Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ADVISOR SIGNATURE
DECLARATION
We hereby declare that the project work entitled “Civil Engineering Integrated Design Project
II” submitted to the Jimma Institute of Technology Civil Engineering Department, is a record
of an original work done by us under the guidance of advisor Mr. Oluma.G and Mr. Mesfin
Dinku All writings in this document contain things that are done by our effort exclusively, and
that it has not been submitted partially or in full, by any other person.
GROUP MAMBERS
ADVISOR SIGNATURE
i
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
Our greatest thanks from the bottom of our heart first of all go to God for endowing us with
the courage, strength as well as health throughout our school time and for the successful
accomplishment of this project.
Next we would like to express our deepest gratitude and respect to Jimma Institute of
Technology University (JIT) and all the staff members of Civil engineering department for
their cooperation made for us to accomplish our work from the beginning and giving us this
precious opportunity.
Also our gratitude goes to our advisors Mr. Oluma.G and Mr. Mesfin Dinku for their unlimited
support throughout our work, and for his helpful discussions we have had over all contact
hours.
Lastly the guidance and support received from all the members who contributed to this project,
was vital. We are grateful for our constant participation up to the complete of the project.
ii
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Transportation is simply a movement of person, goods or information from place to place by
different means like vehicles, airplane etc. for some particular purposes. It is a service created
to serve society by linking locations where activity takes place such as markets, industries and
factories, offices, schools and etc. It penetrates into all phases of production and distribution of
goods. The development of infrastructure in the world is mainly based on road. This project
deals with constructing new road at Jimma zone which is economic, short and safe. It include
project background, objective of the project, the selection of route, geometric alignment, traffic
analysis, pavement, earthwork, drainage design and traffic sign.
Selecting the best route from the proposed three route alternative depending up on the selection
criteria which include the shortest length, the least severe terrain type, the less no of curve and
the minimum average gradient, so based on this criteria we select route one as best route and
then by calculation of AADT which is 791 the road belongs to DC-5 as per ERA 2013.Traffic
counting and forecasting is another important in road design. The amount of vehicles which
used the road must be known. Depend on the given surveying data the traffic class is
determined as T5 and subgrade strength CBR=1.85% which belongs to S1. Thus, the pavement
is design under T5S1. The selected route is 1.88Km length.
Geometric design depend up on the design speed 70Km/hr. Which is forwarded in ERA
manual which include horizontal alignment, stopping sight distance, passing sight distance,
super elevation and vertical alignment.
Earth work and quantity are calculated by using trapezoidal method. The amount of cut and fill
is determined from the earthwork.
Flexible pavement which is multilayer structure with better material on the top and material
with lower quality at the bottom is designed. The Drainage structure designed and it include
calculation of design discharge by rational formula, selection of trapezoidal design cross-
section which is both economical and safe.
To minimize an accident traffic control and marking is more important. It include pavement
marking, pavement marking type and different traffic warning signs. The overall of the project
constriction we have faced while doing our project and also include recommended things for
the accountable things for he accountable body.
iii
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
TABLE OF CONTENT
DECLARATION ........................................................................................................................ i
ACKNOWLEDGMENT............................................................................................................ii
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................... iii
TABLE OF CONTENT ............................................................................................................ iv
LIST OF TABLE .....................................................................................................................vii
LIST OF FIGURE.................................................................................................................. viii
ACRONOMY ........................................................................................................................... ix
CHAPTER ONE ........................................................................................................................ 1
INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 1
1.1. PROJECT BACKGROUND ........................................................................................... 1
1.1.1. Jimma and its location .............................................................................................. 1
1.1.2. Topography............................................................................................................... 1
1.2.3. Climatic condition of Jimma .................................................................................... 1
1.2. ROAD (HIGWAYS) ....................................................................................................... 2
1.3. OBJECTIVE OF THE PROJECT ................................................................................... 2
1.3.1 The General Objective of this Project ....................................................................... 2
1.3.2 The Specific Objective of this Project ....................................................................... 3
CHAPTER TWO ....................................................................................................................... 4
ROUTE SELECTION ............................................................................................................... 4
2.1. DESIGN CONTROL AND CRITERIA ......................................................................... 4
2.2. NECESSITY OF ROUTE SELECTION ........................................................................ 4
2.3. STEPS IN ROUTE SELECTION ................................................................................... 4
2.4. MAIN DESIGN CONTROL AND CRITERIA.............................................................. 5
2.4.1 Traffic counting and forecasting................................................................................ 5
2.4.2. Terrain Type ............................................................................................................. 9
2.4.3. Road Functional Classification and Numbering ..................................................... 14
2.4.4. Design Speed .......................................................................................................... 14
2.4.5. Design Standards .................................................................................................... 14
CHAPTER THREE ................................................................................................................. 16
GEOMETRIC DESIGN........................................................................................................... 16
3.1. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... 16
3.2. HORIZONTALALIGNMENT ..................................................................................... 16
iv
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
v
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
vi
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
LIST OF TABLE
Table 1.1. Average Temperature and Rainfall at Jimma ........................................................... 2
Table 2.1 Route selection comparison ....................................................................................... 4
Table 2.2. Design period of Road .............................................................................................. 6
Table 2.3. Night factor determination ........................................................................................ 7
Table 2.4. AADT0 and AADT1 calculation for each vehicle ................................................... 9
Table 2.5. Terrain Slope classification based on ERA .............................................................. 9
Table 2.6.Transverse terrain (selected route-2 ......................................................................... 10
Table 2.7. Design standard vs design speeds ........................................................................... 15
Table 3.1. Horizontal curve 1 setting out ................................................................................. 19
Table 3.2.Clearance Distance (d3) vs. Ambient Speeds (source ERA manual table 7.2) ....... 21
Table 3.3 Stopping sight distance and passing sight distance ................................................. 21
Table 3.4. Transition curve parameters.................................................................................... 23
Table 3.5 Setting vertical curve one ........................................................................................ 29
Table 5.1. One directional cumulative numbers of vehicle .................................................... 36
Table 5.2. Cumulative no. of ESA’S ....................................................................................... 37
Table 5.3. Traffic Classes for Flexible Pavement Design ....................................................... 38
Table 5.4. CBR Calculation ..................................................................................................... 39
Table 5.5. CBR Calculation ..................................................................................................... 40
Table 5.6. CBR value and their corresponding structural ........................................................ 41
Table 5.7 Relative cost of the alternative pavement structures ............................................... 42
vii
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
LIST OF FIGURE
Figure 1.1 Jimma map................................................................................................................ 1
Figure 3.1 Stopping Sight Distance on Horizontal Curve ....................................................... 19
Figure 3.2 passing sight distance ............................................................................................. 20
Figure 5.1 Graph of CBR ......................................................................................................... 40
Figure 6.1 Rainfall-Intensity-Duration curves ......................................................................... 45
Figure 7.1 Right of Way Series Signs ...................................................................................... 51
Figure 7.2 Single and double continuous dividing line ........................................................... 52
viii
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
ACRONOMY
AADT Annual average daily traffic
AASHTO American Association of State Highway and Transportation
ADT Average Daily Traffic
CBR California Bearing Ratio
BFSE Beginning of Full Super Elevation
DC Design Class
EF Equivalency Factor
EFSE End of Full Super Elevation
ERA Ethiopian Road Authority
ESA Equivalent Standard Axle
NF Night Factor
PSD Passing Sight Distance
SSD Stopping Sight Distance
ix
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1. PROJECT BACKGROUND
1.1.1. Jimma and its location
Jimma (Oromo: Jimma also spelled Jimmaa, is the largest city in southwestern Oromia Region in
Ethiopia. It is a special zone of the Oromia Region and is surrounded by Jimma Zone. It has a
latitude and longitude of 7°40′N 36°50′E respectively. The town was the capital of Kaffa Province
until the province was dissolved. Prior to the 2007 census, Jimma was reorganized administratively
as a special Zone. The nickname of Jimma is Jimma Abba Jifar. This road project is a 1800m
asphalt road which is Located around Jimma of the Oromia Region. The main economic activity
in the given area is Agriculture. The project is designed around jimma.
1.1.2. Topography
The topography of the project area should be considered in planning and designing of safe and
economical road. The project area is located in the west parts of Ethiopia. The road project is
located on rolling terrain.
1.2.3. Climatic condition of Jimma
In Jimma the wet season is mostly cloudy, the dry season is partly cloudy and is warm year round.
Over the course of the year the temperature typically varies from 48ºF to 83ºF and is rarely below
42 ºF or above 88ºF. Climatic data is very important to design a good road. It is important for the
determination of road materials and the root selection of the road.
1
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
2
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
3
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
CHAPTER TWO
ROUTE SELECTION
2.1. DESIGN CONTROL AND CRITERIA
The selection of the best route is influenced by various factors. The shortest road alignment is not
necessarily the easiest, quickest or most economical option for construction and maintenance. In
general, the aim of a highway route selection process is to find a location for the new road that will
result in the lowest total construction, level, traffic and environmental costs.
2.2. NECESSITY OF ROUTE SELECTION
The quality of the survey has influence on the cost of the project. A number of alternatives should
be examined (3 alternatives) and the most appropriate solution should be selected out.
Failures are encountered if the selection is not properly done. Embankment subsidence, flooding
of roads, land slide, deposition of sand-dunes, and erosion of river or sea are some of the problems
which can be avoided by proper route surveying.
2.3. STEPS IN ROUTE SELECTION
A. Desk study
B. Reconnaissance survey
C. Preliminary survey
D. Final location survey
E. Drawings and reports
The comparison of three route which selected from the given contour
Table 2.1 Route selection comparison
Route selection comparison
Criteria ROUTE 1 ROUTE 2 ROUTE 3
Length of the Route(m) 2020 1880 2000
Terrain type (general) Rolling Rolling Rolling
No.of H/curves 2 2 2
Maximum depth cut/fill 12.5 8 7.5
Maximum long. gradient 62.5 40 37.5
4
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
5
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
4. Location and terrain of the project - if location and terrain of the project is difficult for
maintenance, the design period should compromise the total cost of project and cost of further
maintenance.
5. Financial constraints - if there is limitation of economy, design period might be taken to be
small.
6. Difficulty in forecasting traffic.
The road serve as link from and to the area because of the economic importance of the project
area, and the AADT count, the road is classified as Trunk Road.
Design period(years) 20 20 15 10
6
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
TOTAL
Day 1 2 3 4 5 6D 6N 7D 7N NF ADT0 Adj.ADT
ADT1
R 90 75 19 105 92 75 66 94 56 1.72 79 135
Car 165
L 92 92 59 94 64 167 138 67 53 1.82 91 165
R 56 19 92 8 74 66 42 66 32 1.56 54 85
Wagon & pick up 89
L 59 34 58 41 67 58 46 67 31 1.62 55 89
R 53 50 60 59 56 58 7 60 5 1.10 57 62
Mini bus & Vans 62
L 66 46 22 22 22 22 5 22 5 1.23 32 39
R 44 42 43 42 44 37 29 21 17 1.79 39 70
Small bus 70
L 43 42 44 41 46 54 9 58 9 1.16 47 54
R 37 43 33 34 47 33 8 33 5 1.20 37 44
Medium bus 46
L 40 44 45 35 42 33 8 32 5 1.20 39 46
R 32 27 35 41 33 16 7 19 5 1.34 29 39
Large bus 51
L 38 43 40 35 35 21 17 31 7 1.46 35 51
R 53 42 42 50 41 41 0 40 0 1.00 44 44
Light truck 46
L 40 52 51 42 54 44 0 39 0 1.00 46 46
R 38 33 42 49 40 9 8 16 4 1.48 32 48
Medium truck 96
L 94 77 80 90 97 50 18 50 7 1.25 77 96
R 7 6 8 6 9 2 1 8 6 1.70 7 11
Heavy truck 11
L 6 8 7 8 7 8 0 5 1 1.08 7 8
R 5 5 5 5 5 6 4 8 1 1.36 6 8
Articulate 8
L 5 5 7 4 5 5 1 5 1 1.20 5 6
Total ADT1 644
7
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
LEFT SIDE
𝟐∗𝟗𝟐+𝟓𝟗+𝟗𝟒+𝟔𝟒+𝟏𝟔𝟕+𝟔𝟕
ADTleft= =91
𝟕
AADT1=AADT0*(1+Growth rate %)x , where x is the anticipated year between 2020 to 2024 .
Sample calculation
For car, AADT1=180.15*(1+0.04)4=202.64
8
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
9
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
10
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
11
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
12
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
13
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
14
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
Basic unpaved
access <10 3.5
The design traffic flow shall normally be limited to be not more than one design class step higher
than the Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) in the first year of opening.
From the above table, for DC5:-
surface type paved
AADT1= 791
The carriageway width is 7 m
The design speed is 70km/hr. for Rolling terrain
15
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
CHAPTER THREE
GEOMETRIC DESIGN
3.1. INTRODUCTION
Geometric design is the process whereby the layout of the road through the terrain is designed to
meet the needs of the road users. The principal geometric features are the road cross-section,
horizontal and vertical alignment.
1. Cross section element
Width of carriage way
Width of shoulders
Right of way
Cross fall, camber and super elevation
2. Horizontal alignment
Minimum radius of curve
Minimum stopping sight distance
Minimum passing sight distance
3. Vertical alignment
Maximum gradient
Minimum stopping sight distance on vertical curves
Length of vertical curve
3.2. HORIZONTALALIGNMENT
The design elements of the horizontal alignment are the tangent, or straight section, the
circular curve, the transition curve (spiral) and the super elevation section.
3.2.1. Tangent sections
From an aesthetic point of view, tangent sections may often be beneficial in flat country but are
less so in rolling or mountainous terrain. From a safety standpoint, they provide better visibility
and more passing opportunities.
16
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
developed between the tires and the road surface. For calculation of the minimum horizontal
radius, Rmin, for a particular design speed, the following equation shall be used:
𝐕𝐝^𝟐
Rmin = , Where
𝟏𝟐𝟕∗(𝐟+𝐞)
Vd = Design Speed (km/h)
f = Side friction coefficient (given in Tables 8-1 and 8-2) ERA Manual 2013
17
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
360∗10 3600
Da = = =, Da =4degree
𝜋𝑅 𝜋∗300
Step 2. Tangent length
T = (R) tan (∆/ 2), T = (300) tan(48˚/2 )
T = 133.57m
Step 3.Length of circular curve
𝐿 = (∆ × R*π)/180= (40˚*300*π)/180=209.33m
Step 4. External Distance
E = R(sec(∆/ 2 ) − 1), E = 300 ∗ (sec(̥48˚/2 ) − 1) =E = 28.23m
Step 5. Chord from P.C to P.T
C = 2 ∗ R ∗ sin(∆c /2) C = 2 ∗ 300 ∗ sin(48˚/ 2 ), C=244m
Step 6. Middle Ordinate
M = R(1 − cos(∆/ 2 )) , M = 300 ∗ [1 − cos(40˚/2)] =25.94m
Station PI=0+790
Point of curvature (P.C.) Station PC= PI - T= 0+790–133.57=0+656.43
Point of tangency (P.T.) station P.T. = P.C. + L =0=656.43 + 209.33= 0+866
Step 7. Setting out for the first curve
Length of first sub-chord, Cf= (0+660 -0+656.43) =3.57m
Length of the last sub-chord, Cl= (0+866-0+860) =6m
Step 8. Tangential angles
∂=1718.9c/R minutes R=300m ∆=48˚
PC=0+656.43 PT=0+866m
∂1=(1718.9*3)/300 minute=17.189minutes=0˚3 ̍16.97 ̎
∂2 to ∂10 =(1718.9*20)/300=114.59 ̍=1˚54 ̍35.6 ̎
∂11= (1718.9*6)/300=34.378 ̍ =0˚34 '22.68 ̎
Step 9. Deflection angles
∆1 = δ1 = 17.189 ̍ =0˚3’16.97 ̎
∆2 = ∆1 + δ2 =17.189 ̍ +114.59 ̍ = 131.779′ = 2˚11 ̍ 46.74 ̎
18
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
19
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
SSD=0.278vt +v2/254f f=0.31 from ERA table 7.1 t=2.5sec v=70km/hr. Where;
t= driver reaction time in second v=design speed in km/hr
f=0.31 coefficient of friction between tires and road way from
SSD=0.278*2.5*70*+702/254*0.31 =110.88m
Assumption SSD is less than length of curvature, SSD<LC
But For curve length =L>110.88m………… take L=209.33m for design
3.3.2. Passing Sight Distance
Passing Sight Distance is the minimum sight distance on two-way single roadway roads that must
be available to enable the driver of one vehicle to pass another vehicle safely without interfering
with the speed of an oncoming vehicle traveling at the design speed. Within the sight area the
terrain should be the same level or a level lower than the roadway. Otherwise, for horizontal
curves, it may be necessary to remove obstructions and widen cuttings on the insides of curves to
obtain the required sight distance. Care must be exercised in specifying passing/no-passing zones
in areas where the sight distance may be obscured in the future due to vegetative growth.
The passing sight distance is generally determined by a formula with four components, as follows:
PSD = d1+d2+d3+d4
d1 =initial maneuverer distance, including a time for perception and reaction
d2 = distance during which passing vehicle is in the opposing lane
d3 = clearance distance between vehicles at the end of the maneuverer
d4 = distance traversed by the opposing vehicle
The formulae for these components are as indicated below:
d1 = 0.278 t1 (v – m + at1/2), Where
t1 = 4 sec, time of initial maneuver,
a = 2.3 km/h/s average acceleration, km/h/s
v = 70km/hr average speed of passing vehicle, km/h
20
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
d3 (m) 30 55 80 100
d4=2(194.6/3) =129.733
The minimum Passing Sight Distance (PSD) for design is therefore
PSD=d1+d2+d3+d4
PSD =48.65+194.6+55+129.733
PSD =427.98m
The usual values resulting from application of the formulae are reduced in this manual, as it
is deemed appropriate to address the distances covered by twice the d4 distance and the
clearance distance d3.
21
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
22
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
PI=0+790 R=300m
Table 3.4. Transition curve parameters
PC VD (KPH) R ∆ LS Lmax ϕs ∆c Lc SC CS ST
0+656.43 70 300 48 49.01 84.85 4.68 38.64 202.21 0+705.44 0+907.65 0+956.66
3.3.4. Super elevation
Super-elevation rate, e is the raising of the outer edge of the road along a curve in order to
counteract the effect of radial centrifugal force in combination with the friction between the surface
and tires developed in the lateral direction.
Advantages of providing super elevation are
Higher speeds without danger of over turning
Increases volume of traffic Maintenance is reduced otherwise there will be wear on the
outside wheels causing potholes
Water drain off which decrease the construction of gutters
i) Super elevation Runoff:-the length of roadway needs to accomplish a change in out-lane cross
slope from zero to super elevation, or vice versa.
Minimum length of Super elevation Runoff for tangent-to-curve transition: Maximum acceptable
difference between the longitudinal grades of the axis of rotation and the edge of the pavement:
appearance and comfort. Relative gradient varies with design speed longer runoff lengths at higher
speeds and shorter lengths at lower speeds.
Minimum length of Super elevation Runoff:
Lr = (wn1)* ed (bw)/G, where
n1 - No of lane rotated using AASHTO exhibit 3-28
w - Width of one traffic lane
ed - design super elevation rate
G - Maximum relative gradient
bw - adjustment factor for number of lane rotated
ii) Super elevation transition length
1. Minimum length of Super elevation runoff:
Lr = [(wn1)* (ed*bw)]/G using AASHTO exhibit 3-28, n1 = 2, bw =0.75 G = 0.485
w = 3.5m
23
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
Total transition length (TTL) =tangent run out+ tangent runoff, TTL=28+87=115mm
Calculation
Curve 1
Chainage of BC =0+ 656.43, Radius, R= 300m, Design speed= 70km/h, No, of lane = 2
For DC5 shoulder cross fall= 4%, For DC5 normal cross fall= 2.5%, Road width = 7m
Rate of super elevation= 8%, Runoff length L r = 87m, Runout length L t = 28m
Calculated transition length in the tangent = 2/3Lr= 2/3*87=58m
Length of runoff on the curve = 1/3Lr=1/3*87=29m
Chainage of normal crown (transition in)
= Chainage of PC – 2/3TTL =0+656.43-2/3*115=0+579.76m
Chainage of BFSE (beginning of full super elevation)
= Chainage of PC + Lt/3=0+656.43+28/3=0+665.63m
Chainage of EFSE (end of full super elevation)
= PT- Lt/3=0+866-28/3= 0+856.67m
Chainage of normal crown (transition out)
= Chainage PT + 2/3TTL = 0+866+2/3*115=0+942.67m
3.3.5 Methods of Attaining Super elevation
Four methods are used to transition the pavement to a super elevated cross section. These methods
include:
Method-1:-evolving a travelled way with normal cross slopes about the Centre line profile.
24
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
Method-2:- Revolving a travelled way with normal cross slopes about the inside edge Profile.
Method-3:- Revolving a travelled way with normal cross slopes about the outside-edge profile.
Method-4:- Revolving a straight cross-slope travelled way about the outside-edge profile.
In our project we use method one –evolving a travelled way with normal cross slopes about the
centre line. (See Appendix B)
3.4. VERTICAL ALIGNMENT
The vertical alignment of the road has a strong influence on the construction cost, operation cost
of vehicles using the road and the number of accidents. The vertical alignment should provide
adequate sight distances over crests and sags and should not present any sudden hidden changes
in alignment to the driver. A vertical curve consists of straight parts of highway (grades) with
vertical curves.
During vertical alignment the following should be considered
Gradient of the route should be between the allowable maximum & minimum.
Critical length should be within limits.
Vertical & horizontal curves should not overlap.
Cut & fill should be balanced.
Provision of adequate sight distance over all crests
Avoidance of very short sag vertical curve, i.e. minimum of 120m for new road
Avoidance of short grade between two vertical curves
Avoidance short drop immediately before a long up grade
3.4.1. Gradients
One of the important considerations in designing a highway is the gradient. The cost of operation
of vehicles the speed of vehicles and the capacity of a highway are profoundly affected by the
grades provided. The grades are selected based on:
The amount of earthwork (cut/fill) should be as minimum as possible to reduce cost.
Design speed and topographic factors.
Vehicle operating cost.
Minimum grade of 0.05% should be provided for drainage purpose.
Grades are selected as much as possible not to cause high fill.
Fixing of grade for the road aligned
25
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
26
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
The upward spread of the light beam above the 1-degree divergence angle provides some
additional visible length of roadway, but is not generally considered in design. For overall safety
on highways, a sag vertical curve should be long enough that the light beam distance is nearly the
same as stopping sight distance.
𝟐𝟎𝟎∗(√𝐇𝟏+√𝐇𝟐)𝟐
ii. When SSD> L L2 = (2SSD - 𝐀
Where: H1 - driver's eye height = 1.070m, H2 - object height for SSd =0.15m and
for PSd = 1.3m
SSD is sight distance (m), A= Absolute value of gradient
3. Length required for passengers comfort
Lc = Vd 2* A /395
4. Length required for aesthetic (appearance)
La= 30 *A
Length of sag curve
1. Curve length required for minimum curvature, k
L =AK
2. Length required for safe stopping
i. When SSD< L
L1 = A*S2 / 200(h + S* tanβ)
27
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
SSD=0.278*V*t+V2/254f=0.278*70*2.5+702/(254*0.3)=110.8m
ASSD2 11.53∗110.82
When SSD<L, L1 = = =350.15m, (SSD<L=110.8<350.15) Ok!
200∗(√H1+√H2)2 404.25
28
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
29
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
CHAPTER FOUR
EARTHWORK
4.1 INTRODUCTION
Earth work is conversion of natural condition to required section and grade. Earth work in highway
design includes determination of cuts and fills, location of borrow, waste sites, the free haul and
over haul distance determination. The most common item of work encountered in highway project
is earth work.
Earth work includes: Clearing and Grabbing, Excavation of drainage channels, Borrows, Haul &
overhaul, Grading and Preparation of side slopes
4.2. EXCAVATION
The process of losing and removal of soil and rocks. It can be done for three reasons.
For structure foundation
For borrow excavation
Road ways and drainage excavation
4.3. EARTHWORKS QUANTITIES
The steps involved in the computation of earthwork quantities and the development of the optimal
mass haul diagram are:
End area calculations
Earthwork calculations
Preparation of mass haul diagram
Balancing earthworks using the mass haul diagram
30
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
Area=0.5*b*(∑h)
4.3.2 Volume calculation
The volume is calculated by using average end area method
𝐴1+𝐴2
V= ×𝐿 where A1 and A2 are end area and L is length between two station
2
31
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
32
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
CHAPTER FIVE
PAVEMENT DESIGN
5.1. INTRODUCTION
Pavements are all weathered surface ranging from the low cost gravel surface roads to the most
expensive composite pavement. A pavement structure is a layer structure which supports the
vehicle load on its surface and transfers and spreads the loads to the sub-grade without exceeding
either the strength of the sub-grade or the internal strength of the Pavement itself. Material and
thickness design are the major considerations in the structural design of highway pavements.
Material design refers to the selection of materials for each pavement layers and thickness design
refers to the process of determining the required thickness for each pavement layers.
Based on material nature and load distribution property, pavement can be categorized as:-
1. Flexible
2. Rigid
5.2. FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT
A flexible pavement is defined primarily as those pavements with bituminous surface (Asphalt
concrete) which has low flexural strength, and the load is largely transmitted to the sub grade soil
through the lateral distribution of stresses with increasing depth. The pavement trickiness is
designed such that the stresses on the sub grade soil are kept within its bearing capacity and the
sub-grade is prevented from excessive deformation. The strength and smoothness of flexible
pavement structure depends to a large extent on the deformation of the sub grade soil. Flexible
pavements are composed of a series of granular layers topped by a relatively thin high quality
bituminous surface.
5.2.1. Types of Flexible Pavement
1. Conventional flexible pavements
2. Full-Depth Asphalt Pavements
A) Conventional Flexible pavements
Conventional Flexible pavements are multi-layered structures with better materials on top where
the intensity of stress is high and inferior materials at the bottom where the intensity is low.
33
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
Flexible pavement is constructed by laying different layers of pavement material for the purpose
of decreasing the load distribution to the sub-grade and to limit the deflection of pavement
structure. And it consists of:
1. Surface Course (1st layer of pavement)
2. Base Course (2nd layer of pavement)
3. Sub-base Course
4. Capping layer
5. Sub grade
b) Full-Depth Asphalt Pavements
Full-depth asphalt pavements are constructed by placing one or more layers of hot mix asphalt
directly on the subgrade or improved subgrade. This concept was conceived by the Asphalt
Institute and is generally considered the most cost-effective and dependable type of asphalt
pavement for heavy traffic and quite popular in areas where local materials are not available.
34
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
5.5.2. Materials:
It is the second most parameter, which controls the performance of pavement structure throughout
its life periods. Therefore, the soils and materials investigations over the proposed alignment of
the road should be carried out to:
Assess the suitability of the natural sub grade materials along the alignment as roadbed
materials
Identify the material formation along the alignment as to whether they are disable or require
blasting
Locate and investigate the suitability of construction material sources at reasonable hauling
distances
Material cost constitutes a large portion of the total construction cost. Therefore, emphasis
should be put to minimize quantity as much as possible and making use of locally available
materials.
5.6. TRAFFIC ANALYSIS
Traffic is the major deteriorating cause for paved roads. This is the result of both the magnitude of
the individual wheel loads and the number of times these loads are applied. Equivalency factor are
used to convert the different axle loads into equivalent standard axle loads which will then be
added together to get the cumulative standard axle load repetition.
35
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
36
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
Cumulative Equivalency
Vehicle category 10^6ESAs
vehicle (T) factor
Car 1101251.70 0 0.00
Wagon & pick up 594008.49 0 0.00
Mini bus & Vans 413803.67 0.7 0.29
Small bus 467197.69 0.73 0.34
Medium bus 307015.63 0.73 0.22
Large bus 340386.89 1.7 0.58
Light truck 307015.63 0.8 0.25
Medium truck 640728.26 1.7 1.09
Heavy truck 73416.78 1.8 0.13
Articulate 53394.02 2.2 0.12
TOTAL 3.02
37
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
LV1 <0.01
LV2 0.01-0.1
T3 0.7-1.5
T4 1.5-3.0
T5 3.0-6.0
T6 6.0-10.0
T7 10.0-17
T8 17.0-30
T9 30.0-50.0
T10* 50.0-80.0
T11 >80.0
38
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
𝐿𝑜𝑎𝑑 @2.54𝑚𝑚
CBR (%)@2.54mm= *100%
13.44
𝐿𝑂𝐴𝐷 @5.08𝑚𝑚
CBR (%)@5.08mm= *100%
20.16
Table 5.4. CBR Calculation
39
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
1 1.602
2 1.920
3 2.655
4 2.916
5 3.400
From the above graph the value of design CBR (%) is 1.85%
Now we can determine the subgrade depending upon the design class shown by ERA2013 Manual.
40
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
S1 <3
S2 3-4
S3 5-7
S4 8-14
S5 15-30
S6 30+
Our CBR (%) 1.85% is less than 3%, hence the sub grade strength class to be assigned to this
project is S1. Therefore based on the above, and with the T5-S1 combination of traffic and
subgrade strength classes. The choice of chart will depend on a variety of factors but should be
based on minimizing total transport costs.
From the table below chart N0.7 is selected for design because it is economic with compare to
others. The total relative unit cost of chart 7 is 1.77 and the total thickness of pavement=750mm
41
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
42
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
CHAPTER SIX
DRAINAGE DESIGN
6.1. INTRODUCTION
Highway drainage is the process of removing and controlling excess surface and sub-surface water
with in the right of way. This includes interception and diversion of water from the road surface
and sub-grade. There are two types of highway drainage
a) Surface drainage: it is the removal and diversion of surface water from the roadway and
adjoining land.
b) Sub-surface drainage: it is the diversion or removal of excess soil-water from the sub grade
6.2 IMPORTANCE OF HIGHWAY DRAINAGE
An increasing moisture content cause decrease in strength or stability of soil mass; the variation in
soil strength with moisture content also depends on the soil type and the mode of stress application.
Drainage structures such as side ditches, bridges and culverts are an essential component in the
design development of a highway. The drainage design of roads is aimed at the protection of the
road through the prevention of damage due to flood or direct rainfall to achieve a chosen level of
service, without major rehabilitation, at the end of a selected design period, as economically as
possible. Design procedures take into account factors such as rainfall intensity, catchment areas,
ground cover, land use and run‐off and accomplished based on Ethiopian Roads Authority (ERA)
Drainage Design Manual (2013).
There are two main designing systems in a highway:
1. Longitudinal drainage system
2. Cross drainage
i) Longitudinal drainage system
The primary function of roadside channels is to collect surface runoff from the highway and areas
that drain to the right‐of‐way and convey the accumulated runoff to acceptable outlet points
The alignment, cross section, and grade of roadside channels is constrained to a large extent by the
geometric and safety standards applicable to the project. These channels should accommodate the
design runoff in a manner that assures the safety of motorists, and minimizes future maintenance,
damage to adjacent properties, and adverse environmental or aesthetic effects.
43
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
44
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
45
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
ii) Area for shoulder (Ash) From the geometric design part of this project for DC-5 the width of
the shoulder is determined to be 1.5m on both sides of the road.
𝐴𝑠ℎ = 380𝑚 ∗ (1.5𝑚 +1.5m) = 1140𝑚2 =0.114ha
Area of the surrounding land (Asa)
Asa = length of ditch * length of overland flow
𝐴𝑠𝑎 = 380𝑚 ∗ 50𝑚 = 19000𝑚2 = 1.9ℎ𝑎
𝐴 = 𝐴𝑐 + 𝐴𝑠ℎ + 𝐴𝑠𝑎 = (0.266+0.114+1.9) ℎ𝑎 = 2.24ℎ𝑎
Determine runoff coefficients since the carriageway, the shoulder and the catchment have different
run off coefficient, the runoff coefficient is the weighted value of the three areas. The coefficient
is from ERA Manual.
(A1∗C1)+(A2∗C2)+(A3∗C3) 0.266∗0.825+0.114∗0.85+1.9∗0.45
C= = = 0.52
(A1+A2+A3) 0.266+0.114+1.9
Overland flow is the type of flow that occurs in small, flat or in upper reaches of catchments, where
there is no clearly defined watercourse. Run-off, then, is in the form of thin layers of water flowing
46
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
slowly over the fairly uneven ground surface. The kerby formula is recommended for the
calculation of Tc in this case. It is only applicable to parts where the slope is fairly even.
𝑟𝐿
TC1 = 0.604 (√𝑆) ^0.467
L = hydraulic length of catchment, measured along flow path from the catchment boundary to the
point where the flood needs to be determined (km) = 0.38km
r= roughness coefficient of land = 0.4
H=Elevation difference (m)
𝛥𝐻 1782−1748
S= average slope, S=1000∗𝐿= =0.0895 L= length of catchment are(km)
1000∗0.38
𝟎.𝟒∗𝟎.𝟑𝟖𝟎
Tc1=0.604*( √𝟎.𝟎𝟖𝟗𝟓 ) 0.467 = 0.73hr=44min
47
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
1 2
b. A=y2*(2√1 + (2) -1/2)
0.28=y2*1.736; y=0.4m
c. Perimeter (P) =A/y-my+2y√1 + 0.5^2 = 0.28/0.4-0.5*0.4+2*0.4*1.118=1.4m
d. Bottom width (B)=A/y-my=0.28/0.4-0.5*0.4=0.5m take B=0.6m
e. top width (T) =B+2my=0.6+2*0.5*0.4 =1m
f. Hydraulic radius (R) = A/P =0.28/1.4=0.2m or R= y/2 =0.4/2 =0.2m
nv (0.025∗1.2) 2
g. Channel slope (S) =[ 2 ]2= [ 2 ] = 0.008
R^( ) (0.2)^(3)
3
48
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
Steps 1. Recalculate the area using the total depth after freeboard is added
A check = 𝑌2 (2√1 + 𝑚2 – m)
A check = 0.72(2√1 + 0.5^2 – 0.5)
A check = 98m2
Step 2 Determine discharge
Q check = A*V
Q check = 0.98*1.2=1.18m3/sec
Step 3 compare the calculated discharge with 10 year return period discharge
Q10 = 0.00278CCfIA
Q10 = 0.00278 ∗ 0.52*1* 0.98*75
Q10 = 0.11m3/sec
If Q check ≥ Q10 ----------- safe, (1.18>0.11) ------- Okay!
49
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
CHAPTER SEVEN
TRAFFIC SIGN AND ROAD MARKING
7.1. INTRODUCTION
Road features include the elements intended to improve the driver's perception and comprehension
of the continually changing appearance of the road. The elements addressed include:
Traffic signs - provide essential information to drivers for their safe and efficient Maneuvering on
the road.
Road markings - delineate the pavement edges and thereby clarify the paths that Vehicles are to
follow.
Marker posts - assist in a timely perception of the alignment ahead and, when Equipped with
reflectors, provide good optical guidance at night.
Traffic signals - key elements for the efficient functioning of many urban and rural junction roads.
Lighting - provided to improve the night-time safety of a road.
Standards for traffic signs, road markings and their placement are provided in the ERA.
The most commonly used control measures are:-
Traffic signs
Road marking
Traffic signals
7.2. TRAFFIC SIGNS
The safety and efficiency of a road depends to a considerable degree on its geometric design.
However, physical layout must also be supplemented by effective traffic signing as a means of
informing and warning drivers, and controlling drivers. Design of traffic signs and road markings
is an intricate part of the design process. Traffic Signs are of three general types:
Regulatory Signs
Warning Signs
Informatory Signs
7.2.1. Regulatory Signs
Indicate legal requirement of traffic movement this include stop signs, give way signs, etc.
Right of way series: These include two unique signs that assign the right of way to the selected
approaches of an intersection. They are the STOP sign and GIVE WAY sign.
50
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
Colours used for this type of signs is that the legend will be black in colour with a white background
and upward triangular or diamond shape with red borders.
Some examples of warning sign include;
Right turn or Left turn
Cross-road
Use of warning sign
Safety of workers and motorists is from a great importance.
The work include Highway construction, maintenance, utility and emergency operation
Road users should have to be guided in a clear and positive manner.
A uniform placement of traffic Control devices at highway work zones provides traffic
Control consistency for the motorist.
51
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
52
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
CHAPTER EIGHT
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
8.1. CONCLUSION
Highway road design is the backbone of world country to connect each other. The surveying data
had collected for three route (3 alternative) from the given contour. Among them route two is
selected as best route depend on route selection criteria such as, short length, economic, type of
terrain and safety. The design and functional class of the route is DC-5 and Trunk Road
respectively with rolling terrain. The Annual Average Daily Traffic is 791 and design speed is
70Km/hr. The road is designed as per ERA manual 2013.the road has two horizontal and vertical
curve.
In design process we had included traffic analysis, horizontal and vertical alignment design,
earthwork, surface drainage and economical pavement structure. Providing appropriate gradients,
which balance the amount of earth work and other basic factor which controls economy and
aesthetics as well as drainage of the highway. Calculation of the volume of earth work and drawing
of mass haul diagram is done to determine the economical over haul distance and total cost of earth
work. In addition to this traffic sign and signal are provided to decrease the traffic accident. The
road design is 1.88km length and all constant parameters are taken from ERA and AASHTO
manual.
Finally, for safe driving condition and longer life of the road, sufficient collection of data, good
design and implementation of the design and good construction are the corner stone in road
construction.
53
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
8.2. RECOMMENDATION
To minimize the traffic accident the driver must drive as per speed provided.
Ditches shall be kept free of silt, debris, large amount of vegetation.
The subgrade soil is very weak so it may exposed to erosion. To minimize the soil erosion
planting the plant is encouraged.
Ditches must be free of obstruction such as sand or sediment deposits shall be removed as
soon as possible.
In order to fulfill the specification requirement pavements structure properly designed.
Thus, the users of this road have responsibility to protect the safety of the road.
The project is designed as per ERA Manual so we recommend that the user of this
document must be refer the manual where it is necessary.
54
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
REFERENCE
1. ERA, Route Selection Manual, Ethiopian Roads Authority. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: 2013.
2. ERA, Geometric Design Manual, Ethiopian Roads Authority. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia:
2013.
3. American Association of State of Highway and Transportation Official. Policy on the
geometry design of highway and street. Washington, DC. 2001.
4. ERA, Pavement Design Manual Volume 1 Flexible Pavements, Ethiopian Roads
Authority. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: 2013.
5. ERA, Drainage Design Manual, Ethiopian Roads Authority. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: 2013
55
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
56
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
57
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
58
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
59
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
Table A2 Route 3
60
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
61
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
62
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
63
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
Note:
BC =Beginning of curve
NC = Normal crown
64
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
65
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
66
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
67
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
68
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
69
Jimma University Institute of Technology
CIVIL ENGINEERING INTEGRATED DESIGN PROJECT II
70
Jimma University Institute of Technology