Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Acknowledgements
Acknowledgements Collaborators
This work was sponsored by Philip Mattson and Kai-Dee Chu from the Andy Olesen, Canadian Explosives Technicians Assoc., Canada
Department of Homeland Security, Science and Technology Directorate, Tom Haus, Los Angeles Fire Dept. & CA-TF1, CA
through an interagency agreement with the National Institute of Tom Prentice, Reveille Peak Ranch, Burnet, TX
Parry Boogard, Valley Regional Fire Authority & WA-TF1, WA
Standards and Technology (NIST). Michael Leo, Fire Department of New York City, NY
Clint Arnett, TEEX/Disaster City & TX-TF1, TX
The NIST Team includes: Katie Thielmeyer, Woodlawn Fire Dept. OH
George Hough, Fire Dept. of New York City & NY-TF1, NY
Adam Jacoff, Kamel Saidi, Raymond Sheh,
Kenny Kimble, and Ann Virts. Jim Ingledue, Virginia Beach Fire Dept. & VA-TF2, VA
Mark Hundley, Virginia Beach Fire Dept. & VA-TF2, WA
Dozens more people have contributed to the development and
validation of these test methods. They include FEMA urban search and Michael O’Shea, U.S. Dept. of Justice, DC
rescue task force teams, firefighters, law enforcement, collaborating
Martin Hutchings, Sacramento Sheriff & IAB, CA
test facilities, other civilian and military organizations, and commercial
manufacturers. There are far too many to mention, but some of the John Delaney, Arlington County Fire, Dept., & IAB, VA
ongoing (non-commercial) collaborators are listed below, roughly in
Mike Marino, Prince George’s County Fire Dept. & IAB, MD
order of their involvement:
Coitt Kessler, Austin Fire Dept., TX
Disclaimer Chris Sadler, York County Fire Dept., VA
Commercial equipment shown in this document are for illustrative
Andy Moore, Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX
purposes only. This does not imply recommendation or endorsement by
the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor does it imply Al Frazier, Grand Forks County Sheriff’s Dept., ND
that the products identified are necessarily the best available for the
Ben Miller, DFPC Center of Excellence for Aerial Fire Fighting, CO
purpose.
Max Delo, ESF-13, U.S. Marshals Service, DOJ
Measurement Units Bryan Gillespy, ESF-13, U.S. Marshals Service, DOJ
The International System of Units (a.k.a. SI Units) and U.S. Customary
Units (a.k.a. Imperial Units) are used throughout this document. Howie Stockhowe, Virginia Beach Fire Dept, Virginia Beach, VA
Approximate equivalents in each system of units enable use of readily Tony Galladora, Montgomery County Police, MD
available materials in different countries. This avoids excessive
purchasing and fabrication costs. The differences between the stated Satoshi Tadokoro, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
unit dimensions are insignificant for comparison of test method results, Tetsuya Kimura, Nagoaka Univ. of Technology, Nagoaka, Japan
so each set of units are considered standard for the purposes of these
test methods.
2
Standard Test Methods for Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems
ASTM International Standards Committee on Homeland Security Applications;
Response Robots (E54.09) | Website: RobotTestMethods.nist.gov
e 3
lti tud
2X A FLY SMALL SYSTEMS FLY LARGE SYSTEMS
X
Spiral Bucket
Leveling Post
de
A ltitu
X
X 2
1 X WORK THE INTERFACES PRACTICE PROCEDURES
Omni Bucket Leveling Stand
X
Omni Bucket Leveling Stand
X
Launch/Land Platform
X
Lane Marker
FL
IG EVALUATE SENSORS COMPARE PAYLOADS
HT
LIN
E
3
Standard Test Methods for Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems
ASTM International Standards Committee on Homeland Security Applications;
Response Robots (E54.09) | Website: RobotTestMethods.nist.gov
3
de X
A ltitu
2X
X
Spiral Bucket X
Leveling Post
X
2
de
A ltitu 1 X
X
Omni Bucket Leveling Stand
X X
Omni Bucket Leveling Stand
X
Launch/Land Platform
X
Lane Marker Inside each bucket is an inscribed ring to evaluate alignment. LEFT
FL
IG
HT
LIN
is aligned, RIGHT is not quite. Center targets can be letters,
E visual/color/thermal acuity charts, hazmat labels, or other items. 4
Standard Test Methods for Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems
ASTM International Standards Committee on Homeland Security Applications;
Response Robots (E54.09) | Website: RobotTestMethods.nist.gov
e X
A l t i t ud X
2 X
X X
INE
NTER L
CE
t it ude X
X Al
X X
X LE NGT
H
LL
VERA
X 4X O
FL
IG
Inside each bucket is an inscribed ring to evaluate alignment. LEFT
HT is aligned, RIGHT is not quite. Center targets can be letters,
LIN
E visual/color/thermal acuity charts, hazmat labels, or other items. 5
Standard Test Methods for Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems
ASTM International Standards Committee on Homeland Security Applications;
Response Robots (E54.09) | Website: RobotTestMethods.nist.gov
H
22 I NOT A
G J Gap sizes:
M QUITE
D
11 E ALIGNED
e C F
tud
X Alti Align to see the entire Align and identify the
X A inscribed ring inside each acuity target inside each
B
bucket. The letters are bucket with increasingly
bucket identifiers. small concentric C gaps in
one of eight directions.
X
FL
IG
HT
LIN
E
6
Standard Test Methods for Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems
ASTM International Standards Committee on Homeland Security Applications;
Response Robots (E54.09) | Website: RobotTestMethods.nist.gov
H
22 I 2) UNDERBODY
G J
M
D
11 E
e C F
tud
X Alti
X A
B
Viewed from the 1) SURFACE
Launch/Land Platform
X
FL
IG Perch acuity from the Launch/Land Platform
HT
LIN
E
benefit from accurate landings to apply full zoom capabilities
7
Standard Test Methods for Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems
ASTM International Standards Committee on Homeland Security Applications;
Response Robots (E54.09) | Website: RobotTestMethods.nist.gov
8
Standard Test Methods for Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems
ASTM International Standards Committee on Homeland Security Applications;
Response Robots (E54.09) | Website: RobotTestMethods.nist.gov
+
• 5 gallon white buckets with 10 in diameter inside
bottoms require an inscribed ring plus a sticker.
9
Standard Test Methods for Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems
ASTM International Standards Committee on Homeland Security Applications;
Response Robots (E54.09) | Website: RobotTestMethods.nist.gov
A
small concentric C gaps in one
A
CO
A
of eight directions.
Gap sizes:
X
An appropriate lane spacing is when a
X 2X hover allows reading at least the
FL
outer ring of a concentric C target THIS IS JUST BARELY CLOSE ENOUGH
IG
HT
LIN two stands away. TO BE CERTAIN OF A COMPLETELY INSCRIBED RING
E (ROUGHLY 1 / 10 OF THE DISPLAY OR LARGER) 10
Standard Test Methods for Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems
ASTM International Standards Committee on Homeland Security Applications;
Response Robots (E54.09) | Website: RobotTestMethods.nist.gov
NOT QUITE ALIGNED START THE TIMER when the drone launches from the platform
PAY 1-5 VISUAL ACUITY TARGETS
Align and identify the visual 1. HOVER at X over Bucket 1 ------------------ Bucket E Bucket 1
A acuity targets with increasingly 180° 2. ROTATE RIGHT 360° -------------------------- Bucket E Bucket 1
A
small concentric C gaps in one
A
of eight directions.
Gap sizes:
360° 3. ROTATE LEFT 360° ---------------------------- Bucket E Bucket 1
180°
4. CLIMB to 2X ------------------------------------ Bucket I Bucket 1
5. DESCEND to X --------------------------------- Bucket E Bucket 1
X Alt
itud
e 6. FORWARD over Bucket 2 ------------------- Bucket I Bucket 2
7. BACKWARD over Bucket 1 ----------------- Bucket E Bucket 1
8. FORWARD/ROTATE 180° over Bucket 2- Bucket C Bucket 2
9. FORWARD/ROTATE 180° over Landing - Bucket A Landing
10. LAND CENTERED facing stands ----------- Centered Perch 1
Centered Perch 2
e RESULTS
itud
X Alt • Total aligned buckets
• Total C’s identified
• Faults
• Elapsed time of trial
2X
Altitude/Radius
de
ltitu
e 1X A
ltitud 1X
2X A Altitude/Radius
180°
2 x 360° Flight
Free
e
ltitud
1X A
• Hover position stability • Sideways along a line • Orbit identifications • Free flight inspections • Max speed following a line
• Basic maneuvers • Left and right directions • Left and right directions • Any proximity • 5X distance
• Landing accuracy • Landing accuracy • X and 2X altitudes • Any altitude • X altitude
• 20 tasks in 1 lap • 20 tasks in 2 laps • 20 tasks in 4 laps • 20 tasks in 1 lap • 20X distance per lap
MAN: Align only MAN: Align only MAN: Align only MAN: Align only MAN: Follow paths
PAY: Align and Identify PAY: Align and Identify PAY: Align and Identify PAY: Align and Identify PAY: Deliver Payload Accurately
13
Standard Test Methods for Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems
ASTM International Standards Committee on Homeland Security Applications;
Response Robots (E54.09) | Website: RobotTestMethods.nist.gov
Position (Version D)
s
diu
/Ra
itu 2X
MAN 1 / PAY 1
de
START POSITION
Alt
s
diu
/Ra
itu 1X
de
ALIGNED
e
A
ltitud • 10 positions in 1 lap
2X A
180°
2, I, C
• 18 bucket alignments and 1 landing (2pts)
2 x 360° • 1 point each
Bucket
180°
1, E
Targets • 20 points maximum
e A
Altitud
1X
A PAYOAD FUNCTIONALITY 1 (PAY 1)
A
A
A
A
A
A
• 10 positions in 1 lap
• 18 bucket targets and 2 perch targets
A Gap sizes:
Gap sizes:
Traverse
MAN 2 / PAY 2
START POSITION
DE LAPS L
A L TITU WARD K
1X F T
uLdEe
AANltDitH
R D
TWA 1X
NOT QUITE MANEUVERING 2 (MAN 2)
RIGH
ALIGNED
J
A • 20 alignments in 2 laps (rightward/leftward)
• 18 bucket alignments and 2 landings
• 1 point each
F Bucket
Targets • 20 points maximum
A B
A
A
A
• 20 targets in 2 laps (rightward/leftward)
PERCH
• 18 bucket targets and 2 perch targets
AGap sizes:
Gap sizes:
15
Alti
2X
e/
t
Standard Test Methods for Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems
ASTM International Standards Committee on Homeland Security Applications;
Response Robots (E54.09) | Website: RobotTestMethods.nist.gov
L
1X
Altitude/Radius
K
A • 20 alignments in 4 orbits
(rightward & leftward, 1X & 2X)
1, I • Each orbit has 4 buckets toward center
J
Bucket
and 1 downward radius
2, I Targets • 1 point each
J
• 20 points maximum
A A
A
A
Spiral
MAN 4 / PAY 4
START POSITION
NOT QUITE
ALIGNED MANEUVERING 4 (MAN 4)
ree Fligh
t A • 20 bucket alignments in 1 lap
• 1 Point Each
F
• 20 Points Maximum
Bucket
Targets
PAYOAD FUNCTIONALITY 4 (PAY 4)
A • 20 targets in 1 lap
A A
• 5 concentric Cs per target
A
A A
A
A
17
Standard Test Methods for Small Unmanned Aircraft Systems
ASTM International Standards Committee on Homeland Security Applications;
Response Robots (E54.09) | Website: RobotTestMethods.nist.gov
Sustain Speed / 5X
Deliver Accurately 5X
MAN 5 / PAY 5
de
START POSITION
A ltitu
2X
5X NOT QUITE MANEUVERING 5 (MAN 5)
A
Overshoot ALIGNED
Limit
• 5 laps
de • 4 flight path (2 horizontal, 2 vertical)
ltitu
XA • 1 Point Each
• 20 Points Maximum
Sustain Speed / 5X
Deliver Accurately 5X
MAN 5 / PAY 5
de
A ltitu
2 X WEIGHTED PAYLOAD LAND or DROP
5X
Overshoot
AIRCRAFT
Limit
de
A ltitu
X
BUCKET AT CENTER
OF DROP ZONE
2X
Altitude/Radius
de
ltitu
e 1X A
ltitud 1X
2X A Altitude/Radius
180°
2 x 360° Flight
Free
e
ltitud
1X A
• Hover position stability • Sideways along a line • Orbit to identify objects • Free flight to inspect objects • Max speed following a line
• Basic maneuvers • Left and right directions • Left and right directions • Any proximity (use zooms) • 5X distance
• Landing accuracy • Landing accuracy • X and 2X altitudes • Any altitude • X altitude
• 20 tasks in 1 lap • 20 tasks in 2 laps • 20 tasks in 4 laps • 20 tasks in 1 lap • 20X distance per lap
20