Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Economic and Political Weekly is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Economic and Political Weekly
Caste hierarchy and gender hierarchy are the organising principles of the brahmanical social order an
closely interconnected. This article explores the relationship between caste and gender, focusing on wha
possibly the centralfactorfor the subordination of the upper caste woman: the need for effective sexual
trol over such women to maintain not only patrilineal succession but also caste purity, the institution unique
to Hindu society.
STUDIES of women in early Indian history The task of exploring the connections bet- caste can be ensured without closely guar-
have tended to focus on what is broadly ween patriarchy and other structures within ding women who form the pivot for the en-
termed as the 'status of women', which in a historical context was pioneered by Gerda tire structure. As Yalman's informants
turn has led to a concentration of attention Lerner (1986) and her work is both theoreti- pointed out the honour and respectability
on a limited set of questions such as mar- cally and methodologically useful for of men is protected and preserved through
their women. The appearance of puberty
riage law, property rights, and rights relatinghistorians. In outlining the historical process
to religious practices, normally viewed as in- of the creation of patriarchy in the thus marks a profoundly 'dangerous' situa-
dices of status. The limited focus has left a Mesopotamian region Lerner describes her tion and is the context for major rituals
major lacuna in our understanding of social growing awareness of the fact that crucial which indicates the important relationship
processes which have shaped men, women, to the organisation of early Mesopotamian between female purity and purity of caste.
and social institutions in early India. It is society was the total control of women's sex- It is in order to stringently guard the purity
now time to move away from questions of uality by men of the dominant class. She had of castes that very early on pre-puberty mar-
'status' whether high or low, and to look in- been puzzled by her evidence wherein riages were recommended for the upper
stead at the structural framework of gender women seemed to have greatly differing castes especially brahmanas [Yalman: 25-58].
relations, i e, to the nature and basis of the statuses, some holding high positions and Yalman also points out that caste blood is
subordination of women and its extent and enjoying economic independence but whose always bilateral, i e, its rituali quality is
specific form in early Indian society. In this sexuality was controlled by men. This led her received from both parents. Thus ideally
context we may point out that although the to recognise that there was a need to look both parents must be of the same caste.
subordination of women is a common beyond economic questions and focus on the However, this cannot always be ensured and
feature of almost all stages of history, and control over women's sexuality and the man- is the basis of grave anxiety in the texts.
s prevalent in large parts of the world, the ner in which reproduction was organised and The anxiety about polluting the ritual
xtent and form of that subordination has thus to look for the causes and effects of order and the quality of the blood through
een conditioned by the social and cultural such sexual control [Lerner 1986: 8]. A women is best demonstrated in the horror
environment in which women have been similar exploration of the process of of miscegeny as we shall show. In the theore-
placed. establishing control over women's sexuality tical explanations for the proliferation of
The general subordination of women in a highly stratified and closed structure caste the most polluting and low castes are
assumed a particularly severe form in India could be useful in analysing the connections attributed to miscegeny, i e, the mixing of
through the powerful instrument of religious between caste, class, patriarchy, and the state castes ('varnasamkara'). Most polluting are
traditions which have shaped social prac- in the brahmanical texts of early India. The those castes which are the products of
tices. A marked feature of Hindu society is structure that came into being has shaped reprehensible unions between women of a
its legal sanction for an extreme expression ghe ideology of the upper castes and con- higher caste and men of a lower caste. The
of social stratification in which women and tinues to be the underpinning of beliefs and ideologues of the caste system had a p.r-
the lower castes have been subjected to practices extant todav. ticular horror of hypogamy-pratiloma-or
humiliating conditions of existence. Caste A possible starting point for an explora- against the grain as it was described-and
hierarchy and gender hierarchy are the tion of the historical evidence on the crucial reserved for it the severest condemnation and
organising principles of the brahmanical place of' control over women's sexuality the highest punishment as will be evident.
social order and despite their close intercon- within the larger structure in which Violations continued to be punished until
nections neither scholars of the caste system brahmanical patriarchy was located thus recent times by drowning mother and child
nor feminist scholars have attempted to could be the practices and beliefs prevalent (Yalman: 52] and excommunication and
analyse the relationship between the two. I among the upper castes as studied by anthro- ritual death.
will explore here (very tentatively) the rela- pologists. An insightful essay by Nur Yalman The safeguarding of the caste structure is
tionship between caste and gender, focusing (1962) on the castes of Ceylon and Malabar' achieved through the highly restricted move-
on what is possibly the central factor for the shows that the sexuality of women, more ment of women or even through female
subordination of the upper caste women: the than that of men, is the subject of social seclusion. Women are regarded as gate-
need for effective sexual control over such concern. Yalman argues that a fundamental ways-literally points of entrance into the
women to maintain not only patrilineal suc- principle of Hindu social organisation is to caste system. The lower caste male whose
cession (a requirement of all patriarchal construct a closed structure to preserve land, sexuality is a threat to-upper caste purity has
societies) but also caste purity, the institu- women, and 'ritual quality within it. The to be institutionally prevented from having
tion unique to Hindu society. The purity of three are structurally linked and it is impossi- sexual access to women of the higher castes
women has a centrality in brahmanical ble to maintain all three without stringently so women must be carefully guarded
patriarchy, as we shall see, because the purityorganising female sexuality. Indeed neither [Ganesh 1985: 16; Das 1976: 129-45]. Wh
of caste is contingent upon it. land, nor ritual quality, i e, the purity of the structure to prevent miscegeny breaks