutory inspection, ISO certification and
evaluation against the ‘business excellence’ framework. Each of these is progressively adapting to
meet the changing demands of public accountability, clinical effectiveness and improvement of quality
and safety, but the most rapid development is in accreditation. This review article focusses on the
T. Nirmal Fredrick MS, MS, DO, DNB, standards for accreditation in India, approach to implementation, documentation, costs and Benefits.
FICO, FCD, FMMC, FAICO, CML, MBA (HM)
Eye Surgeon & Managing Director
Keywords : • accreditation • standards • eye hospitals • quality of healthcare • structure •
Nirmals’ Eye Hospital Pvt. Ltd process • outcomes
1058, Ayyasamy street, West Tambaram
Chennai 600045, TamilNadu, India Quality of health care and the initiatives continuous improvement strategies
& taken to address various risk and safety and achievement of optimal quality
Principal Assessor issues in the hospitals have become a standards, rather than adherence to
National Accreditation Board for Hospital subject of debate. Many countries and minimal standards intended to assure
and Health Care Providers (NABH) organizations are exploring various public safety”
Quality Council of India. means to improve the quality of health Accreditation Process is intended to
Email: nirmalfred@hotmail.com care services. “Accreditation is a status change the way the system operates,
that is conferred on an organization technical procedures of service delivery,
that has been assessed as having met in the appropriate use of available
particular standards. The two conditions technologies, in the integration of
for accreditation are an explicit definition relevant knowledge, in the way the
of quality (i.e. standards) and an resources are used, and in the efforts to
independent review process, aimed ensure social participation.2
at identifying the level of congruence Thus the objective of accreditation
between practices and quality standards.” is continuous improvement in the
organizational and clinical performance
Principle Features of Accreditation of health services, not just the
Rooney and van Ostenberg define achievement of a certificate or award
accreditation and contrast it with or merely assuring compliance with
licensing. “Accreditation is usually a minimum acceptable standards (Figures
voluntary program, sponsored by a non- 1-5). Accreditation decisions are made
governmental agency (NGO), in which following a periodic on-site evaluation
trained external peer reviewers evaluate by a team of peer reviewers, typically
a health care organization’s compliance conducted every three years.3
with pre-established performance National Accreditation Board for
standards.1 Hospitals and Health Care Providers
Accreditation addresses organizational, (NABH) is a constituent Board of
rather than individual practitioner, Quality Council of India, set up with the
capability or performance. Unlike co-operation of the Ministry of Health
licensing, accreditation focuses on & Family Welfare, Government of India
www.djo.org.in 118
ISSN 0972-0200
Allied Ophthalmic Sciences Nirmal F & Nirmal S
www.djo.org.in 120
ISSN 0972-0200
Allied Ophthalmic Sciences Nirmal F & Nirmal S
- Quality Procedures (QP), The apex manual could be distributed to all individuals
- Process flow charts (QFC), in the first rung of the organogram. It is preferable that
- Departmental work instructions (WI) & procedures and processes for various objective elements
- Other documents i. e. forms / formats & etc. (QR, be incorporated in the apex manual or done separately
FM, FILE, REG., etc.) required to conduct the depending on the size of hospital.
operations and complete the “Quality Manual”.
10. Implement the Newly established “Management A suggested content for the Essential documentation is
System” from a planned / fixed date. given below4:
11. Arrange for “Internal Auditors Training” for at-least n Introduction of the organization
three to four members of Core Team. (Develop Self n Management including ownership, vision, mission,
-assessment Capability) ethical management, etc.
12. Conduct first Internal Quality Audit (After a gap of n Quality policy and objectives including service
at-least 30 days from the date of implementation of standards
system). n Scope of services provided by the organization and the
13. Make Application for certification to NABH. details of services provided by every department.
14. Pre Assessment date will be given by NABH. n Composition and role of various committees (in
15. Pre-Assessment by NABH Audit team – they will give alphabetical order)
a deficiency report. Close the deficiencies and send the n CPR analysis
report to NABH. - Clinical audit
16. NABH will schedule the date for final assessment. - Ethics
17. NABH team will assess the hospital again and give - Infection control
their report. If there are any deficiencies they will give - Pharmacy
a report to the accreditation committee. If the Hospital - Quality
closes all non-conformances effectively, accreditation - Safety
committee will recommend Accreditation. n Organogram
18. Receive the Certificate and enjoy the fruits of hard n Statutory and regulatory requirements
work. n Chapter-wise documentation
19. Continue with the Accreditation work and reap the n Annexure (if any)
multiple benefits of the quality Journey.
Essential Documentation: Like all quality management Costs of Accreditation
systems, documentation is an essential component of NABH Many doctors ask about the cost of accreditation and also
accreditation. NABH standards require documentation at have misconceptions on costs of accreditation. We have
every step and process. We suggest that the Hospital prepare developed a list of frequently asked questions to help in
an apex manual (quality manual) incorporating the various decision making.
standards, objective elements with appropriate linkages.
Approximately what is the cost of a NABH / Any NABH standards for small health care organisations
accreditation survey for a hospital? (SHCO):
Varies, from agency to agency, certifying body to certifying Approximately 50,000 health care organizations are
body, the education/qualification/experience of the functioning in our country out of which significant number
Consultant, the size of the Hospital, present status of fall under the Small Health care Organizations which are
the Hospital, Bed Strength, Core and Ancillary Services, less than 50 beds.
Staffing Pattern, Commitment of the top management and The SHCO standards, which are applicable to single
the employees. specialty Eye hospitals, are a compilation of all applicable
The total cost for accreditation would be: Consultancy standards relevant to for small healthcare organizations.
charges + Cost of preparation for the Accreditation This will facilitate small Hospitals in easy understanding
(employee training + changes to infra and superstructure) and implementation of standards within their facilities.
+ initial Assessment + Actual Certification charges + (Figure 4)
Assessment charges (for the team). Lack of knowledge, High cost of Accreditation, Manpower
issues and Poor insurance coverage are challenges faced
Cost determination: The cost is determined by the size and
by the SHCOs for Accreditation. To be more inclusive and
complexity of the hospital. This determines the number
to encourage SHCOs to join quality journey, NABH has
of Auditors and the number of days needed to survey
developed Pre Accreditation Entry Level standards. SHCO
the standards. The details found in an organization’s
entry level requirements focus on the most critical elements
application for accreditation drive the formula to determine
important for patient safety. This makes accreditation
survey team size and survey length and this determines the
affordable and will encourage the hospitals to adopt quality
cost.
initiative, to attain the next stage (progressive level) and
Costs related to a sssessment: The cost for transportation of eventually full accreditation.
the team and hotel, food and local transportation costs on-
site are not included. These are not included in the survey Accreditation - Challenges of Implementing Quality
cost as they are extremely variable and subject to currency in Eye Hospitals
fluctuations. The different challenges faced by the smaller hospitals in
The cost of an accreditation assessment does not include implementing national accreditation standards are:
any training and consultation as the hospital prepares. a) Escalating Costs
While NABH/ISO/ JCI does offer accreditation preparation An accreditation system is a highly specialized,
services through a separate division, many hospitals choose knowledge and cost-intensive endeavor. The acute need
to prepare on their own or with assistance from other to cope with the advance in the medical technology,
sources to maintain integrity. integrated hospital management system, sophisticated
laboratory tests and equipment and implementing
www.djo.org.in 122
ISSN 0972-0200
Allied Ophthalmic Sciences Nirmal F & Nirmal S
national standards, will lead to an increase in the overall 6. Costing and budgeting (NABH, 2012)
hospital expenses.
b) Infrastructural Deficiency Benefits of Accreditation (a system oriented ap-
As many small hospitals in our country have seen a proach) to Patients and Staff
phased growth and have expanded from a smaller The benefits of accreditation (Figure 5) include3:
clinic, there is an acute shortage of space and a well- Ø As all members of a team are trained and aware of
planned infrastructure. Different departments, standard protocols, they are able to identify deviations
including operation theatre, are not well planned and as soon as they occur, and rectify the same.
may not have the required infrastructural requirement Ø In absence of a team leader, the team can continue to
for accreditation. work efficiently by adhering to the standard protocols.
c) Shortage of Healthcare Staff Ø Regular monitoring of results helps quality enhancement,
There is an acute shortage of qualified and experienced as early detection of complications and their causes can
healthcare professionals. Smaller set-ups don’t budget help in timely and relevant interventions.
for competitive salary for healthcare staff including Ø On most occasions, complications occur due to deviations
doctors, so it’s difficult for them to even acquire and then from protocols. When protocols and procedures are
retain the talent. Thus the hospitals are always short of standardized and implemented, even minor deviations
manpower for which staff end up doing extended shifts can be identified and steps for rectification introduced.
and ‘burnouts’ are very common. Timely identification and immediate management of
d) Inadequate Training complications can help in reducing morbidity.5
Most critical care staff are not BLS (Basic life Support)
and ACLS (Advanced Cardiac Life Support) trained
Effect of Accreditation / Standardization on Hospital
or certified. The healthcare staff, in many small and
medium sized healthcare units, are not well versed with Management
the biomedical waste, its management, hospital safety The effect of accreditation / standardization on hospital
and risk management, infection control, medication management can be summarized as follows1:
Ø Standardization increases cost effectiveness and helps
management practices etc. which are critical not just
patient safety, but also employee wellbeing. costing and budgeting.
Ø Accreditation helps to know the vital signs of Hospital
e) Increased Cost Pressure
The smaller hospitals are sandwiched between the performance - KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
increased cost of maintaining quality assurance and (KPI) The implementation of Key Performance
on the other side poor revenue cycle management and Indicators (KPIs) is one of the hallmarks of Accreditation
increased pressure from the insurance companies, TPAs and Good Management Practice to assess the overall
and corporates in extending more discounts to patients. performance of the Hospital.
Ø KPIs can also include non-clinical areas such Business
f) High-Customer Expectations
In recent years, productivity and efficiency of services Development and financial management, which
in patient care have become a very important issue. are also important factors in the performance of an
With increased awareness and the emergence of organization.
Ø Updates to accreditation standards are common and
consumerism, patients have become highly demanding
and take an important role in the medical decision NABH training sessions impart continued education on
making process. the standards and policies, procedures and practices.
Ø Along with the quality improvement, the insurance
g) Inadequate Licensing
Most hospitals do not have all the licenses applicable companies, TPAs and corporate may extend better rates
in the hospital. Thus implementation of the quality to accredited hospitals which may serve as ‘boon in
management system has become a challenging task for disguise’.
Ø If all the international standards are met, the healthcare
smaller hospitals as it comes with a big “price tag”. The
solution that the hospital management is looking for facility operators can contract with foreign governments
is ‘how to strike a balance between cost reduction and (as some Indian hospitals have done) to provide services
maintaining/raising standards’. with superior outcome and lower costs. Medical tourists
could potentially bring in hundreds of millions dollars
as they do for Thailand, Malaysia and Singapore
Benefits of Accreditation Ø Accreditation provides a powerful policy tool which
Standardization of all processes and procedures, helps
makes the healthcare providers accountable and
through six important factors, namely:
potentially a “win win” situation for all parties —
1. Enhanced efficiency
particularly patients.
2. Reduced complications
3. Improved monitoring
4. Cost effectiveness Best Time to start Accreditation Process
5. Replication Before a hospital starts accreditation process, it is better to
assess the response from all stakeholders by a thorough
internal review before committing with the external Financial & competing interest disclosure
agency for the following aspects: gain expected, risks The authors do not have any competing interests in any product/
and costs, incentives, or benefits to the staff, patients and procedure mentioned in this study. The authors do not have any financial
Hospital, choice of provider and committement from Senior interests in any product / procedure mentioned
management, General staff and Medical staff.1
References
Conclusion
Accreditation is basically a framework, which helps 1. www.who.int/hrh/documents/en/quality_accreditation.
Hospitals to establish objective systems aimed at quality pdf. Quality and accreditation in health care services A
GLOBAL REVIEW. Evidence and Information for Policy,
& patient safety. The standards provide a basic format for Department of Health Service Provision (OSD) World Health
Hospitals to organise and develop a quality management Organization, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland. 2003.
system that is focused on error prevention and continuous 2. Kimberley A, Galt K A: Foundation in Patient safety for
improvement. Accreditation emphasizing participation of Health Professionals. Jones & Bartlett Publishers, LLC, 2011.
various stakeholders has the potential to be more successful 3. n a b h . c o / I m a g e s / P D F / n a b h _ g i b _ h o s . p d f : N a t i o n a l
Accreditation Board for Hospitals and Healthcare Providers
than regulation. There is a growing realization that General Information Brochure, 2013.
without the commitment of Hospital Owners, Consultants, 4. nabh.co/images/pdf/all-gib.pdf: National Accreditation
the changes needed within our health care institutions to Board for Hospitals and Healthcare Guidebook to NABH
improve patient safety will not be made. By focusing on Standards 2012.
creating systems that support both quality and safety, 5. Myers S A. Patient Safety and Hospital accreditation A model
for ensuring success. Springer Publishing Company, LLC,
Ophthalmologists can transform the eye care system and
New York, 2012.
improve the lives of the patients and communities they
serve.
www.djo.org.in 124