The battles throughout the last 1000 years where inane

to a massive degree, as stated in history records, such

as the crusades and the battles of Agincourt, with 100’s
of French and English knights died due to raining
arrows from the English longbowmen, my hypothesis is
that with more battles fought and won the less deaths
will succumb due to morale.

This was proved both wrong and right, most of the

time it was that after a large amount of morale soldiers
sometimes became careless due to them feeling
stronger than their opponents.

Method:
From the array of the data, I’ve got there would be at
least 1\2 of a regiment gone on the average. With it
now being calucated by the numbers created by battle
historians which gives me the current statistic

Discussion:
The possibility would be shown that these numbers are
incorrect, due to the collection of reasons such as, the
tally of or not of the deaths from terrain, such as traps,
landmines, and pikes, barricades. So, in turn it will
allow for say, civilians to be counted towards the
dead? Or even enemies in similar uniform, no one
knows the truest numbers but so far it is but an
easement of the loses for each country showing the
abilities of each historian. So, these are the best
guesses I am able to give.