Professional Documents
Culture Documents
VALUATION THEORY
Valuation Theory
Valuation theory is the study of how to measure the value or price of an
asset, liability, or investment. The aim of valuation theory is to develop a
systematic method for determining value or price that is objective and reliable, so
that it can be used in investment, accounting, and management decisions.
Valuation Theory considers various factors that can affect the value of an
asset or investment, such as quality, risk, timing and market conditions. The
valuation methods used in valuation theory can vary depending on the type of
asset being valued, for example tangible or intangible assets.
Valuation theory is often used in the investment and finance fields,
particularly in valuing stocks, bonds and other financial instruments. Valuation
theory is also important in the field of accounting, because the exact value of
assets must be recorded in a company's financial statements. Using the right
valuation method, investment and management decision making becomes more
informed and accurate.
Valuation theory has a close relationship with assets, liabilities and equity
in financial accounting. This is because valuation theory is used to determine the
value of a company's assets, liabilities and equity in its financial statements. The
following is a further explanation regarding the relationship between assets,
liabilities and equity with the valuation theory:
1. Asset
Assets are resources owned by a company that can provide future
economic benefits. Examples of assets that are commonly found in
financial statements are cash, accounts receivable, inventory, and
buildings. Valuation theory is used to determine the value of these assets,
whether the assets are acquired, tested for impairment, or sold.
Valuation theory provides guidance on how to value assets and ensure that
the resulting value is accurate and justifiable. Some of the valuation
methods commonly used are the cost method, the fair value method, and
the replacement cost method.
2. Liability
Liabilities are financial obligations owed by a company to third parties.
Examples of liabilities that are commonly encountered in financial
statements are accounts payable, taxes payable, and accrued wages.
Valuation theory is also used to determine the value of these obligations.
Just like assets, valuation theory provides guidance on how to value
liabilities. Commonly used methods are the cost method , the fair value
method, and the replacement cost method. By assessing liabilities
appropriately, companies can ensure that the financial information
presented in their financial reports is accurate and reliable.
3. Equity
Equity is the portion of a company's assets that remains after deducting all
of the company's liabilities. Equity can come from paid-up capital, retained
earnings, or undistributed net profits. Valuation theory is also used to
determine the equity value of a company.
Valuation theory can help a company determine the value of its assets and
liabilities, which can then be used to determine the value of equity. By determining
the value of equity correctly, companies can ensure that the financial information
presented in their financial statements is accurate and can be trusted by users of
financial statements, such as investors and creditors.
Objectivity
Objectivity is one of the basic concepts of accounting valuation which is
important to guarantee the accuracy and reliability of the value of assets, liabilities
and equity stated in the company's financial statements. Objectivity refers to the
ability of a value to be based on facts and data that can be measured objectively,
without any personal influence or interest from individuals or groups involved in
the appraisal process.
In accounting judgments, objectivity can be achieved in several ways. One
way is to follow generally accepted accounting principles, which are
internationally recognized and have high credibility. These principles establish
standards and guidelines for determining the objective and accountable value of
assets, liabilities and equity.
In addition, objectivity can also be achieved through the use of appropriate
and relevant valuation methods for the type of asset, liability or equity being
assessed. The method used must be based on objective data and facts, such as
market prices that can be measured objectively, and not be influenced by
subjective factors such as personal preferences or business interests.
An objective accounting assessment will ensure that the company's
financial statements can be trusted and relied upon by stakeholders, including
investors, creditors and related parties. This will help companies build trust and
credibility in the market, as well as increase their ability to get better funding and
business support.
Consistency
Consistency is the basic concept of accounting valuation which refers to
uniformity and similarity in the use of valuation methods and policies over a long
period of time. In accounting valuation, consistency is very important to ensure
that the values of assets, liabilities and equity listed in the company's financial
statements are consistent and can be compared from time to time.
When a company uses consistent valuation methods and policies over a
long period of time, it allows stakeholders to compare the company's financial
performance over time. Consistency also allows companies to make better
decisions by considering consistent and reliable historical financial information.
To achieve consistency in accounting valuations, companies must pay
attention to several things, such as:
1. Establish consistent valuation methods for the same types of assets,
liabilities and equity. For example, if a company uses the cost method to
value fixed assets, this method must be applied consistently over the long
term.
2. Adopt consistent accounting policies, such as consistent revenue or
expense recognition over a long period of time.
3. Avoiding significant changes in valuation methods or policies without good
reason.
4. Provide clear and detailed explanations in the financial statements
regarding the valuation methods and policies used, as well as the impact
of changes to these methods or policies.
Suitability
Appropriateness is a basic concept of accounting valuation that refers to
the selection of valuation methods and techniques that are appropriate for the
type of assets, liabilities and equity being valued. In accounting valuation,
conformity is very important to ensure that the value given is in accordance with
the characteristics and actual condition of the asset, liability or equity.
In achieving conformity, companies should consider the following factors:
1. The characteristics of the asset, liability or equity being valued, such as age,
physical condition, value, risk and market value.
2. Valuation purposes, such as valuations for accounting, tax, or legal
purposes.
3. Applicable laws and policies, such as accounting regulations or tax
regulations.
4. Available valuation methods and techniques, such as the cost method, the
fair value method, or the discounted cash flow method.
In determining suitability, companies must select the valuation methods
and techniques that are most appropriate and relevant for the type of asset,
liability or equity being valued. For example, if a company values land, then the
most suitable valuation method is the fair value method because land does not
have a clear cost of production.
Reliability
Reliability is a basic concept of accounting valuation which refers to the
accuracy and reliability of information used in valuing assets, liabilities and equity.
In accounting valuation, reliability is very important to ensure that the value stated
in the company's financial statements can be relied upon by stakeholders.
To achieve reliability in accounting judgments, companies must consider
several things, such as:
1. Determine accurate and reliable data sources, for example internal
company data sources or data from trusted third parties.
2. Ensure that the data used in the assessment has been properly tested and
filtered to avoid errors and inaccuracies.
3. Choose appropriate and relevant assessment methods and techniques,
and apply them correctly and consistently.
4. Provide a clear and detailed explanation in the financial statements
regarding the assumptions, methods and valuation techniques used, as
well as provide an explanation regarding the risks or uncertainties
associated with the values stated in the financial statements.
Relevance
Relevance is a basic concept of accounting valuation which refers to the
ability of the information used in valuing assets, liabilities and equity to influence
the decisions of users of information in understanding a company's financial
performance. In accounting valuation, relevance is very important to ensure that
the value stated in the company's financial statements is useful and meaningful
for stakeholders.
To achieve relevance in accounting valuations, companies must consider
several things, such as:
1. Ensuring that the value stated in the financial statements is directly related
to the purpose of the assessment carried out. For example, if a company
performs valuations for accounting purposes, the values listed must be
relevant to the applicable accounting principles.
2. Carefully determine the assumptions and estimates used in the valuation,
and provide clear and detailed explanations in the financial statements
regarding these assumptions and estimates.
3. Ensuring that the valuation methods and techniques used can generate
values that are relevant to current market conditions.
4. Presenting information in financial reports in a way that is easy to
understand and useful for stakeholders.
Historical Cost
Asset valuation method based on acquisition cost or historical cost is a
method based on the costs incurred by the company to acquire these assets.
Acquisition cost or historical cost includes purchase cost, delivery cost, installation
cost and other costs related to acquiring the asset.
An example of using the historical cost or historical cost method is when a
company buys a machine for IDR 50 million. The value of the machine assets will
be recorded in the company's financial statements at a value of IDR 50 million, in
accordance with the acquisition costs incurred to buy the machine.
The historical cost or historical cost method is also used to value tangible
assets such as buildings, land, vehicles and office equipment. In this case, the value
of the assets recorded in the company's financial statements is based on the costs
incurred to acquire these assets.
However, this method has the disadvantage that it does not reflect the
actual value of the asset being valued, especially for assets whose prices fluctuate.
In addition, the value of assets recorded using this method does not reflect the
depreciation or impairment of these assets over time.
Fair Value
Asset valuation method based on fair value or fair value is a method that
is based on the current market price or the exchange rate of the asset if sold at
the time of valuation. Fair value or fair value reflects the price that can be
reasonably accepted by the buyer and seller of the asset at the time of valuation.
An example of using the fair value method is when a company has an
investment in shares. The value of the investment assets in these shares will be
assessed based on the market price at the time the valuation was carried out. For
example, if the market price of a company's shares is Rp. 10 million, then the value
of the investment assets of the shares will be recorded in the company's financial
statements at a value of Rp. 10 million.
The fair value method is also used to value assets that do not have a clear
market price, such as patents or trademarks. In this case, the value of the asset
will be determined based on an estimated price that can be reasonably accepted
by the buyer and seller of the asset at the time of valuation.
However, this method has the disadvantage that it can be highly subjective
and it is difficult to determine the exact fair value. In addition, this method does
not reflect the cost of the asset and also does not take into account the potential
for impairment in the value of the asset in the future.
Carrying Value
The method of valuation of assets based on carrying value or carrying value
is a method based on the value of these assets in the company's accounting
records. The carrying amount represents the acquisition cost of the asset less the
depreciation or amortization that has been carried out since the asset was
purchased.
An example of using the carrying value method is when a company owns
fixed assets such as buildings or machinery. The value of these assets will be
recorded in the company's accounting records with a carrying amount that reflects
the acquisition cost less the accumulated depreciation or amortization that has
been made.
For example, if a company buys a machine for Rp. 100 million and
depreciates Rp. 20 million annually for 5 years, the carrying value of the machine
after 5 years is Rp. 100 million - (Rp. 20 million x 5 years) = Rp. 0.
The carrying amount method can provide accurate information about the
cost of an asset and can also be used to predict the useful life of the asset.
However, this method does not reflect the actual market value of the asset nor
does it take into account the potential increase in the asset's value in the future.
Therefore, this method is more suitable for assets that have a long service life and
a stable market value.
Combination Method
The combined method of asset valuation combines several other asset
valuation methods, such as the cost method, fair value, or carrying amount, to
achieve a more accurate valuation result. The combined method is often used to
value complex or unique assets.
An example of using the combined method is when a company owns
property in which there are various types of assets such as buildings, land and
equipment. Companies may use the cost method to value equipment and the fair
value method to value land and buildings.
However, because the property comprises many different types of assets,
the combined method may provide a more accurate valuation result by combining
the results from the cost method and the fair value method.
For example, a company owns a property consisting of buildings, land, and
equipment. After evaluating using the acquisition cost method, the equipment
asset value was Rp. 5 million. Then, after conducting an appraisal using the fair
value method, the land asset value was Rp. 10 million and the building asset value
was Rp. 20 million.
In the combined method, the company may combine the results of the cost
method and the fair value method to obtain a more accurate valuation. For
example, a company could use the value proposition of each asset to calculate the
total value of the property. If the proportion of the value of land, buildings and
equipment is 40%, 30% and 30%, then the total value of the property can be
calculated as (Rp 10 million x 40%) + (Rp 20 million x 30%) + (Rp 5 million x 30%) =
IDR 10.5 million.
Replacement Method
The replacement cost method is an asset valuation method based on the
cost of replacing the asset with a new asset of the same type or equivalent. This
method is often used to value assets that have unstable values or are difficult to
value by other methods.
For example, the company has a machine that is used for production. The
machine has been used for 5 years and has a residual value of IDR 50 million.
However, to buy a machine similar to the current one, the company has to pay Rp
100 million.
Under the replacement method, the value of the machine will be
calculated based on the cost of replacing the machine with a new, equivalent
machine. In this case, the value of the machine will be calculated as the cost of
replacing a new machine in the amount of IDR 100 million minus the residual value
of the old machine in the amount of IDR 50 million, which is IDR 50 million.
The replacement method is also often used to value assets that are unique
and difficult to value by other methods, such as works of art, antiques, or other
unique collectibles. In this case, the value of the asset will be calculated based on
the cost of replacing it with a similar or equivalent asset available on the market
at that time.
Historical Cost
Liability valuation method using historical cost or historical cost is one of
the methods commonly used in accounting. This method refers to the costs
incurred to acquire the liability at the time the transaction occurs.
An example of using the acquisition cost method in assessing liabilities is
when a company purchases goods or services from a supplier and has not paid the
invoice. When the claim is recorded in the financial statements, the value of the
liability recorded is the amount incurred to obtain the goods or services. For
example, if a company buys 10 million rupiah worth of goods from a supplier and
has not paid, then the value of the liability recorded in the company's financial
statements is 10 million rupiah.
Present Value
The liability valuation method using present value refers to the value of
money received or paid in the future, which has been reduced by an appropriate
discount factor to account for time and risk.
An example of using the present value method in valuing liabilities is when
a company issues bonds with a maturity of 5 years and an interest rate of 10% per
year. The company has an obligation to pay interest annually and pay the principal
at maturity. If the nominal value of the bond is 1 billion rupiah, then the present
value will be calculated using a discount factor that is appropriate to the term and
risk. If the discount factor used is 9%, then the present value or present value of
the bond is approximately 772 million rupiah.
In this example, the liability valuation method using present value takes
time and risk into account, thus providing a more accurate picture of the current
value of the liability.
Redemption Value
The liability valuation method using redemption value refers to the value
that must be paid to redeem or terminate the liability at some time in the future.
An example of using the redemption value method in valuing liabilities is
when a company has bonds payable with a maturity date at a certain date in the
future, at which time the company must pay the principal amount owed and
interest that has been running. The redemption value of the bond is the amount
of money that must be paid by the company at maturity to redeem the bond.
For example, a company has bonds payable worth 1 billion rupiah with a
maturity date of January 1, 2025. At maturity, the company must pay the principal
amount of the debt and the accrued interest. If the redemption value of the bonds
is 1.2 billion rupiah, then the liability valuation method used is the redemption
value.
In this example, the liability valuation method using the redemption value
provides a clear picture of the amount of money the company must pay when the
bond matures. However, this method does not take into account time and risk, so
it does not provide a complete picture of the current value of the liability.
Fair Value
The third method of valuation of liabilities is fair value. Fair value is the
price expected to be obtained from other parties in a normal market transaction,
carried out at the time of valuation. In evaluating liabilities, fair value can be used
to measure the value of a liability traded on the market, such as bonds or debt
traded on the stock exchange.
For example, company X has $100 million worth of bonds issued at a fixed
rate of 5%. If at the time of valuation the fair value of the bonds is estimated at
$110 million, the amount of the liability recognized by company X is $110 million.
Conversely, if the fair value is estimated at only $90 million, the amount of the
liability recognized is $90 million.
Combination Method
The combined method of equity valuation can be carried out by
considering both book value and market value. Examples are as follows:
A company owns shares that are traded on the stock exchange. The market
value of the shares is $100 million, while the book value is $80 million. However,
the company also has productive assets that are not reflected in the market value
of its stock, such as patents or classified technology whose value is estimated to
be around $30 million.
In this case, the combined method can be used to value the company's
equity by considering both book value and market value, as well as taking into
account the value of earning assets that are not reflected in the market value of
its shares. For example, the value of equity can be calculated as follows:
• Stock market value: $100 million
• Book value: $80 million
• Earning asset value: $30 million
• Equity value = (stock market value + book value + earning asset value) /
number of outstanding shares
• Equity value = ($100 million + $80 million + $30 million) / 10 million shares
= $21 per share
Accounting Assessment in the Context of Financial Statements
Accounting appraisal in the context of financial statements is a process of
valuing and measuring company assets, liabilities and equity which is carried out
regularly and systematically using generally accepted accounting principles.
The purpose of accounting appraisal in the context of financial statements
is to provide accurate and reliable information about the company's financial
condition to stakeholders, such as investors, creditors, the government and the
wider community. Information provided through financial reports is also used for
making business decisions, evaluating company performance, and monitoring the
use of company funds. Therefore, accounting judgments in the context of financial
statements have a very important role in maintaining corporate transparency and
accountability.
Barney, J.B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal
of Management, 17(1), 99-120.
Beaver, WH (1968). The information content of annual earnings announcements.
Journal of Accounting Research, 6, 67-92.
Bodnar, GM, & Hopwood, WS (2012). accounting information systems. Pearson
Higher Ed.
DeAngelo, H. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and
Economics, 3(3), 183-199.
Demski, JS, & Feltham, GA (1976). Cost information and price determination: A
study of the petroleum refining industry. Journal of Accounting Research,
14(1), 1-22.
Demski, JS, & Feltham, GA (2002). Cost accounting: Foundations and evolutions.
South-Western College Publishing.
FASB. (2018). Concepts Statement No. 8: Conceptual framework for financial
reporting. Financial Accounting Standards Board.
Hirst, DE, & Koonce, LL (2008). Financial accounting: In communicating reality, we
construct reality. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33(3), 370-390.
IASB. (2018). Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting. International
Accounting Standards Board.
Jensen, MC, & Meckling, WH (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior,
agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4),
305-360.
Miller, MH, & Modigliani, F. (1961). Dividend policy, growth, and the valuation of
shares. Journal of Business, 34(4), 411-433.
Ohlson, JA (1995). Earnings, book values, and dividends in equity valuation.
Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(2), 661-687.
Penman, SH (2007). Financial statement analysis and security valuation. McGraw-
Hill Irwin.
Scott, WR (2006). Financial accounting theory (4th ed.). Pearsons.
Watts, RL, & Zimmerman, JL (1978). Towards a positive theory of the
determination of accounting standards. Accounting Review, 53(1), 112-
134.
Watts, RL, & Zimmerman, JL (1990). Positive accounting theory: A ten year
perspective. Accounting Reviews, 65(1), 131-156.