You are on page 1of 4

MANAGEMENT

Facilitating Collaboration in a High-Tech,


High-Risk Environment
Tom Benwell, Principal, Critical Path Strategies

When most people imagine a high- grow, the most successful operators conventionally structured procure-
tech business, they picture San Jose and suppliers develop collaborative ment groups and established opera-
or Seattle, not Tulsa or Lafayette or relationships to deploy new technolo- tions leadership. It has never been
Houston. Those who walk the hallways gies, maintain supply chains, and gain more important for operators and sup-
of the energy business know better. Oil access to technical resources. The pres- pliers to understand each others busi-
and gas exploration and development sure to maximize efficiency and get ness, needs, processes, and potential,
has become a world of high technol- results is intense, even with prices at and find the most productive common
ogy. While drill bits, pipe, and supplies historic levels. Operators and suppliers ground. There are good reasons to
for the toolpushers are still at the core are stretching their technical resources, begin facilitated discussions about new
of the oil and gas business, executives forcing companies to selectively allocate ways of working together.
increasingly must manage complex their hardware, software, and person-
networks of new-technology provid- nel. When a supplier bundles services Communication,
ers, and of traditional oilfield services and equipment for a competitor’s key Collaboration, Value
that have leapt into a new technologi- project, it may contractually commit Three years ago, a major provider of a
cal age. specific technical talent, making them variety of oilfield products and services
Onshore exploration and develop- unavailable to others for some period found itself spending millions of dol-
ment continues to push deeper, apply- of time. lars in time and money trying to keep
ing new science every step of the way. Resources continue to be consolidat- track of its equipment and inventory.
Offshore, rigs push from deep water ed into larger, more complex organiza- Eighty percent of the time, bits and
into ultradeep prospects, demanding tions through mergers and acquisitions. tools were moving—from manufac-
technological innovation. As the ener- New corporate combinations often lose turing to the warehouse, between the
gy-finding climate changes and risks focus on the customer, becoming inter- warehouse and the field, or from the
nally focused for a while after the owner’s location to an offsite repair/
consolidation. Operators are reducing refurbishing facility. Manual data entry,
Tom Benwell is Principal and Client the number of suppliers they do busi- physical inventory, and asset recon-
Executive for Critical Path Strategies. ness with to reduce the expense of ciliation were sapping the company’s
Previously, he was President and Chief managing so many relationships. Some resources. The company was already
Executive Officer of Argus Advisory companies have adopted a policy to using state of the art inventory soft-
Group, focusing on business consult- deal with no more than three vendors ware, and had a direct relationship with
ing, executive development, and team in each procurement category. Smaller one of the nation’s most respected soft-
performance in small- to medium- suppliers and service companies weed- ware providers, but there was a critical
sized companies, and has held posi- ed out in that process find it necessary need for improvement.
tions with Hewlett Packard, Compaq, to work as a subcontractor to a larger The company decided to meet with
Pfizer, and NCR. He was part of supplier in order to maintain their its software provider to talk about new
the Hewlett Packard/Compaq team access to the business. solutions. It wanted an environment
that managed the integration of the Even in its most traditional moments, that reached beyond the limits of a typi-
two companies. Benwell was a Vice the energy sector has understood the cal sales meeting, so it engaged a profes-
President with Compaq. He formerly need for joint ventures and strategic sional business relationship facilitator
taught in Texas A&M University’s partnerships, as well as the value of to guide their discussions. The results
Executive MBA Program on the sub- collaborative relationships. But as the were striking: in the words of the soft-
ject of building high-performance industry evolves, so must its approach ware company’s engagement manager,
teams. Benwell earned a BS degree to collaboration. In a time of rapid “We weren’t solving the problem for
in business administraton from Texas change, companies cannot afford to the energy services company by pitch-
A&M and also served as a captain in have technology acquisition and appli- ing technology; we were working in
the U.S. Air Force. cation struggle through traditional partnership with them to come up with
internal layers of approvers, such as a solution.”

42 JPT • AUGUST 2008


MANAGEMENT

The service company was under-


standably reluctant to share all of the Move from vendor Move to trusted supplier
external and internal problems that
it faced, but facilitation prompted the • Competitive price • Solving customer problems
software team to insist that the service • Minimum resources • Multiple relationships at higher levels
company’s team put all their cards on • Central contact • Operational excellence
the table. “I told [the service com- • Adding and measuring value
pany team leader] that this solution
would benefit his company and we
needed the information to work the Fig. 1—Becoming a trusted supplier.
problem together. By collaborating, we
can enhance business results—for both tionships. They may focus on the chal- Selected vendors of goods and ser-
organizations. It was an ‘Aha!’ moment lenging technical problems, avoiding vices must present themselves as—and
for him.” tough conversations around how to truly become—trusted strategic suppli-
The participants left the meeting manage the unique challenges of con- ers (Fig. 1). Here are some ways they
with an executable strategy and imme- flicting personalities, cultures, poli- can move in the right direction:
diate action plans. The service compa- cies, and procedures. Those difficulties • Open regular, candid lines of com-
ny and the software provider brought are as likely to be internal as external. munication between supplier execu-
in a recognized hardware expert to One technology-provider executive tives and the customer’s end user, pro-
develop sophisticated radio frequency told us that “a large sales opportunity curement, and technical leadership.
identification (RFID) technology. Now, often creates more conflict within our • Position their business-develop-
a sensor tag on each drill bit’s thread- own organization than it does with ment and technical teams as best-prac-
caps relays information about its loca- our customer.” tice experts within a specialty that
tion and destination to onsite RFID At the March International Associa- serves the end user and its procure-
readers, constantly emitting real-time tion of Drilling Contractors’ Deepwater ment/technical groups.
information that maximizes supply- Drilling Conference in Rio de Janeiro, • Ensure operational delivery de-
chain efficiency. the hot topic was “the big crew change.” pendability to build confidence.
It seems like a small advance. But Sweeping retirements of senior person- • Understand and communicate how
the software engagement manager nel bring surges of new talent into the their company’s solution augments and
explained, “If we can help them find industry, and layers of management complements their customers’ knowl-
one bit in real time just once a month shift up the ladder. The change brings edge and capabilities.
when they need it—a cheap bit is USD new ideas and perspectives, but it also • Take actions to streamline and cus-
40,000, the most expensive can run brings a lack of experience at creating tomize their solution to reduce the
up to USD 250,000—it is nothing but and managing collaborative relation- customer’s investment in supervision
profitable for them. “And,” he predict- ships—and creates discontinuities in and management.
ed, “I expect we will probably do that existing collaborations. • Measure and communicate how
more than once a month.” With the industry in this fluid and their internal knowledge and technolo-
challenging state, creating, re-exam- gy enhances their customer’s business.
The Art of “Fierce Conversations” ining, enhancing, and expanding • Train business development teams
Collaborative relationships are not collaborative relationships is more on their changing roles and responsi-
built by sending everyone to yet important than ever. To remain com- bilities.
another team-building session and petitive, three process components With some operating companies,
assuming that all will work in har- must adopt new points of view that procurement groups are moving from
mony. In the real world, collabora- enhance collaboration. contention-based competitive bidding
tive relationships often are a result of
well-managed “fierce conversations”
that face difficult problems involving Move from
diverse company cultures and conflict- contention-based bidding Move to collaborative buying
ing best practices. One more conven-
tional meeting between the company • By product/service • Jointly develop solutions for groups of
procurement team and the technol- products/services
ogy provider team is not the answer. • Responsive mode • Proactive approach
Without facilitation, underlying prob- • Price focus • Total cost of ownership
lems tend to lurk unexposed. • Report card • Value measurement
For example, technology-driven
companies tend to underestimate the
time needed to develop soft skills to Fig. 2—Procurement group move from contention-based competitive
manage complex collaborative rela- bidding to a collaborative buying process.

44 JPT • AUGUST 2008


MANAGEMENT

objectives and often acts as a media-


Re-examine traditional tor to help resolve conflict.
relationships Move to value recognition Fig. 4 outlines the complexity of the
relationships in a collaborative model,
• This is the way we are going • What specific value can each revealing why these relationships take
to do it supplier bring? time and often require sophisticated
• These are my vendors • Where are the gaps? management skills (such as emotional
• What is the lowest cost • How can we make it work? intelligence) to be successful. The
• Cost sharing most logical place to start the process
is to examine the relationship between
procurement and operations. Because
Fig. 3—Operators must change how they view relationships.
these are internal constituencies, they
may already be working collabora-
to a more collaborative buying process technology and resources are of value tively and cohesively. Still, a review
(Fig. 2). This change requires creativ- (Fig. 3). is appropriate to identify what, if
ity, value recognition and measure- • Recognize the increased respon- anything, needs to change to meet the
ment, and win-win negotiating skills. sibilities and involvement of procure- standards outlined above. Assuming,
Here are suggestions on how to start ment groups. as is usually the case, that there is
the transition: • Identify key technologies and room for improvement, their joint
• Recognize that customer–supplier potential partners in collaboration task is to quantify the gap between
collaboration is not the same as a for- with procurement groups. where their relationship is today and
mal strategic partnership or alliance. • Develop value measurements in where they would like it to be within a
• Get the right people at the right all critical areas. given period of time (e.g., 12 months
level involved from both organiza- • Develop regularly scheduled com- out). Once the gap is understood, the
tions. munications. groups can identify potential joint
• Focus on key areas that will pro- • Hold all parties accountable. projects (or key initiatives) that bridge
duce business-unit results for the • Focus on solutions. the gap and move both groups toward
customer and the supplier. • Train participants on their chang- desired results (Fig. 5).
• Clearly document expectations ing roles and responsibilities. As part of this process, an outside
and commitments. There is a fourth participant in the facilitator/consultant can help steer
• Establish mutually agreed mea- process of shifting toward the new col- the joint team toward more productive
sures for success. laborative model. A professional out- collaboration between the customer
• Regularly review the agreed side facilitator helps each party see the and a key supplier. Meetings among
expectations, commitments and suc- potential value of collaboration, opens procurement, operations, and the sup-
cess measures. new relationship paths, and coordi- plier should begin with a similar gap
• Solicit candid performance feed- nates the achievement of a new busi- analysis and the initiatives needed to
back from all collaborative elements. ness paradigm. The facilitator leads a move toward collaborative relation-
• Train procurement teams on their process that drives the development of ships should be established. Ultimately,
changing roles and responsibilities. an actionable business plan, including it is a business unit that will assume
Operations (shorthand for the E&P the evaluation, selection, and prioriti- the overall responsibility for managing
decision makers who rely on the pro- zation of critical initiatives. the supplier teams involved in crafting
curement group) must expand exist- The documentation and packaging and delivering solutions, but it will do
ing relationships, develop new rela- of the business plan—and an associat- so with the cognizance of, and par-
tionships, and be willing to consider ed communications strategy—ensure ticipation by, procurement and other
doing business with multiple sup- accountability. A skilled outside facil- support groups, which hold significant
pliers, some of whom may be new itator drives the agenda, keeps all responsibility for enabling the success
and somewhat unproven but whose parties on track, stays focused on the of the overall endeavor.

Prepare, research, Develop strategy and


and enroll select initiatives Develop business plan Execute and measure

• Frame project • Conduct session • Document the plan and • Execute initiatives
• Develop agenda • Select and develop accountability • Measure progress
• Interview stakeholders plans for key initiatives • Establish metrics for • Report results
• Synthesize interviews • Establish accountability success

Fig. 4—The collaborative model.

46 JPT • AUGUST 2008


MANAGEMENT

Solution Team A Deepwater/


Ultradeepwater
Operations

Software
Services
Provider
Collaboration Collaboration

Collaboration
Procurement/
Energy Supply Chain Solution Team B
Services Management
Company
Team

Hardware Collaboration
Services
Provider

Solution Team C

Fig. 5—A model of facilitated collaboration.

In addition to working with the joint


leadership, these meetings among sup-
plier, procurement, and operations are
where an outside facilitator can typical-
ly add significant value. With no turf at
stake, with no investment in following
tradition or standing policy, and with
a background in helping people recog-
nize common purposes, the facilitator
can keep the meetings on track, focus
the participants on productive engage-
ment, and spot openings that might be
less obvious to the principals involved.
A nudge, a suggestion, or a bit of expe-
rience in building relationships can
multiply the potential for value-driven
collaboration. The most successful
business relationships grow from care-
fully identified, carefully structured,
and carefully nurtured collaboration
based on clearly established under-
standings, joint goals, and values.
Today’s deepwater drilling programs
are incredibly complex. They require
the collaboration of multiple compa-
nies, employing unique technologies,
to design and deliver integrated solu-
tions in remote and extreme environ-
ments. One energy executive put it
this way: “Average daily deepwater
rig rates have surpassed a half-million
dollars. Facilitated collaboration is
not a luxury; it is a necessity.” JPT

JPT • AUGUST 2008 47

You might also like