Professional Documents
Culture Documents
FACULTY OF ENGINEERING
SEMM3823
GROUP 1 ASSIGNMENT 2
SECTION 21
JANUARY 23
2022/2023 - 1
GROUP MEMBERS
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION 4
1.1. Background of Study 4
1.2. Objective 4
1.3. Scope 5
2. ACCIDENT CASES 6
3. INCIDENT CASES 8
4. WORKPLACE SAFETY ISSUES 11
5. CONCLUSION 16
6. REFERENCES 17
7. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT 17
3
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Background of Study
On 14 April 1912, The R.M.S. Titanic collided with a massive
iceberg and sank in less than three hours. The Titanic sank near
the route to New York City from Southampton, England. It was
sailing to America for the first time with more than 2200 passengers
and crew on board. Only 705 people lived. The Titanic's designers
claimed that even in the worst-case scenario of a maritime calamity,
the ship should have remained afloat for two to three days. Many
deaths due to hypothermia but not drowning. Based on the
information we obtained from studying this case study, we tried to
identify the main reason why this disaster occurred by using our
knowledge we learned from the Engineering Management , Safety
and Economics classes. The Titanic incident is good case study for
engineering students to investigate and learn from.
1.2. Objective
4
1.3. Scope
1.4. Summary
The sinking of the Titanic was one of the deadliest maritime
disasters in history, and it caused widespread shock and grief. The
event was made even more tragic by the fact that many of the
ship's lifeboats were not filled to capacity, and that there were not
enough lifeboats on board to save all of the passengers. The
incident also brought attention to the need for better safety
regulations in the shipping industry, and led to changes in maritime
laws to improve safety at sea.These issues encountered led to a
better understanding of the importance of safety regulations in the
shipping industry, and to changes in maritime laws to improve
safety at sea. The International Convention for the Safety of Life at
Sea (SOLAS) was adopted in 1914, which mandated new safety
requirements, including the requirement for all ships to carry
enough lifeboats for all passengers and crew.
5
2. ACCIDENT CASES
2.1. Case 1: Rapid sinking of the ship due to poor design of the
compartments.
6
OSHA Part V - General Duties of Designers, Manufacturers and
Suppliers Section 20. (1)
Designer of the ship did not design it practically to withstand the
pressure after hitting the iceberg. The possible paths of water
entering the hull within the design should have taken into
consideration. Due to this, rapid sinking of the titanic occurred.
2.2. Case 2: One of the worker got electrocuted by the main generator
Involves:
OSHA 1994 Part VI - General duties of employees, Section 24:
Employees' general responsibilities at work include wearing or
using any protective equipment or clothes provided by the employer
at all times in order to prevent hazards to his safety and health
when operating machinery in the workplace.
7
3. INCIDENT CASES
3.1. Case 1: Titanic passengers at risk near the gunwale of the ship
8
3.2. Case 2: Material Failure of Hull Steel
When the Titanic collided with the iceberg, the hull steel and
wrought iron rivets failed due to brittle fracture. Brittle fracture is a
type of catastrophic failure in structural materials that occurs at
extremely high speeds and without prior plastic deformation. It was
determined that the material used to make the Titanic's rivets was
of poor quality and contained excessive sulphur. As a result of the
sheer force of the collision with the iceberg, the top head of the
rivets tore. This allowed water to enter and fill the ship's six
watertight compartments. Low temperature, high impact loading,
and a high sulphur content all contributed to brittle fracture. Each of
these three elements was present on the night the Titanic sank:
The water temperature was below freezing, the Titanic was moving
quickly after colliding with the iceberg, and the hull steel was
sulphur-laden. As a result, it can be concluded that the failure of the
Rivet joint and ripping of the hull plates was a major factor in the
ship's sinking.
9
3.3. Case 3: The Turning of the Ship
It has long been posited that if the Titanic had not been abruptly
turned in an attempt to avoid hitting the iceberg, the giant ship
would’ve survived the incident. The main captain of the ship,
William Murdoch, ordered that the steering wheel of the ship be
turned all the way left instead of as initially instructed, toward right.
This is also known as hard-a-starboard. Nevertheless, the initial
warning of the impending iceberg directly in front of the ship came
too late, it was impossible for the ship to be steered in a different,
safe direction without causing collateral damage. However, scores
of studies have been done and concluded that minimal and less
life-threatening damages would’ve been imposed on the ship had it
collided with the iceberg head-on, as opposed to turning a sharp
left, which wound up damaging a total of 16 compartments along
the right side of the ship.
Analysis of the incident has shown that the whole fatal event
would’ve been avoidable if the iceberg was detected earlier, though
taking into account the navigation technology employed at the time,
no one could’ve predicted what had transpired afterward.
Nevertheless, the captain of the ship should’ve employed proper
crisis management and mitigation steps to alleviate the situation.
10
4. WORKPLACE SAFETY ISSUES
4.1. Issue 1: Lack of Training
The 20 lifeboats weren't fully utilised. At least four of the
lifeboats were only half-full or less. Only 12 people were in a
lifeboat that could hold 40. Captain Edward J. Smith cancelled the
lifeboat exercise that was scheduled on the day the Titanic struck
the iceberg. It's possible that the training affected how the
emergency escape turned out, maybe sparing more lives. (Labib &
Read, 2013)
11
on the ship's bridge before they became aware of the iceberg. This
may be a significant issue that, as a result of a lack of job
concentration, results in a delay in recognising the iceberg. The
consequences were devastating as the ship collided with the
icebergs, which led to the deaths of thousands of passengers in the
aftermath. It is imperative that suitable equipment, such as
binoculars and radar, be made available in order to prevent the
occurrence of this horrifying tragedy. Sonar can be used to locate
icebergs.
12
lifeboats, are provided by the statute. Despite weighing 46,328
tonnes, the Titanic ship only had 20 lifeboats. To be able to save
the most passengers, the Titanic ship should carry about 75
lifeboats. In addition, the 20 lifeboats aren't even being used to their
maximum potential. At least four of the lifeboats were only half-full
or less. Only 12 people were in a lifeboat that could hold 40. On the
day the Titanic struck the iceberg, Captain Edward J. Smith called
off the scheduled lifeboat drill. There have been rumours that if the
lifeboat drill had taken place, many more lives might have been
spared. This is a lesson to remind the ship's officers and pilots to
supply enough lifeboats and conduct the lifeboat exercise earlier.
13
4.4. Issue 4: Lack of Overall Maritime Protocol
14
4.5. Issue 5: Lack of Circumstantial Awareness and Evaluation
The lack of circumstantial awareness and evaluation can be seen in
many instances throughout the event of the Titanic. A case in point,
there was a general lack of situational awareness on the side of the
ship’s captain when he intentionally ignored heaps of weather
warnings regarding sea conditions. The right thing to do would’ve
been to employ the necessary crisis management strategies and
preemptive measures to ensure the ship was able to withstand
unforeseen weather and sea conditions. Instead, we see how the
captain repeatedly ignored the potential danger often linked to bad
sea conditions, he also insisted that the ship be operated at a
speed faster than allowed by the operating policy so that they could
arrive faster at the destination. This not only demonstrates a blatant
lack of awareness toward the surroundings, it also clearly reflects
the incompetence and ineptitude of the ship’s captains to prioritise
the safety and wellbeing of the passengers.
The employees, AKA the people working onboard the Titanic ship
should always prioritise the safety, health and welfare of the
passengers onboard. This is in line with their pledge of duty which
must be fulfilled. Therefore, the decisions they make, which in this
case, regarding the sinking incident, should have the passengers’
best interests at heart.
15
5. CONCLUSION
In this report, we’ve seen in the Titanic event that devoured hundreds of
innocent casualties due to the incompetence and ineptitude of those with
authority, that a proper crisis management strategy and mitigation steps
should’ve been taken first before anything else. In this event, we’ve
divided the report into several sections highlighting key issues present
within each category. Firstly, for accidents, the ones included are poor
design of the compartments and the electrocution of a worker by the main
generator. All these accidents were valid reasons as to why the
management of the Titanic was inherently problematic. Secondly, we’ve
also talked about several important incidents present throughout the
Titanic event and how they impacted the eventual outcome of the painful
event. The ones included are the fact that the passengers were at risk
being near the gunwale of the ship, material failure of the hull steel as well
as the turning of the ship. These incidents have led to a greater series of
smaller incidents, which transpired when a panic erupted across the giant
ship. As highlighted by OSHA 1994 and FMA 1967, these incidents
could’ve been avoided partially if not completely, had the captains and
those with authority, taken heed of the advice. Incidents such as the
turning of the ship was not a mean feat. Thirdly, we also talk about
workplace safety issues, lack of training, lack of lifeboats, lack of overall
maritime protocols, lack of circumstantial awareness and evaluation, as
well as insufficient number of people who went with you. Workplace issues
are of paramount importance when it comes to deciding whether or not the
series of action ensuing would benefit the safety, health and welfare of the
passengers. We’ve also clearly highlighted the importance of tackling
these workplace issues before a ship could be operated again.
16
6. REFERENCES
1. Mohd Nazim, Dr. Ravi Butola, Dr. JP Kesari, "Case Study of Failure of Titanic Ship",
International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), Volume 10 Issue 2,
February 2021, pp. 1342-1348,
https://www.ijsr.net/get_abstract.php?paper_id=SR21222163214
2. Labib, A., & Read, M. (2013). Not just rearranging the deckchairs on the Titanic:
Learning from failures through risk and reliability analysis. Safety Science, 51(1),
397–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.08.014
3. Accidents and incidents: OSHwiki. (n.d.).
https://oshwiki.eu/wiki/Accidents_and_incidents
17
7. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
We would like to express our sincere gratitude for the opportunity to work
on this group assignment regarding OSHA 1994 and the FMA 1974. We
have learned so much through the research and discussion process on the
infringement of the law based on the real life case study of the ‘Titanic
Disaster’. We would also like to thank you for your guidance and support
throughout the duration of the assignment. Your lectures and feedback
have helped us to better understand the subject matter and to complete
the assignment to the best of our abilities. We would also like to
acknowledge the contributions of our group mates. Working with them has
been a pleasure, and we have learned so much from each other through
our discussions and collaboration throughout the duration of the
assignment. Their insights and ideas have been invaluable in helping us to
complete this assignment. We hope that our project has demonstrated our
dedication to learning and our commitment to making a positive impact in
our field.Thank you again for this wonderful learning experience.
18