Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CAMPUS : SWC
SEMESTER : Second
ASSESSOR(S) : Ms F. Simelane
MODERATOR : Mr X Khohliso
Umyalelo:
1|Page
SZI3BB3 Methodology and Practicum- 3 -
Umbuzo 1
Ukufunda ngokuqonda
Umbuzo 2
Ukubhala
Total (25)
2|Page
Umbuzo 3
Ukulalela nokukhuluma
a) Ukuphimiswa kwemisindo
b) Izakhi zamagama
d) Imisho (syntax)
Umbuzo 4
3|Page
injongo yezikhangisi kwamele icace, faka nokunye okudingekayo kulesikhuzelo.
Bese uyasisebenzisa futhi uhlele isifundo usebenzisa le sikhangisi
njengensizakufunda ukufundisa izingane ngalesu lokukhangisa. (25)
0-1 2 3
B. Lesson
presentation
B1. Invitation phase The invitation phase was The invitation phase The invitation phase was
(Introduction to the rushed and did not introduced the topic of well presented and
lesson) introduce the learners to the lesson to a partial defined the topic of the
the topic of the lesson. extent, and also lacked in lesson accurately. The
Learner interest was not defining key concepts learner’s interest and
elicited nor was their prior relevant to the topic. The reflection on prior
knowledge on the topic learners’ interest, knowledge was elicited
prompted. reflection and prior beyond expectations.
knowledge was
prompted/elicited to a
limited extent.
0-1 2 3
B2. Implementation There was no evidence of There are some aspects There are clear links
phase (Lesson lesson progression from linking the introduction from the invitation phase
progression and the invitation phase to to the main concept of to teaching the main
suitability of the teaching the main the lesson with hints to concept leading up to the
content) concept/s and conclusion. the lesson conclusion. conclusion of the lesson.
0-1 2 3
B3. Pedagogic The students lack the The student displayed The student had a
content knowledge necessary PCK to teach some knowledge of detailed understanding of
(PCK) the content of the lesson PCK, but it was evident the PCK needed to teach
effectively. that his/her the lesson effectively.
4|Page
understanding lacked The level of insight was
depth and critical insight. exceptional.
0-1 2 3
B4. Suitability of the The content was not The content was The content of the lesson
content taught appropriate. appropriate, but the was relevant, innovative
student lacked the and an enriching
insight required to experience for the
structure the teaching learners.
episode effectively.
0-1 2 3
B6. Teaching level: The learners were not The learners were The learners were fully
Learner interest, engaged with the content partially engaged with engaged with the content
curriculum being taught. The student the content being taught. being taught. There was
differentiation and did not adjust the teaching The teaching level and clear evidence
language level and language usage language had been throughout the lesson
adjustment to suit the diverse needs suitably adjusted to for that the teaching level
of learners. the diverse needs of and language was
learners. adjusted to suit diverse
needs of learners
0-1 2-3 4
B7. Summary of the The conclusion of the The conclusion of the The conclusion of the
lesson (Conclusion) lesson did not involve a lesson involved a partial lesson included a
summation or reflection summation or reflection summation or reflection
on what has been learnt. on what has been on what has been
There was also no learned. There was also learned. There was
integration of what limited integration of strong integration of
learners learnt from the what learners learnt from what learners learnt from
lesson that could be of the lesson that could be the lesson that could be
value in their own lives. of value in their own of value in their own
Thus the lesson was lives. Thus, the various lives. Thus the student
conceptually inconsistent phases of the lesson were presented a cohesive
and lacked cohesion. aligned, but the lesson lesson that was
was rushed with the implemented as a
various phases seamless whole. The
needlessly and various phases are well
artificially separated. integrated and there was
no artificial separation of
one from the other
Total: 25
5|Page