This document discusses the distinction between public and private law. [1] Under Roman law, public law involved laws relating to the governance of Rome and sacred rites, while private law focused on individual welfare. [2] Martin Loughlin defines public law as the practices around establishing and regulating governmental activity, which can only be understood once political governance is conceptualized as its own autonomous sphere. [3] The document then lists several other dichotomies that relate to the public vs private law distinction such as legitimacy vs prudence and rights vs interests.
This document discusses the distinction between public and private law. [1] Under Roman law, public law involved laws relating to the governance of Rome and sacred rites, while private law focused on individual welfare. [2] Martin Loughlin defines public law as the practices around establishing and regulating governmental activity, which can only be understood once political governance is conceptualized as its own autonomous sphere. [3] The document then lists several other dichotomies that relate to the public vs private law distinction such as legitimacy vs prudence and rights vs interests.
This document discusses the distinction between public and private law. [1] Under Roman law, public law involved laws relating to the governance of Rome and sacred rites, while private law focused on individual welfare. [2] Martin Loughlin defines public law as the practices around establishing and regulating governmental activity, which can only be understood once political governance is conceptualized as its own autonomous sphere. [3] The document then lists several other dichotomies that relate to the public vs private law distinction such as legitimacy vs prudence and rights vs interests.
– Publicum ius est, quod ad statum rei Romanae spectat, privatum, quod ad singulorum utilitatem. (“the government of the Roman empire” vs. “the welfare of individuals”). – Publicum ius in sacris, in sacerdotibus, in magistratibus consistit. (“sacred rites, with priests, with public officers”) • Martin Loughlin (2005) – “a set of practices concerned with the establishment, maintenance and regulation of the activity of governing the state … the nature of [which] can be grasped only once that activity has been conceptualised as constituting an autonomous sphere; the political realm”
• Legitimacy vs. prudence
• Rights vs. interests • Private vs. public – Public vs. private • Autonomy vs. heteronomy • Government vs. management • Equality vs. hierarchy • Judiciary vs. executive • Legislature vs. executive • Fiction vs. fact – Ideology vs. reality – Ideal vs. actual – Theory vs. practice