Carnegie 03 — Brad Mehldau http://www.bradmehldau.

com/carnegie-03

HOME BRAD NEWS MEHLIANA MUSIC

WRITING TOUR

BRAD MEHLDAU

CREATIVITY IN BEETHOVEN
AND COLTRANE
Installment 3 – Which Came First, The Melody or
The Motif?

What is the theme, actually? This is a common semantic wrinkle in musical

terminology. Specifically, is a theme simply the melody, or is it the melody and the
harmony that underpins it? It would seem that the melody has primacy. The
monophonic nature of a melody is a mnemonic aid – one internalizes that single
line more readily than a group of simultaneous pitches. The melody rises to the
forefront of one’s memory the way it rises to the forefront of much of Western
music; it stands out in relief. One can recall a melody in a conversation with
someone else, and say, “I love that piece that goes like that…” and then sing a

1 sur 13 18/07/15 08:01

Carnegie 03 — Brad Mehldau http://www.bradmehldau.com/carnegie-03

snatch of the melody, obviously without accompaniment, since we usually don’t

have a guitar, piano or string orchestra standing by when we’re on the go.

But many of us have probably experienced a particular phenomenon that

demonstrates the varying degree of importance of melody in a given piece of
music: Someone sings a melody to you, unaccompanied, asking if you know it –
maybe he or she knows the music, but has forgotten the name. And you have no
idea what he or she is singing – it does not register in your memory of all the
music you know. Later that person remembers what the piece was and tells you,
and of course you know it as well. Now, when the melody is sung again, you place
the harmony under it in your imagination, and it all comes together.

Some themes, as great as they are, lean more on harmony than others and are
very hard to sing to someone – and very hard to recognize only from the melody.
Take for instance the riveting, bad-assed opening of Brahms’s First Symphony:

2 sur 13 18/07/15 08:01

Carnegie 03 — Brad Mehldau http://www.bradmehldau.com/carnegie-03

3 sur 13 18/07/15 08:01

Carnegie 03 — Brad Mehldau http://www.bradmehldau.com/carnegie-03

Many have remarked about Brahms’s First Symphony and its debt to Beethoven –
the most overt example of that debt being the similar character of the theme of
Brahms’ last movement and Beethoven’s “Ode to Joy” theme in the finale of his
Ninth Symphony. The opening of the Brahms above is a perfect example of one of
those melodies that you cannot sing to a friend – it is pretty funny and frustrating
to even try, and while Brahms also wrote many perfectly singable gorgeous
melodies, this opening does bear out George Bernard Shaw’s quip, in this case at
least, that you can’t sing Brahms. This disavowal of singability, I believe, is a
Beethovenian gesture.

4 sur 13 18/07/15 08:01

Carnegie 03 — Brad Mehldau http://www.bradmehldau.com/carnegie-03

It’s easy to see how unsingable this opening is by trying to sing the violins or
cellos, which double the melody in octaves. The upwards-chromatic climb of the
line does not sound like much by itself. Then, starting at bar 5, the intervals grow
and descend in wide leaps. Just to sing these intervals in tune requires pretty good
pitch. This is not the melody that the layman walks out of the concert hall whistling
or humming, like he does with a theme from a symphony of Tchaikovsky (who did
not warm to Brahms’s music at all, at least in his correspondence).

The other factor is rhythmic displacement. Already in the first bar, Brahms
introduces a key motivic component by making the C-sharp in the melody
anticipate the downbeat of the following bar by one eighth note, and he continues
with this practice, anticipating the downbeats at the beginning or halfway point of
each bar. We shouldn’t underestimate the audacity of opening a symphony like
this – if the symphony was hard enough to sing without a piano standing by, the
anticipated upbeats ensure that your poor friend will be completely rhythmically
lost as soon as you start singing it to him or her, unless you’re ready to bang out
some eighth-note triplets. If Brahms was a less original composer, he might have
written the opening without this rhythmic anticipation. Brahms was nothing if not
a supremely imaginative rhythmicist. Here is how a more rhythmically “square”
composer might have approached the opening:

5 sur 13 18/07/15 08:01

Carnegie 03 — Brad Mehldau http://www.bradmehldau.com/carnegie-03

The violins and cello now play on downbeats. It’s perfectly acceptable, but
nowhere near as unsettling. The rhythmic displacement, along with the
chromaticism and wide leaps of melody, is what makes the symphony unlike
anything else. Everything works together: The rhythmic anticipation is easily felt
and heard as a wonderful syncopation once we have the timpani, basses and
contrabassoon pounding out those killer low C eighth-note pedal points. Likewise,
the melody needs the rich harmony of the woodwinds, horns and violas that
descend in the opposite direction to tell its chromatic story – and in this sense,
then, the story is a harmonic story as much as it is a melodic story. That is big, and
it’s why Brahms is so big: he was able to fundamentally shift the focus of musical
narrative away from a singable melody. This, more than the cosmetic similarities
between Brahms’ First and Beethoven’s Ninth, was how Brahms honored the

6 sur 13 18/07/15 08:01

Carnegie 03 — Brad Mehldau http://www.bradmehldau.com/carnegie-03

symphonic legacy of his great predecessor.

The harmony itself is a kind of protagonist in Brahms’ symphony, and this is an

undoubtedly modern gesture. Although the harmony of the opening is completely
stamped with Brahms’ identity, he is not reinventing the wheel here – it owes
much to Bach. (Play the opening of the symphony back to back with Bach’s
Toccata and Fugue in D Minor, for example.) Rather, Brahms’ innovation is in the
way he reassign the role of a musical component like harmony in the unfolding
symphonic narrative. This opening is undoubtedly about something, but it’s not
something that you could pluck out and sing to a friend. Its identity is spread
throughout the whole texture, and each part is interdependent. It is the
malleability of identity that is deeply modern. To forsake melodic primacy is to
forsake a definition of beauty that rests on clarity and comprehensibility. When the
melody is not easily identifiable, what draws us in?

This rhetorical question is the subject of the symphony: As with Beethoven’s Ninth,
the story begins with non-comprehending angst and moves towards the clarity of
melodic primacy in the last movement. Both symphonies arrive at famously
singable melodies in their last movements, implying a victory of melody over motif
finally – a counter-disavowal of the more motivic form of expression that the
symphonies began with. Beethoven and Brahms say to us, “Here is melody, it does
indeed have primacy,” but it is really the motif that reigns supreme. What draws us
in and holds us there for the duration with Beethoven and Brahms is the
omnipresent motif.

For Brahms and Beethoven the symphonists, melody is a creation born of the
motif – it is not the simple “gift” we talked about earlier: It must be earned. The
motif is the source, the raw stuff from which melody springs. The melody acts like
a mortal being: is always immediately perceivable yet intermittent – it comes and
goes; it is always in flux, transient, and temporary. The motif acts like that mortal
being’s omnipotent creator: it is not always immediately perceivable yet always
present – it is constant and fixed; it is forever. The melody is beautiful; the motif is
sublime. If the melodic activity throughout a large-scale work has motivic
continuity, then it makes a claim at sublimity as well.

It’s easy to stumble on the term “motif” because it is vague: Often, the melody
and motif are one and the same thing in a discussion about a work, but usually,
the motif means an isolated part of the melody that has specific intervallic and
rhythmic properties. It may sound melodic in itself; it may not. Here are the
opening bars of Beethoven’s Ninth:

7 sur 13 18/07/15 08:01

Carnegie 03 — Brad Mehldau http://www.bradmehldau.com/carnegie-03

The motif has two quickly recognizable features: the interval of an open fifth, and the
highly dotted rhythm that we hear first in the first violins, answered in the next bar by the
violas and basses. As a melody, that figure is little more than a wisp. But that’s the idea.
When a proper melody begins and we hear the first real theme of the movement at the
pick up to the seventeenth bar,

8 sur 13 18/07/15 08:01

Carnegie 03 — Brad Mehldau http://www.bradmehldau.com/carnegie-03

we then see that the motif was preparing us for it – the melody employs the
motif’s dotted rhythm, and the interval of the fifth is inverted.

For the first 16 bars of the symphony, Beethoven uses only two notes – an A and
an E. Our ear, the first time we hear this, assumes that we are hearing a tonic fifth,
with the A as the root. We sense that we are in some sort of “A” tonality. Whether
it’s A major or A minor is not clear because there is no minor third or major third
interval above the A that would indicate the mode. So we feel a sense of
suspension, but whereas suspension in classical music from Bach on had implied
an incipient resolution, here we are suspended in mid-air as it were, with no sign of
where we might be headed. In those opening 16 bars, Beethoven has succinctly
sketched a musical portrayal of chaos and formlessness.

For me, the effect of this opening never diminishes. Even though I know the
symphony and know what’s coming, I am never prepared for the D-minor tonality
that is coming down the pike, until it gets there and blasts itself into my body and
brain. When the main theme does enter at bar 17, it creates a unique, unsettling
feeling that was new to music: Instead of lessening the vertigo of the beginning, it
increases it. It is as if we have been standing on a precipice in the clouds, not sure
of what is underneath us. Then some of the clouds clear, we can see the ground
from our high precipice, and all of the sudden we realize how far away we are
from the ground.

But why are we still in the clouds, filled with only more vertigo? Why doesn’t the
firm tonality of D-minor in the theme at bar 17 ground us? Hasn’t this whole
beginning just been a long and drawn-out V – I progression? Not really: The open
fifth of A and E, in itself, does not qualify as a functioning dominant: It lacks a
C-sharp leading tone that would pull us towards the D tonic, or a G that would pull
us towards the F natural of the D minor triad. It is stubbornly directionless. It is a
motif, which means: It is an empty vessel for now, waiting to be filled. So when the
D minor theme arrives, it does not feel like it resolves what preceded it – on the
contrary, it feels like a usurping.

Beethoven creates that feeling of space between the dominant and tonic through
the vagueness of the motivic open fifth. But how exactly does he draw those
clouds away from underneath our precipice? The secret is the bassoons and the
horns in B-flat. Let’s look at the full score from bar thirteen, as we head into that
terrifying theme:

9 sur 13 18/07/15 08:01

Carnegie 03 — Brad Mehldau http://www.bradmehldau.com/carnegie-03

10 sur 13 18/07/15 08:01

Carnegie 03 — Brad Mehldau http://www.bradmehldau.com/carnegie-03

At bar 15, the bassoons and B flat horns play Ds. They do not start on the downbeat, but
come in on the second eighth note of the bar. This is a masterstroke – they sneak in upon
us rather than landing squarely, and in this way the effect is more of a subtle shift and
less of an overt transition – an A pedal point is shifting to a D. After all – this is not any
kind of harmonic resolution at all – it’s more like a drop. In a symphonic texture,
everything always blurs together a bit, and Beethoven exploits this blur. We still have the
motivic A-E open fifth in our ears and then the Ds of the horns and bassoons nestle
under the A. For a strange, blurred moment at bar 15, our ears perceive something like

11 sur 13 18/07/15 08:01

Carnegie 03 — Brad Mehldau http://www.bradmehldau.com/carnegie-03

this:

What is Beethoven up to here? He’s playing the same kind of game as he did in
the Op. 96 quartet we looked at earlier: He is messing around with the hierarchy of
the dominant and tonic, poking and prodding at the bedrock of Western tonality,
this time by scrambling our ears right from the gate with this strange cipher of the
open fifth that begins the symphony. Again, as in Op. 96, the tonic and dominant
are in an adversarial relationship, repelling each other rather than attracting each
other. And again, the bedrock relationship of dominant and tonic will become the
main story of the piece.

Beethoven is like a storyteller who says to you: I am going to tell you about a
beautiful princess and a prince and a dragon. And so you roll your eyes because
you’re sure you’ve heard it before. And then he starts to tell you his tale. All the
characters are there, and all of the themes are there – love, nobility, good
conquering over evil, bravery – but some things have been switched around: The
dragon, perhaps, is the one who falls in love with the princess. And the princess is
torn between the dragon and the prince. Maybe the dragon isn’t purely evil;
maybe the prince isn’t purely good…Maybe the dragon is the prince. Beethoven
uses the same material as everyone else and then pokes a hole in it, so that
something new springs forth and we see everything in a different way.

© Brad Mehldau, All Rights Reserved

Contacts: Links: Sign up for updates:

12 sur 13 18/07/15 08:01

Carnegie 03 — Brad Mehldau http://www.bradmehldau.com/carnegie-03

Booking/Management:New Sheet Music:

International Full scores and lead
Music sheets of Brad's
Network releases and
collaborations. SUBMIT
Publicity/Press
More info & purchase
downloads:
>
imnworld.com/bradmehldau
Elegiac Cycle:
Music
A new book with a
Publishing:
complete transcription
Werther
and interview with
Music, BMI
Brad is available on
Amazon.com in
France. The book is in
French and English.
Purchase the book >

Copyright 2015 Brad Mehldau. All rights reserved. Website Design and Social Media
Marketing: Designsite

13 sur 13 18/07/15 08:01