Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Circular Motion
Circular Motion 2
Introduction
circular trajectories and the influences on this motion. The lab was conducted by experimenting
with a cork attached to the string while the other end of the string consists of masses (50g, 100g,
150g, 200g), the cork is then spun around using a plastic tube. The variables that have changed
throughout this experiment are the masses and the radius of the string. By changing the variables,
we are able to establish the relationship between the centripetal force, mass, velocity, and radius
Hypothesis
The radius of the circle and the strength of the centripetal force affects the speed of the
object that is moving in a circular motion. The speed required for the object to be moving in a
circle becomes faster as the centripetal force increases but the speed required to keep moving in a
circle reduces as the radius increases. This indicates that centripetal force is inversely
proportional to the radius. However, it would be the complete opposite for mass, as mass
increases, the speed required to move in a circle increases as well. Which indicates that
List of Materials
Circular Motion 3
● Metre Ruler
● String
● Cork (22g)
● Crocodile Clip
● Plastic Tube
● Stopwatch
● 3 x Goggles
Diagram
Circular Motion 4
Procedure
1. Measure the mass of the masses, cork and mass hook using an electronic balance.
2. Attach the cork to one end of the string, then place the hollow tube through the string.
3. Use a metre ruler to determine the length that the experiment will be rotating in. (Minimum
length 50cm) Then use a crocodile clip to keep the hollow tube in place. (Refer to Figure 1.2)
4. The plastic tube is then held and spun in a circular motion. This was carried out up until the
7. After that, you will repeat the entire procedure from steps 3 - 6 but adding more mass onto the
mass hook
8. Afterwards repeat steps 3 - 7, changing the length of where the plastic tube will be stopping
Data
0.05 7.88 8.59 8.91 8.46 12.17 1.18 3.71 27.53 1.38
0.10 5.28 6.19 6.31 5.93 17.37 1.69 5.31 56.39 5.64
0.15 5.19 4.91 5.10 5.06 19.76 1.98 6.22 77.38 11.61
0.20 4.87 4.31 4.19 4.46 15.25 2.24 7.04 99.12 19.82
0.25 3.64 4.25 4.28 4.06 15.76 2.46 7.73 119.51 29.88
0.05 7.25 7.47 6.75 7.16 10.06 1.40 4.84 42.59 2.13
0.10 6.41 6.54 5.75 6.23 12.68 1.61 5.56 56.21 5.62
0.15 5.25 4.65 4.43 4.78 17.15 2.09 7.22 94.78 14.22
0.20 4.44 4.38 4.19 4.34 5.76 2.30 7.95 114.91 22.98
0.25 4.59 4.66 4.53 4.59 2.83 2.18 7.53 103.09 25.77
0.05 7.07 7.81 7.97 7.62 11.81 1.31 4.94 40.67 2.03
0.10 5.92 6.02 5.96 5.97 1.68 1.68 6.33 66.78 6.68
0.15 5.91 5.28 4.99 5.39 17.07 1.86 7.01 81.90 12.29
0.20 4.94 5.19 5.07 5.06 4.94 1.98 7.46 92.75 18.55
0.25 4.28 4.50 5.13 4.64 18.32 2.16 8.14 110.43 27.61
0.05 9.41 8.87 8.22 8.83 13.48 1.13 4.61 32.70 1.64
0.10 6.12 6.25 6.59 6.32 7.44 1.58 6.45 64.00 6.40
0.15 5.19 5.31 4.93 5.14 7.39 1.95 7.96 97.48 14.62
0.20 4.06 4.13 4.56 4.25 10.12 2.35 9.60 141.78 28.36
0.25 3.03 3.54 4.01 3.53 27.76 2.83 11.56 205.59 51.39
Appendix A
Graph
Circular Motion 10
(Grap
Analysis
Looking from tables 1.1 - 1.4, it shows values such as average, percentage difference,
average occurrence, centripetal speed, centripetal acceleration and centripetal force. All of these
Now looking at graphs 1.1 - 1.4 it shows that the relationship is positively linear which
indicates that it is directly proportional on the graphs. The trendline has the mathematical
formula y=mx+b. It is possible to conclude that the value of y would be the centripetal force, the
value of m would be the gravitational force, the value of x would be the mass, and the y-intercept
would be some sort of error because if it were a directly proportional relationship, it should start
at the origin. This conclusion can be drawn using knowledge based on the formula and our
Conclusion
The centripetal force increases as mass increases. The tables include the information
necessary to substantiate this claim. Using Table 1.1 as an example, the centripetal force for a
hanging mass of 0.05 kg was determined to be 1.38 N, whereas the centripetal force for a
hanging mass of 0.25 kg was calculated to be 29.88 N. Now using graph 2.1 as a guide, notice
that the trendline is positively linear, indicating that as the hanging mass rises, so does the
estimated centripetal force. This demonstrates that what we said was true.
Circular Motion 13
References
Centripetal force 2012 - university of notre dame. (n.d.). Retrieved March 9, 2023, from
https://www3.nd.edu/~hgberry/Fall2012/E5-Centripetal_Force-2012.pdf
Average formula: How to calculate average (calculator, Excel template). EDUCBA. (2023,
Admin. (2020, September 16). Percent difference formula- how to calculate percentage
formula/
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/cf.html#:~:text=Centripetal%20force%20%3D
%20mass%20x%20velocity2%20%2F%20radius
Circular Motion 14
Appendix A
(Average formula: How to calculate the average (calculator, Excel template) 2023)
= 8.46
= 12.17
= 1.18
(Centripetal force)
= 3.71
Circular Motion 15
(Centripetal acceleration)
= 27.53
= 1.38