Professional Documents
Culture Documents
For instance, Ankita agrees to sell his car to Bhavya. Ankita is the
owner of two cars and wishes to sell the Swift. Bhavya thinks he is
purchasing the Audi. Here Ankita and Bhavya have not agreed upon
the same thing in the same sense. Therefore there is no contract for
there is no consent.
For example, while paying at a grocery store, the clerk at the counter
may ask you if you would like to provide your contact number so that
the grocery store can expand its marketing base. Providing your
:
contact number would be a very clear, direct way of giving the clerk
your express consent.
Now, a contract must have been entered into in the absence of:
1. Coercion
In accordance with the Indian Contract Act, 1872, coercion means:
2. Undue Influence
When the situation is such that one of the contracting parties is in a
dominating position and it uses its position to gain an unjust
advantage, then the consent is said to have been a result of undue
influence. Now, the Act of 1872 also provides instances where a
person can dominate the will of another. These instances are:
When the situation is such that the consent was obtained through
undue influence, the contract becomes voidable on the option of the
aggrieved party.
Illustration
3. Fraud
Fraud is a fallacious representation of facts presented with the ill
intent of cheating the other party. Fraud is proved when false
representation has been made-
1.Knowingly
As per Section 17, a fraud is when one party convinces another party
to enter into an agreement by
:
1. Suggesting a false fact to be true (Suggestio falsi)
Just being silent about elements which can affect the willingness of
a person to enter into a contract does not amount to fraud, but if
there is a duty to speak upon the person who is keeping silent, then
it becomes a fraud. Example of such cases is contracts of utmost
good faith where full disclosure is expected.
In cases of fraud, it is upon the party who alleges fraud to prove it.
The party has to prove the circumstances which can lead to the
existence of fraud. Merely mentioning fraud while pleading is not
enough. A crucial point of consideration is that if the party who has
been the alleged victim of fraud had the opportunity or means to find
out the truth with ordinary care, then the contract is not held to be
void.
A father called his illegitimate son as “son” for the purpose of fixing
his marriage. It was held that the father knowingly hid the illegitimacy
of the son with the intention of cheating the parents of the bride
:
which amounts to fraud.
4. Misrepresentation
In accordance with section 18 of the Indian Contract Act,
misrepresentation can be divided into three types –
The plaintiff purchased two blocks of land for the from the defendant
to practise sheep farming. During negotiations, the defendant said
that if the place was worked properly, it would carry 2,000 sheep.
The plaintiff bought the place believing that it would carry 2,000
sheep. Both parties were aware that the defendant had not carried
on sheep-farming on the land. In an action for misrepresentation, the
:
trial judge said that in the case, the statement of the defendant
regarding the carrying capacity of the land could not be taken as
anything but a mere expression of opinion and not a fact since both
parties were aware that the defendant did not practise sheep
farming. The Privy Council concurred with the view of the trial court
and held that in the absence of fraud, the purchaser does not have
the right to rescind the contract.
5. Mistake
a. Mistake of Law
b. Mistake of Fact
Exceptions
Conclusion
Free Consent is mandatory to make an agreement a valid contract.
:
The importance of free consent cannot be stressed enough. Such
consent must be free and voluntary in nature, without any sort of
pressure. If the consent to the agreement was obtained or induced
by coercion, undue influence, fraud, misrepresentation or mistake,
then it has the potential to make the agreement void.
Endnotes
[1] (1964) 2 H&C 906
Pratham Arya
Author
Pratham hails from Symbiosis Law School, Noida and spends most
of his time researching, reading and debating. His Interest areas are
law and policy. For any clarifications, feedback, and advice, you can
reach us at editor@lawcirca.com
: