SYLLABUS - ADR (ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION) APDR 2022-23

CLEP - Revised Student Practice Rule – Rule 138-A of the Rules of Courts

Introduction:

Historical background of ADR in the Philippines

Jose Rizal’s Notes on Morga’s sucesos de las Islas Filipinas, Paris, 1890

ADR is considered as a paradigm shift – explain

Hamilton-Burr Method

What is the context of Shakespeare’s lines from Henry VI Part 2 (1600)

“The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers.”

Who rules the ADR proceedings? (concept of party-autonomy) (Exception) (Art.

2035 of the NCC)

ADR vs. Judicial proceedings.

Is there a winner or a loser in an ADR proceeding?

Is it correct to rename - ADR as Appropriate Dispute Resolution?

Is Conciliation-Mediation and Arbitration the same thing?

Do our government recognizes the benefits of ADR – What are the ADR
mechanisms adapted by the state? Give examples and explain briefly. – Art. III,
Section 5(5) / Art. III section 10 / Art. III Sec. 16 / Civil code Chapter 1 and 2, title
XIV book IV on compromises and arbitration.

Exhaustion of administrative remedies – (ADR imbedded) (condition president)

ADR under the hospices of the state:

Revised Katarungang Pambarangay Law R.A. 7160 Sections 399-422 Chapter VII,
Title 1, Book III – The Local Government Code.

CAM-JDR-ACM-MCAM-CAA (ADR Act of 2004 –R.A. 9285 and A.M. 11-1-6-SC

Provisions of Mediation in Administrative Agencies with adjudicatory powers

(quasi-judicial agencies)

SEnA – Department Order No. 107, series of 2011 DOLE

REPUBLIC ACT NO. 876 Domestic Arbitration Law

1958 U.N. CONVENTION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARDS

UNICITRAL model law on international commercial Arbitration

R.A. 9285 2004 including implementing rules

E.O. No. 1008 CIAC - Construction Industry Arbitration Commission – including

implementing rules

A.M. 07-11-08-SC 2009

Revised Student Practice Rule – Rule 138-A of the Rules of Courts

Supreme Court Decisions: - cases:

Koppel, Inc. v. Makati Rotary Club Foundation, Inc. G.R. no. 198075 – 2013

PLUS ASIA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION V. UTILITY ASSURANCE CORPORATION –

G.R. NO. 199650 - 2013

PUROMINES INC. V. CA G.R. 91228 – 1993

CHUNG FU INDUSTRIES (PH.), INC. V. CA R. 96283 1992

CALIFORNIA AND HAWAIIAN SUGAR COMPANY, ET AL. V. PIONEER INSURANCE
AND SURETY CORPORATION G.R. 139273, 2000

ASSET PRIVATIZATION TRUST V. CA G.R. NO. 121171, 1998

AGAN, JR. ET. AL. V. PHILIPPINENINTERNATIONAL AIR TERMINALS CO., INC., ET. AL
G.R. 155001 2003

ASSOCIATED BANK V. CA GR. 107918 1994

HEIRS OF AUGUSTO L. SALAS JR. V. LAPERAL REALTY CORPORATION, ET AL. GR.

135362 – 1999

COCA-C0LA BOTTLERS PHILIPPINES, INC. SALES NFORCE UNION-PTGWO-BALAIS V.

COCA-COLA BOTTLERS PH. INC. GR. 155651 – 2005

NATIONAL STEEL CORPORATION V. TRC LANAO DEL NORTE BRANCH 2, ILIGAN

CITY 127004 – 1999

DEL MONTE CORPORATION-USA V. CA GR. 136154, 2001

GEORGE GONZALEZ AND PANEL OF ARBITRATORS V. CLIMAX MINING LTD., ET AL.

GR. 161957 – 2007

OIL AND NATURAL GAS NCOMISSION V. CA AND PACIFIC CEMENT COMPANY INC.
114323 – 1998

DFA AND BSP V. HON. FRANCO T. FALCON, PRESIDING JUDGE OF RTC BR. 71 OF
PASIG CITY –GR. 176657 2010

KOREA TECHNOLOGIES CO. LTD. (KOGIES) V. HON. ALBERTO A. LERMA, PRESIDING

JUDGE NOF BR. 256 RTC MUNTINLUPA NGR. 143581 – 2008

MCC INDUSTRIAL SALES CORPORATION V. SSANGYONG CORPORATION GR.

170633 – N2007

MAGELLAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION (MCMC) AND MAGELLAN

CAPITAL HOLDINGS CORPORATION (MCHC) V. ROLANDO M. ZOSA AND HON. JOSE
P. SOBERANO, JR. 129916 – 2001
TRANSFIELD PH. INC. (TPI) V. LUZON HYDRO CORP. (LHC), AUSTRALIA AND NEW
ZEALAND BANKING GROUP LIMITED AND SECURITY BANK CORPORATION GR.
146717 – 2006

HUTAMA-RSEA JOINT OPERATIONS, INC. V. CITRA METRO MANILA TOLLWAYS

CORPORATION 180640 – 2009

HI-PRECISION STEEL CENTER, INC. V. LIM KIM STEELBUILDERS, INC. AND CIAC GR.
110434 – 1993

RUBEN N. BARRAMEDA, ET AL. V. ROMEO ATIENZA, ET AL. 129175 – 2001

EDUARDO J. MARINO, JR., ET AL. V. GIL GAMILLA ET AL. GR. 132400 – 2005

D. GOTHONG MANUFACTURING CORP. EMPLOYEES UNION –ALU (THE UNION) V.

HON. NIEVES CONFESSOR, SECRETARY OF DOLE AND A.D. GOTHONG
MANUFACTURING CORP. (THE COMPANY) GR. 113638 – 1999

CAPITOL MEDICAL CENTER, INC. (THE COMPANY) V. NLRC, ET AL. 147080 – 2005

***REPORTING OF CASES – WILL BE DISCUSSED LATER

***ALL STUDENTS NEEDS TO DIGEST THIS: ENCODED AND THE DOCTRINE HAND
WRITTEN. TO BE SUBMITTED AT THE END OF THE TERM.