Professional Documents
Culture Documents
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/3174534?seq=1&cid=pdf-
reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Signs
Samira Haj
I wish to thank Johanna Brenner for reading this text and offering criticism
suggestions. I am especially grateful to Norman Finkelstein for carefully editin
1 I am also against the notion that the market economy is uniformly negati
women. The effects of the market vary and can affect women differently dep
the particular circumstances and conditions of women under study. To determ
effects of the market, one has to consider class and gender, cultural and region
ences, and national and international circumstances. For further information o
sue, see Maria Mies, Patriarchy and Accumulation on a World Scale: Women
ternational Division of Labour (London: Zed, 1986).
2 The field research for this article was conducted over two summers in 198
1989. Interviews with women activists from the villages, camps, and towns we
tated by the various women's factions and through personal connections. Th
were interviewed first in groups and then as individuals.
[Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 1992, vol. 17, no. 4]
? 1992 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. 0097-9740/92/1704-0005$01.00
3 I agree with Chandra Mohanty that the term "Third World" has to be u
cally; it is used here with qualification and for lack of a better alternative. Ca
such as first and third worlds are problematic because they (a) imply a linear
archical interpretation of historical development, and (b) pose differences in e
binary, and oppositional terms: e.g., the First World reads development, mode
progress, and rationality, while the Third World reads underdevelopment, tra
backwardness, religiosity, irrationality, etc.; Chandra Mohanty, "Under Weste
Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourse," Feminist Review, no. 30 (Aut
333-58.
4 According to Kandiyoti, the central feature of classic patriarchy is the patri
patrilocal extended household, which is commonly associated with the reproduction of
peasantry. Classic patriarchy may be found in what is considered the "patriarchal belt
which includes North Africa, the Middle East (including Turkey, Iran, and Pakistan),
India and China. As Kandiyoti points out, the implications of the patrilineal system fo
women are remarkably similar and involve modes of control that can transcend cultu
religious differences (e.g., Islam, Hinduism, and Confucianism). Deniz Kandiyoti, "Bar
ing with Patriarchy," Gender and Society 2, no. 3 (September 1988): 274-89.
and indulgent, even after the son has taken a wife. Indee
between mothers and daughters-in-law within this ho
common. In sum, then, for a woman in the extende
crucial realities are devaluation of the daughter agai
marriage, membership in the male-headed househol
and the birth of a male heir and the acquisition of powe
attends it.
The woman's maternal role is reinforced by the m
female sexuality is viewed.8 As Kandiyoti points out,
Middle Eastern societies is defined and controlled by
of the clan or hamula-that is, the extended family rangi
and siblings to close and distant relatives and someti
other members of the community. Women are taugh
sexuality does not belong to them, is not theirs to give o
is the inalienable, permanent property of the hamula.
purity and lineage honor are seen as inseparable. On
lineage honor is early arranged marriage; sex segregat
effects of the latter practice are twofold. On the
segregated society perpetuates female subordination
prevailing male prerogatives. On the other hand, it a
less dependent on men for their self-definition. It enabl
and maintain their own networks of sociability outside t
their marriages. Leila Ahmed observes that, in contra
eties "where women live dispersed and isolated amon
works in Middle Eastern societies offer women more
own world and protect them against emotional and s
The Separate World of Bedouin Women," Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Soci-
ety 10, no. 4 (1985): 637-57; and C. Makhlouf-Obermeyer, Changing Veils: A Study of
Women in South Arabia (Austin: University of Texas Press, 1979).
10 The West Bank includes East Jerusalem, which was openly annexed by Israel in
1980. Though I am not discussing the Golan Heights in this article, the Golan was also
incorporated into the "land of Israel" in 1981.
1 For the best overview of the Palestinian economy under occupation, see George
Abed, ed., Palestinian Economy: Studies in Development under Perpetual Occupation
(London: Routledge, 1988); and Meron Benvenisti, The West Bank Handbook: A Politi-
cal Lexicon (Jerusalem: Jerusalem Post Press, 1986).
16 The patrilineage both totally appropriates women's labor and renders the
and contribution to production invisible. The institution of sex segregation an
status symbols such as veiling further reinforce women's subordination and t
nomic dependence on men. The observance of restrictive practices is such a
ment in the reproduction of family status that women will resist breaking th
when it means further economic hardship. As Kandiyoti points out, women un
cal patriarchy often "adhere as far and as long as they possibly can to rules th
in the unfailing devaluation of their labor. The cyclical fluctuations of their p
tion, combined with status consideration, result in their active participation in
subordination"; Kandiyoti, "Bargaining with Patriarchy," esp. 280-82.
17 Hiltermann, 132.
18 Susan Rockwell, "Palestinian Women Workers in the Israeli Occupied G
Journal of Palestine Studies 14, no. 2 (1985): 115-36, esp. 123.
19 Hiltermann, 205-7.
20 For more details, see Brian Van Arkadi, Benefits and Burdens: A Report
West Bank and Gaza Strip Economies since 1967 (Washington, D.C., and Ne
Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, 1977); and Hillel Frisch, Stagn
Frontier: Arab and Jewish Industry in the West Bank (Jerusalem: West Ban
Project, 1983).
21 United Nations International Development Organization, Survey of Ma
Industry in the West Bank and Gaza (New York: United Nations, 1981).
suits in economic hardships and the devaluation of their labor. Maria Mies, The Lace
Makers of Narsapur (London: Zed, 1982).
27 Randa Seniora, "Palestinian Labour in a Dependent Economy: The Case of
Women in the Sub-contracting Clothing Industry in the West Bank" (M.A. thesis, Ameri-
can University of Cairo, 1987), 83-91.
28 Hiltermann, 134.
29 Seniora, 83.
32 Hiltermann, 429-30.
33 Ibid., 486-87.
34 Ibid., 478.
35 It is perhaps fair to say that women activists in the occupied territories have devel-
oped a much higher level of feminist consciousness than Palestinian women activists
elsewhere. Women militants in Lebanon could not and did not challenge gender relations
in the same way. They did not form an autonomous women's movement nor raise the
issue of the inseparability of the two struggles. This is not to say that Palestinian activ-
ists in Lebanon have not organized around women's concerns but that these issues were
almost always subordinated to the larger question-the national struggle. In the words
of Julie Peteet, who studies Palestinian women in Lebanon, "Women's activism may have
awakened the stirrings of a feminist consciousness.... Yet this newly awakened con-
sciousness did not prompt the formation of a women's movement ready to confront pa-
triarchy. The level of crisis, the protracted nature of the national struggle, and the com-
munal bases of resistance clearly militated against such trends. This coincided with a
history of national movements incorporating the women's movement"; Julie Peteet, "No
Going Back: Women and the Palestinian Movement," Middle East Report, no. 138
(January-February 1986), 20-24.
36 Sayigh, 12.
Kevorkian Center
New York University
38 See Michele Barrett, Women's Oppression Today, rev. ed. (London: Verso, 1989);
Henrietta Moore, Feminism and Anthropology (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota
Press, 1988); Jane Flax, "Postmodernism and Gender Relations in Feminist Theory," in
Feminism/Postmodernism, ed. Nancy Fraser and Linda J. Nicholson (New York and
London: Routledge, 1990).
39 Barbara Laslett and Johanna Brenner, "Gender and Social Reproduction: Histori-
cal Perspective," Annual Review of Sociology 15 (1989): 381-404; Evelyn Glenn, "Ra-
cial Ethnic Women's Labor: The Intersection of Race, Gender and Class Oppression,"
Review of Radical Political Economy 17, no. 3 (1985): 86-108; Valerie Amos and
Praibha Parmar, "Challenging Imperial Feminism," Feminist Review, no. 17 (Autumn
1984).