Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Example
Objective-Evaluation
Key issues- Time value of money, Cash flow occurring at different time , Designs with
different durations
What is Economy?
Its essential that an engineering proposal is evaluated in terms of economics [worth & cost]
before it is undertaken
Discipline that involves the systematic evaluation of the cost and benefit [economic
merits] of proposed technical projects
It is the branch of social science that deals with the production & distribution and
consumption of goods and services and their management.
It is the study of production and distribution of wealth.
It is the study of choice and decision-making in the world with limited resources.
It is the study of how individuals, businesses & governments use their limited resources and
satisfy unlimited wants. [Others]
Engineering decision is often time-invariant. i.e., it uses known physical resources, principles
of physics /chemistry, design correlates, & engineering judgment to arrive at workable &
optimal design. but, economic decisions are time dependent.
Factors to be considered for decision making may vary from time to time.
Investment decisions often require information about the uncertain future (w/c basically
depends on the degree of forecast& prediction).
Which engineering projects should have a higher priority? [priority for available alternatives]
Timeframe: future
Analysis of present and past situations based on observed data to predict the future
Economic environment is affected by the behavior of people, therefore, its not certain
and economic laws are not exact and certain
The alternatives need to be identified and then defined for subsequent analysis.
Since the choice [decision] is among alternatives, developing and defining the
comprehensive list of alternatives for detailed evaluation is important.
Creativity and innovation are essential.
Principle 2: Focus on the differences
Only the differences in expected future outcomes among the alternatives are relevant to
their comparison and should be considered in the decision.
Outcomes that are common to all alternatives can be disregarded in the process of
comparison and decision
Principle 3: Use a consistent viewpoint
The prospective outcomes of the alternatives, selection of the criteria and other, should be
consistently developed from a defined viewpoint [perspective.
Usually, the viewpoint of the decision maker would be used.
For example, the perspective of the employees is used for the problem of designing the
employee benefit package.
Risk and uncertainty are inherent in estimating the future outcomes of the alternatives and
should be recognized in the analysis and comparison.
Improved decision making results from an adaptive process. The initial projected outcomes of
the selected alternative should be subsequently compared with the actual results achieved.