Professional Documents
Culture Documents
a) Show (include descriptions) the relevant running configuration for the Edge Router
In the above diagram, PC1 with the IP address 172.16.1.1 sent ping requests to the
Internet Gateway with IP address 200.1.1.2, and all the requests were successfully
replied to by the Internet Gateway. The Internal Router has Network Address
Translation (NAT), which allowed PC1 to communicate with the outside internet through
the Internet Gateway.
PC1, with IP address 172.16.1.1, attempted to ping PC0, which has an IP address of
10.1.1.1, and successfully received
In the diagram provided, PC1, which has the IP address 172.16.1.1, attempted to ping the
EdgeRouter with the IP address 192.168.1.254. PC1 sent four requests, and all of them
received successful replies from the EdgeRouter.
In the above diagram, PC1 having an IP address of 172.16.1.1 attempted to ping the
TelnetServer that has an IP address of 192.168.1.2. PC1 sent ping requests to TelnetServer
and received replies from it successfully.
ii) PC0 is unable to Ping the Internet Gateway but able to Ping all other internal devices.
In the above diagram, PC0 having IP address 10.1.1.1 attempted to ping PC1 with IP address
172.16.1.1. PC0 sent ping requests and received responses from PC1 for all of them
. In the depicted network topology, PC0 attempted to ping the Internet Gateway with IP
address 200.1.1.2, but none of the four requests were replied to by the EdgeRouter. This is
because the Internal Router has no NAT configuration in place to translate the IP address of
PC0 to the allowed IP address range between 192.168.1.1 and 192.168.1.254. Consequently,
PC0 cannot communicate with the Internet Gateway, as the access-list only permits the
specified IP address range to access it.
In the diagram above, PC0 (with IP address 10.1.1.1) attempted to ping the TelnetServer
(with IP address 192.168.1.2). PC0 sent four requests and received successful replies from
TelnetServer. This was possible because there is a static route configured for all the routers,
enabling them to communicate with each other.
Network Address Translation (NAT) occurs when PC1 with IP address 172.16.1.1 pings the
Internet Gateway. Initially, the request packet has a Source IP of 172.16.1.1 and a
Destination IP of 200.1.1.2, as shown in the first diagram. Upon entering the Internal Router,
the IP address is translated from 172.16.1.1 to 192.168.1.3, resulting in a change in the
Source IP as seen in the second diagram. Since the packets are still in the same network, the
Source IP and Destination IP remain unchanged in the third diagram. The second translation
occurs when the packet reaches the EdgeRouter, which changes the Source IP from
192.168.1.3 to 200.1.1.1 based on the NAT configuration set on the router. Consequently,
the Source IP changes again, and the Destination IP remains unchanged. The Destination IP
remains constant throughout the process because the request packet is from the "inside" of
the network (private) to the "outside" of the network (public). In contrast, when the reply
packet travels from the "outside" network to the "inside" network, the situation will be
reversed.
d) Show the Internet Gateway is able to connect to the Telnet Server using telnet, but unable to
Ping to the Telnet Server
Internet Gateway is able to ping the Edge Router 200.1.1.1, but not the Telnet Server
192.168.1.2 since NAT is applied and only Telnet connections (port 23) to the Telnet Server is
allowed. When Internet Gateway tries to ping 192.168.1.2
The screenshot above demonstrates that the Internet Gateway can establish a connection to
the Telnet Server using telnet, through the use of Network Address Translation (NAT). The
NAT translates the Telnet Server's address 192.168.1.2:23 to 200.1.1.1:23, which allows
access to the server by telnetting to the Edge Router. The Edge Router then redirects the
telnet traffic to the Telnet Server.