You are on page 1of 6

Clinical effect of subgingival chlorhexidine i gation

on gingivitis in adolescent orthodontic patients


Dan Morrow, DMD, PhD," David P. Wood, DDS, MCID, b and Mark Speechley, PhD c
London, Ontario, Canada

Twenty-three adolescent orthodontic patients with gingivitis affecting all banded first molars
volunteered for the study. Three measures associated with gingivitis (papilla bleeding index, plaque
index, and probing depth) were recorded at four sites for all four molars. A single application of
subgingival irrigation with 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate or isotonic saline was performed for 5
seconds at each site. As determined by coin toss, the first molars on the right or left side Of the
mouth received either chlorhexidine or saline irrigation. The papilla bleeding index, plaque index, and
probing depth were recorded before the treatment and subsequently at 2 weeks and then 4 weeks.
The gingival bleeding as determined by papilla bleeding index, was virtually eliminated in 4 weeks by
a single application of subgingival irrigation with either chlorhexidine or saline. However, there was
no significant reduction in pocket depth or plaque index. In addition, no significant difference
between the effect of chlorhexidine or saline was found for any of the outcome measures. (AM J
ORTHOD DENTOFACORTHOP 1992;101:408-13.)

G i n g i v i t i s is known to develop inadolescent fective plaque control is important in adolescent ortho-


patients during fixed orthodontic treatment with the re- dontic patients for both the prevention and treatment of
sponse characterized by gingival inflammation and lay- gingivitis.
perplasia. The sites reported to be the most severely Thorough plaque control is very difficult in patients
affected are the interproximal areas of the posterior with fixed orthodontic appliances, and the use of chem-
teeth, and the severity of the inflammation depends on ical agents, such as chlorhexidine in the form of mouth
the level of oral hygiene. However, even orthodontic rinses, have been shown to be useful adjuncts in plaque
patients with excellent oral hygiene have some inflam- control for these patients, s Chlorhexidine is an effective
matory changes, i adjunct to periodontal therapy, but there are some pos-
Histologic evidence indicates that gingivitis in sible side effects associated with its use. Staining of
orthodontic patients is related to dental plaque depos- the teeth, which may require professional removal, does
its. 2 It has also been shown that gingivitis develops in occur, and more uncommon, a dulling of taste and
the presence of dental plaque in nonorthodontic pa- epithelial desquamation is experienced. The latter two
tients, and the condition can be reversed in nonortho- effects resolve after discontinued use of chlorhexidine. 9
dontic patients with plaque control. 3 Both supragingival Subgingival irrigation with a solution of chlorhex-
and subgingival plaque plays an important role in the idine, either by single or repeated applications over
initiation of inflammation of the gingival tissues. 4'5 varying time periods, has been reported to effectively
It has not been established that gingivitis in patients reduce inflammation in periodontal patients not under-
with fixed orthodontic appliances results in periodontal going active orthodontic treatment? ~ In addition, it
loss of attachment, 6 however, it is considered that in has recently been shown that subgingival irrigation with
some cases gingivitis can lead to periodontitis and the either 0.1% chlorhexidine or saline at monthly intervals
associated periodontal attachment loss. 7 Therefore ef- over a 5-month period is effective in maintaining both
reduced bleeding on probing and reduced probing at-
tachment levels in patients with advanced periodontal
From The University of Western Ontario.
disease who were treated with scaling and root planing
=Assistant Professor and Chairman, Division of Periodontics, Faculty of Den-
tistry. procedures. ~6 Thus far, the effect of subgingival irri-
*'Assistant Professor and Clinic Chairman, Graduate Orthodontics, Faculty of gation with chlorhexidine on gingivitis in adolescents
Dentistry.
with fixed orthodontic appliances has not been reported.
':Assistant Professor, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of
Medicine. The purpose of this study was to determine the
811128951 clinical effect of a single subgingival irrigation of chlor-

408
Volume 101 Effect of subgingival irrigation on gingivitis in adolescents 409
Number 5

Table I. Descriptive statistics for three outcome measures (papilla bleeding index, plaque index, and
probing depth) at three time points (n = 23)

M esur e I tim e
I X SD
Coefficient o f
variation

Papilla bleeding index


Baseline 0.83 0.255 0.307
2 weeks 0.24 0.153 0.637
4 weeks 0.13 0.100 0.798
Plaque index
Baseline 0.83 0.173 0.215
2 weeks 0.80 0.121 0.151
4 weeks 0.96 0.130 0.136
Probing depth
Baseline 3.10 0.279 0.090
2 weeks 2.87 0.249 0.087
4 weeks 2.73 0.197 0.072

hexidine digluconate on gingivitis affecting orthodon- Measures of plaque index, ts probing depth with a Mich-
tically banded first molars in adolescent orthodontic igan 0 probe, and papilla bleeding index~9were taken at the
patients. four interdental papilla sites on each first molar. These mea-
sur.es were taken at baseline and at 2 and 4 weeks after treat-
MATERIALS AND METHODS me nt. The treatments were applied immediately after the base-
After the University of Western Ontario Review Board line measures. All observations were made by the same ex-
for Health Sciences Research Involving ttuman Subjects ap- aminer (D.M.), who was blinded as to the treatment condition
proved the experimental protocol, eligible patients from ihe ,and who did not review the data sheets from previous visits
University of Western Ontario Graduate Orthodontic Clinic when recording his measurements.
were invited to enter the study. Eligibility criteria were age Patients had previously received oral hygiene instructions,
12 to 17 years, with orthodontically banded maxillary and and they continued their usual oral hygiene procedures
mandibular first molars, and existing gingivitis present. The throughout the study. No additional attempts to improve the
medical history of all the subjects was noncontributory. patients' oral hygiene were made.
Twenty-five subjects met the criteria and agreed to participate. Statistical analysis was by analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Marginal gingivitis, as determined clinically by observing the with repeated measures using BMDP2V. -'~Confidence inter-
redness of the gingiva and the bleeding on probing, affected vals about each mean were computed with the following
all of the banded first molars in all subjects. A pilot study of formula:
I0 subjects revealed high reliability of measurement 95% Confidence interval = X _ ~/2VMS error/n • t44
(Chronbach's'7 alpha 0.81 to 0.91).
The treatment procedures consisted of isolating the four RESULTS
first molars with cotton rolls, air drying the teeth, and then
irrigating subgingivally the mesiobuccal, distobuccal, me- Of the 25 patients, 23 completed the study. One
siolingual, and distolingual areas of the teeth with either a patient was unable to attend all scheduled appointments
solution of 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate or sterile isotonic because of illness and the other because of inclement
saline. The subgingival irrigation was done at each of the weather.
four sites for 5 seconds with a flow rate of 20 ml/min with Descriptive statistics for the three outcome mea-
a commercially available ultrasonic dental instrument de- sures are listed in Table 1. Analysis of variance
signed for use in subgingival irrigation procedures, the Cavi- (ANOVA) was conducted separately on each measure.
Med 200 (Dentsply Canada Ltd., Downsview, Ontario, Can- In none of these statistical analyses was there a signif-
ada) with the CM-135 insert. No attempt at root-surface in- icant difference between chlorhexidine and saline (not
strumentation was made. The Cavi-Med 200 had been pre-
shown; available on request). Post hoc calculations of
viously calibrated and standardized in terms of flow rate of
statistical power indicate that we had at least an 80%
the irrigating solutions.
chance of finding differences as small as 20% in each
The treatment condition (chlorhexidine versus saline) was
determined by coin toss and applied contralaterally (i.e., de- of the three outcome measures (a = 0.05, 2-tailed). 2~
termination of treatment condition to the side of mouth was This suggests that the lack of treatment effect is not
random and independent for each subject). The operator -due3_o low statistical power. All three measures (papilla
(D.W.) was unaware of what solution was being applied. bleeding index, plaque index, and probing depth)
410 Morrow, Wood, and Speechley Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop.
May 1992

CHLORHEXIDINE
. . . . SALINE

1.12

.79
.66 .63

I I I
Baseline 2 weeks 4 weeks

Fig. 1. Plaque index by treatmen t groups on orthodontically banded first permanent molars. Vertical
lines indicate 95% confidence intervals.

Table II. Results of repeated measures analysis of vari~ince across three time points for mean papilla
bleeding 9 Plaque index, and probing 9depth (n = 23)

O.tcome
variablelsource Sum of squares I DF I Mean square F I Probability

Papilla bleeding index


9Time effect 106. i 11 2 53.055 146.15 0.0001
Within subject error 15.973 44 0.363
Plaque index
Time effect 5.418 2 2.709 13.19 0.0001
Within subject error 9.040 44 0.205
Probing depth
Time effect 25.382 2 12.691 9 0.0001
Within subject error 24.326 44 0.553

showed significant differences over time; plaque indices DISCUSSION


increased from baseline to 4 weeks, whereas the other The results of this study show no difference in out-
two measures decreased. The results are summarized come between the two solutions, chlorhexidine versus
in Table II. To assess the clinical significance Of the saline. The repeated measures analysis, sensitive
changes, we calculated 95% confidence intervals for enough to detect even relatively small differences over
eachmeasure at each time point (Figs. 1 to 3).In the time, consistently indicate an absence of difference be-
case of plaque index and probing depth, all differences tween solutions.
over time are within one unit of measurement (e.g., Changes observed in the plaque indices after treat-
plaque increased on aver'age from 0.83 to 0.96 after 4 ment do not represent a clinically significant reduction
weeks; probing depth decrea'sed from 3.1 to 2.7 mm or increase in plaque levels. This could be because no
over the same interval). These differences, while sta- attempt was made to improve the patients' supragin-
tistically significant, probably do not represent mean- gival plaque control throughout the study and because
ingful clinical changes. The measure 0f papilla bleeding the irrigation was restricted to the subgingivai area. Post
index, however, decreased from near unity (0.83) to hoe power analysis reveals an 80% chance of finding
near zero (0.13), a more meaningful clinical achieve- a difference as small as 14% between groups. The ex-
ment than in the other two measures. tremely small size of the differences actually observed
rob,me 101 Effect of subgingival irrigation on ghzgivitis in adolescents 411
Number 5

CHLORHEXIDINE
. . . . SALINE
3.41
~ 3 . 1 8 3 04

2.78
2.56 2.42

I I I
Baseline 2 weeks 4 weeks

Fig. 2. Probing depth by treatment groups on orthodontically banded first permanent molars. Vertical
lines indicate 95% confidence intervals.

CHLORHEXIDINE
. . . . SALINE

1.08
I
.58 " .49 .38

Baseline 2 weeks 4 weeks


Fig. 3. Papilla bleeding index by treatment groups on orthodontically banded first permanent molars.
Vertical lines indicate 95% confidence intervals.

between groups suggest the true absence of a mean- 4 weeks could have resulted from variations in the prob-
ingful treatment effect. However, frequent supragin- ing technique and also from a reduction in gingival
gival irrigations with chlorhexidine have been shown inflammation. The initial shallow probing depths would
to be effective for reducing plaque in patients with tend to limit the amount of probing depth reduction
gingivitis. 22 Studies involving patients with periodontal expected to occur. However, in patients with deeper
pockets treated with more frequent irrigations of chlor- periodontal pockets, frequent subgingival irrigations
hexidine solutions have also resulted in significant with chlorhexidine have resulted in significant pocket
plaque reductions. '~ reductions. ~~ In addition, subgingival irrigation with
The slight reduction in probing depths seen at 2 and either chlorhexidine or saline in patients with peri-
412 Morrow, Wood, attd Speechley Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop.
?.lab" 1992

odontitis has been shown to be effective in reducing It is possible that the mechanism for reduction of
pockets, with the chlorhexidine solution being the more the gingival inflammation associated with subgingival
effective." irrigation may be due to the reduction of specific mi-
The statistically significant reduction in this study croorganisms or toxic products of plaque 22 or by a dis-
of the papilla bleeding index with either a solution of ruption of subgingival plaque rather than an instant
0.12% chlorhexidine or isotonic saline has clinical sig- killing of microorganisms. 16
nificance. The reductions occurred over a 4-week pe-
riod, and the bleeding index at 4 weeks approached CONCLUSIONS
zero. A longer period of observation would allow a 1. Subgingival irrigation of orthodontically banded
better estimate of extinction of the effect. This would first molars with a solution of 0.12% chlorhexidine
also allow us to see how long it takes for the gingiva digluconate or isotonic saline virtually eliminated gin-
to return to baseline condition and determine whether gival papillary bleeding over a 4-week period. How-
there is a treatment effect after 4 weeks. The reduction ever, this does not insure that all of these sites are free
in papilla bleeding index after 4 weeks on patients with of periodontal disease activity or that they are immune
gingivitis in this study with the single irrigation of saline to future periodontal breakdown.
or chlorhexidine suggests that the effect could be a 2. There is no difference between a single subgin-
result of the irrigation procedure on the subgingival gival irrigation with either the chlorhexidine or the sa-
plaque and is not dependent on the solution used. line solution over a 4-week period.
In a study involving patients with advanced peri- 3. Subgingival irrigation is an effective procedure
odohtal defects, a single irrigation with a 0.2% solution that could be performed during monthly visits on ad-
of chlorhexidine or saline has resulted in significant olescent orthodontic patients to reduce the gingival
reduction in bleeding sites. However, with saline the bleeding associated with inflammation.
bleeding had returned to baseline levels i n 5 weeks,
We wish to acl~nowledge Dentsply Canada Ltd. for pro-
whereas the chlorhexidine resulted in maintenance-of viding financial support for this project. The support of Mrs.
the reduction in bleeding sites for at least a 5-week Vicky Rhyno and Ms. Beverley Goldsmith for the typing of
period. 13 However, patients with gingivitis who have the manuscript is gratefully acknowledged.
received repeated irrigations with either water or chlor-
hexidine have shown reduced bleeding on probing, and REFERENCES
the chlorhexidine irrigation was more effective. This I. Zachrisson S, Zachrisson BU. Gingival conditions associated
gingival irrigation with chlorhexidine was also more with orihodontic treatment. Angle Orthod 1972;42:26-34.
2. Zachrisson BU. Gingival condition associated with orthodontic
effective than a chlorhexidine mouthrinse. 22 treatment II: histologic findings. Angle Orthod 1972;42:352-7.
Subgingival access for irrigation is important, :3''-4 3. Lre H, Theilade E, Jensen SB. Experimental gingivitis in man.
and oral irrigating devices have been shown to be useful J Periodontol 1965;36:177-87.
for the delivery of antimicrobial agents in effective 4. Slots J. Subgingival microflora and periodontal disease. J Clin
dosages. 25.26 Periodontol 1979;6:351-82.
5. Fillery ED, Pekovic DD. Identification of microorganisms in
The results of this study show that a single subgin- immunopathologiealmechanismon humangingivitis. J Dent Res
gival irrigation of a 0.12% chlorhexidine digluconate 1982;61:253.
or a isotonic saline with the Cavi-Med 200 can effec- 6. Alstad S, Zachrisson BU. Longitudinalstudy of periodontal con-
tively reduce the inflammation of the interdental papilla dition associated with orthodontictreatment in adolescents. AM
of orthodontically banded teeth in adolescent patients. J OR'ntOD1979;76:277-86.
7. Page RC. Gingivitis. J Clin Periodontol 1986;13:324-9.
The effect of reduced inflammation is maintained over 8. Zachrisson BU. Cause and prevention of injuries to teeth and
a 4-week period, which frequently coincides with supporting structures during orthodontictreatment. A.~IJ ORTHOD
scheduled orthodontic appointments during active treat- 1976;69:285-300.
ment. This would conveniently allow for repeated treat- 9. Greenstein G, Berman C, Jaffin R. Chlorhexidine an adjunct to
ments at specific interproximal sites that are difficult periodontal therapy. J Periodontol 1986;57:370-7.
10. Soh LL, Newman HN, Strahan JD. Effects of subgingival chlor-
for plaque control and are the most severely effected hexidine irrigation on periodontal inflammation. J Clin Peri-
by inflammation in orthodontic patients. odontol 1982;9:66-74.
At this time an accurate and practical clinical I1. MacAlpine R, Magnusson I, Kiger R, Crigger M, Garret S,
method of identifying periodontal sites that are actively Egelberg J. Antimicrobial irrigation of deep pockets to supple-
undergoing periodontal destruction or that are poten- ment oral hygiene instruction and root debridement. J Clin Peri-
odontol 1985;12:568-77.
tially active does not exist; however, evidence "does 12. Wieder SG, Newman HN,' Strahan .ID. Stannous fluoride and
suggest that sites free of inflammation usually do not subgingival chlorhexidine irrigation in the control of plaque and
loose periodontal attachment. 27 chronic periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol 1983;10:172-81.
Vo/ume 101 Effect of subgingival irrigation on gingivitis in adolescents 413
Number 5

13. Lander PE, Newcomb GM, Seymour JG, Powell RN. The an- 22. Flemmig TF, Newman MG, Doherty FM, Grossman E, Mechel
timicrobial and clinical effects of a single subgingival irrigation AH, Bakdash MB. Supragingival irrigation with 0.06% chlor-
of chlorhexidine in advanced periodontal lesions. J Clin Peri- hexidine in naturally occurring gingivitis. I. 6 month clinical
odontol 1986;13:74-80. observations. J Periodontol 1990;61:112-7.
14. Watts EA, Newman HN. Clinical effects on chronic periodontitis 23. Pitcher OR, Newman HN, Strahen JD. Access to subgingival
of a simplified system of oral hygiene including subgingival plaque by disclosing agents using mouthrinses and direct irri-
pulsated jet irrigation with chlorhexidine. J Clin Periodontol gation. J Clin Periodontol 1980;7:300-8.
1986; 13:666-70. 24. Eakle WS, Ford C, Boyd RL. Depth of penetration in peri-
15. Wennstrom JL, Heijl L, Dahlen G, Grondahl K. Periodic subgin- odontitis pockets with oral irrigation. J Clin Periodontol
gival antimicrobial irrigation of periodontal pockets. I. Clinical 1986;13:39-44.
Observations. J Clin Periodontol 1987;14:541-50. 25. Lang NP, Raber K. Use of oral irrigators as a vehicle for the
16. Schlagenhauf U, Stellwag P, Fiedler A. Subgingival irrigation application of antimicrobial agents in chemical plaque control.
in the maintenance phase of periodontal therapy. J Clin Peri- J Clin Periodontol 1981;8:177-88.
odontol 1990;17:650-3. 26. Lang NP, Ramseier-Grossman K. Optimal dosage of chlorhex-
17. Norusis JM. SPSS/PC+ Advanced Statistics VZ.0. Chicago: idine digluconate in chemical plaque control when applied by
SPSS Inc., 1988:B206-7. the oral irrigator. J CIin Periodontol 1981;8:189-202.
18. Silness J, L~3e ti. Periodontal disease in pregnancy. II. Corre- 27. Greenstein G, Caton J. Periodontal disease activity: a critical
lation between oral hygiene and periodontal condition. Acta assessment. J Periodontol 1990;61:543-52.
Odontol Scand 1964;22:121-35.
Reprint requests to"
19. Muhlmann HR. Psychological and chemical mediators of gin-
Dr. D. Morrow
gival health. J Prev Dent 1977;4:6-17.
Chairman, Division of Periodontics
20. Jennrich R, Sampson P, Frane J. P2V analysis of variance and
Faculty of Dentistry
covariance including repeated measures. In: Dixon WJ, ed.
The Uniyersity of Western Ontario
BMDP Statistical Software. Berkeley: University of California
London, Ontario
Press, 1983:359-87.
NrA 5C!
21. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences.
L. Erlbaum. Hillsdale, NJ, 1988:19-74.

BOUND VOLUMES AVAILABLE TO SUBSCRIBERS


Bound volumes of the AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTttODONTICS AND DENTO-
FACIAL ORTIIOPEDICS are available to subscribers (only) for the 1992 issues f r o m
the Publisher, at a cost o f $53.00 ($67.71 Canada and $64.00 international) for
Vol. 101 (January-June) and Vol. 102 ( J u l y - D e c e m b e r ) . Shipping charges are in-
cluded. Each b o u n d v o l u m e contains a subject and author index and all advertising
is r e m o v e d . C o p i e s are shipped within 60 days after publication o f the last issue
in the v o l u m e . T h e binding is durable b u c k r a m with the journal n a m e , v o l u m e
number, and y e a r stamped in g o l d on the spine. Paytnent must accompany all
orders. Contact M o s b y - Y e a r B o o k , Inc., Subscription S e r v i c e s , 11830 Westline
Industrial D r i v e , St. Louis, M O 63146-3318, U S A ; telephone (314)453-4351 or
(800)325-4177.
S u b s c r i p t i o n s m u s t be in f o r c e to q u a l i f y , . B o u n d v o l u m e s a r e n o t a v a i l a b l e
in p l a c e o f a r e g u l a r J o u r n a l s u b s c r i p t i o n .

You might also like