Mendoza v. Bake, 11-20405 (5th Cir., June 27, 2011) (“It is ordered that appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal is GRANTED. As noted by the district court, and as presented to us, although the facts present some issues of law potentially, there is ultimately a genuine factual dispute that is material to liability. That can only be decided by a fact finder.”)
Mendoza v. Bake, 11-20405 (5th Cir., June 27, 2011) (“It is ordered that appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal is GRANTED. As noted by the district court, and as presented to us, although the facts present some issues of law potentially, there is ultimately a genuine factual dispute that is material to liability. That can only be decided by a fact finder.”)
Mendoza v. Bake, 11-20405 (5th Cir., June 27, 2011) (“It is ordered that appellee’s motion to dismiss the appeal is GRANTED. As noted by the district court, and as presented to us, although the facts present some issues of law potentially, there is ultimately a genuine factual dispute that is material to liability. That can only be decided by a fact finder.”)
Report of the Decision of the Supreme Court of the United States, and the Opinions of the Judges Thereof, in the Case of Dred Scott versus John F.A. Sandford
December Term, 1856.
Panagiotis Kokoris v. Paul E. Johnson, United States Immigrant Inspector-In-Charge, and Albert Del Guercio, United States District Director of Immigration, and 5 Other Cases, 180 F.2d 355, 4th Cir. (1950)