Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Modern Political Theory
Modern Political Theory
An analytical essay
Melit Jane R. Yu
leaders killed just this year (Inquirer, 2020) most of which were affiliated with government
opposition. Human rights groups count at least 30,000 killed in anti-drug operations (Rappler,
2020) with numbers still growing even during the coronavirus lockdown (ABS-CBN News,
2020). There are 336,926 confirmed cases of COVID-19 with 6,238 deaths in the Philippines
(World Health Organization, 2020) but there was no mention of pandemic response roadmap
in Duterte’s SONA on July 27 (Rappler, 2020). Corruption scandals are perennial to the
country but it worsens today with the PhilHealth P15-Billion Fraud, right when the Filipinos
are most desperate for health insurance and assistance amidst this deadly pandemic.
This analytical essay begins with facts and data to support my discussion on the liberal
conception of a just society, and the end goal of a liberal democratic system – all while
reflecting my answers to the Philippine status quo. All of which is conducive to create the
foundation for my claim and thesis statement that the Philippines is not a just society as far as
the liberal conception of the word is concerned, and has not met the end goals of a liberal
The main concern of the liberal political theory is the individual and his rights (Klosko,
2013, p.107). Thomas Hobbes, like other liberal thinkers had an instrumental view of the
politics or the state which claims that the state is needed to achieve the human persons’ ends,
and because of this, the state should have no interest of its own. Hence, the just society then
has a government that protects the rights of all individuals so that they are able to enjoy as
much freedom as possible, which is why the individuals consented to erect it in the first place.
All of these agreements are in the shape of what we know as the constitution, and also other
laws and statutes – all of which are designed for the shared prosperity of all. Furthermore, note
that the lead paragraph of this essay begins with the issue of the right to life in the Philippines
– particularly its violation: the silencing of farmers who only want better treatment;
Extrajudicial Killings of the War on Drugs; the lack of response to the pandemic leading to the
death of many Filipinos; and corruption which leaves the poorest of the poor to fend for
themselves. All of which, and especially the latter is very unlikely and unbecoming of what a
The end goal of liberal democracy is to limit government authority through mechanisms
government officials are expected to represent the people’s needs, and not their own interests.
Unfortunately, in our country, there is extensive bribery within the public administration,
manipulation by public officials, (Gan Integrity, 2020), lack procedural fairness and
transparency due to nepotism, favoritism, and impunity. Hence, there is little to no checks and
punished to the degree and with so much Severity as will suffice to make it an ill bargain to the
Offender, give him cause to repent, and terrify others from doing the like”. On the contrary,
there is little to no punishment when it comes to powerful people in the Philippines. Corruption
scandals by those on power – or those who have connections with them – are left unaccounted
for. These people never repent and even have the audacity to run again for candidacy only to
disappear when needed by the people. While one crime remains unsolved, new controversies
are manufactured to distract us away from more pressing issues. Furthermore, the justice
system is so problematic that the idea of “legitimate punishment” is surreal. People never really
get what is due to them. “Ang batas ay batas.” is an illusion when the rich gets away with their
crimes, and the poor faces jail time for mistrial or delayed justice; some even face death extra
judicially.
John Locke also asserts that the people has the right to revolt when the government is
not doing its end of the bargain or is not being a neutral arbiter, particularly when it tampers
with the legislature or abuses its power (Klosko, 2013, p.157). In the Philippines, we cannot
even at the very least, demand for just treatment from those in power. We cannot exercise our
right to peaceful protests. Instead, the authority violates our right against unlawful arrests. As
a matter of fact, they like keeping the people uneducated so as to hinder them from knowing
enough to dissent. They don’t want to alleviate our poverty so their electoral fraud would work.
Freedom is an illusion here when people don’t really have a choice because they cannot even
provide subsistence for their families. Our right to revolt is an illusion when asking for the bare
minimum of being treated humanely feels like asking for too much. Democracy is an illusion
As much as liberalism’s social contract theory is concerned, we, the people agreed and
consented to erect a government for it to protect our rights, but why do we feel robbed from it
instead? Is this the end goal of a liberal democratic system – one that screams “Right to life,
liberty, property”? If it is, then the Philippines is fading farther away from such social and
political system. It cannot even grant us the first right, what more the others? What right do we
have left? If the liberal definition of a just society is one that listens and protects the individual
and her rights, then the Philippines is far from being a just nation.
References:
ABS-CBN News. (2020, September 18). Drug war deaths doubled during lockdown? Killings
deaths-doubled-during-lockdown-killings-only-up-by-5-pct-says-pnp
/portal/country-profiles/the-philippines/
Klosko, G. (2013). John Locke. History of political theory: An introduction: Volume II:
Laslett, P. (Ed.). (1988). Locke: two treatises of government student edition. Cambridge
University Press.
roadmap-duterte-sona-2020
Ocampo, K. (2020, July 1). 190 farmer-leaders killed in last 5 months. Philippine Daily
Inquirer. https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/1299885/190-farmer-leaders-killed-in-last-5-
months
https://covid19.who.int/region/wpro/country/ph